Plan Review Stops For Permit 07020467 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
Time |
18:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-11-14 |
Time |
18:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
18:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
18:42 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-10-11 18:54:39 | | | | | DENIED | | | | 1)SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF CORRECTED ENERGY CALC'S PER | | 13-101.2.2 FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND DATED | | BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. PLEASE | | NOTE THAT WALL ASSEMBLY FOR COMBINED VALUE IS NOT | | PERMITTED SEE 13-602.1.ABC.I WALL INSULATION AND | | 13-C1.2 BUILDING ENVELOPE INSULATION FOR RESIDENTIAL | | COMPLIANCE METHODS (R-VALUES OF STRUCTURAL BUILDING | | COMPONENTS SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED) | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | ADRIAN MORSE | | 561-805-6716 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
Time |
18:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
Time |
18:52 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-08-21 19:01:58 | | | | | DENIED | | | | 1)PLEASE HAVE RAR SIGN AND SEAL THE ROOFING | | CALCULATIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED. ALSO HAVE THE NOA # | | CHANGED TO MATCH THE NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED IN | | COMMENT #2. | | | | 2)THE STATE HAS NOT UPDATED THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | TAMKO MODIFIED ROOFING SYSTEMS AND THE NOA HAS EXPIRED, | | PLEASE PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE REVISED MIAMI-DADE | | REPORT # 07-0111.03 THE PAGES 6 & 7 OF 19 ARE THE SAME | | SYSTEM THAT WAS SUBMITTED ON THE OLD PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | THE MIAMI-DADE REPORT WILL THEN BE GIVEN LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR USE. | | | | 3)PER 713.13(2) F.S. IF THE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN | | THE NOC HAS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING, | | THE NOTICE IS VOID | | | | 4)THE COPIES OF THE TRUSS ENGINEERING WERE NOT | | RESUBMITTED, THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED BEFORE A PERMIT IS | | ISSUED BUT ARE REQUIRED BEFORE TRUSSES ARE SET. | | | | 5)OLD DRAWINGS CAN BE REMOVED FOR RESUBMITTAL BUT BE | | SURE TO INSERT PAGES WITH THE IMPACT FEE STAMP ON THEM | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | ADRIAN MORSE | | 561-805-6716 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-06-23 |
Time |
14:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-06-23 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-06-23 14:14:40 | | | | | DENIED | | | | THE FOLLOWING REVIEW COMMENTS WERE NOT COMPLETELY | | ADDRESSED: | | | | 5)PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF CURRENT SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED | | WORK AND ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS. ****NOTE SURVEY AND | | SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH SEE ZONING REVIEW COMMENTS**** | | | | 6)SUBMIT ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | DATED BY PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR | | TO SUBMITTAL. ****REQUIRES CORRECTIONS SEE MECHANICAL | | REVIEW COMMENTS, ALSO CLARIFY R11 ON ENERGY CALC'S AND | | R4.7 ON DRAWINGS**** | | | | 9)THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURAL DETAILS REQUIRE | | CORRECTION; | | B) PLAN S-2 THE SECTIONS LABELED A/S7 SHOULD BE THE | | TYPICAL TRUSS BEARING DETAIL A/S6. ****NOT | | CORRECTED**** | | E) PROVIDE SCHEDULE FOR PRE CAST LINTEL THAT WILL BE | | USED AND OPENING SIZES TO COMPLY WITH 2104.1.5 FBC. | | ****NOA # ON SCHEDULE IS OLD PLEASE USE THE REVISED # | | FROM PRODUCT APPROVALS**** | | | | 15)THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION ARE REQUIRED FOR THE | | PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | B) PROVIDE THE ROOF SYSTEM FROM THE MODIFIED PRODUCT | | APPROVAL THAT WILL BE USED. *****PROVIDE CALCULATIONS | | FROM RAS 117 PER LIMITATION #7 OF THE NOA, PLEASE NOTE | | THAT NOA USES 12" O/C AT THE 4" LAP AND 2 ROWS AT 12" | | O/C IN MIDDLE. SEEMS EXTREME AT 4" O/C EACH WAY WITH 3" | | PLATES**** | | | | NEW | | | | 1)TRUSS ENGINEERING IS INCOMPLETE, PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL | | TRUSSES WITH UPLIFT VALUES AT CONNECTION POINTS, THESE | | DO NOT REQUIRE INDIVIDUAL SIGN AND SEAL AS LONG AS | | THERE IS A SIGNED AND SEALED COVER PAGE THAT LISTS THE | | PAGES. ALSO THE WIND DESIGN IS INCORRECT AND DOES NOT | | MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND TOP | | AND BOTTOM DEAD LOADS SHALL ALSO MATCH STRUCTURAL | | DRAWINGS. | | | | 2)REMOVE MULLION PRODUCT APPROVALS AS NONE ARE SHOWN | | ON THE DRAWINGS. WINDOWS 2A & 2B AND 2L & 2M SHOW | | STRUCTURAL STEEL BETWEEN AND DO NOT REQUIRE MULLIONS. | | | | 3)PROVIDE INDIVIDUAL WINDOW DESIGN PRESSURES, IF WE | | USE THE CHART FOR THIS ON S/8, PLAN REVIEW DOES NOT | | INTERPOLATE THEREFORE THE CASEMENT WINDOWS 5050 THAT | | ARE IN THE END ZONE WILL NOT MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURE | | OR A STRONGER GLAZING TYPE MUST BE USED FROM THE | | CHOICES IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | 4)PER 713.13(2) F.S. | | IF THE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE NOC HAS NOT | | COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECORDING THE NOTICE IS | | VOID, PLEASE RE-RECORD THIS CAN BE DONE AT TIME OF | | FINAL PERMIT PICKUP | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | ADRIAN MORSE | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-04-14 |
Time |
06:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2007-04-14 |
Time |
06:06 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-04-14 07:36:04 | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | 1)BEFORE FURTHER PLAN REVIEW ALL FEES DUE ARE | | REQUIRED TO BE PAID IN FULL. | | | | 2)IN AREAS OF QUESTIONABLE SOILS AS SHOWN IN THE | | OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, 2 | | COPIES OF A SOIL TEST REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED PER | | R401.4 BC RES. | | | | 3)PROVIDE A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS DRAINAGE IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF R401.3 BC RES. BE | | SURE TO CREATE SWALES SO NOT TO DRAIN ON TO ADJACENT | | PROPERTY | | | | 4)PROVIDE NOTE ON DRAWINGS THAT TERMITE TREATMENT IS | | REQUIRED ON ALL EXTERIOR CONCRETE WITHIN 1 FOOT OF | | PRIMARY STRUCTURE PER 1816.1.6 OR R320.1.6 FBC | | | | 5)PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF CURRENT SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED | | WORK AND ALL REQUIRED SETBACKS | | | | 6)SUBMIT ENERGY CALC'S PER 13-101.2.2 | | FBC. BE SURE THAT THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | DATED BY PRUEPARER AND OWNER/AGENT PRIOR | | TO SUBMITTABLE | | | | 7)PROVIDE ATTIC ACCESS ON DRAWINGS TO ALL AREAS AS | | REQUIRED PER R807.1 FBC RES. | | | | 8)ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR NAME, | | ADDRESS, AND LICENSE NUMBER ON EACH SHEET THAT BEARS | | THEIR SEAL PER | | 61G15-23.002(2)PLEASE NOTE ENGINEER IS REQUIRED TO | | SIGN NOT USE STAMP PER FBPE | | | | 9)THE FOLLOWING STRUCTURAL DETAILS REQUIRE | | CORRECTION; | | | | A) THE TIE BEAM AND CB 16 BEAMS ON SECTION 07/S7 ARE | | NOT DESIGNATED ON PLAN S-2 | | B) PLAN S-2 THE SECTIONS LABELED A/S7 SHOULD BE THE | | TYPICAL TRUSS BEARING DETAIL A/S6 | | C) PROVIDE DETAIL OF KNEE WALL ATTACHMENT TO ROOF | | TRUSSES | | D) MAKE CORRECTIONS FOR SECTIONS ON S-3 | | E) PROVIDE SCHEDULE FOR PRE CAST LINTEL THAT WILL BE | | USED AND OPENING SIZES TO COMPLY WITH 2104.1.5 FBC | | | | 10)PLEASE NOTE THAT ROUGH OPENING SIZES IN THE DOOR | | AND WINDOW SCHEDULES DO NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE ARCHED | | TRANSOMS | | | | 11)THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE TWO COPIES OF | | EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT | | IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA | | STATE APPROVAL COVER PAGES, AND THE PRODUCT NOAH THAT | | LISTS THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS/ FASTENER LIST PAGES, THE | | PAGES WITH THE CHOSEN ASSEMBLY/ SYSTEM TO BE USED AND | | THE GENERAL LIMITATIONS PAGE. ALL CAN BE FOUND ON | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 12)THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DC RULE | | 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | 13 )THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH REQUIRES THE FLORIDA | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER | | SHEETS WHEN AVAILABLE. THEY CAN BE SEARCHED FOR ON | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.WHEN AVAILABLE AND NOT | | SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL BE DENIED | | | | 14)THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT | | SUBMITTED, PRECAST LINTELS, ENTRY DOORS, CASEMENT | | WINDOWS AND MULLIONS | | | | 15)THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION ARE REQUIRED FOR THE | | PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | A) PROVIDE THE MODEL FOR THE GARAGE DOOR (NOT ALL | | MODELS MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURE) | | B) PROVIDE THE ROOF SYSTEM FROM THE MODIFIED PRODUCT | | APPROVAL THAT WILL BE USED | | C) PLEASE NOTE THE ATTACHMENT METHODS IN THE ROOF TILE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL ONLY SEVERAL WILL WORK IF YOU ARE | | USING POLYFOAM A PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED | | D) FOR YOUR INFORMATION I HAVE ATTACHED THE FLORIDA | | COVER SHEETS TO THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE PGT FRENCH | | DOORS (THESE ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS) | | | | | | | | | | | | 16)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | A PERMIT BEING ISSUED | | | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | ADRIAN MORSE | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
Time |
07:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-03 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-06-04 07:48:18 | ** PROVISO ** | | | | ** REVISION REQUIRED WITHIN30 DAYS OF ISSUANCE OF | | PERMIT. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, | | WHEN THE AMOUNT OF DECORATIVE AND/OR RECESSED LIGHTING | | EXCEEDS THAT OF THE NORMAL 3VA PER SQ FT, THEN THE | | HIGHER AMOUNT SHALL BE FIGURED. PLEASE SEE THAT THE | | WATTAGE BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF EACH OF THESE TYPES OF | | FIXTURES DO EXCEED THE 3VA PER SQ FT.THIS WAS | | CONFIRMED BY THE CODE PANELIST AND THE AHJ IS THE | | DETERMINING AUTHORITY.PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING TEXT | | WHICH IS TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM THE 2005 NEC. | | | | *D) LUMINAIRES (LIGHTING FIXTURES) AN OUTLET SUPPLYING | | LUMINAIRE(S) [LIGHTING FIXTURE(S)] SHALL BE CALCULATED | | BASED ON THE MAXIMUM VOLT-AMPERE RATING OF THE | | EQUIPMENT AND LAMPS FOR WHICH THE LUMINAIRE(S) | | [FIXTURE(S)] IS RATED. | | IN GENERAL, NO ADDITIONAL CALCULATION IS REQUIRED FOR | | LUMINAIRES (RECESSED AND SURFACE MOUNTED) INSTALLED IN | | OR ON A DWELLING UNIT, BECAUSE THE LOAD OF SUCH | | LUMINAIRES IS COVERED IN THE 3 VOLT-AMPERES PER SQUARE | | FOOT CALCULATION SPECIFIED BY TABLE 220.12. WHERE THE | | RATING OF THE LUMINAIRES INSTALLED FOR GENERAL LIGHTING | | EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM LOAD PROVIDED FOR IN TABLE 220.12, | | THE MINIMUM GENERAL LIGHTING LOAD FOR THAT PREMISES IS | | TO BE BASED ON THE INSTALLED LUMINAIRES. DISTINGUISHING | | BETWEEN THE LUMINAIRES INSTALLED FOR GENERAL LIGHTING | | VERSUS THOSE INSTALLED FOR ACCENT, SPECIALTY OR DISPLAY | | LIGHTING IS MUCH EASIER TO DELINEATE IN COMMERCIAL | | (PARTICULARLY MERCANTILE) OCCUPANCIES. | | | | AS STATED, *IN GENERAL* AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT IS NOT | | NEEDED ONLY WHEN THE FIXTURES ARE USED FOR NORMAL | | GENERAL LIGHTING. WHEN THE FIXTURES EXCEED THE GENERAL | | LIGHTING USE AS THIS IS DONE ON THIS PLAN, THEN THE | | ADDITIONAL SHALL BE FIGURED. | | THIS REVIEW IS BEING PASSED AS THE SERVICE IS KNOWN TO | | BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE HOWEVER RECORD PLANS ARE TO BE | | CORRECTED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2007-06-03 16:31:11 | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-04 |
Time |
17:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-04 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-03-04 17:58:43 | | | ** UNSAT ** | | | | 1) NOTE: 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT PERMIT APPLICATION | | HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 WHICH | | PLACES PROJECTS UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE | | STATE. | | PLEASE SEE THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO | | THE 2004 FBC FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH WILL | | AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL TRADES. | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS | | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS. | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | 2002 NFPA-72 (DONE) | | 2003 NFPA-101(DONE) | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE LOAD CALCULATIONS AS THERE ARE | | SEVERAL CODE SECTIONS REFLECTED FROM THE 2002 CODE | | WHICH ARE NO LONGER ACCURATE. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ALL OF THE SMALL APPLIANCE | | CIRCUITS AND THE CIRCUITS OF THE LIKE WHICH ARE | | REQUIRED TO BE FIGURED INTO THE LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | PLEASE SEE 210.52B1, 210.11C1, AND 220.52A. | | PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE MORE THAN THE FOUR FIGURED | | AND SHOWN. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PLANS. PLEASE SEE | | PLANS INDICATE PANEL *B* AS BEING ON THE GROUND FLOOR, | | YET THE RISER SHOWS PANEL *B* UPSTAIRS AND COORDINATE | | WITH PANEL *C*. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE THE FOLLOWING. | | PLEASE CORRELATE PANEL *B* AS PANEL *B* ON RISER SHOWS | | THIS AS 100AMPS AND PANEL *B* SCHEDULE SHOWS THIS AS | | 150AMPS. | | PLEASE SEE RISER AND PANEL SCHEDULE FOR THE SAME FOR | | PANEL *C*. | | PLEASE SEE RISER AND PANEL SCHEDULE FOR PANEL *A* WHICH | | SHOWS ONE AS 400A MLO AND THE OTHER AS 300A MLO. PLEASE | | CORRELATE ALL OF THE ABOVE. | | FBC 106.1.2 , 106.3.5.4 | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE LOAD FOR DISHWASHER(S) ON | | LOAD CALCULATIONS AND THE LOAD AS SHOWN ON PANEL | | SCHEDULE. PLEASE SEE THE AMPERAGE AS SHOWN ON PANEL | | DOES NOT FIGURE FOR THE LOAD IN KVA AS SHOWN IN | | CALCULATIONS. | | 220. | | FBC 106.3.5.4 | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LOAD FOR THE DISPOSAL WHICH | | ALSO DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH THE VA ON LOAD | | CALCULATIONS AS LOAD ON PANEL SCHEDULE ONLY SHOWS 1AMP | | LOAD? | | 220. | | FBC 106.3.5.4 | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER FOR GROUNDING ELECTRODE | | SYSTEM SHOWS ATTACHMENT TO *BLDG STEEL* WHICH IS OK AND | | REQUIRED IF * BLDG STEEL* IS PRESENT. PLEASE INCLUDE | | *FOOTER STEEL* AS REQUIRED PER 250.50. | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS AND PANEL SCHEDULE INDICATE | | SMOKE DEVICES AS *SD* AND SYMBOL LEGEND HAS THESE AS | | SMOKE DETECTORS. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT A MEETING WAS HELD AT THE SOUTHERN | | SECTION MEETING IN OCT 06 WHERE WE WERE DIRECTLY | | INFORMED BY NFPA THAT THE USE OF SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS | | ON PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE WHEN | | THESE DEVICES ANY ACTUALLY FALL UNDER THE DEFINITIONS | | OF SMOKE ALARMS WHICH WOULD BE SHOWN AS SA/SMOKE | | ALARMS. | | THIS INFORMATION WAS NEW TO THIS AHJ AS THE GENERAL USE | | OF THE SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS WAS ALWAYS ACCEPTED. BY | | THE DEFINITIONS AS STATED IN NFPA-72 A SD/ SMOKE | | DETECTOR IS ONLY A DEVICE WHICH WILL DETECT AND WILL | | NOT SOUND AN AUDIBLE ALARM. THIS WOULD BE DONE BY | | HORN/SIREN TYPE DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF | | SA/SMOKE ALARMS; THESE ARE DEVICES WHICH ARE 120V (AS | | SHOWN) AND WOULD DETECT AND SOUND AN ALARM. THIS IS | | SOMETHING THAT IS NOW BEING COMMENTED ON OTHER REVIEWS | | FOR OTHER NEW HOMES. | | ** PLEASE SEE THAT SMOKE ALARMS ARE STATED IN THE FBC | | RESIDENTIAL CODE/ FBC AND IN NFPA-72. | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS COMMENT PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE*. | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THAT IN NO CASE MAY *STICKERS* OF | | ANY KIND BE PLACED ON PLANS. | | PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO CORRECT THE ISSUE AS TO WHY THE | | LABELS WERE PLACED ON SHEETS. | | 106.3.1 ADMIN SECTION. | | FS 471.025 | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE RECESSED LIGHTING IN THE | | NUMBER AS SHOWN ON PLANS MUST BE BASED ON THE NUMBER OF | | FIXTURES AND MAXIMUM WATTAGE PER FIXTURE. PLEASE SEE | | THE PREVIOUS CODE 2002 WHICH IS SECTION 220.3B4. PLEASE | | SEE 220.14/220.12. | | PLEASE KNOW THIS WAS CONFIRMED AT THE SOUTHERN SECTION | | MEETING AND BROUGHT FORTH TO THE CODE PANELIST. WHEN A | | CONSIDERABLE NUMBER OF RECESSED FIXTURES OR OTHER | | FIXTURES ARE SHOWN THEN THE LOADS NEED TO BE SHOWN IN | | ADDITION TO THE GENERAL LIGHTING LOADS FIGURED. | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO STATE THE TYPE OF RECESSED | | LIGHTING FIXTURE TO BE USED FBC 13-606.1.ABC.1.2.4. | | THIS IS TO ALLEVIATE THE AIR MOVEMENT FROM CONDITIONED | | SPACE ETC. | | | | 13 NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE TRUSS PLANS AND | | ENGINEERINF CONTAINS A *RUBBER STAMP* INSTEAD OF THE | | REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD | | AS SHOWN. THIS IS REQUIRED PER FAC 61G15-23.002 AND FS | | 471.025 | | THIS IS ALSO REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY | | OTHER TRADE(S). | | THIS COMMENT IS NOT FOR THE DEISGNER OF THE ELECTRICAL | | PLANS. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
10:54 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
10:54 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-06-20 11:02:40 | ****************PROVISO**************** | | GAS SYSTEM PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | TABLES: 402.4(2) AND 402.4(20). | | | | IF DRYER ROOM IS A CONFINED SPACE, OPENINGS | | REQUIRED PER SECTION 304.5 OR | | SECTION 304.6 SHALL BE INSTALLED. | | MINIMUM 1,100 CUBIC FEET REQUIRED. | | | | IF WATER HEATER ROOM IS A CONFINED | | SPACE, OPENINGS REQUIRED PER SECTION | | 304.5 OR SECTION 304.6 SHALL BE | | INSTALLED. | | MINIMUM 4,000 CUBIC FEET REQUIRED. | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-03-12 09:52:54 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS; THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | BEACH GAS PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS; | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR GAS PLAN | | REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | 1. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | NOTE: SHEET P-3 GAS ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: NOT ALL | | CORRESPONDING LENGTHS ARE INDICATED. THE LONGEST LENGTH | | IS BEING INDICATED IS 88' BUT THE ADDED SUM OF THE | | INDICATED CORRESPONDING LENGTHS EQUALS 77'-6". PLEASE | | CORRECT AND CORRELATE ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 2. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE BEING USED. | | NOTE: SHEET P-3 GAS ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: THE ONLY | | INDICATED PIPING MATERIAL BEING USED IS PE FOR THE | | UNDERGROUND. ALL PIPING MATERIALS MUST BE INDICATED ON | | THE RESUBMITTAL. IF THE GAS TYPE IS NATURAL GAS WITH A | | DELIVERY PRESSURE OF 0.5 PSI PLEASE NOTE THE RED LINE | | CORRECTIONS TO THE GAS PIPE SIZES. PLEASE REFERENCE THE | | ATTACHED GAS SIZING TABLES TO THE GAS COMMENTS | | INDICATING THIS. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | 3. SHEET P-3 GAS ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: THE TYPE OF | | GAS BEING USED SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AS, (LP) OR | | (NATURAL). PLEASE CORRECT ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 4. BTU LOAD OF EACH APPLIANCE AND THE | | TOTAL BTU LOAD ON THE SYSTEM. REFER TO | | THE FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SECS. 401.8 | | THRU 402.6.1 AND TABLES 402.4(1) THRU | | 402.4(33). | | NOTE: SHEET P-3 GAS ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: THE TOTAL | | BTU'S ARE NOT CLEARLY INDICATED AND ARE BEING INDICATED | | WRONG AS 3?0,000. THE TOTAL SUM OF THE BTU'S SHOULD BE | | 410,000. PLEASE CORRECT ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | ONLY. NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ssherman |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ssherman |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-16 10:51:21 | HISTORICAL APPROVAL PER FRIEDERIKE MITTNER |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-08 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-08 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-11-08 14:29:41 | TO "M" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-10-04 14:53:50 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-08 |
Time |
18:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-08 |
Time |
18:46 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-08-08 18:48:36 | TO ZONING INBOX. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-31 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-31 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-05-31 16:42:34 | TO "E" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
Time |
11:14 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-05-29 11:14:41 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-03 |
Time |
15:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-03 |
Time |
15:17 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-03-03 15:17:43 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2007-04-14 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-19 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-27 14:36:47 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-13 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-11-13 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
13:51 |
Rev Time |
0.35 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
13:51 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-10-10 14:00:03 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (WPB), FLORIDA | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (FAC), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (FS). | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | 1) SEE ATTACHED PRINTED ARI LISTING FOR ARI REFERENCE | | #1106086 AND #1106536 DO NOT MATCH THE MODEL NUMBERS ON | | THE A.C. SCHEDULE ON PLAN M-3.AS NOTED IN LAST TWO | | REVIEWS 6/8/07 AND 8/13/07 PLEASE CORRECT EQUIPMENT | | MODEL NUMBERS ON PLAN PAGE M-3 A/C SCHEDULE. SEE 2004 | | FBC 13-607.1.ABC.3.1. | | | | 2) SEE ATTACHED NOTICE FS 553.80 (2) (B) REGARDING FOUR | | TIMES THE FEE. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | E-MAIL: [email protected]. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
09:23 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
09:23 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-08-13 09:55:56 | PLAN REVIEW UNDER THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE & | | REFERENCED CODES WITH 05, 06 REVISIONS, CITY OF WEST | | PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 1 (WPB), FLORIDA | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (FAC), AND FLORIDA STATUTES (FS). | | | | *** DENIED *** | | | | 1) PLEASE CORRECT EQUIPMENT MODEL NUMBERS ON PLAN PAGE | | M-3 A/C SCHEDULE, SEE ARI CERTICATE (MODEL #2TWB3060A1, | | 2TEC3F60B1 AND 2TWX4048B1, 2TEC3F48B1) DO NOT USE WHITE | | OUT, PEN, OR PENCIL. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | E-MAIL: [email protected]. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-06-08 16:15:40 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT DETAILED MANUFACTURER'S | | SPECIFICATION'S FOR A/C SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT LISTED ON | | MECHANICAL PLANS COULD NOT BE FOUND ON THE ARI | | DIRECTORY. PLEASE BE AWARE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE | | CALLING FOR HEAT PUMP UNITS. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-05 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-05 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-03-05 10:57:12 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATIONS, PER 2004 FBC | | 13-101.2. | | | | 2) PLEASE SUBMIT DETAILED MANUFACTURER'S | | SPECIFICATION'S AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR | | FIREPLACES AND GAS LOGS. | | | | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATIONS AND OR | | COMBUSTION AIR FOR GAS CLOTHS DRYER, SEE 2004 FBC/R | | M1701.1. | | | | 4) THE LICENSE FOR RAR ARCHITECT INC. EXPIRED ON | | 2-28-07, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
10:46 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
G |
|
Notes |
2007-06-20 10:54:26 | ****************PROVISO**************** | | PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING, SECTION 504.6.1, THE RELIEF | | VALVE DISCHARGE SHALL NOT HAVE ANY TRAPPED SECTIONS. | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
Time |
08:38 |
Rev Time |
1.25 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
G |
|
Notes |
2007-03-12 09:19:03 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING | | PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | 1. A} SHEET P-1 KEY NOTE #6 INDICATES A 3" SANITARY | | RISER. | | B} SHEET P-2 KEY NOTE #1 INDICATES A 4" SANITARY | | DOWN. | | C} SHEET P-3 UNDERGROUND TO 2ND FLOOR RISER BEHIND | | 1ST FLOOR LAUNDRY INDICATES A 3" SANITARY RISER. PLEASE | | CORRELATE SHEETS FOR RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 2. SHEET P-4 ISOMETRIC WATER RISER DIAGRAM PLEASE ADD | | WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS AT THE TWO DISHWASHERS HOT WATER | | SUPPLY PIPES PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING, SECTION 604.9, | | WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS REQUIRED ON QUICK CLOSING | | VALVES. PLEASE ADJUST PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES #16 TO | | REFLECT THIS ON THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 3. SHEET P-1 KEY NOTE #2 INDICATES UNDERGROUND WATER | | SUPPLY PIPE TO BE 1" GALVANIZED BUT SHEET P-5 PLUMBING | | GENERAL NOTES #11 INDICATES ALL UNDERGROUND WATER TO BE | | TYPE K COPPER. IS IT THE INTENT TO HAVE KEY NOTES OVER | | RIDE GENERAL NOTES. PLEASE CLARIFY OR CORRELATE ON THE | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 4. SHEET P-3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: PLEASE | | INDICATE THE CLEANOUT FOR THE WASHING MACHINE AT FOUR | | FEET ABOVE FINNISH FLOOR (4' A.F.F.) PER FBC-2004 | | PLUMBING SECTION, 708.7 MINIMUM SIZE AND 708.9 ACCESS. | | | | 5. SHEET P-3 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM: CLEARLY | | INDICATE THE CLEANOUT AT THE JUNCTION OF THE BUILDING | | DRAIN AND BUILDING SEWER AS BEING A TWO-WAY CLEANOUT | | PER FBC-2004 PLUMBING, SECTION 708.3.5 ON THE | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED, PLEASE INCLUDE A | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | ITEM WAS ADDRESSED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | ONLY. NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-10-04 16:59:19 | USE SHEET SP-1 STAMPED BY ZONING.ES. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-08-10 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
08:39 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-08-10 15:01:51 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-30 |
Time |
15:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-29 |
Time |
14:26 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-05-30 15:39:29 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. SURVEY AND SITE PLAN SHALL REFLECT SAME ACTUAL | | CONDITIONS: | | | | A. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, THE DEPTH OF THE PROPERTY | | IS 119.97 FEET.HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A LOT | | DEPTH OF 119.42 FEET. | | | | B. ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, 3 FEET OF THE 6 FOOT | | UTILITY EASEMENT IS WITHIN THE PROPERTY ALONG THE NORTH | | PROPERTY LINE.HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE 6 FOOT | | UTILITY EASEMENT OUTSIDE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. | | | | C. SURVEY SHOWS A SHED AT THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.IN | | THE EVENT THAT THE SHED IS NO LONGER EXISTING, IT SHALL | | BE INDICATED ON BOTH COPIES OF THE SURVEY.IF THE SHED | | WILL BE DEMOLISHED, THAN A DEMOLITION PERMIT FOR THE | | SHED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL.IF THE | | SHED IS TO REMAIN, THAN SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE | | SHED TO THE PROPOSED PRIMARY STRUCTURE SHALL BE | | PROVIDED.PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION 94-304(B)(3) OF | | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, ACCESSORY | | STRUCTURES SHALL BE LOCATED NO LONGER THAN 6 FEET FROM | | THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-03-01 12:52:14 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | 2. PROVIDE TWO (2) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEYS.THE | | SURVEY SHALL BE LESS THAN A YEAR OLD. | | | | 3. PROVIDE HEIGHT DIMENSION FROM GRADE TO THE TOP OF | | THE CHIMNEY. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|