Plan Review Details - Permit 07011115
Plan Review Stops For Permit 07011115
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2007-04-02 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2007-04-02 Time 08:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2007-04-02 Time 08:27 Sent To  
Notes
2007-04-02 09:05:16****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC*
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FSFLORIDA STATUTE
  
 FROM PREVIOUS LIST:
  
 1.)ADDRESSED.
  
 2.)ADDRESSED.
  
 3.)IN SEVERAL PLACES, THE PLAN STATES "AS PER FBC
 2004 1009".DETAILS ARE TO BE SPECIFIC FBC*106.1.1.
  
 DETAILS ARE NOW PROVIDED BUT ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT;
 SEE OTHER COMMENTS.
  
 4.)PROVIDE A PERMIT NUMBER FOR WHAT YOU CALL
 "EXISTING STAIRS" ON THE PLAN.THE DIMENSIONS ARE TO
 COMPLY WITH FBC1009.ON THE PLAN, EVERY RISER IS SHOWN
 AT A DIFFERENT DIMENSION RANGING FROM 2" TO 6" ON ONE
 SIDE, 5" AND 7" ON THE OTHER SIDE, AND THE TREADS ARE
 SHOWN AT 2'11" AND 3'2".SEE FBC1009.3.IT APPEARS
 THAT THE "EXISTING STAIRS" WERE NOT BUILT IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE CURRENT BUILDING CODE AND PRESENT A HAZARD.
  
 2ND REVIEW, A "STEPS REPAIR" WAS INCLUDED IN THE PLAN,
 AND NOW THERE ARE RISER HEIGHTS RANGING FROM 4.5" TO
 6".PLEASE READ REFERENCED CODE SECTION AND REVISE.
 STAIRS MODIFIED AS PROPOSED ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT AND
 STILL PRESENT A HAZARD.
  
 5.)DECLARE GOVERNING CODE, INCLUDING 2006 AMENDMENTS,
 AND EXISTING BUILDING CODE.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 6.)IS THIS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY?OUR RECORDS SHOW
 AN AUTO BODY SHOP IN THIS LOCATION.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.PROVIDING A SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW
 COMPLIANCE.OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS ARE TO BE
 DECLARED AS IN FBC CHAPTER 3.THE SITE PLAN AND SURVEY
 SHOW TWO SEPARATE BUILDINGS 6' APART.IT IS NOT CLEAR
 IF AN OCCUPANCY WAS CHANGED WITHOUT SHOWING COMPLIANCE
 WITH FBC6 AND FBC5.TWO TENANTS ARE SHOWN IN ONE
 BUILDING, BUT THIS DOES NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION IN
 REGARDS TO THE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY.
  
 7.)THE GUARD IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC1012 AND FBC1607.7.
 SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN.
  
 PROVIDE CALUCLATIONS; IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE WOOD 1X2
 PICKETS WILL WITHSTAND LOADS FBC1607.7.1.2.THIS
 SECTION WAS NOT MENTIONED IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA.
  
 8.)ADDRESSED.
  
 9.)THE CONTRACTOR DECLARED A $350 VALUE.PROVIDE A
 REASONABLE VALUE OR A VALUATION ADJUSTMENT WILL BE DONE
 FOR YOU USING MARSHALL & SWIFT.
  
 CONTRACTOR HAS REVISED THE COST.THIS WILL BE
 EVALUATED AFTER THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK HAS BEEN
 DETERMINED.
  
 10.)HANDRAILS REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STAIR,
 FBC1009.11.SHOW ALL DETAILS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
 FBC11-4.9.4 AND FBC1009.
  
 NO HANDRAILS SHOWN.
  
 11.)ADDRESSED.
  
 12.)DIAZ DRAFTING SERVICES HAS ALREADY BEEN INFORMED
 BY THIS DEPARTMENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LICENSED TO DO
 DESIGN WORK FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.CONTINUED
 NONCOMPLIANCE WILL RESULT IN A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE
 COMPANY.DUE TO THIS ISSUE AND THE DEFICIENCIES IN THE
 PLAN, A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.
  
 A SET OF THE PLANS IS TO BE SENT TO FBPE AS PREVIOUSLY
 ADVISED.
  
 13.)THE NOTES STATE THAT THE BOTTOM RAIL SHALL REJECT
 THE PASSAGE OF A 2" OBJECT.HOWEVER, A 3" AND 5" GAP
 IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE BALUSTERS AND THE
 "PLATFORM".DETAILS ARE TO BE CONSISTENT AND CODE
 COMPLIANT.SEE FBC1012.
  
 NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 14.)RENAMING THE NONCOMPLIANT STAIRS TO "STEPS" DOES
 NOT ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR STAIRS.REGARDLESS
 OF WHAT YOU CALL THEM, THEY ARE STAIRS FBC1002
 DEFININTIONS, AND ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC1009.
  
 15.)INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER WITH THE RESUBMITTAL,
 PREPARED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD.
  
 16.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-03-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2007-03-06 Time 17:12 Rev Time  
Received By shill Date 2007-03-06 Time 13:01 Sent To FIRE
Notes
2007-03-06 17:12:23****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC*
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 FAC
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FSFLORIDA STATUTE
  
 1.)DO NOT REFER TO THE "TYPICAL NOTES" TO SHOW CODE
 COMPLIANCE AS YOUR NOTES ARE CONFLICTING AND ARE NOT
 CODE COMPLIANT.
  
 2.)NOTE 6 STATES THAT STAIRS GUARDRAILS TO BE 34" TO
 38" HIGH, NOTE 4 STATES THAT GUARDRAILS ARE TO BE 42"
 HIGH.
  
 3.)IN SEVERAL PLACES, THE PLAN STATES "AS PER FBC
 2004 1009".DETAILS ARE TO BE SPECIFIC FBC*106.1.1.
  
 4.)PROVIDE A PERMIT NUMBER FOR WHAT YOU CALL
 ?EXISTING STAIRS? ON THE PLAN.THE DIMENSIONS ARE TO
 COMPLY WITH FBC1009.ON THE PLAN, EVERY RISER IS SHOWN
 AT A DIFFERENT DIMENSION RANGING FROM 2? TO 6? ON ONE
 SIDE, 5? AND 7? ON THE OTHER SIDE, AND THE TREADS ARE
 SHOWN AT 2?11? AND 3?2?.SEE FBC1009.3.IT APPEARS
 THAT THE ?EXISTING STAIRS? WERE NOT BUILT IN COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE CURRENT BUILDING CODE AND PRESENT A HAZARD.
  
 5.)DECLARE GOVERNING CODE, INCLUDING 2006 AMENDMENTS,
 AND EXISTING BUILDING CODE.
  
 6.)IS THIS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY?OUR RECORDS SHOW
 AN AUTO BODY SHOP IN THIS LOCATION.
  
 7.)THE GUARD IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC1012 AND FBC1607.7.
 SHOW COMPLIANCE ON THE PLAN.
  
 8.)MANY PLACES ON THE PLAN STATE "BY OTHERS".WHAT
 DOES THIS MEAN?PLANS ARE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE AND
 SCOPE OF WORK.APPLICATION STATES "ADD GUARD RAIL TO
 EXISTING CONCRETE WALKWAY AND LEVEL IT."HOW CAN YOU
 EXCLUDE THE GUARDRAIL IF THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THE
 APPLICATION?WHERE IS THE CONCRETE WALKWAY?WHAT DOES
 "LEVEL IT" MEAN?PLANS SHOULD CLEARLY SHOW SCOPE OF
 WORK AND BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPLICATION.
  
 9.)THE CONTRACTOR DECLARED A $350 VALUE.PROVIDE A
 REASONABLE VALUE OR A VALUATION ADJUSTMENT WILL BE DONE
 FOR YOU USING MARSHALL & SWIFT.
  
 10.)HANDRAILS REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STAIR,
 FBC1009.11.SHOW ALL DETAILS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH
 FBC11-4.9.4 AND FBC1009.
  
 11.)THE PLANS STATE ?PRE-FABRIC. GUARDRAIL PER 1108.5
 FBC SEE TYPICAL NOTES BY OTHERS.?WHAT IS BY OTHERS,
 THE TYPICAL NOTES OR THE GUARDRAIL?SEE COMMENT 8
 ABOVE REGARDING WHAT INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO BE ON
 THE PLAN.SECTION 1108.5 DOES NOT EXIST IN THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, NOT SURE OF THE PURPOSE OF THIS NOTE.
  
 12.)DIAZ DRAFTING SERVICES HAS ALREADY BEEN INFORMED
 BY THIS DEPARTMENT THAT THEY ARE NOT LICENSED TO DO
 DESIGN WORK FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.CONTINUED
 NONCOMPLIANCE WILL RESULT IN A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE
 COMPANY.DUE TO THIS ISSUE AND THE DEFICIENCIES IN THE
 PLAN, A SET HAS BEEN RETAINED.
  
 13.)THE NOTES STATE THAT THE BOTTOM RAIL SHALL REJECT
 THE PASSAGE OF A 2" OBJECT.HOWEVER, A 3" AND 5" GAP
 IS SHOWN BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE BALUSTERS AND THE
 "PLATFORM".DETAILS ARE TO BE CONSISTENT AND CODE
 COMPLIANT.SEE FBC1012.
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-02-12 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2007-02-12 Time 11:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2007-02-12 Time 11:38 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-02-12 11:39:51SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6724 [email protected]
  
 FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004
 FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE
 FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE
 FBC2004
  
 1.)THIS IS A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY.SUBMIT PLANS
 PREPARED BY A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT OR
 ENGINEER) SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF
 FBC11 AND FBC16.APPLICATION TO BE MADE BY A
 CONTRACTOR LICENSED TO DO THIS SCOPE OF WORK, CANNOT DO
 OWNER/BUILDER.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-04-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2007-04-03 Time 10:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2007-04-03 Time 10:55 Sent To  
Notes
2007-04-03 11:03:01***DENIED***
  
 1) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FIRST FIRE PLAN REVIEW, COMMENT
 #2 STATES THAT "IN ADDITION TO APPLICABLE BUILDING
 CODES, STAIRS, GUARDS AND HANDRAILS TO COMPLY WITH NFPA
 101, 2003 EDITION CHAPTER 7. NO RESPONSE WAS GIVEN WITH
 THIS SUBMITTAL.
  
 2) HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STAIRS.
 NFPA 101, SECTION 7.2.2.4.1.1. THIS COMMENT WAS NOT
 ADDRESSED FROM THE FIRST FIRE REVIEW.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-03-08 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2007-03-08 Time 15:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2007-03-08 Time 15:02 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-08 15:22:16***DENIED***
  
 1) PLEASE NOTE THAT STAIR AND GUARDRAIL NOTES ARE
 CONFUSING AND APPEAR BE CONTRADICTING.
  
 2) IN ADDITION TO APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, STAIRS,
 GUARDS AND HANDRAILS TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, 2003
 EDITION CHAPTER 7.
  
 3) PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE ADPTED CODE REFERENCE WHEN
 PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED.
  
 4) HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES OF STAIRS. NFPA
 101, SECTION 7.2.2.4.1.1.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW(561) 805-6722
 FIRE PREVENTION(561) 804-4756
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2007-03-26 Cont ID  
Sent By spalmer Date 2007-03-26 Time 18:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By spalmer Date 2007-03-26 Time 18:34 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-26 18:34:28TO BOB # 15
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2007-03-06 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-03-06 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-03-06 Time 10:25 Sent To B
Notes
2007-03-06 10:25:26TO "SHILL" DESK/RESUB
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2007-02-26 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-02-26 Time 08:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-02-26 Time 08:16 Sent To Z
Notes
2007-02-26 08:16:51TO "Z" BOX/REV
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2007-02-05 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-02-05 Time 09:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-02-05 Time 09:26 Sent To B
Notes
2007-02-05 09:26:43TO "MISC" BOX#2
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2007-02-26 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2007-02-12 Time 08:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2007-01-29 Time 11:01 Sent To  
Notes
2007-01-29 11:01:22TO "Z" BOX
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2007-03-27 Cont ID  
Sent By adavila Date 2007-03-27 Time 13:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adavila Date 2007-03-27 Time 13:01 Sent To  
Notes
2007-03-27 13:01:45PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2007-03-05 Cont ID  
Sent By adavila Date 2007-03-05 Time 15:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adavila Date 2007-03-01 Time 15:36 Sent To I
Notes
2007-03-05 15:49:07PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
  
 ***FAILED***
  
 1.SHOW LOCATION OF GUARD RAIL ON SURVEY WITH SETBACK
 DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE (REPEAT COMMENT).
  
 COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q., OR ERIC
 SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-02-03 Cont ID  
Sent By mmclean Date 2007-02-03 Time 09:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mmclean Date 2007-02-03 Time 09:50 Sent To I
Notes
2007-02-03 10:03:20DENIED,
 1. PLEASE DRAW CLEARLY (NOT HIGHLIGHTED) THE EXACT
 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED GUARD RAIL ON THE TWO COPIES
 OF SURVEYS.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DISTANCE OF THE PROPOSED GUARD
 RAIL FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
 3. THE SURVEYS SUBMITTED JUST HAS THE LOCATION
 HIGHLIGHTED, BUT DOES NOT MARK EXACTLY THE PROPOSED
 LOCATION, NEED TO BE SPECIFIC.
 4. THE PICTURE SUBMITTED SHOWS THE LOCATION, BUT THE
 SURVEYS JUST SHOWS CONCRETE ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF
 PROPERTY LINE.
 5. MAKE SURE TO SHOW THE GUARD RAILIS SHOWN NOT
 ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE ON THE TWO COPIES OF
 SURVEYS.
  
 MICHELLE MCLEAN
 ZONING TECHNICIAN
 805-6720


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved