Plan Review Stops For Permit 07030070 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
17:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
17:39 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-04-28 17:57:18 | SLIDING GLASS DOORS AND LINTELS PRODUCT APPROVAL, | | SURVEY, SOIL TEST REPORT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
17:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-04-04 18:25:32 | SLIDING GLASS DOOR SUBMITTAL, BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | REVIEW UNDER FBC2004. | | | | 1- PROVIDE COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SLIDING GLASS | | DOORS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9B-72AS REQUESTED ON | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS.PACKAGE SUBMITTED NOW DOESN'T | | INCLUDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND THERE IS NOT PRODUCT | | APPROVAL IN FILE. | | | | 2- ENGINEER LETTER BY LUCAS A. TURNER, P.E. REGARDING | | DOOR ASSEMBLY TO INCLUDE THREE PANELS NEEDS TO PROVIDE | | ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SHOWING HOW THE MIDDLE PANEL IS | | TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION TO RESIST THE DESIGN LOADS. | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SHOWS THAT TESTED UNIT HAD ONLY TWO | | PANELS ON EACH SIDE. ASSEMBLYWITH TWO PANELS SHOWS | | THAT BOTH PANELS MAY BESUPPORTED ON THREE SIDES, | | WHILEASSEMBLY WITH THREE PANELS SHOWS THAT MIDDLE | | PANEL MAY BE SUPPORTED ONLY ON TWO SIDES (TOP AND | | BOTTOM).PLEASE, PROVIDE ENGINEERING ANALYSIS TO SHOW | | HOW IS THIS ISSUE ADDRESSED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. | | R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | ***NOTE: IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS | | ISSUE, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT BROWN AT (561)805-6652, | | SINCE I SHARED THIS ISSUE WITH HIM BECAUSEI AM GOING | | TO BE AWAY FROMTHE OFFICE UNTIL APRIL 14TH. | | | | 3- REMAINDER: | | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED ON PROVISO | | DATED 7/27/07TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DELAYS IN THE | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PROCESS.SEE ATTACHED COPY OR | | REVIEWIT ON-LINE. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-10-23 16:05:02 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. BUILDING REVIEW REVISION | | CHECKLIST. | | REVIEW UNDER FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004 | | WITH 2006 REVISIONS. | | | | 1- CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING THIS SET OF DRAWINGS SHOWING | | DIFFERENT ASSEMBLIES SINCE MOST OF THE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPROVAL. | | THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT MOST OF THE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS LISTED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS DON'T MATCH | | THOSE ALREADY APPROVED WITH THE PERMIT PACKAGE.IF | | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE GOING TO BE REVISED, | | THEN PROVIDE COPIES OF NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS. ARCHITECT | | OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM IN WRITING (NOT | | SIGNING AND SEALING) PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. | | SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SLIDING GLASS DOORS AS | | SHOWN ON PLANS AND SET OF DRAWINGS SUBMITTED.PRODUCT | | APPROVAL IS NOT IN THE CITY FILE. | | | | 3- IF SUBMITTED SET OF DRAWINGS IS TO OBTAIN LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN, PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERING | | PACKAGE FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW BY ROBERT | | BROWN, PLAN REVIEWERS MANAGER. (561)805-6652. | | | | 4- THERE IS NO NEED TO SUBMIT TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR | | REVIEW, UNLESS THERE ARE REVISIONS TO ORIGINAL SET OF | | TRUSSES. TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED SHOWS THE SAME DATE AS | | THE TRUSS PACKAGE THAT WAS FILED BY THE BUILDING | | INSPECTOR. THEREFORE, NOT ADDITIONAL REVIEWS ARE | | REQUIRED.TRUSS DRAWINGS ARE CHECKED IN THE FIELDBY | | THE BUILDING INSPECTOR WHEN DOING FRAMING INSPECTIONS. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-07-27 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
18:26 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-07-27 10:01:23 | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | 1- ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE ON | | SHEET T1 AND A4 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 602.1OF FBC | | 2004. | | 2- PROVIDE REVISED DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING WATER BEING | | DIVERTED AWAY FROM NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. | | 3- REVISE TYPE OF NAIL USED FOR ROOF SHEATHING. NEED | | "RING SHANK NAILS" AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.12004 | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | 4- SOIL TEST REPORT NEED TO HAVE THE CERTIFICATEOF | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | 5- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING PRODUCT | | APPROVAL SUBMITED FOR: | | A) ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOORS NOA 05-1121.08. | | ARCHITECT APPROVED THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER | | PAGE FL2038, BUT NOA AND FLORIDA APPROVAL DON'T | | CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER. | | B) 8" PRECAST LINTELS. SAME THING FROM PREVIOUS | | COMMENT. NOA AND FLORIDA APPROVAL DON'T CORRESPOND TO | | EACH OTHER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
12:39 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-06-18 14:30:09 | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | 1- ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE ON | | SHEET T1 AND A4 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 602.1OF FBC | | 2004. | | 2- PROVIDE REVISED DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING WATER BEING | | DIVERTED AWAY FROM NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. | | 3- REVISE TYPE OF NAIL USED FOR ROOF SHEATHING. NEED | | "RING SHANK NAILS" AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.12004 | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | 4- SOIL TEST REPORT NEED TO HAVE THE CERTIFICATEOF | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | 5- ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING PRODUCT | | APPROVAL SUBMITED FOR: | | A) ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOORS NOA 05-1121.08. | | ARCHITECT APPROVED THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER | | PAGE FL2038, BUT NOA AND FLORIDA APPROVAL DON'T | | CORRESPOND TO EACH OTHER. | | B) 8" PRECAST LINTELS. SAME THING FROM PREVIOUS | | COMMENT. NOA AND FLORIDA APPROVAL DON'T CORRESPOND TO | | EACH OTHER. | | 6- REVISE ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHOWING WHERE ARE LINTELS | | LB-2 USED. NONE SHOWN ON PLAN. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
Time |
12:44 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-04-13 17:00:02 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | 2- ARCHITECT TO SIGN DRAWINGS WITH ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, | | NOT RUBBER STAMP AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G1-16.003 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 3- SHEET T1:UPDATE STRUCTURECONSTRUCTION TYPE.USE | | FBC 2004 FOR CORRECT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AND REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 4- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.3OF | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | ***NOTE: WATER NEED TO BE DIVERTED SO IT DOESN'T GO TO | | THE NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. | | | | 5- SHEET A1:FOOTING SHOW ON FOUNDATION PLAN BY ONE | | CAR GARAGE DOESN'T MATCH DETAIL 5. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 6- SHEET A2:A) SPECIFY INSULATION FOR WALL BETWEEN | | ONE CAR GARAGE AND CLUB ROOM.CHAPTER 13 FBC 2004. | | | | B) CLEARLY SPECIFY THAT ROOM NEXT TO THE GARAGE | | (CLUB ROOM) CAN'T BE USED FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES. SEC. | | R309.1 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | | | 7- SHEET A4: | | A)FRONT ELEVATION IS MISSING THE DESIGN PRESSURES | | FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS.PROVIDE SUCH INFORMATION. | | | | B) REVISE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE. SEE FBC 2004 | | FOR CORRECT CONSTRUCTION TYPE. | | | | 8- SHEET A6: | | A) GARAGE JAMB DETAIL: SPECIFY HOW MUCH EMBEDMENT IS | | REQUIRED FOR THE WEDGE ANCHORS. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE SCREEN ENCLOSURE ENGINEERED | | INFORMATION OR SPECIFY UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | 9- SPECIFY ROOF SHEATHING NAIL TYPE AND SIZE. SEE SEC. | | R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | 10- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | A)NEED TO USE REVISED FORM 600A-2004 R. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. | | | | B) CONTRACTOR IS THE RIF GROUP, NOT KENCO | | COMMUNITIES. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 11- PROVIDE COMPLETE UL LISTING AND SPECS FOR EXTERIOR | | HOOD ABOVE BBQ.ONLY BBQ INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AT | | THIS TIME. | | | | 12- SURVEY TO HAVE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, NOT COPY, AS | | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 FLORIDASTATUTE. | | | | 13- SOIL TEST REPORT:PROVIDE THE ENGINEERING FIRM | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IN ALL SHEETS AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE. | | | | 14- THERE WAS A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 4", 6" AND 12" | | PRECAST LINTELS. CLARIFY WHERE ARE THESE LINTELS GOING | | TO BE USED. WHY IT WAS APPROVED IF IT DOESN'T APPLY TO | | THIS PROJECT? | | | | 15-NOA #03-0605.05 SUBMITTED FOR 8" PRECAST LINTELS | | EXPIRED ON 05/21/06. PROVIDE CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVAL | | AND DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE PRIOR TO | | SUBMITTAL. | | | | 16-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE NOA | | #05-1121.08 SUBMITTED FOR THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-03 |
Time |
12:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-03 |
Time |
11:50 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-06-03 12:08:48 | REDLINED | | | | DISC FOR CU #2 DOES NOT MEET 110.26 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
20:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
19:17 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-03-06 20:05:29 | *** UNSAT *** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT PERMIT APPLICATION HAS BEEN | | SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 WHICH PLACES | | PROJECTS UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. | | PLEASE SEE THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO | | THE 2004 FBC FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY | | AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL TRADES. | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS | | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL SHEETS IN BOTH SETS OF PLANS | | CONTAIN A *RUBBER STAMP* INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FROM THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THIS | | COMMENT HAS BEEN MADE BY THIS OFFICE/REVIEWER ON OTHER | | PROJECTS AND PREVIOUSLY TO THIS DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | PLEASE KNOW AS THIS IS STILL BEING DONE ON PLANS, ONE | | SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE, PLACE | | WITH OTHER PREVIOUSLY HELD PLANS FOR THE SAME COMMENT | | AND FORWARDED TO THE STATE'S LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE | | FLORIDA BOARD OF ARCHITECTS FOR REVIEW. | | PLEASE SEE FS 481.221(2) | | *ALL FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND INSTRUMENTS OF | | SERVICE WHICH INCLUDE DRAWINGS, PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, | | OR REPORTS PREPARED OR ISSUED BY THE REGISTERED | | ARCHITECT AND BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL BEAR | | THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE REGISTERED ARCHITECT WHO | | PREPARED OR APPROVED THE DOCUMENT AND THE DATE ON WHICH | | THEY WERE SEALED. THE SIGNATURE, DATE, AND SEAL SHALL | | BE EVIDENCE OF THE AUTHENTICITY OF THAT TO WHICH THEY | | ARE AFFIXED* | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS AND PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATE | | SMOKE DEVICES AS *SD* AND SYMBOL LEGEND HAS THESE AS | | SMOKE DETECTORS. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT A MEETING WAS HELD AT THE SOUTHERN | | SECTION MEETING IN OCT 06 WHERE WE WERE DIRECTLY | | INFORMED BY NFPA THAT THE USE OF SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS | | ON PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE WHEN | | THESE DEVICES ANY ACTUALLY FALL UNDER THE DEFINITIONS | | OF SMOKE ALARMS WHICH WOULD BE SHOWN AS SA/SMOKE | | ALARMS. | | THIS INFORMATION WAS NEW TO THIS AHJ AS THE GENERAL USE | | OF THE SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS WAS ALWAYS ACCEPTED. BY | | THE DEFINITIONS AS STATED IN NFPA-72 A SD/ SMOKE | | DETECTOR IS ONLY A DEVICE WHICH WILL DETECT AND WILL | | NOT SOUND AN AUDIBLE ALARM. THIS WOULD BE DONE BY | | HORN/SIREN TYPE DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF | | SA/SMOKE ALARMS; THESE ARE DEVICES WHICH ARE 120V (AS | | SHOWN) AND WOULD DETECT AND SOUND AN ALARM. THIS IS | | SOMETHING THAT IS NOW BEING COMMENTED ON OTHER REVIEWS | | FOR OTHER NEW HOMES. | | ** PLEASE SEE THAT SMOKE ALARMS ARE STATED IN THE FBC | | RESIDENTIAL CODE/ FBC AND IN NFPA-72. | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS COMMENT PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE*. | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AH#2 AS THE CONDUCTOR SIZE TO THE | | 5KW AHU IS SHOWN AS #6. PLEASE KNOW AS IT IS | | PERMISSIBLE BY THE NEC TO INCREASE THE CONDUCTORS, THE | | #6 AS INDICATED WILL NOT FIT UNDER A 30AMP BREAKER AS | | THE CONNECTIONS ARE NOT LISTED FOR THIS SIZE | | CONDUCTOR. | | 110.3 | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING DISCONNECT FOR CU #2 AS | | REQUIRED PER 440.11. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ELECTRICAL PLANS WITH | | MECHANICAL PLANS FOR THE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE | | FOR THE CU #3. ELECTRICAL PLANS INDICATE 30AMP AND THE | | MECHANICAL PLANS 50AMP. | | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | AND COORDINATION. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE WASHER AND DRYER IN THE UTILITY | | ROOM. ONE OR THE OTHER DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY ELECTRICAL | | RECEPTACLE FOR CONNECTION OF THE APPLIANCE.? PLEASE SEE | | PANEL SCHEDULE MENTIONS ONLY A 1-POLE 20AMP CIRCUIT FOR | | DRYER IS THIS GAS? | | PLEASE COMPLETE AND CORRELATE. | | FBC106.3.5.4 ADMIN SECTION. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8A7 FOR REQUIRED GFI PROTECTED | | RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6FT OF A SINK IN LAUNDRY ROOMS. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS INCLUDES *ALL* 15/20AMP 125VOLT , | | EVEN WASHER. (WASHER BECAME INCLUDE IN THIS CODE CYCLE | | EVEN IF A SINGLE USE DEDICATED OUTLET) | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING RECEPTACLE FOR 2FT OR MORE | | OF WALL SPACE IN DINING ROOM PER 210.52. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SECTION FOR THE 2004 FBC | | CHAPTER 13 FOR RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES IS NOW | | 13-606.1.ABC.1.2.4. | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE LABEL ALL APPLIANCES WHICH ARE GAS | | POWERED ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE AS SUCH. | | COOKTOP, DRYER ETC. | | 408.4. | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 472.025(1) FOR THE SITE/SURVEYS | | WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
15:35 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-04-24 15:36:21 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-02 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-02 |
Time |
14:57 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-04-02 14:57:49 | TO "Z" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-02 |
Time |
14:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-02 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-04-02 14:46:56 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
10:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
10:44 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-11-02 10:44:41 | TO "M" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
15:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-10-10 15:57:09 | TO "JGOMEZ" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
14:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-07-11 14:24:54 | TO "P" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
Time |
08:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-05-29 08:57:03 | TO "E" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
14:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-05-24 14:45:51 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
16:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-06 16:31:28 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-07 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-07 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
08:48 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
08:48 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-06-08 08:49:38 | *** PROVISO *** | | 1) DUCTS IN THE GARAGE AND DUCTS | | PENETRATING THE WALLS OR CEILINGS | | SEPARATING THE DWELLING FROM THE GARAGE | | SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A MINIMUM NO. 26 | | GAGE SHEET STEEL OR OTHER APPROVED | | MATERIAL AND SHALL HAVE NO OPENINGS INTO | | THE GARAGE. PER 2004 FBC/R 309.1.1 . | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
08:37 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
08:36 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-03-19 08:47:43 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE ON FORM 600A-04R, SEE | | FBC 13-600.3.A, 12-8-06 REV. | | | | 2) COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR A/C #3 ARE CALLING FOR | | 25,246 SENSIBLE BTU'S, MECHANICAL PLANS FOR A/C #3 ARE | | CALLING FOR 43,700 SENSIBLE BTU'S, THE PLANS CAN ONLY | | CALL FOR 15% MORE THAN THE COOLING LOAD CAL'S, SEE 2004 | | FBC13-607.1.ABC.1.1, 12-8-06 REV. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-07-25 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.35 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-07-25 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-06-15 16:33:58 | DENIED 2ND TIME | | REFERENCE: | | ** FBC-2004 PLUMBING. | | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. | | ** FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | ** FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | 1. SHEET A6 SANITARY RISER: THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS | | ARE REQUIRED FOR THE RESUBMITTED SANITARY ISOMETRIC | | RISER DIAGRAM TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE. | | A} UTILITY: PLEASE DELETE THE "48" A.F.F." | | INDICATED BELOW THE WASHER, AND CORRECTLY SIZE THE | | STANDPIPE AND TRAP AS BEING 2". PLEASE DELETE THE | | INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED FIXTURE AS BEING AN 1-1/4" LAV | | AND CORRECTLY IDENTIFY THE FIXTURE AS BEING AN 1-1/2" | | LAUNDRY TRAY (1-1/2" L.T.) | | B} HER BATH: CORRECTLY SIZE THE BRANCH DRAIN TO | | THE BIDET AS BEING TWO INCH AND THE TRAP TO THE BIDET | | AS BEING 1-1/4" | | C} HER BATH: A VENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE SHOWER | | PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING, TABLE 906.1, A TWO INCH TRAP CAN | | NOT BE MORE THAN SIX FEET FROM THE VENT. | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | ONLY. | | NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
10:27 |
Rev Time |
1.25 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-28 |
Time |
10:27 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-03-28 11:18:02 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: | | ** FBC-2004 PLUMBING. | | ** FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS/INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | 1. PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 SECTION 106.1.1: INFORMATION | | ON CONSTRUCTION | | DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL | | BE OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE | | LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK | | PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL | | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE | | AND RELAVENT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, | | AS DETERMINED BY THE | | BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | NOTE: THE SUBMITTED SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM ON | | SHEET A6 DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2. | | PLEASE REFERENCE SHEET A2 WITH THIS PLAN REVIEWERS RED | | LINE UNDERGROUND SANITARY SYSTEM INDICATING THE | | FOLLOWING. | | | | A} CABANA BATH: LAV IS INDICATED ON THE WRONG SIDE OF | | THE WATER CLOSET. | | | | B} THE UNDERGROUND BRANCH TO THE KITCHEN IS INDICATED | | IN THE WRONG PLACE. | | | | C} THE UNDERGROUND BRANCH TO BATH #3 IS INDICATED IN | | THE WRONG PLACE. | | | | D} BATH #3: LAV IS MISSING FROM THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC | | RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | E} HER BATH: DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | | F} HER BATH: VENT REQUIRED FOR SHOWER PER FBC-2004 | | PLUMBING SECTION 901.2.1 AND TABLE 906.1. | | | | G} UTIL. (LAUNDRY ROOM): DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR | | PLAN. | | | | 2. SHEET A6 KITCHEN: IS IT THE INTENT TOINSTALL A 7' | | TO 8' WASTE ARM FOR THE DOUBLE BOWL KITCHEN SINK WITH | | DISHWASHER DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE IS A SNACK BAR | | LOCATED THERE. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT AN AIR ADMITTANCE | | VALVE (STUDOR VENT) BE INSTALLED IN THIS AREA. PER | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING TABLE 906.1 A 2" FIXTURE DRAIN WITH | | AN 1-1/2" TRAP CAN ONLY BE 6' FROM THE VENT. PLEASE | | CLAIFY THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 3. PER FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1, SECTION 106.3.5.4: PLEASE | | SIZE ALL SANITARY PLUMBING AND FIXTURE TRAPS. | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION******** | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | ONLY. NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
Review Stop |
S |
SIGNS |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
18:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2007-06-19 |
Time |
17:26 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-04-03 11:00:22 | ***APPROVED - LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTAL*** |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
14:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-11 14:22:28 | WRONG STOP ENTERED FOR ZONING.APPROVED/STAMPED BY M. | | CRUZ |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcruz |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
Time |
17:43 |
Rev Time |
|
Received By |
mcruz |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-03-14 17:43:12 | PLANNING & ZONING: ** FAILED** | | | | 1.PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE IN WRITING. | | | | 2.THE SURVEY IS NOT ABSTRACTED, THEREFORE, NO | | ADDITIONAL RECORDS SEARCH HAS BEEN PERFORMED THAT MAY | | INCLUDE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS.PROVIDE AN ABSTRACTED | | SURVEY WHICH SHOWS THIS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | 3.IDENTIFY APPURTENENANCES ON THE SIDES OF HOUSE AND | | PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS AND SETBACKS ON THE SURVEY AND | | SITE PLAN. | | | | 4.SHOW THE FRONT SETBACK OF THE ONE CAR GARAGE ON THE | | SURVEY AND SITE PLAN. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | MARGARITA CRUZ | | ASSOCIATE PLANNER | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | 561-822-1444 | | | | |
|
|