Plan Review Stops For Permit 06120363 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
Time |
09:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
Time |
09:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-23 10:29:30 | REVISION TO A4 AND SUPPLEMENTAL PAGE A5.1 IS OK |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
Time |
13:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-08 13:40:49 | BUILDING REVISION TO A4 AND A5 IS DENIED | | | | THE TECHNICAL INFORMATION ON THE REVISIONS APPEARS TO | | BE CORRECT. HOWEVER, IT CAN NOT BE APPROVED DUE TO THE | | FOLLOWING ITEMS. | | | | 1) SHEET A4 OF THE APPROVED PLAN WAS SIGNED AND SEALED | | BY THE ENGINEER AND THE REVISED A4 IS SIGNED AND SEALED | | BY THE ARCHITECT. ONLY THE PERSON THAT SIGNED AND | | SEALED THE APPROVED PLAN SHEET CAN REVISE IT. | | | | 2) THE SUPPLEMENTAL DRAWING A5 THAT WAS SUBMITTED CAN | | NOT BE ACCEPTED BECAUSE IT DOES NOT REVISE SHEET A5 OF | | THE APPROVED PLANS. FOR RECORD KEEPING PURPOSES AND TO | | AVOID CONFUSION, IT SHOULD BE NUMBER DIFFERENTLY FOR | | EXAMPLE A5.1. SEE CITY AMENDMENT FBC 106.1.3. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-04-06 |
Time |
09:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-04-06 |
Time |
09:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-06 09:55:14 | BUILDING PROVISO | | | | 1) AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE FOR THE ADDITION WILL BE | | REQUIRED BEFORE THE C.O. WILL BE ISSUED. | | | | 2) A SUBSURFACE SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT PER R 401.4 | | IS REQUIRED AFTER THE DEMOLITION WORK IS COMPLETED AND | | PRIOR TO COMMENCING NEW CONSTRUCTION. | | | | 3) THE ROOFER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT RAS 117 CALULATIONS | | FOR ENHANCED FASTENING FOR THE GAF MODIFIED ROOF | | SYSTEM, NOA #03-0501.02PAGE 26 (-52.5 PSF DESIGN | | PRESSURE) WHEN APPLYING FOR THE ROOF PERMIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-03-07 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-03-07 |
Time |
10:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-07 16:14:35 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) IN REGUARD TO THE SUBSURFACE SOIL REPORT REQUIRED BY | | FBC 1802.2.1. THE REPORT CAN BE SUBMITTED AFTER THE | | DEMO WORK BUT BEFORE COMMENCING THE NEW CONSTRUCTION. | | IT WILL BE A PROVISO. | | | | 2) ON SHEET A6 A SIMPSON LTH 1 WAS ADDED TO THE ANCHOR | | SCHEDULE. THERE IS NO SIMPSON CONNECTOR THAT | | CORRESPONDS WITH THIS. DID YOU INTEND TO SPECIFY A | | SIMPSON LTA 1? | | | | 3) SPECIFY ON THE PLANS THE METHOD OF TERMITE TREATMENT | | WILL BE EMPLOYED TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | R320.1. | | | | 4)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 5) RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE GAF | | RUBEROID MODIFIED ROOF SYSTEM SPECIFING THE ENHANCED | | FASTENER SPACING IN THE SAMPLE SUBMITTED DOES NOT | | CORRESPOND TO THE SYSTEM SPECIFIED IN THE NOA. THE RAS | | 117 CALCULATIONS CAN BE SUBMITTED AS A PROVISO WHEN THE | | ROOFING CONTRACTOR APPLIES FOR PERMIT. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
Time |
15:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-01-26 |
Time |
17:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-01-26 18:02:40 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 2) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | BEACH COUNTY, PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND | | COPY OF RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, | | BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 3)BASED ON THE 2006 SUPPLEMENT TO THE 2004 FBC | | RESIDENTIAL EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 8, 2006, THE EXPOSURE | | CATEGORY FOR THIS PROJECT IS EXPOSURE C. PLEASE MAKE | | ALL NECESSARY CORRECTIONS. | | | | 4)SUBMIT A SUBSURFACE SOIL REPORT. FBC 1802.2.1 | | QUESTIONABLE SOILS, | | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. | | WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN | | DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT | | SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY INVESTIGATION | | BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | 5)THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN AN A5 FLOOD ZONE. THE | | MINIMUM ELEVATION FOR THE FINISHED FLOOR IS 7' 6", | | WHICH INCLUDES THE 6" FREEBOARD REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH. AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE | | REQUIRED. | | | | 6)PLEASE UPDATE THE STRUCTURAL NOTES ON SHEET A0. THE | | 2006 AMENDMENTS TO THE 2004 FBC WILL APPLY TO THIS | | PROJECT. ALSO, THE 2002 EDITIONS OF ACI- 315, 318 AND | | 530 APPLY PER THE REFERENCED STANDARDS OF THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE. | | | | 7)ROOF SHEATHING FASTENER SPACING IS REQUIRED TO | | COMPLY WITH FBC R803.2.3.1 (2006 AMENDMENTS) . WOOD | | STRUCTURAL PANELS SHALL BE FASTENED TO ROOF FRAMING | | WITH 8D RING- SHANK AT 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT EDGES AND | | 6 INCHES ON CENTER AT INTERMEDIATE FRAMING. SPACING OF | | RING-SHANK FASTENERS SHALL BE 4 INCHES ON CENTER IN | | NAILING ZONE 3FOR 130MPH OR GREATER DESIGN WIND | | SPEEDS. PLEASE REVISE NOTE ON A6. | | | | 8) PLEASE SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF FASTENERS AND CORRECT | | THE FASTENER TYPE FOR THE SIMPSON HETAL 20 CONNECTORS | | IN THE TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE ON A6. | | | | 9) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITHR320.1. | | TERMITE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY REGISTERED | | TERMITICIDES, INCLUDING SOIL APPLIED PESTICIDES, | | BAITING SYSTEMS, AND PESTICIDES APPLIED TO WOOD, OR | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF TERMITE PROTECTION LABELED | | FOR USE AS A PREVENTATIVE TREATMENT TO NEW CONSTRUCTION | | (SEE SECTION 202 , REGISTERED TERMITICIDE). UPON | | COMPLETION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE TERMITE PROTECTIVE | | TREATMENT, A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE SHALL BE ISSUED | | TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BY THE LICENSED PEST CONTROL | | COMPANY THAT CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT: ?THE | | BUILDING HAS RECEIVED A COMPLETE TREATMENT FOR THE | | PREVENTION OF SUBTERRANEAN TERMITES. TREATMENT IS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH RULES AND LAWS ESTABLISHED BY THE | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER | | SERVICES.? | | | | 10) SUBMIT TRUSS DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY R802.10.1. | | TRUSS DESIGN DRAWINGS. | | TRUSS DESIGN DRAWINGS, PREPARED IN CONFORMANCE WITH | | SECTION R802.10.1 , SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL AND APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THE TRUSS | | LAYOUT AND TRUSS DRAWING ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED, | | SEALED AND DATED BY THE TRUSS ENGINEER AND REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THE | | PROJECT. | | | | 11) SPECIFY THE TRUSS DEAD AND LIVE LOADS FOR THE TOP | | AND BOTTOM CORDS AND TOTAL LOADS ON THE PLANS. | | | | 12)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 13) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE POLYGLASS MODIFIED | | BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM ON PAGE 37 OF NOA 06-0410.06 HAS A | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF -45 WITH LIMITATION NUMBER | | 9. THIS LIMITATION DOES NOT ALLOW ENHANCED FASTENING | | WHICH IS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE THE UPLIFT PRESSURES OF | | ROOF ZONES 2 AND 3. PLEASE ALSO NOTE THAT LIMITATION | | NUMBER 7 OF THIS NOA REQUIRES SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 | | CALCULATIONS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING. | | | | 14)SPECIFYTHE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT THAT WILL BE | | USED TO INSTALL THE MONIER CONCRETE ROOF TILE. PLEASE | | CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE FASTENER OR ADHESIVE SYSTEM ON | | THE NOA. PLEASE BE SURE THAT THE ATTACHMENT SELECTED | | WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESISTANCE FOR A MOMENT BASED | | SYSTEM. | | | | NOTE: SEE MARKS ON THE PLAN. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
09:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-15 |
Time |
09:55 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-07 |
Time |
07:58 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-09-07 10:44:45 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW FOR REVISIONS ** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE NOTE(S) FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS WHICH CORRELATE. PLEASE | | SEE EACH SHEET CONTAINS TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PANEL | | SCHEDULES FOR CIRCUITING. | | IF THE FRONT SHEET E-1 IS ONLY FOR THE EXISTING PANELS, | | THEN WHY ARE THERE NEW CIRCUITS BEING SHOWN? | | THE SECOND SHEET E-2 INDICATES THESE AS EXISTING WITH | | NEW CIRCUITS SHOWN? | | PLEASE SEE EACH SHEET FOR POWER AND LIGHTING ALSO | | CONTAINS ITEMS WHICH ARE BEING FED FROM SEPARATE | | CIRCUITS TO THE SAME ITEMS DEPENDING ON THE PANEL | | SCHEDULE YOU LOOK AT. | | 408.4, 310.16, 240.4 | | FBC 106.1.3, 106.3.5.4 | | | | 2) NOTE: ** THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WITH RESPECT TO | | THE OVEN. PLEASE KNOW THE PREVIOUS PLANS INDICATED A | | *LOCK OFF* DEVICE WAS GOING TO BE USED. THIS LED TO AN | | UNDERSTANDING THAT THE OVENWAS A *HARDWIRED* UNIT AND | | NOT CORD AND PLUG CONNECTED FROM THE MANUFACTURE. THIS | | RESPONSE LETTER AND PLANS NOW MENTIONS THE RECEPTACLE | | WAS REMOVED? IS THIS UNIT *HARWIRED* OR CORD AND PLUG | | CONNECTED*? | | IF THIS UNIT IS LISTED TO BE CORD AND PLUG CONNECTED | | AND COMES LISTEDR AND/OR WITH A CORD FOR PLUGGING IN, | | THEN DISCONNECT IS NOT REQUIRED AND A STANDARD | | RANGE/OVEN RECEPTACLES MAY BE SUED WITH OUT A | | DISCONNECT BEING REQUIRED. | | IF THIS UNIT IS LISTED TO BE HARDWIRED OR COMES WITH A | | WHIP TO HARDWIRE THEN A DISCONNECTING MEANS IF NOT | | WITHIN SITE OF THE PANEL IS REQUIRED. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET E-1 IS NOT SIGNED, DATED OR | | SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025 | | | | | | ** AS STATED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, IF THERE ARE | | COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS WHICH CAN BE GONE OVER ON THE | | PHONE, PLEASE CALL. | | THIS WOULD ALLEVIATE THE BACK AND FORTH ON PLANS ON ANY | | ITEMS NOT CLEAR AND PERHAPS NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED | | IN ANY MANOR. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
18:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
18:12 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-08-27 18:33:44 | | | *** DENIED REVIEW *** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS WHICH CORRELATE. PLEASE | | SEE EACH SHEET CONTAINS TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PANEL | | SCHEDULES FOR CIRCUITING. | | PLEASE SEE EACH SHEET FOR POWER AND LIGHTING ALSO | | CONTAINS ITEMS WHICH ARE BEING FED FROM SEPARATE | | CIRCUITS TO THE SAME ITEMS DEPENDING ON THE PANEL | | SCHEDULE YOU LOOK AT. | | 408.4, 310.16, 240.4 | | FBC 106.1.3, 106.3.5.4 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RE-LOCATED OVEN MENTIONS THIS | | WILL HAVE A BREAKER LOCK OFF DEVICE. ** IMPORTANT, | | PLEAS KNOW THAT THE TYPE OF DEVICE MUST HAVE THE LOCK | | OFF MECHANISM PERMANENTLY A PART OF THE BREAKER. *SNAP | | OR CLIP ON TYPE DEVICES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE AND A | | DISCONNECTING MEANS WILL BE REQUIRED. | | ** 110.3, 90.4, 422.30, 422.31 | | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-18 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-18 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-03-18 09:32:06 | REDLINE DPLANS. | | | | ALL SMOKE DEVICES ARE BEING NOTED AS EXISTING AND ALL | | AS LOW VOLTAGE. ALL DEVICES , LOCATIONS, AND SOUNDING | | SHALL BE VERIFIED TO MEET THE CURRENT NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, | | 11.8.3. DEVICES ARE ALL NOTED AS EXISTING ON PLANS AT | | THIS TIME. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-02 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-02 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-03-02 12:18:55 | *** UNSAT 2NDREVIEW *** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY THE 2005 NFPA-70 WAS ADDED TO | | PLANS. | | THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE ON PLANS AT A MINIMUM ON | | ELECTRICAL SHEETS. | | 2005 NFPA-2005 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC R313, PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING | | OR NEW TO BE INSTALLED *SMOKE ALARMS* AS REQUIRED PER | | NFPA-72 11-5.1.1, 11.8.3 | | PLEASE SEE THIS WAS NOT DONE, ONLY WHAT APPEARS TO BE | | THREE VERY FAINT *SMOKE DETECTORS* WERE ADDED TO FIRST | | FLOOR ONLY. PLEASE KNOW THIS COMMENT IS FOR ALL | | EXISTING TO BE SHOWN MEETING THE CURRENT CODE OR NEW TO | | BE INSTALLED. | | * PLEASE KNOW THAT A MEETING WAS HELD AT THE SOUTHERN | | SECTION MEETING IN OCT 06 WHERE WE WERE DIRECTLY | | INFORMED BY NFPA THAT THE USE OF SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS | | ON PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL HOMES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE WHEN | | THESE DEVICES ANY ACTUALLY FALL UNDER THE DEFINITIONS | | OF SMOKE ALARMS WHICH WOULD BE SHOWN AS SA/SMOKE | | ALARMS.THIS WAS MENTIONED IN PREVIOUS NOTE FOR SMOKE | | ALARMS UNLESS THIS RESIDENCE DOES CONTAIN A FIRE ALARM | | PANEL? | | THIS INFORMATION WAS NEW TO THIS AHJ AS THE GENERAL USE | | OF THE SD FOR SMOKE DETECTORS WAS ALWAYS ACCEPTED. | | BY THE DEFINITIONS AS STATED IN NFPA-72 A SD/ SMOKE | | DETECTOR IS ONLY A DEVICE WHICH WILL DETECT AND WILL | | NOT SOUND AN AUDIBLE ALARM. THIS WOULD BE DONE BY | | HORN/SIREN TYPE DEVICES. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF | | SA/SMOKE ALARMS; THESE ARE DEVICES WHICH ARE 120V (AS | | SHOWN) AND WOULD DETECT AND SOUND AN ALARM. THIS IS | | SOMETHING THAT IS NOW BEING COMMENTED ON OTHER REVIEWS | | FOR OTHER NEW HOMES. | | ** PLEASE SEE THAT SMOKE ALARMS ARE STATED IN THE FBC | | RESIDENTIAL CODE/ FBC AND IN NFPA-72. | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS COMMENT PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE*. | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 11.5.1.1, 11.8.3 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY RECEPTACLE SPACING FOR NEW WALL | | AREAS IN ADDITION AREA OF KITCHEN/BREAKFAST AREA PER | | 210.52. PLEASE SEE WALLS 2FT OR MORE. PLEASE SEE ONLY | | ONE WAS ADDED. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THESE CIRCUITS. PANEL SCHEDULES | | DO NOT DIFFERENTIATE THE NEW AND EXISTING CIRCUITS WITH | | ANY DESIGNATION SO IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE NEW ADDITION | | AREA FOR BREAKFAST/DINING MEETS THIS REQUIREMENT. | | PLEASE SEE 210.52B1 WHICH REQUIRES ALL RECEPTACLE | | CIRCUITS IN DINING, KITCHEN, BREAKFAST AREAS AND AREAS | | OF THE LIKE TO BE ON ONE OR MORE OF THE SMALL APPLIANCE | | CIRCUITS. | | PLEASE KNOW IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 3, THEN THE LOADS | | SHALL BE FIGURED ACCORDINGLY. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS. 210.52B1, 210.11B1, | | 220.52A | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW RECEPTACLES BEING ADDED TO | | VESTIBULE AREA WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE GFI /GFI | | PROTECTED. PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS PLANS WERE REDLINED | | FOR THE SINGLE RECEPTACLE WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN TO | | BE GFI PER 210.8 AND THE SAME ONE AS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN | | AND NOW THE NEW ONES ALSO NEED TO INDICATE THE GFI | | PROTECTION. | | 210.8A7 | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY LOAD CALCULATIONS AS NOTED IN | | PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE SEE THESE NOW INDICATE *SPACE | | HEATERS*? PLEASE SEE THIS SECTIONS INDICATES *SPACE | | HEATERS* AND *CENTRAL HEAT*, HOW DOES THE LOAD | | CALCULATIONS SHOW ALL THESE ARE SPACE HEATERS AND AT | | 65%. ? ARE THESE *SPACE HEATERS*? | | SEE 220.83B FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS WHEN ADDING HEAT LOAD | | TO AN EXISTING DWELLING. PLEASE SEE THE HEAT LOADS FOR | | UNITS SHALL BE FIGURED AT 100% AS SHOWN ON PANEL B. | | THIS DOES PERMIT THE FIRST 8KVA AT 100% REMAINDER AT | | 40%,INSTEAD OF THE FIRST 10KVA AT 100% ,THEN HEAT AT | | 100%. | | | | 8) NOTE:PLEASE SEE LOAD CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE NEW | | RECESSED LIGHTS, HOWEVER RESPONSE DOES NOT MENTION IF | | THERE ARE OTHER FIXTURES IN THE EXISTING DWELLING? ARE | | THESE THE ONLY ONES? | | PLEASE SEE 220.14D WHICH IF THE AMOUNT OF RECESSED | | LIGHTS IN DWELLING ARE ABOVE 20, THEN THE TOTAL NUMBER | | SHALL BE BASED ON THE MAXIMUM WATTAGE PER FIXTURE TIMES | | THE AMOUNT OF FIXTURES ADDED TO THE 3VA PER SQ FT. | | PLEASE SEE THE 2002 NEC SECTION 220.3(B)(4) | | | | 9) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUIT FOR THE AHU ON PLANS | | SHOWS 28/30 YET PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS THESE SAME | | CIRCUITS FOR GENERAL LTS ETC. | | PLEASE SEE 408.4 AND COMMENTARY FROM CODE WHICH IS | | BEING SHOWN BELOW. PLEASE INDICATE NEW AND EXISTING | | CIRCUITS. | | | | * SECTION 408.4 WAS REVISED FOR THE 2005 CODE TO | | REQUIRE THAT THE IDENTIFICATION FOR EVERY CIRCUIT | | SUPPLIED BY A PANEL-BOARD OR SWITCHBOARD BE LEGIBLE AND | | CLEARLY STATE THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE | | CIRCUIT IS USED. CIRCUITS USED FOR THE SAME PURPOSE | | MUST BE IDENTIFIED AS TO THEIR LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, | | SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS CAN SUPPLY OUTLETS IN | | THE KITCHEN, DINING ROOM, AND KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS. | | IDENTIFYING THE CIRCUITS AS SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH | | CIRCUITS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD, THEY SHOULD BE | | IDENTIFIED AS ``KITCHEN WALL RECEPTACLES,'' ``DINING | | ROOM FLOOR RECEPTACLE,'' OR ``KITCHEN COUNTERTOP | | RECEPTACLES LEFT OF SINK.'' CIRCUIT DIRECTORIES | | CONTAINING MULTIPLE ENTRIES WITH ONLY ``LIGHTS'' OR | | ``OUTLETS'' DO NOT PROVIDE THE SUFFICIENT DETAIL | | REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION.* | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS SOME NOTES WERE REPEATED FOR | | CODE COMPLIANCE ONLY A NOTICE FOR FS 553.80(2)(B) IS | | BEING GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
Time |
19:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
Time |
17:56 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2006-12-27 19:13:40 | ** UNSAT ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE FOLLOWING CODES ARE STATED | | ON PLANS AS THIS PERMIT APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE UNDER | | THE NEW 2005 NEC. | | THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE ON PLANS AT A MINIMUM ON | | ELECTRICAL SHEETS. | | 2005 NFPA-2005 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC R313, PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING | | OR NEW TO BE INSTALLED SMOKE ALARMS AS REQUIRED PER | | NFPA-72 11-5.1.1, 11.8.3 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY RECEPTACLE SPACING FOR NEW WALL | | AREAS IN ADDITION AREA OF KITCHEN/BREAKFAST AREA PER | | 210.52. PLEASE SEE WALLS 2FT OR MORE. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.52B1 WHICH REQUIRES ALL | | RECEPTACLE CIRCUITS IN DINING, KITCHEN, BREAKFAST AREAS | | AND AREAS OF THE LIKE TO BE ON ONE OR MORE OF THE SMALL | | APPLIANCE CIRCUITS. | | PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULES DO NOT INDICATE THESE. ? | | PLEASE SEE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE SEEM TO SHOW | | 3- SMALL APPLIANCE CIRCUITS, HOWEVER THESE ARE NOT | | LISTED ON EITHER PANEL SCHEDULE? | | PLEASE KNOW IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 3, THEN THE LOADS | | SHALL BE FIGURED ACCORDINGLY. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS. 210.52B1, 210.11B1, | | 220.52A | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE A NEW OR EXISTING GFI RECEPT | | LOCATED AT THE NEW CONDENSING UNIT BEING ADDED AT THE | | SIDE OF DWELLING. PLEASE SEE 210.63 AND 210.8A3. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NEW LIVING ROOM WHICH WILL REQUIRE | | A LIGHT FIXTURE OF SOME KIND TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE | | SEE OTHER EXCEPTIONS IN 210.70 WHICH WILL PERMIT THE | | SWITCHING OF ? SWITCHED RECEPT ? OR RECESSED LTS. | | PLEASE SEE LS 101 7.8 | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 220.83B FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS WHEN | | ADDING HEAT LOAD TO AN EXISTING DWELLING. PLEASE SEE | | THE HEAT LOADS FOR UNITS SHALL BE FIGURED AT 100% AS | | SHOWN ON PANEL B. | | THIS DOES PERMIT THE FIRST 8KVA AT 100% REMAINDER AT | | 40%,INSTEAD OF THE FIRST 10KVA AT 100% ,THEN HEAT AT | | 100%. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 220.14D WHICH IF THE AMOUNT OF | | RECESSED LIGHTS IN DWELLING ARE ABOVE 20, THEN THE | | TOTAL NUMBER SHALL BE BASED ON THE MAXIMUM WATTAGE PER | | FIXTURE TIMES THE AMOUNT OF FIXTURES ADDED TO THE 3VA | | PER SQ FT. | | PLEASE SEE THE 2002 NEC SECTION 220.3(B)(4) | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-12-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ssherman |
Date |
2006-12-13 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ssherman |
Date |
2006-12-13 |
Time |
10:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-12-13 10:42:17 | HISTORICAL APPROVAL PER JILLIAN PAPA |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
10:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-14 |
Time |
10:08 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-09-14 10:08:52 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
08:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
08:22 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-09-06 08:23:20 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
14:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-27 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-08-27 14:06:18 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-14 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-14 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-05-14 14:08:08 | TO "RMCDOUGAL" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
Time |
15:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
Time |
15:04 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-05-04 15:05:05 | TO "RMCDOUGAL" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-16 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-16 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-16 16:37:57 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-22 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-22 |
Time |
15:23 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-02-22 15:23:39 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
Time |
10:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-27 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2006-12-27 10:19:52 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-01-29 |
Time |
15:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2006-12-16 |
Time |
17:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-12-16 17:31:47 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
07:39 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
07:39 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-05 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-05 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-03-05 08:49:55 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) THE ENGINEER WHO SEALED THE PLANS HAI-VINH LY | | LICENSE HAS EXPIRED 2-28-07, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 2)THE ENGINEER HEI-VINH LY MUST HAVE PRINTED NAME, | | ADDRESS, AND LICENSE NUMBER IN THE TITLE BLOCK, SEE FAC | | 61G15-23.002. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-12-28 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-12-28 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-29 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-29 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-03-29 16:48:09 | NOTE: NO PLUMBING PERMIT APPLIED FOR. A PLUMBING PERMIT | | IS REQUIRED FOR THE SCOPE OF WORK BEING DONE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
08:13 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
08:13 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-03-06 08:31:45 | DENIED 2ND TIME | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING; FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE; | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE STILL | | IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW COMMENTS, | | SOME BASED ON PLANS NOW SUBMITTED, NEW DOCUMENTS BEING | | REVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME AND SOME NEW COMMENTS NOT | | MADE ON PREVIOUS REVIEWS. | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM | | PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A NO, OK OR A NO/OK. | | THESE WILL BE FOR THE EXACT NUMERICAL NOTATION OF THE | | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES. | | | | A NO IS IF THE COMMENT WAS NOT FULLY ADDRESSED AND/OR | | FURTHER EXPLANATION OR CHANGES IN PLANS OR DOCUMENTS | | ARE STILL NEEDED. THIS REVIEWER WILL TRY TO BETTER | | EXPLAIN NOTE ABOVE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT. | | | | AN OK WILL BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE SAME NUMERICAL | | COMMENT AND WILL HAVE OLD NOTE REMOVED FROM COMMENTS. | | | | A NO/OK MEANS PART OF THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN | | ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED. | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END OF | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AND NOTED AS SUCH. | | | | THE FOLLOWING ARE FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1.OK | | | | 2. OK | | | | THE FOLLOWING ARE NEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. THE ENGINEER (HAI-VINH LY)WHO SEALED THE PLANS ON | | SHEET MP-1 LICENSE HAS EXPIRED 2/28/07. PLEASE SEE THE | | ATTACHED DBPR SEARCH RESULTS INDICATING THIS. PLEASE | | CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | 2. THE ENGINEER (HAI-VINH LY) PER FAC 61G15-23.002 | | SHALL HAVE PRINTED NAME, ADDRESS, AND LICENSE NUMBER IN | | THE TITLE BLOCK. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-01-04 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2007-01-04 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-01-04 11:56:55 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | | THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING | | PLAN REVIEW TO MEET CODE COMPLIANCE: | | | | 1. SHEET A-4 INDICATES AN ICE MACHINE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | MANUFACTURER CUT SHEETS INDICATING HOW IT DRAINS. IF | | UNIT NEEDS A DRAIN PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE TO FBC-2004 | | CHAPTER 8 ON THE RESUBMITTED SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | 2. SHEET MP-1 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: THE EXISTING WC | | IS MISLABELED EXISTING LAV, PLEASE CORRECT THIS ON THE | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 3.SHEET MP-1 SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM: PLEASE INCREASE | | THE WASTE AND VENT SIZE OF BARTO 2" PER TABLES | | 710.1(1) AND 909.3 DUE TO INCREASE OF DFU LOAD. | | | | ********IMPORTANT INFORMATION | | IN ORDER TO EXPIDITE PLAN REVIEW: WHEN RESUBMITTING, | | PLEASE REPLACE ONLY SHEETS | | WHICH HAVE CHANGED AND PROVIDE ONE COPY | | OF ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS FOR REFERENCE | | ONLY. NOTE: ONLY ONE CORRECTED DRAWING | | IN RED INK FOR REFERENCE FOR | | RESUBMITTAL. | | | | END OF COMMENTS: | | | | REVIEW BY MIKE PERSON | | (561) 805-6730 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | UNDER SUPERVISION OF K.STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-12-22 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-12-22 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|