Plan Review Stops For Permit 07031080 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
13:04 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-02-20 13:32:19 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW SIXTH CHECKLIST. | | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS. | | | | 1- FLAT ROOFASSEMBLY NAIL ENHANCING SPACING AT | | PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET A1 ARE | | EXACTLY THE SAMEAS SHOWN ON NOA 03-0501.05.ENGINEER | | IS NOT PROVIDING ANY NAIL ENHANCING ON THE CONTRARY IS | | PROVIDING THE SAME SPECIFICATIONS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL ON SHEET 18 OF 21.ENGINEER TO READ | | HOW TO DO THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY | | GENERAL LIMITATION #7 OF NOA SUBMITTED AND PROVIDE SUCH | | CALCULATIONS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 | | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE R301.2(2) OF 2004 | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | ***NOTE: ONE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN THIS | | OFFICE TO BE SEND TO THE BOARD OF ENGINEER'S FOR | | REVIEW. | | | | 2- PLANS SUBMITTED NOW ARE REVISED FROM THOSE SUBMITTED | | ON EARLIER RE-SUBMITTALS. NOW ALL THE AREA CALCULATIONS | | DON'T MATCH ACTUAL AREAS SHOWN ON PLANS AND DON'T ADD | | UP CORRECTLY.REVISE AS REQUIRED. PERMIT FEES AND | | RADON FEES WILL BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY ONCE THE AREA | | CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECTED. | | | | 3- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS IF WORK | | IS NOT STARTED.NEED RE-RECORDED NOC AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-12 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-12 |
Time |
12:37 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-12-12 13:46:00 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW FIFTH CHECKLIST. | | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2006 REVISIONS. | | | | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS:R VALUES SHOWN FOR ROOF AND | | WALLS ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH THOSE SHOWN ON | | PLANS.REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | ALSO, SEE MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEWER COMMENTS AND | | COORDINATE AS REQUIRED. | | ACCORDING TO TABLE 6C-1 THE MINIMUM WALL INSULATION IS | | R-5. THEN, WHY INSTALLING R-4.2?. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 2- DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY DON'T MATCH DIMENSIONS | | SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.(REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | 3- FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL: | | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY ON SELECTED ASSEMBLY , PAGE 18, | | THE SPECIFIC FASTENING OPTION FOR BASE SHEET TO BE USED | | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE UPLIFT DESIGN PRESSURES. | | (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | B) PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCING | | AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION | | #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA SUBMITTED. (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | 4- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REVISE NUMBER OF NAILS TO BE USED | | FOR SIMPSON MTSM20. SEE CURRENT CATALOG AND REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERINGFOR | | NAIL FASTENERS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND | | PUBLISHED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-02 |
Time |
12:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-02 |
Time |
12:34 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-10-02 15:15:00 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW FOURTH CHECKLIST. | | | | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND FBC | | 2004. | | | | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS (FIRST TIME ENERGY CALCS ARE | | SUBMITTED): | | A) OWNER/AGENT NEEDS TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF | | FORM. | | B) JURISDICTION NUMBER ON TOP OF FORM IS INCORRECT. | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | C) COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, | | INCLUDING NAME OF BUILDER AND PERMITTING OFFICE. | | D) CLARIFY WHY THE CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA ON ITEM #4 | | IS 210SF, WHILEUNDER ATTIC SQUARE FOOTAGE ON ITEM | | #10(A) IS 274SF. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | 2004. | | E) COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TABLE 6C-1. | | F) INFORMATION ON TABLE 6C-2 IS WRONG. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 2- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REVISE NUMBER OF FASTENERS | | SPECIFIED FOR SIMPSON HETAL20 CONNECTOR.SEE CURRENT | | SIMPSON CATALOG AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.OTHERWISE | | PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING ANALYSISFOR NUMBER OF | | FASTENERS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE TESTED AND PUBLISHED | | BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | FBC 2004. | | | | 3- ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND EXISTING WALL:NEED TO | | SPECIFY WOOD TO MASONRY CONNECTOR FOR ROOF JOISTS THAT | | ARE RESTING ON EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL.FLOOR PLAN | | SHOWS THIS WALL AS CONCRETE BLOCK WALL WITH FILLED | | CELLS AT DOOR OPENING.CONNECTOR MTS-18IS A WOOD TO | | WOOD CONNECTOR. REVISE INFORMATION ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN | | AS REQUIRED. CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHAT KIND OF WALL IS THE | | EXISTING WALL. IS IT MASONRY OR WOOD FRAMED WALL?. SEC. | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. (THIS INFORMATION | | WAS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST ALSO). | | | | 4- SOFFIT VENTILATION SPECS SHOWN ON WALL STEM DETAIL | | ON SHEET A2 WERE REVISED AGAIN AND STILLDON'T COMPLY | | WITH SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.NEED | | TO PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION.SEPARATE VENTS DON'T | | PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION ON A FLAT ROOFWITH 2X12 | | ROOF JOISTS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 5- WALL STEM DETAIL ON SHEET A2: SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | INTERIOR CEILING CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT CLEAR.REVISE | | INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. REMEMBER THIS IS AN INTERIOR | | CEILING. ALSO, WHERE IS THE FIREBLOCKING LOCATED AT?. | | THERE ARE NOT TRUSSES IN THIS ROOF EITHER.WHY USING | | EXTERIOR GRADE GYPSUM BOARD?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. REVISE COMPLETE SPECS AS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 6- REVISE EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS INFORMATION ON SHEET | | A2: | | A) REVISE REFERENCES. SEC. 1005.4 AND SEC. 105.43 | | DON'T CORRESPOND TO 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | B) NET CLEAR OPENING OF 20". IS THIS FOR CLEAR WIDTH?. | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | C) EGRESS IS MEASURED BY EGRESS CLEAR OPENING,NOT | | MINIMUM TOTAL GLASS AREA. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 7- STRUCTURAL LOADS ON SHEET A2: | | A) FLOOR AND ROOF LIVE LOADS CAN'T BE 10PSF.REVISE | | AS REQUIRED. | | B) CLARIFY WHY CEILING DEAD LOAD IS 20LBS?. SEC. | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | C) CLARIFY WHYSUBMITTING WALL INTERIOR AND | | EXTERIOR DEAD LOADS AND WHERE ARE THESE NUMBERSTAKEN | | FROM. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | D) SPECIFY BUILDING CODE USED AND WIND LOADS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | THESE INFORMATION WAS GIVEN ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTALS, BUT | | NOW IS NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED | | INFORMATION. | | | | 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY RULE 9B-72 | | FOR: | | A) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY: | | * NOA 04-0506.03 EXPIRED ON 5-23-07. NEED CURRENT ONE. | | | | ** NOA 04-0506.03 SUBMITTEDHAS NOTHNG TO DO WITH | | FL735. | | *** CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLY TO BE | | INSTALLED. | | **** CLEARLY IDENTIFY ASSEMBLY BASE SHEET FASTENING | | OPTION. | | ***** PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY | | GENERAL LIMITATION #7. SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON | | LAST PAGE OF NOA SUBMITTED. (NOTE: IF GENERAL | | LIMITATION #7 STATES THAT RAS 117 CALCULATIONS MUST BE | | DONE BY A PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR | | REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT, THEN SUCH CALCS MUST BE | | DONE BY ONE OF THEM ONLY). | | | | SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | 9- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | USE COMPANY STANDARD REVIEW STAMP OR WRITE ENGINEERS | | NAME AND CLEARLY WRITE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AND SIGNED | | BY WHO DID THE REVIEW. PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WERE | | REVIEWED BY SOMEBODY ELSE OTHER THAN THE ENGINEER OF | | RECORD. AND ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE WITHOUT NAME IS NOT | | INFORMATION ADEQUATE ENOUGH TO IDENTIFY PERSON WHO | | REVIEW THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. THESE COMMENT WAS | | ADDRESSED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. | | | | 10- SURVEY AND FLOOR PLANS DON'T MATCH REVISE | | DIMENSIONS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | 11- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WAS RECORDED ON 03/30/07. | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT EXPIRES AFTER 90 DAYS OF | | RECORDING IF WORK IS NOT STARTED.SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA | | STATUTE. NEED RE-RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. | | | | 12- NOW TYPICAL WALL SECTION IS MISSING THE ROOF AND | | WALL INSULATION. PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS AS | | REQUIRED. SEC. 13-600 FBC 2004. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
Time |
13:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
Time |
13:28 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-07-30 14:43:47 | BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST: | | 1- THIS IS THE THIRD TIME THAT THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | (FORM 600B-04ROR 600C-04R)ARE REQUESTED AS REQUIRED | | BY SEC. 13-600.3.ABC.3FBC 2004. | | | | 2- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: REVISE NUMBER OF FASTENERS | | SPECIFIED FOR SIMPSON HETAL20 CONNECTOR TO ACHIEVE THE | | SPECIFIED UPLIFT LOAD.SEE CURRENT SIMPSON CATALOG AND | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. OTHERWISE, PROVIDE COMPLETE | | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO DEMONSTRATE WHY NUMBER OF | | FASTENERS IS DIFFERENT THAN THAT TESTED AND PUBLISHED | | BY THE MANUFACTURER. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | FBC 2004. | | | | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOFFIT | | CONSTRUCTION. "STUCCO FINISH SOFFIT" ARE NOT COMPLETE | | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | 2004. | | | | 4-SOFFIT VENTILATION WAS CHANGED.NEW SPECS CALL FOR | | 7" X 24"AT 24" O.C. VENTS.THEY ARE ARE NOT ENOUGH | | TO PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R806 | | FOR FLAT ROOFS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 5- REVISE REFERENCES FOR EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS. SEE | | RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR CORRECT CODE SECTIONS TO BE USED. | | ON THE OTHER HAND,EGRESS WINDOWS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR | | BATHROOM WINDOWS. | | | | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | 9B-72 FOR: | | A) STORM SHUTTERS. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ARE NOT AN | | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | ***NOTE: ALSO, CLEARLY INDICATE ON SHUTTER DRAWINGS | | SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG; WALL MOUNTED, ETC) | | AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED. | | | | B) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY. AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC | | ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED AND SPECIFIC FASTENING OPTION. | | | | ALSO, PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCING | | AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL | | LIMITATION #7. | | | | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | ***NOTE: ENGINEER NEEDS TO WRITE HIS NAME ON REVIEW | | STAMP.REVIEW & APPROVE STAMP ALONE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE | | BECAUSE IT DOESN'T SAY WHO REVIEWED THE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL. | | | | 8- SURVEY AND FLOOR PLANS DON'T MATCH. SEE DIMENSIONS | | AND BUILDING LAYOUT. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
16:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-06-15 17:02:06 | BUILDING REVIEW 2ND CHECKLIST: | | 1- ROOF FRAMING PLAN: | | A) SPECIFY HOW MANY FASTENERS ARE REQUIRED FOR TRUSS | | CONNECTORS. INFORMATION IS MISSING. | | | | B) ROOF FRAMING PLAN SPECIFIESEXISTING WALL TO BE | | WOOD FRAMING.ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHOWS PRECAST LINTEL | | ABOVE DOOR OPENING.HOW CAN YOU HAVE A PRECAST LINTEL | | ON A WOOD FRAMED WALL?. ALSO, FLOOR PLAN SHOW CONCRETE | | BLOCK WALL AND CONCRETE FILLED COLUMNS AT BOTH ENDS OF | | SWING DOOR. CLARIFY/REVISE DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED TO | | MATCH. | | | | 2- WALL STEM WALL: | | A) FIREBLOCKING AND FINISH CEILING INFORMATION IS | | MIXED UP.THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT CODE ISSUES. PROVIDE | | INFORMATION FOR CEILING ASSEMBLY AND INFORMATION FOR | | FIREBLOCKING SEPARATELY. REVISE/CLARIFY NOTE AS | | REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECS FOR SOFFIT INSTALLATION. | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE."MASONRY TEXT. | | FINISH SOFFITS W/3"CONT VENT" IS NOT ENOUGH | | INFORMATION.SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC | | 2004. | | | | 3- STRUCTURAL LOADS INFORMATION IS INCORRECT: | | A) FLOOR AND ROOF LIVE LOADS CAN'T BE ONLY 10PSF. | | SEE SECTIONS R301 AND TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR REQUIRED LOADS TO BE CONSIDERED. | | ALSO, INCLUDE ATTIC LIVE LOADS. | | | | 4- EMERGENCY EGRESS WINDOWS.2004 SEE FLORIDA | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE AND 2006 REVISIONS AND CITE | | SPECIFIC SECTIONS THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS MISMATCHING THE FLORIDA | | RESIDENTIAL CODE AND THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | 9B-72 FOR: | | A) PRECAST LINTELS.NOA 03-0605.04 SUBMITTED IS FOR | | 4", 6" AND 12" PRECAST LINTELS.NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL | | FOR 8" PRECAST LINTELS. | | | | B) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. | | | | C) STORM SHUTTERS IF WINDOW DOESN'T HAVE IMPACT | | GLASS. AND, CLEARLY SPECIFY ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO | | BE USED. SEE SHUTTERS ENGINEERING DRAWINGS. | | | | D) FLAT ROOF ASSEMBLY. AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC | | ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED AND SPECIFIC FASTENING OPTION. | | ALSO, PROVIDE NAIL ENHANCING FOR PERIMETER AND CORNER | | AREAS PER RAS 117 AS IT'S TYPICALLY REQUIRED BY GENERAL | | LIMITATION #7.SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE | | OF REPORT.SEE ATTACHED CITY POLICY FOR ROOFING | | PERMITS. | | | | 6- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEWAND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | ***NOTE; MAKE SURE NAME OF ENGINEER WHO REVIEWS THE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL IS CLEAR.PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED | | ONLY STATES "REVIEW & APPROVED". NEED THE NAME OF | | ENGINEER WHO REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | 7- PROVIDE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS COMPLETELY FILLED | | AND SIGNED AND DATED BY THE OWNER.AGENT.NOW AT TIME | | OF PERMIT. NOTAT A LATER DATE. SEC. 13-600 FBC 2004. | | | | 8- OWES $44.06 FOR UPDATED VALUATION PLUSADDITIONAL | | RESUBMITTAL FEES WILL BE CHARGED AFTER THE FIRST | | RE-SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
Time |
07:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
Time |
07:39 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-04-26 10:18:53 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | 1-SHEET A1: | | A) ROOF FRAMING PLAN: | | * SPECIFIED SIMPSON CONNECTORS ARE WOOD TO WOOD | | CONNECTORS. NEED TO SPECIFY WOOD TO MASONRY CONNECTORS. | | SEE CURRENT CATALOG FOR CORRECT CONNECTOR AND FASTENING | | TYPE AND NUMBER AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | ** CLEARLY SPECIFY CONNECTORS FOR ROOF RAFTER/JOIST TO | | MASONRY WALL AND FOR ROOF RAFTER TO ROOF JOIST. SEC. | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDEMNTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | B) FOUNDATION PLAN/FLOOR PLAN: STARTER COLUMN IS NOT | | DRAWN CORRECTLY. NOTE CALLS FOR CONCRETE POURED COLUMN, | | WHILE DRAWING SHOW CONCRETE FILLED CELL. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED TO MATCH AND AVOID CONFUSIONS.SEC. 106.1.2 | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | 2- SHEET A2: | | A) WALL STEM DETAIL: | | * REVISE SIMPSON CONNECTORS. SEE ITEM 1(A) ABOVE. | | ** REVISETYPE OF FLAT ROOF SPECIFIED. SEE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC MANUFACTURER AND ASSEMBLY TO BE | | INSTALLED.WHAT DOES BY "BITUMEN" ON 43 LB STANDS | | FOR?. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | *** REVISE FASCIA DETAIL.REVISE SIZE AND PROPER WAY | | OF INSTALLING DRIP EDGE. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDEMNTS | | TO FBC 2004. | | **** SPECIFY FIREBLOCKING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R602.8 OF | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | ***** THERE ARE 2 DIFFERENT SPECS FOR FURRING STRIPS ON | | THE SAME WALL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | B) SHOWER RECESS DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION ON | | FOUNDATION PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | C) PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT CORRESPONDS TO | | THIS PROJECT TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | CONFLICTS/CONFUSIONS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | FBC 2004. | | | | D) REVISE DESIGN WIND PRESSURES FOR ROOF AREA. NEED | | TO USE 10SFTRIBUTARY AREA FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING | | FOR ROOF ASSEMBLY.SEE REVISED TABLE 1609.6.2.1(2) OF | | FBC 2004. | | | | 3-ENGINEER NEEDS TO CONTACT DBPR TO RESOLVE ISSUE | | WITH HIS LICENSE STATUS.NEED CURRENT AND ACTIVE | | STATUS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES. DBPR WEBSITE | | SHOWS LICENSE UNDER A DELINQUENT STATUS.NEED TO | | CORRECT THIS BEFORE RE-SUBMITTING PLANS. | | | | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | 9B-72 FOR: | | A) PRECAST LINTELS. | | B) ALL SIMPSON CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING | | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING)ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | 6- NEED TO PROVIDE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS COMPLETELY | | FILLED AND SIGNED AND DATEDAS REQUIRED BY SEC. 13-600 | | FBC 2004. | | | | 7- ENGINEER SEAL IS NOT LEGIBLE AND WHAT'S DATED | | 1-30-06? | | | | 8- OWES $44.06 FOR UPDATED VALUATION AND RADON FEES. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
11:22 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-19 |
Time |
10:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-02-19 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-08 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-08 |
Time |
09:58 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
10:04 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
06:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
06:18 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
Time |
07:19 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
Time |
07:13 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
Time |
12:31 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-04-12 12:30:57 | | | | | | | | | | | 210.11(C)(3) BATHROOM BRANCH CIRCUITS IN ADDITION TO | | THE NUMBER OF BRANCH CIRCUITS REQUIRED BY OTHER PARTS | | OF THIS SECTION, AT LEAST ONE 20-AMPERE BRANCH CIRCUIT | | SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SUPPLY BATHROOM RECEPTACLE | | OUTLET(S). SUCH CIRCUITS SHALL HAVE NO OTHER OUTLETS. | | | | R313.1.1 SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE LOCATED AS REQUIRED IN | | NEW DWELLINGS WHEN REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS REQUIRING A | | PERMIT OCCUR. SEE ARTICLE FOR COMPLETE TEXT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
16:44 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-02-26 16:44:56 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB--NEW SHEETS ALL TRADES |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-08 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-08 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-02-08 11:08:00 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
11:45 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-11-05 11:45:46 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB--NEW SHEETS ALL TRADES |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-10 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-10 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-09-10 09:57:04 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
08:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
08:44 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-07-10 08:44:48 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-06 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-06 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-07-06 11:22:04 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB--NEW SHEETS FOR "P" AND "Z" |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
08:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
08:34 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-06-01 08:35:10 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
13:26 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-05-24 13:27:15 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB--NEW SHEETS SUBMITTED |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-10 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-10 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-04-10 11:33:02 | TO "SFR" "E" |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
Time |
07:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-03-30 |
Time |
17:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-30 17:20:56 | TO ZONING BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-02-28 10:59:40 | RE-STAMP. ONE BATH EXHAUST FAN AND RELOCATE CONDENSER | | UNIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-02-19 |
Time |
12:13 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-02-19 |
Time |
12:13 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2008-02-19 12:14:24 | ONE BATH EXHAUST FAN AND RELOCATE CONDENSER UNIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
08:54 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-11-26 09:07:16 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (W.P.B.), FLORIDA | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (F.A.C.), AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | (F.S.). | | | | *** DENIED *** | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE ON FORM600C-04R, | | "R", SEE 2004 FBC 13-600.3.C (12-8-06 REVISION). | | | | 2) ENERGY CALCULATIONS LINE 9A-1 IS CALLING FOR R 4.2 | | INSULATION, SEE TABLE 6C-1 ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED STATES THE "MINIMUM" | | INSULATION IS TO BE R-5, SEE 2004 FBC 13-602.1.C.1. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-09-13 10:57:52 | ONE BATHROOM EXHAUST FAN AND RELOCATE A/C CONDENSER | | UNIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
09:45 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
09:45 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-07-11 10:04:26 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED BUT NOT | | REQUESTED. WHAT WAS REQUESTED WAS ENERGY CALCULATIONS, | | SEE 2004 FBC 13-600.ABC.3. *** PLEASE SUBMIT "ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS". | | | | ** 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.3 FORMS. | | CODE COMPLIANCE BY THIS SUBCHAPTER SHALL BE | | DEMONSTRATED BY COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING TO THE | | BUILDING OFFICIAL THE APPROPRIATE FORMS DESCRIBED | | BELOW. AN ORIGINAL FORM OR FLA/RES-04, VERSION 4.5, | | COMPUTERIZED PRINTOUT, ACCOMPANIED BY A COPY OF THE | | FRONT PAGE OF THE FORM AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 600.4 , | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CODE BEFORE A BUILDING | | PERMIT IS ISSUED. | | | | 2)SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80(2)(B) REGARDING FOUR | | TIMES THE FEE. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
09:06 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-06-08 09:21:29 | *** DENIED *** | | ** ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF | | APPLING FOR PERMIT NOT AT A LATER DATE,SEE 2004 FBC | | 13-103.2, AS REQUESTED IN LAST REVIEW 4-13-07 NOTE #1. | | | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM600C-04R, | | SEE 2004 FBC 13-101.2.2 AND 13-600.3.C (12-8-06 | | REVISION). | | | | 2) PLEASE KNOW WHEN SUBMITTING ENERGY CALCULATIONS THEY | | WILL NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT ALSO, PER 2004 | | FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
Time |
10:06 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
Time |
10:06 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-04-13 10:23:17 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM600C-04R, | | SEE 2004 FBC 13-101.2.2 AND 13-600.3.C (12-8-06 | | REVISION). | | | | 2) PLEASE KNOW WHEN SUBMITTING ENERGY CALCULATIONS THEY | | WILL NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT ALSO, PER 2004 | | FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2. | | | | 3) BE ADVISED A MECHANICAL (A/C) PERMIT WILL BE | | REQUIRED FOR THE BATHROOM EXHAUST FAN AND RELOCATING | | THE A/C CONDENSER UNIT. | | | | 4) BE ADVISED THE CLEARANCES AROUND THE A/C CONDENSER | | UNIT NEW LOCATION WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
10:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
08:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2008-02-20 |
Time |
08:33 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-11-19 |
Time |
14:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-11-19 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
13:53 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
Time |
07:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
Time |
07:48 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
08:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
08:15 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-02-27 16:38:01 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. | | | | PROVISO A/C UNIT SHALL NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 4 FEET | | INTO ANY SETBACK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-02-13 |
Time |
09:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-02-12 |
Time |
08:39 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2008-02-13 09:01:43 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. | | | | PROVISO A/C UNIT SHALL NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 4 FEET | | INTO ANY SETBACK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-11-07 |
Time |
16:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-11-06 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-11-07 16:29:27 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. REPEAT COMMENT FROM THE JULY 6, 2007, AND SEPTEMBER | | 10, 2007, PLAN REVIEWS: ?WIDTH, DEPTH AND SETBACK | | DIMENSIONS OF THE SITE AND THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN | | ON THE FLOOR, FOUNDATION AND SITE PLANS DO NOT MATCH | | THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY.ALL PLANS SHALL | | SHOW SAME DIMENSIONS.BOTH SHEET A1 AND SURVEY NEED TO | | BE CORRECTED.? | | A. THE SITE PLAN, FOUNDATION PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN, SHOWS | | THE PROPOSED ADDITION TO BE 14 FEET WIDE BY 15 FEET | | DEEP.THE SURVEY SHOWS THE PROPOSED ADDITION TO BE 14 | | FEET WIDE BY 15 FEET DEEP. | | B. THE SITE PLAN, FOUNDATION PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN, SHOWS | | THE DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE EXISTING BUILDING | | AND THE PROPOSED ADDITION (NEW LOCATION OF THE A/C | | UNIT) TO BE 5 FEET.THE SURVEY SHOWS A DISTANCE | | SEPARATION OF 6 FEET. | | C. THE SURVEY SHOWS A LOT DEPTH OF 104.94 FEET ALONG | | THE WEST PROPERTY LINE AND 105.19 FEET ALONG THE EAST | | PROPERTY LINE.SITE PLAN SHOWS A LOT DEPTH OF 105 | | FEET. | | | | 2. REPEAT COMMENTS FROM THE MAY 25, 2007, PLAN REVIEW: | | ?PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL BE SHOWN ON BOTH COPIES OF | | SURVEY WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS (REPEAT COMMENT).ALL | | SETBACK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE SHOWN ON BOTH COPIES OF | | SURVEY AND SITE PLAN.PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION | | 94-72 OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, | | MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK IS 5 FEET, 15 FEET TOTAL.? | | A. SETBACK DIMENSIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ALONG THE WEST | | PROPERTY LINE. | | B. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, THE EXISTING CONCRETE | | COVERED AREA HAS A SETBACK OF LESS THAN 5 FEET | | (APPROXIMATELY 4 FEET).IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE PROPOSED | | ADDITION SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 11 FEET FROM THE | | EAST PROPERTY LINE.IF THE SETBACKS CAN NOT BE MET, | | THAN A VARIANCE IS NEEDED FOR THE PROPOSED ADDITION. | | PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR | | FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE VARIANCE | | APPLICATION. | | | | COMMENT/QUESTIONS CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-09-12 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-09-10 |
Time |
12:23 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-09-12 11:59:31 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. WIDTH, DEPTH AND SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE SITE AND | | THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHOWN ON THE FLOOR, FOUNDATION | | AND SITE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE | | SURVEY.ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW SAME DIMENSIONS.BOTH | | SHEET A1 AND SURVEY NEED TO BE CORRECTED. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-07-09 |
Time |
17:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-07-06 |
Time |
17:07 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-07-09 17:42:58 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. WIDTH, DEPTH AND SETBACK DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED | | ADDITION SHOWN ON THE FLOOR, FOUNDATION AND SITE PLANS | | DO NOT MATCH THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY.ALL | | PLANS SHALL SHOW SAME DIMENSIONS. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-25 |
Time |
11:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
18:02 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-05-25 12:03:35 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. PROVIDE TWO (2) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEYS.SURVEY | | SHALL BE LESS THAN A YEAR OLD (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | 2. PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL BE SHOWN ON BOTH COPIES OF | | SURVEY WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | 3. ALL SETBACK DIMENSIONS SHALL BE SHOWN ON BOTH COPIES | | OF SURVEY AND SITE PLAN. | | A. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-72 OF THE ZONING AND | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK IS 5 | | FEET, 15 FEET TOTAL. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-04-09 |
Time |
19:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-04-09 |
Time |
18:41 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-04-09 19:56:52 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. PROVIDE TWO (2) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEYS.SURVEY | | SHALL BE LESS THAN A YEAR OLD. | | | | 2. PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL BE SHOWN ON BOTH COPIES OF | | SURVEY WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|