Plan Review Stops For Permit 06120074 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-05-27 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-05-27 |
Time |
08:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-27 08:55:57 | REVISED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS FOR NEW FACADE AND | | STRUCTURAL UPGRADES. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
15:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-07 16:08:38 | 2004 FBC W/2006 REVISIONS | | | | REVISION TO STRUCTURE AT FACADE IS DENIED BY BUILDING. | | | | 1)SPECIFY HOW THE W 8 X 15 STEEL BEAM PROVIDING | | LATERAL SUPPORT AT THE TWO INTERIOR STEEL COLUMNS WILL | | BE ATTACHED TO THE NEW AND THE EXISTING STEEL COLUMNS. | | FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS | | | | 2) SPECIFY HOW THE NEW 6 X 12 TS BEAM IS TO BE ATTACHED | | TO THE EXTERIOR WALLS IN ORDER TO TRANSFER THE TORSION | | LOADS THE STRUCTURE AT EACH END OF THE BEAM.FBC | | 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS | | | | 3) PLEASE CLARIFY THE WELD LOCATIONS AT THE TOP OF THE | | TS COLUMN AND THE 6 X 12 STEEL BEAM SHOWN ON DETAIL 7 | | ON SHEET A-1.2.FBC 106.1.1* CITY AMENDMENTS | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
Time |
13:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-03 16:03:01 | 2004 FBC W/2006 REVISIONS | | | | REVISION TO STRUCTURE AT FACADE IS DENIED BY BUILDING. | | | | 1) PLEASE CORRECT THE BUILDING DATA SPECIFIED ON SHEET | | A-1.1. FBC TABLE 503 SPECIFIES A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 40 | | FEET, ONE STORY AND 6,000 SQUARE FEET PER FLOOR FOR | | GROUP A-2 OCCUPANCIES WITH TYPE V-B CONSTRUCTION. FBC | | SECTION 504.2 ALLOWS AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INCREASE | | FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS COMPLYING WITH FBC 903.3.1.1 OF | | 20 FEET IN HEIGHT AND ONE ADDITIONAL STORY. FBC 506.3 | | ALLOWS A 200% AREA INCREASE FOR MULTISTORY BUILDINGS | | (6000 X 2 = 12,000 + 6000 = 18,000 SQFT PER FLOOR). | | | | 2) DETAIL 7 ON SHEET A-1.2 IS SHOWN IN THE WRONG | | ORIENTATION BASED ON THE INDICATED LOCATION OF THE | | PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 3) THE WALL SECTION AND FOOTING DETAILS ON A-1.2 | | INDICATE THAT THE NEW FOOTINGS WILL EXTEND PAST THE | | PROPERTY LINES. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED BY FBC 3202.1.1. | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 4) THE ECCENTRIC LOADING OF THE NEW BEAM AND COLUMNS | | HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. SHOW HOW THE NEW | | BEAM AND COLUMN ASSEMBLY WILL BE ANCHORED TO THE | | EXISTING FLOOR SYSTEM IN ORDER TO RESIST BENDING. FBC | | CHAPTER 16. | | | | 5) SHEET 13 OF THE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS SHOWS THE | | BRACING OF THE NEW WALL TO THE EXISTING WALL. INDICATE | | THIS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. FBC 106.1.1* CITY | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | - ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
Time |
11:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
17:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-08-15 |
Time |
07:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-08-15 11:30:28 | 2004 FBC W/ 2005 SUPPLEMENT | | ADD WINDOWS AND INSTALL FACADE | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) SUBMIT NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. | | | | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. | | IN ADDITION TO THE FLORIDA COVERSHEETS, THE STATE | | APPROVED EVALUATION REPORT OR MIAMI-DADE NOA SPECIFYING | | THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE PRODUCT AND THE | | INSTALLATION DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR | | REVIEW. SEE FAC RULE 9B-72. IF MULTIPLE PRODUCTS ARE | | LISTED, SPECIFY THE ONES THAT WILL BE USED. | | | | 3)THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVERSHEETS THAT WERE | | SUBMITTED FOR THE JELD-WEN-POZZI CASEMENT WINDOWS AND | | FIXED WINDOWS ARE FOR THE 2001 CODE VERSION. SUBMIT THE | | ONES FOR THE 2004 CODE ALONG WITH THE NOA OR OTHER | | EVALUATION REPORT AS REQUESTED IN COMMENT #2. | | | | 4) PLEASE REVIEW PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ADEQUATE DESIGN | | PRESSURES AND IMPACT PROTECTION. CHECK FOR CORRECT CODE | | ADDITION AND CURRENT REVISIONS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | CHECK THAT THE MULLIONS SPECIFIED ARE COMPATIBLE WITH | | THE WINDOW MODELS THAT ARE SPECIFIED. | | | | 5) THE BEAM ANALYSIS THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS FOR A W12 X | | 65STEEL I-BEAM, WHICH HAS BEEN CHANGED ON THE | | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO A HSS 8 X 8 X 1/2" TUBE STEEL | | BEAM. SUBMIT ANENGINEERED ANALYSIS OF THE TUBE STEEL | | BEAM FOR BENDING AND TORSION. 2004 FBC* 106.1.2 | | (AMENDED) | | | | 6) PROVIDE THE COLUMN SPACING DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS | | FOR THE COLUMNS THAT WILL BE SUPPORTING THE BEAM. 2004 | | FBC* 106.1.2 (AMENDED) | | | | - ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
12:22 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-07-03 14:39:04 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 2) THE PLANS SPECIFY THIS STRUCTURE AS A TYPE III- B. | | THIS IS INCORRECT. IN ORDER TO BE TYPE III- B, THE | | EXTERIOR WALLS ARE REQUIRED TO BE OF NONCOMBUSTABLE | | MATERIALS. BECAUSE OF THE WOOD FRAME EXTERIOR WALL, | | THIS BUILDING IS TYPE V- B. | | | | 3)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 4)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCTS HAVE A STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | SUBMIT A COVERSHEET WITH THE STATE APPROVAL NUMBER. | | | | 5) THE PLANS SPECIFY 3' X 6'CASEMENT WINDOWS. THE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR THE JELD-WEN CASEMENT | | WINDOWS, NOA 03-1204.02 HAS A MAXIMUM WINDOW SIZE OF | | 30" X 72". | | | | 6) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA 04-1122.04 FOR THE MULLIONS | | HAS BEEN REVISED BY NOA 05-0223.01. SUBMIT THE NEW | | NOA. | | | | 7) IN REGUARD TO THE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTH | | WALL OF THE BUILDING: | | - SUBMIT LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE 8" X 8" TUBE STEEL | | BEAM WHICH INDICATE THAT IT IS CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING | | THE NEW BRICK AND MORTAR VENEER AND THE EXISTING STUCCO | | AND WOOD FRAME WALL. | | - SHOW HOW THE EXISTING WOOD FRAME AND STUCCO WALL WILL | | SUPPORT THE ECCENTRIC LOADS. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
11:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-03-16 |
Time |
17:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-19 11:00:57 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT | | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 2) SUBMIT THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE DESIGN | | PRESSURES FOR THE IMPACT WINDOWS. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION | | THAT THE WINDOWS HAVE BEEN TESTED FOR LARGE MISSLE | | IMPACT. (ITEM #6 FROM FIRST REVIEW.) | | | | 3)SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE STRUCTURAL | | MULLIONS BETWEEN THE CASEMENT AND FIXED GLASS ARCHED | | WINDOWS. (ITEM #7 FROM FIRST REVIEW.) | | | | 4) THE DEMOLITION PLAN ON SHEET D-1.1 IS STILL | | INDICATING SIX WINDOW OPENINGS AND THE NEW ELEVATION ON | | A-1.1 SHOWS FIVE NEW WINDOWS. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | 5)ON SHEETS A-1.1 AND A-1.2 THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | APPROVAL NUMBERS FOR THE WINDOWS ARE LISTED ON THE | | PLANS PRECEDED BY FBC. THIS IS INCORRECT. THE NUMERALS | | SHOULD BE PRECEDED BY FL #. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 6)HAVE A FLORIDA REGISTERED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER | | PERFORM A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXISTING AND | | PROPOSED SOUTH WALL OF THE BUILDING AND EXISTING STUCCO | | AND WIRE LATH ATTACHMENT TO THE WOOD FRAME WALL. SUBMIT | | A SIGNED AND SEALED LETTER STATING THAT THE EXISTING | | WOOD FRAME STUCCO WALLS AND PARAPET ARE CAPABLE OF | | SAFELY SUPPORTING THE ADDITIONAL DEAD LOADS THAT WILL | | BE IMPOSED BY THE ADDITION OF THE CULTURED BRICK AND | | TRIM TO THE EXISTING FACADE AND RESIST THE LIVE LOADS | | OF A 140 MPH WINDLOAD. | | | | 7) SPECIFY HOW THE CULTURED VENEER WILL BE ATTACHED TO | | THE EXISTING WALL. SEE THE ENCLOSED INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | NOTE: INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MSDS FOR THE | | CULTURED BRICK HAVE BEEN DOWNLOADED AND INSERTED INTO | | YOUR SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
Time |
08:32 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-01-11 12:09:23 | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT | | MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 2) THE VALUE APPEARS TO BE QUITE LOW FOR THE APPARENT | | SCOPE OF WORK. PLEASE INCREASE THE VALUE TO REFLECT THE | | SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED WORK. | | | | 3) 2004 FL. BLD CODE 1603.1.4 THE | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND | | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION | | DRAWINGS, | | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH | | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING | | CATEGORY | | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE | | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, | | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN | | WIND PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. | | | | 4)SPECIFY THE APPLICABLE CODES ON THE PLANS. | | | | 5) SPECIFY THE WINDLOAD PRESSURES AT THE WINDOW | | OPENINGS ON THE PLANS. | | | | 6) SUBMIT THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS WITH DESIGN | | PRESSURES FOR THE IMPACT WINDOWS. PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION | | THAT WINDOWS HAVE BEEN TESTED FOR LARGE MISSILE | | IMPACT. | | | | 7) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE WINDOW MULLIONS | | BETWEEN CASEMENT AND FIXED ARCHED WINDOWS. | | | | 8)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 9) SPECIFY THE WINDOW SIZES ON THE PLANS. | | | | 10) THE DEMO PLAN ON D-1.1 SHOWS SIX WINDOW OPENINGS | | AND NOTE 3.8 STATES REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL FOR | | WINDOW INSTALLATION. THE ELEVATION ON A1-1 SHOWS FOUR | | WINDOWS. THE WALL SECTION ON A-1.2 SPECIFIES WOOD | | FRAME. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 11) PLEASE CLARIFY THE DRAWINGS ON A-1.2INDICATE WHAT | | IS EXISTING AND WHAT IS NEW. PROVIDE A WALL SECTION | | SHOWING THIS WALL IN ITS EXISTING CONDITION. | | | | 12) IT APPEARS THAT THE SECOND FLOOR IS BEING BUILT | | OUT. INDICATE WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE IS IN RELATION TO | | THE EXTERIOR WALL AT THE SECOND FLOOR. THE SECOND FLOOR | | CAN NOT PROJECT OVER THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | 13)PROVIDE AN ELEVATION SHOWING THE HEADERS AND | | FRAMING DETAILS AT THE NEW WINDOW OPENINGS. SPECIFY | | STRAPPING AND CONNECTORS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | CONNECTORS. | | | | 14)SPECIFY THE VAPOR RETARDER REQUIRED BY FBC 1403.3 | | BEHIND THE NEW CULTURED BRICK VENEER. | | | | 15) PROVIDE THE TECHNICAL DATA AND STANDARDS, INCLUDING | | FIRE RESISTANCE AND WINDLOAD INFORMATION , AS WELL AS | | THE INSTALLATION (ATTACHMENT) INFORMATION FOR THE OWENS | | CORNING CB-4054 BRICK VENEER. | | | | 16)PROVIDE THE TECHNICAL DATA AND STANDARDS, | | INCLUDING FIRE RESISTANCE AND WINDLOAD INFORMATION , AS | | WELL AS THE INSTALLATION (ATTACHMENT) INFORMATION FOR | | THE LIGHTWEIGHT CORNICE, SILL, ROWLOCK COURSE AND ANY | | OTHER TRIM. | | | | 17) THE TITLE BLOCK ON SHEET D-1.1 IS INCOMPLETE | | APPARANTLY DUE TO A PRINTING ERROR. | | | | 18) THE PRINTED NAME OF THE PERSON SIGNING AND SEALING | | THE PLAN IS REQUIRED IN THE TITLE BLOCK BY FAC | | 61G1-16.004. | | | | 19) THERE ARE SOME NOTATIONS ON ONE OF THE PLANS IN RED | | PENCIL. | | | | 20) DUE TO THE LACK OF INFORMATION ON THE PLANS AND | | SUBMITTALS, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY RESULT WHEN THESE | | ITEMS ARE ADDRESSED. | | | | 21) TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW PLEASE RETURN ONE SET OF | | THE OLD PLANS ALONG WITH A RESPONSE LETTER. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
16:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-24 |
Time |
10:45 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
Time |
15:30 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-03-14 15:20:30 | | | | | | | DENIED | | THIS IS THE SAME COMMENT AS THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | THE SCOPE OF WORK APPLIED FOR REQUIRES AN ELECTRICAL | | PERMIT TO SAFELY DISCONNECT SIGNS AND FEEDERS TO SAME. | | HAVE AN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SIGN ON THIS APPLICATION | | OR SUBMIT HIS APPLICATION WITH THIS PACKAGE. | | | | THE WRITTEN RESPONSE STATING THAT PERMIT # 06070846 | | COVERS THE SCOPE OF THIS APPLICATION IS INCORRECT, AS | | THAT PERMIT IS ELECTRICAL FOR THE ELEVATOR SHAFT DEMO. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
Time |
16:09 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
Time |
15:28 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-01-11 16:09:49 | | | | | DENIED | | THE SCOPE OF WORK APPLIED FOR REQUIRES AN ELECTRICAL | | PERMIT TO SAFELY DISCONNECT SIGNS AND FEEDERS TO SAME. | | HAVE AN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SIGN ON THIS APPLICATION | | ORSUBMIT HIS APPLICATION WITH THIS PACKAGE. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
B1 |
|
Notes |
2007-08-14 09:48:14 | *****APPROVED W/REMINDERS***** | | | | ** STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | DEMOLITION OPERATION SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241 - 2000 | | EDITION. | | | | **PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT: (1) THE ADDRESS SHALL NOT | | BE ON THE DOOR(S), AND (2) IF SECURITY AND/OR HURRICANE | | SHUTTERS ARE INSTALLED, THE ADDRESS SHALL BE VISIBLE | | EVEN IF SECURITY AND/OR HURRICANE SHUTTERS ARE | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | PLAN SHEET A-1.1 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
16:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-06-12 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-06-12 16:11:10 | *****DENIED***** | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE | | PLAN REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1.ON SHEET A-1.1 UNDER BUILDING DATA - APPLICABLE | | CODES, REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING:NFPA 1 - 2003 EDITION; | | NFPA 101 - 2003 EDITION;AND NFPA 241 - 2000 EDITION. | | | | 2.ON SHEET A-1.1, SHOW/DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS | | ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS CLEMATIS STREET. | | AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THOSE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO | | LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH | | CONTRASTING TO ITS BACKGROUND.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT: | | (1) THE ADDRESS SHALL NOT BE ON THE DOOR(S), AND (2) IF | | SECURITY AND/OR HURRICANE SHUTTERS ARE INSTALLED, THE | | ADDRESS SHALL BE VISIBLE EVEN IF SECURITY AND/OR | | HURRICANE SHUTTERS ARE INSTALLED. | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-19 13:34:17 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | 1.ON SHEET A-1.1 UNDER BUILDING DATA - APPLICABLE | | CODES, REFERENCE THE FOLLOWING:NFPA 1 - 2003 EDITION; | | NFPA 101 - 2003 EDITION;AND NFPA 241 - 2000 EDITION. | | | | 2.ON SHEET A-1.1, SHOW/DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS | | ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS CLEMATIS STREET. | | AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THOSE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO | | LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH | | CONTRASTING TO ITS BACKGROUND.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT: | | (1) THE ADDRESS SHALL NOT BE ON THE DOOR(S), AND (2) IF | | SECURITY AND/OR HURRICANE SHUTTERS ARE INSTALLED, THE | | ADDRESS SHALL BE VISIBLE EVEN IF SECURITY AND/OR | | HURRICANE SHUTTERS ARE INSTALLED. | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
14:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-24 14:04:51 | TO "COMM" BD#3 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-27 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-02-27 11:18:57 | TO "Z" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mmiller |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mmiller |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-12-21 16:22:23 | SENT TO ROBERT MCDOUGAL'S DESK MMILLER |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
10:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-06 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-09-06 10:52:22 | TO "RMCDOUGAL" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-04 |
Time |
15:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-04 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-09-04 15:19:11 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-03 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-08-03 14:31:39 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-05-21 10:18:03 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-09 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-09 |
Time |
10:18 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-03-09 10:18:28 | TO "BTROBAUB" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-07 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-07 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-03-07 09:35:33 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-01-11 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2006-12-05 |
Time |
10:37 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-01-10 15:52:36 | | | | | 1/10/07SENT TO ANA MARIA APONTE FOR ZONING REVIEW | 2006-12-05 10:37:23 | TO "MISC" BOX#1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-05-06 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-06 10:56:43 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | * EMAILED TO R.BROWN AVAILABLE FOR B REVIEW | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-03-04 |
Time |
09:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-03-04 |
Time |
09:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
Time |
16:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-09-05 |
Time |
16:51 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-09-05 16:52:29 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
Time |
10:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-08-06 10:40:08 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | * TO C. HOOPS FOR ROUTE TO B | | | | MATT FLIS - 822 1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-03-08 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-03-08 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-08 14:27:04 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED WITH COMMENTS | | | | | | 1) PLEASE CONFIRM THAT EXISTING ROUGH OPENINGS WILL BE | | UTILIZED FOR WINDOWS. | | | | 2) PLEASE CONSIDER INSTALLATION OF 6TH WINDOW (FURTHEST | | NORTH); THIS WAS DISCUSSED WITH JOHN AT THE JOBSITE AND | | WILL INCREASE THE AESTHETIC QUALITY OF THE PROJECT. | | | | MATT FLIS 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-01-10 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-01-10 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-01-10 16:33:43 | ZONING REVIEW: | | | | DENIED | | | | 1) IS BRICK THE ORIGINAL MATERIAL FOR THIS FACADE? IF | | NOT, STUCCO IS BETTER FOR BUILDING ELEVATION. | | 2) PLEASE ALIGN WINDOWS TO CREATE SYMMETRY OR SOME | | OTHER PATTERN THAT MAKES SENSE. CAN THE WINDOWS BE | | LOCATED WITHIN THE ORIGINAL ROUGH OPENINGS? | | 3) PLEASE REMOVE ARCHED COMPONENT OF WINDOW FRAME. | | | | PLEASE CALL ME AT 822-1445 TO DISCUSS THE OPTIONS FOR | | RENOVATING THIS BUILDING ELEVATION. WE ARE OPEN TO | | OTHER OPPORTUNITIES TO SOLVE THESE ISSUES. | | | | MATT FLIS, SENIOR URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
|
|