 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 06100891
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06100891 |
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
15:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-06 15:47:09 | THE REVISED SITE PLANS DEPICT THE NEW SITE ADDRESS OF | | 2395 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR.PEMRIT HAS BEEN APPLIED . | | | | LACRAMIOARA URSU | | MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | OFFICE:822-1239 | | FAX: 822-1249 | | E-MAIL:[email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-11-08 |
Time |
15:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-11-08 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2006-11-08 15:50:19 | FOR THIS NEW STRUCTURE, JUNIOR ACHIVEMENT HEADQUARTERS | | , A NEW SITE ADDRESS HAD BEEN ASSIGNED AS 2395 | | NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409.THE | | NOTIFICATION LETTER WILL BE SEND TO THE PROPERTY | | OWNER.PLEASE MAKE THE NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS ON THE | | REVISED SITE PLANS AND APPLICATIONS. | | | | LACRAMIOARA URSU | | MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | E-MAIL:[email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-10-30 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-10-30 |
Time |
09:03 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2006-10-30 09:04:53 | SITE ADDRESS FOR THIS NEW BUILDING MUST BE ASSIGNED TO | | NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-29 15:55:59 | PERMIT: 06100891 | | ADD: 2395 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR. | | CONT: THE WEITZ CO. | | TEL: (561309-7386 | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 4THREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1-7) COMPLIED. | | | | 8) BUILDING PROVISO: PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | 8(5) PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF HATCH, WILL REQUIRE A LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, WILL NEED TO FILL OUT WEST PALM BEACH | | FORM FOR SUBMITTAL FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | A) WILL REQUIRE THE ACTUAL TESTING REPORT | | FROM WHERE PRESSURES WERE DERIVED | | B) WILL ALSO NEED A THIRD PARTY ENGINEER OR | | AGENCY FOR THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 8(9) | | ROOFING ASSEMBLIES, NO ROOFING PERMIT APPLIED FOR, THE | | MIAMI-DADE REPORT # 04-0716.04 FOR STANDING SEAM METAL | | ROOFING IS OK, | | THE ISSUE IS THE MODIFIED BITUMEN REPORT FL | | 644/R2/ 06-0626.05 PAGE 21 OF THE REPORT IS THE SHEET | | INDICATED AS THE SUB-SYSTEM THAT WILL BE INSTALLED ON | | THIS PROJECT. THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE LISTED IS | | -52.5 WITH LIMITATION # 7. | | LIMITATION # 7 INDICATES WHEN THE PRESSURES IN | | ZONE 2 & 3 ARE GREATER THAN LISTED IN THE REPORT | | ENHANCED FASTENING MUST OCCUR IN THOUGHS ZONES. THIS | | REPORT REQUIRES THE RAS 117 CALCULATION TO BE SUBMITTED | | AND TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY EITHER A LICENSED | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. | | ROOFING PERMIT WILL REQUIRE SEPERATE REVIEW , FEES AND | | ASSOCIATED REVIEW. | | | | 9)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | 10)THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLANFL S. S. 553.71(7) " | | THRESHOLD BUILDING" MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS | | GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH | | HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ FT IN | | AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 | | PERSONS. THIS BUILDING IS OVER 5,000 SQ FT AND AN | | OCCUPANT LOAD OF 500, THUS REQUIRING A THRESHOLD | | INSPECTION PLAN. | | | | 105.13.1*THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A | | SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON | | A THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL | | INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE | | STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE | | ENFORCING AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. | | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO | | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO | | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | 11) THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: | | WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S 553.79(5) FLORIDA | | STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS | | CODE.CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561)805-6711 FOR FURTHER | | INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAILCOMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-07 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-07 14:17:39 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | 1-7. BUILDING PROVISOS. | | | | 8. SEE PREVIOUS LIST REGARDING LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | FOR ROOF HATCH, FAC9B72.PLEASE SEE ATTACHED, A COPY | | OF THE LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR A NYSTROM ROOF HATCH | | FOR THE RHG3630T MODEL, AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE PAPERWORK | | WHICH MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR APPLICATION FOR LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE PAPERWORK SUBMITTED IS FOR THE | | RHA SERIES ROOF HATCH.A FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ROOF HATCH IS REQUIRED PRIOR | | TO INSTALLATION.IF NOT APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | ISSUANCE, THIS WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM. | | | | ENHANCED FASTENING AND APPROVED ASSEMBLY INFORMATION | | FOR THE ROOF WILL BE REQUIRED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | 9.IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY, | | 561-233-5025.THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED AND THE | | RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION. | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | 10.SEE PREVIOUS LISTS REGARDING THRESHOLD BUILDING | | REQUIREMENTS.THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN AND | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR AGREEMENT ARE TO REMAIN IN THE | | PACKAGE.THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING AND APPROVAL OF | | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR MUST BE FACILITATED BY HAROLD | | PISKURA, INSEPCTION SERVICES, 561-805-6711, PRIOR TO | | PERMIT ISSUANCE.I SPOKE WITH THE CONTRACTOR ON THE | | TELEPHONE, AND HE SAID THAT THIS WAS ALREADY DONE, BUT | | HAROLD PISKURA SAID THAT THIS WAS NOT DONE.PLEASE | | NOTE THAT FAILURE TO ADDRESS THESE ITEMS WILL RESULT IN | | PERMIT DELAYS, ESPECIALLY AS THE DESIGNER HAS DECLARED | | AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY BUILDING (THEREFORE, THIS IS A | | THRESHOLD JOB, STATUTORY REQUIREMENT FS553.71(7)). | | | | 11.A BUILDING REVIEW OF ENERGY CALCS IS REQUIRED | | EVERY TIME THAT A NEW ENERGY CALC IS SUBMITTED.PLEASE | | CONFIRM THAT ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS ON THE PLAN ARE | | INCLUDED IN THE ENERGY CALC SUCH AS DOORS, WINDOWS, | | INSULATION, HOT WATER HEATER, COFFERED CEILINGS, | | CORRECT FLOOR AREA, ETC.PLEASE HAVE THE DESIGNER | | CONFIRM THAT ALL COMPONENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE ENERGY | | CALC INPUT DATA REPORT.FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT | | IN PERMIT ISSUANCE DELAYS. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-05 10:17:43 | PERMIT: 06100891 | | ADD: 2395 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR. | | CONT: THE WEITZ CO. | | TEL: (561309-7386 | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 4THREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 2 ) FL S S 713.13 | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS | | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. | | | | 3-4) COMPLIED. | | | | 5) BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY THIS CODE SHALL | | BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT | | THE CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS SUCH | | ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT | | TO A CONSENT BY THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER | | TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY | | OWNER. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL | | OF DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, DEBRIS, AND | | THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION | | ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC SURFACE | | WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY | | REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH | | ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW | | RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON EXISTING | | PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ | | FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCEL SHALL AS A | | PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED | | DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A | | CERTIFICATION FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL | | OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 6) BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10.1 HURRICANE PROTECTION. | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW | | CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO | | REMAIN LOOSE OR OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION | | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN | | ISSUED UNTIL THE HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION | | SITE OR SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE | | DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | DEBRIS CAUSING DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | WINDS. ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR | | SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS | | WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00.IN | | ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO | | VIOLATES THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE | | PURSUANT TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | 7) BUILDING PROVISO: THE BUILD OUT FOR THE EXCHANGE | | CITY AND FINANCE PARK WILL BE UNDER A SEPERATE PERMIT. | | | | 8) BUILDING PROVISO: PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | 8(5) PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF HATCH, WILL REQUIRE A LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, WILL NEED TO FILL OUT WEST PALM BEACH | | FORM FOR SUBMITTAL FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | A) WILL REQUIRE THE ACTUAL TESTING REPORT | | FROM WHERE PRESSURES WERE DERIVED | | B) WILL ALSO NEED A THIRD PARTY ENGINEER OR | | AGENCY FOR THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 8(9) | | ROOFING ASSEMBLIES, NO ROOFING PERMIT APPLIED FOR, THE | | MIAMI-DADE REPORT # 04-0716.04 FOR STANDING SEAM METAL | | ROOFING IS OK, | | THE ISSUE IS THE MODIFIED BITUMEN REPORT FL | | 644/R2/ 06-0626.05 PAGE 21 OF THE REPORT IS THE SHEET | | INDICATED AS THE SUB-SYSTEM THAT WILL BE INSTALLED ON | | THIS PROJECT. THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE LISTED IS | | -52.5 WITH LIMITATION # 7. | | LIMITATION # 7 INDICATES WHEN THE PRESSURES IN | | ZONE 2 & 3 ARE GREATER THAN LISTED IN THE REPORT | | ENHANCED FASTENING MUST OCCUR IN THOUGHS ZONES. THIS | | REPORT REQUIRES THE RAS 117 CALCULATION TO BE SUBMITTED | | AND TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY EITHER A LICENSED | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. | | ROOFING PERMIT WILL REQUIRE SEPERATE REVIEW , FEES AND | | ASSOCIATED REVIEW. | | | | 9)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAILCOMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-18 15:44:14 | PERMIT: 06100891 | | ADD: 2395 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR. | | CONT: THE WEITZ CO. | | TEL: (561309-7386 | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 3RDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 2 ) FL S S 713.13 | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS | | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. | | | | 3A) NEW ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS WERE ADDED AS REVISION# 2 | | DATED 3/13/07 THE COVERSHEET,A2.2,A4.01, A4.11,& | | A4.23 PLEASE SEE THAT THE SIGNATURE ON THESE SHEETS IS | | DIFFERENT FROM THE PREVIOUS SHEETS, | | AND ALSO SEE THE FIRMS SEAL WAS USED INSTEAD OF THE | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL JAMES HOWELL. NOTE ONE SET OF PLANS | | WILL BE RETAINED FOR POSSIBLE SUBMITTAL TO THE STATE OF | | FLORIDA AND BOARD OF ARCHITECTS. | | | | 3B) PLEASE HAVE THE SIGNATURE SHEET FORMERLY SUBMITTED, | | SEALED WITH THE CORRECT SEAL BY THE DESSIGN | | PROFESSIONAL JAMES HOWELL AND THE NOTARYAFFIX THE | | PROPER WORDAGE & DATE REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF | | THE NOTARY AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA. | | | | 4) COMMENT# 8 FROM THE 2NDREVIEW;FBC* 105.3 | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND | | LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF THE | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT INSPECTOR | | PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR | | MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | | | XX - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | CONSTRUCTION | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | - PILE DRIVING | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN | | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | 5) BUILDING PROVISO: 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY THIS CODE SHALL | | BE PERMORMED IN A MANNER SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT | | THE CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS | | SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID PROPERTY | | PURSUANT TO A CONSENT BY THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, | | UNDER TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE | | PROPERTY OWNER.THIS INCLUDESBUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE | | CONTROL OF DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, | | DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW | | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT | | HISTORICSURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT | | PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN | | COMPLYING WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS,AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW | | RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON EXISTING | | PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ | | FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCELL SHALL | | AS A PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY | | PREPARED DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE | | WITH THIS PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE | | IMPROVEMENT, A CERTIFICATE FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE | | APPROVAL OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 6) BUILDING PROVISO:109.3.10.1 HURICANE PROTECTION. | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW | | CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO | | REMAIN LOOSE OR OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION | | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN | | ISSUED UNTIL THE HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION | | SITE OR SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE | | DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND | | DEBRIS CAUSING DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | WINDS. ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR | | SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS | | WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00. IN | | ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO | | VIOLATES THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE | | PURSUANT TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | 7) PROVISO: THE BUILD OUT FOR THE EXCHANGE CITY AND THE | | FINANCE PARK WILL BE UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. | | | | | | 8)NOTE THIRD REVIEW, NOT A SINGLE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | WAS SUBMITTED.FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS | | ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | 1) FIXED WINDOWS- STOREFRONT | | 2) OPERTABLE WINDOWS | | 3) GLAZED DOORS, BOTH SWING AND SLIDE | | 4) METAL HOLLOW CORE EXTERIOR DOORS & LOUVERS. | | 5) PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF ACCESS HATCHES | | 6) MULLIONS VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL | | 7) EXTERIOR ROLL UP, OR SECTIONAL DOOR | | 8) SKYLIGHTS | | 9)PANEL WALL SYSTEMS: SIDING, SOFFITS, EFIS | | SYSTEMS, LOUVERS | | 9)ROOFING ASSEMBLIES, | | 10) PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF STANDS | | | | 9)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
14:16 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
14:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-06 14:32:48 | PERMIT: 06100891 | | ADD: 2395 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR. | | CONT: THE WEITZ CO. | | TEL: (561309-7386 | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 2 ) FL S S 713.13 | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS | | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. | | | | 3) COMMENT# 6 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, | | SOILS REPORTS ARE TO BE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE &SEAL. | | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR | | OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND | | BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC | | RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND | | SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED | | TO THE DOCUMENT. | | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS | | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS | | | | 4) COMMENT# 8 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW; | | FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | | SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE | | DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF | | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, | | ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF | | THE FOLLOWING: | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | CONSTRUCTION | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | - PILE DRIVING | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN | | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | 5) BUILDING PROVISO: | | 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY | | THIS CODE SHALL BE PERMORMED IN A MANNER | | SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE | | CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS | | SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT | | SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT BY | | THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER | | TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE | | APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER.THIS INCLUDES | | BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL OF | | DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, | | DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION | | MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY | | SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC | | SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING | | ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE | | SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH | | ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, | | AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL | | DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR | | ITEMS, ON EXISTING PROPERTIES RESULTING | | IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ FT OF | | PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCELL SHALL | | AS A PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A | | PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAINAGE PLAN | | CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE | | IMPROVEMENT, A CERTIFICATE FROM A | | LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO | | THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE | | APPROVAL OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 6) BUILDING PROVISO: | | 109.3.10.1 HURICANE PROTECTION. | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO | | ALLOW CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS | | EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO REMAIN LOOSE OR | | OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION | | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE | | WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED UNTIL THE | | HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, | | EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER | | REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR | | SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE | | THE DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION | | MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS CAUSING | | DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | WINDS. | | ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO | | REMOVE OR SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION | | MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS WITHIN | | 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN | | ISSUED SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO | | EXCEED $500.00. | | IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED | | CONTRACTOR WHO VIOLATES THIS SECTION | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT | | TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | 7) PROVISO: THE BUILD OUT FOR THE EXCHANGE CITY AND THE | | FINANCE PARK WILL BE UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT. | | | | 8) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- | | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | FOLLOWS: | | FLAT ROOF - PRODUCT APPROVALS HAD LOW PRESSURES | | PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF STANDS REQUIRES FLORIDA APPROVALS | | | | 9)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
8.88 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-11-21 16:52:31 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 06100891 | | ADD: 2395 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DR. | | CONT: THE WEITZ CO. | | TEL: (561309-7386 | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 1STREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 2 ) FL S S 713.13 | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT BEFORE A | | PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. NOTE: 713.13(2) | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS | | NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED | | WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. | | | | 3) DISCREPANCY) PLEASE CORRECT THE ADDRESS ON | | THE PERMIT APPLICATION, THE ACTUAL SITE ADDRESS IS ALSO | | WRONG ON ALL PLANS, SITE ADDRESS IS 2600 NORTH MILITARY | | TRAIL. | | | | 4A) SP-2 THE MONUMENT SIGN INDICATED ON THIS SHEET WILL | | REQUIRE A SEPERATE PERMIT. | | 4B) NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT LILI URSA @ 822-1239 FOR | | ADDRESSING OF ALL BUILDINGS ON THE NORTHWOOD CAMPUS. MS | | URSA WILL NEED A CURRENT SITE PLAN OF ALL STRUCTURES | | AND | | A CONTACT PERSON & TELEPHONE NUMBER. | | | | 5 ) 110.2* W. P. B. ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE, INFORMATION THAT IS REQUIRED FOR | | RECORD KEEPING & FOR CERTIFICATE OF | | OCCUPANCY: | | A) THE EDITION OFTHE CODE UNDER WHICH | | THE PERMIT WAS ISSUED. | | B) FLOOD ZONE : A8 MINIMUM ELEVATION 16'-6". THE | | FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE | | VERIFIED BY A SIGNED AND SEALED ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. | | C) OCCUPANT LOADS | | D) OCCUPANCY SEPERATION: NONSEPERATED OR SEPERATED | | USES | | | | 6) FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE | | SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS | | NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION. | | WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL | | IS NOT DEFINITLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE EXPLOR | | ATIONS, TEST OR OTHER ADEQUATE PROOF AS | | TO THE PERMISSIBLE SAFE BEARING | | CAPACITY. REQUIRED TEST AND RECOMMENDA- | | TIONS SUBMITTED TO VERIFY BEARING CAPA- | | CITY SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A GEOTECH- | | NICALREPORT FROM A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | | PROPERLY LICENSED IN THE STATE OF | | FLORIDA. | | | | 7)FBC 13-103.1.1.1THE PROFESSIONALS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | THE DESIGN OF THE | | BUILDING AND THE ELECTRICAL, | | LIGHTING, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING | | SYSTEMS SHALL EACH SIGN THE ENERGY CODE | | COMPLIANCE FORM, TO CERTIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | | 8) FBC* 105.3RESIDENT INSPECTOR. | | SUBMIT INSPECTOR RESUME' AND LICENSE | | DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, DIRECTOR OF | | THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, | | ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF | | THE FOLLOWING: | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | CONSTRUCTION | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | - PILE DRIVING | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN | | OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION (TILT WALL). | | | | 8) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 9) NOTE, 109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY | | THIS CODE SHALL BE PERMORMED IN A MANNER | | SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE | | CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS | | SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT | | SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT BY | | THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER | | TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE | | APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER.THIS INCLUDES | | BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL OF | | DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, | | DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION | | MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY | | SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC | | SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING | | ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE | | SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH | | ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, | | AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL | | DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR | | ITEMS, ON EXISTING PROPERTIES RESULTING | | IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ FT OF | | PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCELL SHALL | | AS A PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A | | PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAINAGE PLAN | | CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE | | IMPROVEMENT, A CERTIFICATE FROM A | | LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO | | THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE | | APPROVAL OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 10) 109.3.10.1 HURICANE PROTECTION. | | IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO | | ALLOW CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS | | EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO REMAIN LOOSE OR | | OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION | | SITE FROM 24 HRS. AFTER A HURRICANE | | WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED UNTIL THE | | HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN | | LIFTED. ALL SUCH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, | | EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE EITHER | | REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR | | SECURED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE | | THE DANGER OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION | | MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS CAUSING | | DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH | | WINDS. | | ANY PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO | | REMOVE OR SECURE THE CONSTRUCTION | | MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS WITHIN | | 24 HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN | | ISSUED SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO | | EXCEED $500.00. | | IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED | | CONTRACTOR WHO VIOLATES THIS SECTION | | SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT | | TO SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | 11)SHEET SP2 THIS SITE PLAN INDICATES THE WALKWAYS | | AND PAVEMENT THAT ARE AJACENT TO THE NEW BUILDING. THE | | PLAN FAILS TO INDICATE ALL ACCESSIBLE | | EXITS (EXIT DISCHARGE) AS REQUIRED IN ACCESSIBLE | | BUILDINGS: | | NEW CONSTRUCTION. 11-4.1.3(8)(II) ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES | | | | MUST BE PROVIDED IN A NUMBER AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO | | THE | | | | NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE | | BUILDING/FIRE | | CODES. SHEET A1.10 INDICATES THE REQUIRED EXITS BUT | | THE | | | | PLANS ARE MISSING THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FOR THOSE | | EXITS. | | | | 10) SHEET A1.11 THE GIRLS AND BOYS GANGED RESTROOMS | | ROOM # 114, 115, 137 & 138ALL HAVE THE SAME ISSUE,IN | | | | NEW CONSTRUCTION THE TOLIET STALLS REQUIRE THE LAV TO | | BE IN | | THE STALL SEE 11-4.17.3, NEW CONSTRUCTION (IN GRAY), | | (1) THE | | STANDARD ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM STALL SHALL CONTAIN AN | | ACCESSIBLE | | LAVATORY WITHIN IT, THE SIZE OF SUCH LAVATORY TO BE NOT | | LESS THAN | | 19 INCHES WIDE BY 17 INCHES (483 MM BY 432 MM) DEEP, | | NOMINAL | | SIZE, AND WALL MOUNTED. THE LAVATORY SHALL BE MOUNTED | | SO AS NOT | | TO OVERLAP THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE AREAS REQUIRED BY | | SECTION 11-4.17 | | [SEE FIGURE 11-30 (A) AND FIGURE 11-30 (E)] AND TO | | COMPLY WITH | | SECTION 11-4.19 OF THE CODE. SUCH LAVATORIES SHALL BE | | COUNTED | | AS PART OF THE REQUIRED FIXTURE COUNT FOR THE | | BUILDING. | | | | (2)THE ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE LOCATED IN | | THE CORNER, | | DIAGONAL TO THE DOOR. | | | | 12)SHEET A4.01 DETAILS 3&4 ENTRYINFORMATION AND | | RECEPTION COUNTER | | BOTH NEED TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 11-4.32.4 HEIGTH OF | | COUNTERS.11-4.32.4 | | HEIGHT OF TABLES OR COUNTERS. THE TOPS OF ACCESSIBLE | | TABLES AND COUNTERS | | SHALL BE FROM 28 INCHES TO 34 INCHES (710 MM TO 865 MM) | | ABOVE THE FINISH | | FLOOR OR GROUND. | | | | 13)PLANS FOR THE INTERIOR BUILD OUT FOR ROOM 102 | | EXCHANGE CITY AND | | ROOM 146FINANCE PARK DO NOT INDICATE ANY INFORMATION | | AT THIS TIME. | | THERE IS NO COMMENT ON EGRESS OR ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES | | AT THIS TIME. | | | | 14)SHEETS A1.11 - A1.13 INDICATE VARIOUS WALL | | ASSEMBLIES BUT | | FAIL TO PROVIDE A SHEET WITH THE ASSEMBLIES DETAILED? | | 106.1.2* | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | 15) SHEETS A1.12 & A1.13 BOTH HAVE AN ASSEMBLY | | OCCUPANCY BUT ARE TRUELY EDUCATIONAL USAGE CHILDREN IN | | SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL GRADES AND LOWER. | | THESE ROOMS STILL NEED AN EMERGENCY ESCAPE WINDOW SINCE | | THE CODE SPECIFICALLY STATES WINDOWEVEN THOUGH THERE | | ARE DOORS TO THE EXTERIOR. | | 1025.4.1 | | EVERY ROOM OR SPACE GREATER THAN 250 SQUARE FEET (23.2 | | M 2 ) IN EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCIES USED FOR CLASSROOM OR | | OTHER EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES OR NORMALLY SUBJECT TO | | STUDENT OCCUPANCY AND EVERY ROOM OR SPACE NORMALLY | | SUBJECT TO CLIENT OCCUPANCY, OTHER THAN BATHROOMS, IN | | GROUP D OCCUPANCIES SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE | | OUTSIDE WINDOW FOR EMERGENCY RESCUE THAT COMPLIES WITH | | THE FOLLOWING: | | 1.SUCH WINDOWS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE | | WITHOUT THE USE OF TOOLS AND SHALL PROVIDE A CLEAR | | OPENING OF NOT LESS THAN 20 INCHES (508 MM) IN WIDTH, | | 24 INCHES (610 MM) IN HEIGHT, AND 5.7 SQUARE FEET (0.53 | | M 2 ) IN AREA. | | 2.THE BOTTOM OF THE OPENING SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN | | 44 INCHES (1118 MM) ABOVE THE FLOOR, AND ANY LATCHING | | DEVICE SHALL BE CAPABLE OF BEING OPERATED FROM NOT MORE | | THAN 54 INCHES (1372 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR. | | 1025.1EXCEPTION# 1IS FOR BLDG WITH FIRE SPRINKLER BUT | | 102.1* WHERE , IN ANY CASE DIFFERENT SECTIONS OF THE | | CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT SHALL BE | | APPLICABLE. | | | | 16)1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS. | | IN WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR | | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE | | IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN | | BUILDINGS SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE | | OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF GLAZED | | OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH | | GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE PRESSURE | | IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH AN | | IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND | | ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE TAS 201, 202 | | AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: | | 1.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 | | FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE SHALL MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | 2.GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN | | 30 FEET (9.1 M) ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET | | THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL MISSILE | | TEST. | | | | FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- | | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | FOLLOWS: | | 1) FIXED WINDOWS- STOREFRONT | | 2) OPERTABLE WINDOWS | | 3) GLAZED DOORS, BOTH SWING AND SLIDE | | 4) METAL HOLLOW CORE EXTERIOR DOORS & LOUVERS. | | 5) PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF ACCESS HATCHES | | 6) MULLIONS VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL | | 7) EXTERIOR ROLL UP, OR SECTIONAL DOOR | | 8) SKYLIGHTS | | 9)PANEL WALL SYSTEMS: SIDING, SOFFITS, EFIS | | SYSTEMS, LOUVERS | | 9)ROOFING ASSEMBLIES, | | 10) PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF STANDS | | | | NOTE PLEASE REVIEW COMMENT# 8:)W P B ADMINISTRTIVE | | CODE 106.3.3* | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH | | ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR ON THE NEXT REVIEW | | BECAUSE OF THE | | FIRST ROUND RESPONCES OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | REQUESTED. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-17 16:07:36 | PERMIT APPLICATION MISSING IN RE-SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. | | SPOKE TO ALLEN GAST, WHO WILL BRING IN PERMIT APPL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-08 16:38:02 | ** DENIED 5TH REVIEW** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW SPECIFICALLY | | REQUESTED FOR A THIRD SET OF ELECTRICAL SHEETS AS ONE | | SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE | | BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. PLEASE SEE THAT ONE OF | | THE THREE SETS OF PLANS SUBMITTED ARE MISSING THE THIRD | | SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS. THE RETAINED PLANS BY THIS | | OFFICE MAY NOT BE USED. IN EITHER CASE AS WAS NOTED ON | | PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NOTES BELOW THERE ARE SHEET(S) | | WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE CHANGED OUT ALONG WITH NEW | | CALCULATIONS. | | FBC 106.1 REQUIRES TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND WHEN | | A THRESHOLD OR SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRES THREE | | COMPLETE SETS. | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SUBMIT. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1AB.1, 13-415.1.A, 13-415.2, | | 13-400.3.A. PLEASE COORDINATE ALL LIGHTING IN THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE INPUT DATA REPORT. | | PREVIOUS REVIEW(S) NOTED TO SEE LIGHTING FIXTURES SUCH | | AS H/H1 WHICH ARE SHOWN AS 1005WATT FIXTURES ON THE | | FIXTURE LEGEND AND NOT THE SAME IN THE IDR.IT WAS | | NOTED BY THIS OFFICE THAT PERHAPS THIS WAS A MISPRINT | | HOWEVER THE PLANS ARE STILL SHOWING THESE FIXTURES ON | | THE FIXTURE LEGEND AS 1005WATTS. | | PLEASE SEE THESE SAME FIXTURES ON THE IDR ARE SHOWN AS | | 100W AND 175W. (IDR UNDER LOBBY SHOWS 175W FIXTURES | | WHEN THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT SHOW ANY 175W FIXTURES | | FOR THE FIXTURES AS NOTED ON PLANS. THE PLANS SHOW H | | AND H1. | | PLEASE SEE OTHER AREAS OF THE IDR SHOW 100W FOR THE | | SAME TYPES OF FIXTURES. | | ** THESE SIMPLY DO NOT CORRELATE. | | PLEASE SEE MISSING F1 FIXTURES FROM FIXTURE LEGEND. THE | | COUNT IS ON THE IDR, AND SEEMS TO BE THE SAME TYPE AS F | | BUT ONLY WITH BATTERY BACK UP HOWEVER AS THIS FIXTURE | | IS NOT LISTED IT CAN NOT BE ASSUMED. | | A MINOR ITEM IS THE IDR IS SHORT ONE 96W FIXTURE. THE | | PLANS SHOW 107 OF THE 96W FIXTURES IN AREAS RTU-1 AND | | RTU-2. | | PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING IDR WHICH INDICATES | | SOME FIXTURES BEING REQUIRED BY HEALTH, LIFE SAFETY | | STATUTE OR ORDINANCE. THERE IS NO KNOWN REQUIREMENT BY | | ANY STATUTE, OR ORDINANCE KNOWN TO THIS OFFICE. | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SUBMIT THREE SETS AND SEE THE | | FOLLOWING COMMENT. PLEASE ALSO BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT | | IS SIGNED ON CERTIFICATION SHEET. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS NOTED JUST ABOVE, PLEASE BE SURE | | TO SUBMIT THREE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED SETS OF ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS. THE STATE STATUE 471.025 AND FLORIDA | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 REQUIRES ALL TO | | CONTAIN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, DATE AND RAISED SEAL. MAY | | NOT SUBMIT COLORED PHOTO-COPIES IN LIEU OF ORIGINAL | | SIGNATURE DATE AND RAISED SEAL. | | PLEASE SEE ONLY TWO SETS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | SUBMITTED CONTAINED ORIGINAL SIGNATURES, DATES AND | | RAISED SEALS. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW DUE TO | | THE REVIEWS, SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS ALONG THE WAY THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED THREE | | CONSECUTIVE TIMES. PLEASE KNOW THAT WITH RESPECT TO FS | | 553.80(2)(B) AND REPEAT CODE COMPLIANCE COMMENTS. | | PLEASE KNOW THIS OFFICE WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSESS THE | | FINE AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE STATUTE OF $50, 400 ON | | THE NEXT REVIEW IF THESE CODE SECTIONS ARE REPEATED. | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER ALL ITEMS AND COORDINATE | | PLANS WITH THE IDR. | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
16:43 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-11-02 16:45:15 | ** PLANS WERE REMOVED FROM INCOMING. PLANS ROUTED TO | | BUILDING REVIEWER AFTER ELECTRICAL REVIEW WSA | | COMPLETED. PLANS WILL BE PLACED ON THE COMM BOARD AFTER | | BUILDING REVIEW. | 2007-11-02 16:44:10 | | | ** DENIED 4TH REVIEW ** | | | | *** PLEASE SEE AS THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT | | SUBMITTED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW AS STATED IN NOTE # 2 | | DATED 6/4/07 A REVIEW ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE | | NOT ABLE TO BE DONE UNTIL THIS REVIEW. | | REVIEW OF OTHER PREVIOUS CODE COMMENTS WAS DONE. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS | | SUBMITTED ARE IN NEED OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC | | CHAPTER 13. | | PLEASE SEE THE VERSION AS NOW SUBMITTED IS INCORRECT | | FOR THE PERMIT APPLIED DATE. THIS PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED | | UNDER THE 2004 FBC BEFORE THE DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 | | CHANGES THEREFORE THE VERSION AS ADOPTED SHOULD BE | | 2.11. | | 13-415.1.A, 13- 400.3.A | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE INFORMATION ON THE INPUT DATA | | REPORT DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON | | PLANS. ANY REFERENCE TO THE INPUT DATA REPORT ON THE | | COMMENT AS NOTED WILL BE ABBREVIATED AS IDR. | | PLEASE SEE THE AMOUNT OF FIXTURES AND WATTAGES OF | | FIXTURES ON THE IDR DO NOT MATCH WITH THE FIXTURES ON | | PLANS. | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES | | WHICH ON PLANS ACTUALLY SHOW MORE FIXTURES THAN IN | | CALCULATIONS. SEE THAT FIXTURE *C* IS ACTUALLY | | MISSING. | | PLEASE SEE THE INTERIOR LIGHTING AS THERE IS FIXTURES | | ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT IN THE IDR. FOR EXAMPLE: | | FIXTURES H, H1, J, L ARE NOT IN THE IDR. FIXTURE H, IS | | SHOWN AS 1005 WATTS ON THE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE | | WHICH APPEARS TO BE A MISPRINT. PLEASE SEE THE IDR AS | | THESE FIXTURES ABOVE WHICH ARE 75W AND 100W FIXTURES | | ARE NOT LISTED AT ALL. | | PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES IN ROOMS AND OTHER | | AREAS ARE MISSING. FOR EXAMPLE: WHERE ARE THE FIXTURES | | *H* IN THE IDR? | | | | ** THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES GIVEN. | | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS AND FIXTURE | | SCHEDULE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE INPUT | | DATA REPORTS. | | ** PLEASE SEE THE OWNER AGENT WILL NEED TO SIGN THE | | CERTIFICATION SHEET ALSO. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE | | NOT SUBMITTED PREVIOUSLY FS 553.80(2)(B) DOES NOT APPLY | | AT THIS TIME. PLEASE BE SURE TO COORDINATE. | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS AND ONE | | SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS | | OFFICE. | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE ONE | | NEW ELECTRICAL SET IN THE THIRD SET OF PLANS. | | ** IF ANY ELECTRICAL SHEETS ARE BEING REPLACED IN OTHER | | TWO SETS DUE TO NOTES ABOVE, PLEASE REMOVE OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND INSERT NEW SHEETS INTO SETS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
Time |
18:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
Time |
17:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-04 18:47:48 | ** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS WITH | | RESPECT TO THE INVALID SEAL ON REVISED CS, SP AND A | | SHEETS. THIS INFORMATION WAS FORWARDED TO THE BUILDING | | REVIEWER FOR VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTES 481 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT NO ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE | | SUBMITTED BACK IN PACKAGE FOR REVIEW. NO REVIEW FOR | | COORDINATION WITH PLANS, FOR LIGHTING LEVELS, CONTROLS | | ETC COULD BE DONE. | | PLEASE SEE FBC 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.2,13-103.1.1.1. | | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO AREAS GREATER | | THAN 25K SQ FT. PLEASE SEE PLANS MENTIONS ONLY ONE | | LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL AND SYSTEM. PLEASE SEE CODE | | SECTION GIVEN ABOVE AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | PLEASE SEE THE DOORWAYS WHICH ACCESS THE STORAGE ROOM | | (#117) DOES NOT SEEM TO CONTAIN ANY OVER RIDE DEVICE AT | | THE POINT OF ENTRANCE. WILL THE OS DEVICE COVER ACROSS | | THE STORAGE ROOM AREA FROM THE OPPOSITE WALL? | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE DOORS ON OUTSIDE OF BUILDING WHICH | | ARE IN TWO MAIN ROOMS ON E1.2 AND E1.3. | | PLEASE CLARIFY ANY OVER RIDES, SOME OTHER AREAS IN | | BUILDING SEEM TO CONTAIN OS TYPE DEVICES WHICH WOULD | | ALSO MEET THE OVER RIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR COVERAGE. | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING DETAIL ON E5.1 DOES NOT APPEAR | | TO BE ACCURATE AS LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM(S), TIMER | | OVER RIDES AND OC TYPE DEVICES ARE BEING INSTALLED. | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAILS FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED | | CONTROLS. AS NOTED ON PLANS, ANY REVISION AND SHOP | | DRAWINGS MAY BE SUBMITTED AT A LATER DATE. | | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE RISER FOR HDP AND PANEL | | SCHEDULE FOR HDP. RISER SHOWS 1000AMPS AND THE PANEL | | SHOWS 1200AMPS. | | (THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED IF THIS WAS THE ONLY | | COMMENT). | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE DUPLICATE PERMIT APPLICATION | | SUBMITTED ON MAY 03, 2007 IS IN FACT A COLOR PHOTO-COPY | | AND DOES NOT CONTAIN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE OF THE | | QUALIFIER/AUTHORIZED AGENT OR ORIGINAL NOTARY | | SIGNATURE. PLEASE KNOW THAT THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST | | ACCOMPANY PLANS WHEN RESUBMITTED AND APPLIED FOR | | PERMIT. PLEASE SEE THAT THE SIGNATURES FOR THE | | QUALIFIER /AUTHORIZED AGENT MUST BE ORIGINAL. | | THIS PHOTO-COPIED APPLICATION HAS BEEN STAMPED *VOID*. | | PLEASE SEE OTHER PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED IS DATED | | OCT 07? | | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL OF THESE ITEMS AND SUBMIT ONLY | | ONE APPLICATION. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
Time |
12:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-04 |
Time |
20:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-05 12:39:23 | ******* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ****** | | | | *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW | | COMMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN PLANS AND NEW INFORMATION | | AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS. | | | | **** IMPORTANT**** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A *NO*, *OK* OR *NO/OK*. | | | | A) A, NO WILL CONTAIN A FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY | | THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE | | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE BELOW WITH **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE | | #1** | | | | B) A, OK, WILL HAVE NO COMMENTS EXCEPT PERHAPS A | | REFERENCE TO SEE ** NEW NOTES*. THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | NOTE WILL BE REMOVED. | | | | C) A, NO/OK, WILL HAVE FURTHER EXPLANATION AS PART OF | | THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL. | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WILL BE NOTED **PREVIOUS | | REVIEW NOTE #1** | | | | D) NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END AND LABELED ** | | NEW NOTES ** | | | | | | | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE COMMENTS BELOW DO NO PERTAIN | | TO JLRD ENGINEERING AND ARE BEING NOTED AT THIS TIME. | | | | 1) NOTE: OK, ADDRESS IS TO BE REVISED IN OUR SYSTEM | | | | 2) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE SHEET 2OF 2 DOES NOT CONTAIN | | THE SAME SIGNATURE AS SHEETS 1 OR 3 AND IS ALSO NOT | | DATED. PLEASE SEE THE SIGNATURE IS COMPLETELY | | DIFFERENT. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE SOME SURVEY/ SITE SHEETS ARE NOT SIGNED AND | | SEALED. SEEMS SOME WERE MISSED. FS 472.025 | | | | 3) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE MOST WAS DONE, HOWEVER PLEASE | | SEE THERE IS ONE OR TWO SHEETS WHICH ONLY CONTAIN A | | SIGNATURE AND ARE NOT SEALED. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** | | PLEASE SEE "C" SHEETS, ARE ALSO NOT SIGNED, DATED OR | | SEALED. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM ENGINEERING REVIEWER. | | FS 481/471 | | | | 4) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE ATTACHED TEXT PULLED FROM THE | | FAC. | | *61G1-16.002 DESCRIPTION OF SEAL. | | (1) THE SEAL SHALL CONTAIN THE NAME OF ONLY ONE | | ARCHITECT OR INTERIOR DESIGNER AND THE REGISTRATION | | NUMBER; THE SEAL OF THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE CIRCULAR, | | AND THE SEAL OF THE INTERIOR DESIGNER SHALL BE | | HEXAGONAL. BOTH SEALS SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 2" IN | | DIAMETER WITH TWO CIRCULAR LINES BETWEEN WHICH LINES | | SHALL APPEAR, AT THE TOP, THE WORDS ?STATE OF FLORIDA? | | AND AT THE BOTTOM THE WORDS ?REGISTERED ARCHITECT? OR | | ?LICENSED INTERIOR DESIGNER,? WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE. | | (2) ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO IS BOTH A REGISTERED ARCHITECT | | AND A LICENSED INTERIOR DESIGNER MUST USE A SEAL WHICH | | CONTAINS BOTH THE ARCHITECT AND INTERIOR DESIGN | | REGISTRATION NUMBERS, IN SUCH A MANNER: | | | | THIS MAY HAVE ONLY BEEN COMMENTED ON BY THIS REVIEWER, | | HOWEVER IT IS STILL REQUIRED EVEN IF COMMENT IS NOT | | MADE BY ANY OTHER TRADE. | | | | | | * PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1* | | PLEASE SEE MINIMUM SIZE SEAL REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPE | | ARCHITECT PER FAC 61G1-16.002. *THIS IS ONLY NOTED BY | | THIS REVIEWER* | | | | 5) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER SEE COMMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | 6) NOTE: OK. | | | | 7) NOTE: OK. | | | | 8) NOTE: OK. | | | | 9) NOTE: OK. | | | | 10) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE PARTS OF THIS COMMENT HAVE | | BEEN ADDRESSED HOWEVER FURTHER INFORMATION IS STILL | | NEEDED. | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE NOTES FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | STILL ALSO APPLY. | | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL MAXIMUM OVER RIDE TIMES FOR DEVICES | | AS SET-FORTH IN THE FBC. PLEASE SEE THAT OC TYPE | | DEVICES ARE A MAXIMUM OF 30MINS AND TIMER TYPE OVER | | RIDES ARE 4HRS (AS STATED). | | PLEASE SEE THAT SWITCH SYMBOLS ON PLANS WHICH CORRELATE | | WITH SYMBOL LEGEND LENDS TO STANDARD DEVICE | | DESIGNATIONS WHICH THESE DEVICES WOULD NOT COORDINATE | | WITH THE PROPOSED SYSTEM. PLEASE SEE THAT THE NEW | | SYSTEM AND LOCATION OF THE OC DEVICES AND CORRECT | | COVERAGE IS STILL IN QUESTION. | | PLEASE SEE SOME ROOMS WHICH DO NOT INDICATE ANY DEVICES | | AND/OR SOME ROOMS WHICH INDICATE TWO *CEILING DEVICES?* | | WHICH SEEM TO BE LOCATED ON A WALL IN THE SAME LOCATION | | OF THE (CONFERENCE ROOM) ETC. | | PLEASE SEE ALL OVER THE OTHER SWITCHES IN LARGE OPEN | | AREAS ARE NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME. | | PLEASE SEE LIMITS ON THE SPACE AND SQUARE FEET OF | | CONTROL.. | | PLEASE SEE THE ALL ENTRANCES TO A SPACE/AREA SHALL | | CONTAIN AN OVER RIDE DEVICE OF SOME TYPE TO CONTROL | | LIGHTING FOR INGRESS INTO SPACE. THIS CONTROL IS | | REQUIRED TO BE READILY ACCESSIBLE AT THOSE ENTRANCES. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CHAPTER 13. | | A) PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, AND .1.3. | | B) PLEASE SHOW A DETAILED SYSTEM WHICH IS REQUIRED. C) | | PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULING OF SYSTEM. | | D) PLEASE PROVIDE ALL OVER RIDE DEVICES AT THE | | LOCATIONS FOR THE OCCUPANTS TO OVER RIDE SYSTEM, THESE | | DEVICES ARE REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED SO THE OCCUPANT CAN | | VISUALLY SEE THE LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED. | | E) PLEASE PROVIDE ALL TIMES FOR OVER RIDE DEVICES. | | (30MINS MAX FOR OCC SENSOR TYPE DEVICES AND 4HRS MAX | | FOR TIMER TYPE DEVICES). | | F) PLEASE SEE ALL SPACES, AND ROOMS WHICH CONTAIN FLOOR | | TO CEILING HEIGHT PARTITIONS SHALL ALL CONTAIN OVER | | RIDE DEVICES OF SOME SORT WHICH WILL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT | | OFF LIGHTING ON THOSE AREAS. (OFFICES, STORAGE ROOMS, | | CONFERENCE ROOMS, ETC) | | G) PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.1.A, IF USING | | METHOD "A", PLEASE SEE AS SUBMITTED ALL ARE SHOWN A | | MANUAL ON/OFF, WHICH WOULD CHANGE TO AUTO. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 13-415.2 | | H) PLEASE SEE AREAS GREATER THAN 10K SQ FT. | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, PLEASE SEE AREAS LARGER THAN 25K SQ | | FT 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 | | | | 11) NOTE: OK. | | | | 12) NOTE: OK. SEE NEW NOTES. | | | | 13) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE GFP PROTECTION IS NOW BEING | | SHOWN ON THE HDP WHICH INDICATES A MCB; HOWEVER THE GFP | | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED AT THE SERVICE ENTRANCE MAIN. | | 230.95, 240.13. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE HDP IS BEING SHOWN ON SCHEDULE WITH "GFI" | | PROTECTION, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE 240.13, 230.95, THIS | | WOULD BE "GF" PROTECTION AS "GFI" IS FOR PERSONNEL | | PROTECTION. | | | | 14) NOTE: OK. | | | | 15) NOTE: OK. | | | | ** NEW NOTES ** | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AN EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR | | IS NOT SHOWN FROM THE NEW MAIN TO THE MCB HDP. 250.6, | | 250.24B, 250.110, 250.122 | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2007-02-05 06:58:41 | 2007-02-05 06:58:41 | | REVIEW IN PROGRESS | 2007-02-04 20:02:21 | 2007-02-04 20:02:21 | | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-11-05 |
Time |
18:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-11-05 |
Time |
16:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-11-05 18:34:24 | *** UNSAT *** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE COMMENTS BELOW DO NO PERTAIN | | TO JLRD ENGINEERING AND ARE BEING NOTED AT THIS TIME. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ADDRESS ON PLANS STATES 2700 NORTH | | MILITARY TRAIL, YET PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM THE | | ADDRESSING REVIEWER. | | PLEASE KNOW ONCE AN ADDRESS IS OBTAINED AND FINALIZED | | PLEASE BE SURE TO PLACE ON ALL TITLE BLOCKS AS | | REQUIRED. | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SOME SURVEY/ SITE SHEETS ARE NOT | | SIGNED AND SEALED. SEEMS SOME WERE MISSED. FS 472.025 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE "C" SHEETS, ARE ALSO NOT SIGNED, | | DATED OR SEALED. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM ENGINEERING | | REVIEWER. FS 481/471 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MINIMUM SIZE SEAL REQUIRED FOR | | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PER FAC 61G1-16.002. *THIS IS ONLY | | NOTED BY THIS REVIEWER* | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED WILL | | BE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY THE | | RESPONSIBLE DESIGNER ONCE REVISED. PLEASE SEE THE SETS | | SUBMITTED WERE NOT DONE. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE FUTURE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO FBC | | 2004 CHAPTER 13. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AT A | | MINIMUM ARE STATED ON PLANS WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO THE | | DESIGN OF PLANS SUBMITTED. | | 2002 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, 2003 NFPA-101, AND 2004 | | FBC. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ACCESS TO THE MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM | | TO SHUT OFF POWER IN AN EMERGENCY AS SHOWN IS NOT | | PERMITTED. PLEASE SEE ACCESS TO THE MAIN ELECTRICAL | | ROOM IS MOST IMPORTANT IF THE FIRE DEPT PERSONNEL ARE | | IN NEED OF SHUTTING DOWN POWER. | | PLEASE SEE ONCE OBTAINING ENTRANCE INTO THE BUILDING | | WHICH COULD BE LOCKED, PLEASE SEE PLANS SHOW A TRAVEL | | DISTANCE DOWN A HALLWAY, THROUGH ANOTHER POSSIBLE | | LOCKED DOOR, THROUGH A STORAGE ROOM AND ANOTHER LOCKED | | DOOR. | | PLEASE KNOW THE SCENARIO AS SHOWN IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO | | THIS AHJ AND IS A LIFE SAFETY ISSUE TO THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE 100, 230.70, 230.71. | | IT IS OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE TO PROVIDE ACCESS | | DIRECTLY FROM THE OUTSIDE WITH A POSSIBLE "KNOX BOX" | | WILL BE REQUIRED. THIS LOCATION OF A DOOR POSSIBLY AT | | THE REAR OF BLDG AND "KNOX BOX" LOCATION SHALL BE | | DETERMINED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE IN COORDINATION | | WITH THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR | | LIGHT POLES WITH THE (EPA) EFFECTIVE PROJECTED AREA OF | | THE LIGHT FIXTURES FIGURED IN WITH THE CALCULATIONS. | | THESE ARE REQUIRED TO BE DONE AT THIS TIME BY A FLORIDA | | REGISTERED PE. PLEASE KNOW THIS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE | | STRUCTURAL REVIEWER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE 140MPH 3SEC | | GUST/ 120 SUSTAINED WIND LOADS. | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS FOR | | THE BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR SITE LIGHTING. | | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE FOR A WORST CASE FOR OTHER BRANCH | | CIRCUITS. | | 13-413.1.ABC.1.2 | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CHAPTER 13. | | A) PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, AND .1.3. | | B) PLEASE SHOW A DETAILED SYSTEM WHICH IS REQUIRED. C) | | PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULING OF SYSTEM. | | D) PLEASE PROVIDE ALL OVER RIDE DEVICES AT THE | | LOCATIONS FOR THE OCCUPANTS TO OVER RIDE SYSTEM, THESE | | DEVICES ARE REQUIRED TO BE LOCATED SO THE OCCUPANT CAN | | VISUALLY SEE THE LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED. | | E) PLEASE PROVIDE ALL TIMES FOR OVER RIDE DEVICES. | | (30MINS MAX FOR OCC SENSOR TYPE DEVICES AND 4HRS MAX | | FOR TIMER TYPE DEVICES). | | F) PLEASE SEE ALL SPACES, AND ROOMS WHICH CONTAIN FLOOR | | TO CEILING HEIGHT PARTITIONS SHALL ALL CONTAIN OVER | | RIDE DEVICES OF SOME SORT WHICH WILL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT | | OFF LIGHTING ON THOSE AREAS. (OFFICES, STORAGE ROOMS, | | CONFERENCE ROOMS, ETC) | | G) PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.1.A, IF USING | | METHOD "A", PLEASE SEE AS SUBMITTED ALL ARE SHOWN A | | MANUAL ON/OFF, WHICH WOULD CHANGE TO AUTO. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 13-415.2 | | H) PLEASE SEE AREAS GREATER THAN 10K SQ FT. | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.2, PLEASE SEE AREAS LARGER THAN 25K SQ | | FT 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE | | ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS FOR THE SD TRANSFORMERS.250.30, | | 250.20, 250.66 | | PLEASE SHOW. | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ONSITE CUSTOMER OWNED | | 13.2KV SYSTEM? HOW IS THIS NOT FPL / UTILITY POWER FROM | | SOMEWHERE ARE DOWN THE LINE? | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | IF INDEED, THIS IS AN ADDITIONAL SD SYSTEM, PLEASE | | DETAIL THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE. | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPEC/CUT SHEETS FOR THIS | | TRANSFORMER UNIT WHICH INDICATES OCP AND A | | TRANSFER/SWITCH? IS THIS INSIDE OR OUTSIDE THIS | | TRANSFORMER? | | PLEASE SEE THIS TRANSFORMER SEEMS TO ALSO INDICATE A | | GROUND? IS THIS BONDED AT THIS LOCATION AND THEN BONDED | | AGAIN AT THE HDP? 250.6, 250.24B. | | 230.70, 230.76, 230.79, 250.30, ETC | | PLEASE KNOW AT THIS POINT THERE ARE MANY QUESTIONS ON | | THIS SYSTEM AS SHOWN? | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE HDP IS BEING SHOWN ON SCHEDULE | | WITH "GFI" PROTECTION, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE 240.13, | | 230.95, THIS WOULD BE "GF" PROTECTION AS "GFI" IS FOR | | PERSONNEL PROTECTION. | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT LOAD CALCULATIONS, LOAD | | SUMMARY. PLEASE SEE NEC 220., 220.3, 220.10, 220.11, | | 220.13 ETC. | | PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125%, | | 215.3, 230.42. | | FBC ADMIN SECT 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 AS ADOPTED BY THE | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ALL DEVICE LEVELS FOR ADA | | REQUIREMENTS IN CHAPTER 11 OF THE 2004 FBC. | | PLEASE SEE 11-4.28.1, 11-4.28.2, AND 11-4.28.3(4). | | PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM DECIBEL LEVELS AND THE MIN | | OF 75 CANDELAS FOR STROBE/VISUAL DEVICES. PLEASE KNOW | | THIS IS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN NFPA-72 AND WILL BE | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS A "SYSTEM" FOR CHAPTER 13 IS NOT YET | | SUBMITTED, THERE MAY BE FURTHER COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2006-11-05 16:58:25 | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
08:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-06 |
Time |
13:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-06 |
Time |
12:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-06 13:20:03 | PLEASE PROVIDE FOLLOWING INFO: | | | | 1. DUMPSTER LOCATION MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP | | TRUCK. | | OUR RESPONSE: CONSTRUCTION SERVICESINDEPENDENTLY | | REVIEWFROM CITY STAFF'S REVIEW, AS YOU WROTE INYOUR | | LETTER THAT CITY'S STAFF ALREADY PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. | | PLEASE SHOW ON WHAT SHEET,#THE DUMPSTER LOCATION IS. | | | | | | 2. SITE AREA, PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS AREASHOWN ON SHEET | | C1, C2 ARE DIFFRENT FROM SHOWN ON WATER QUALITY | | CALCULATIONS AND SFWMD PERMIT .PLEASE MAKE THEM | | CONSISTENT IN ALL PLACES. OR PLEASE EXPLAIN. | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS, POLLUTION PREVENTION SILT | | FENCE AROUND THE WHOLE SITE, CATCH BASINS,EXISTING LAKE | | ETC.POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,HEIGHT OF THE SILT | | FENCE, ATLEAST 5' OR MORE,TYPE OF CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | ETC., | | OUR RESPONSE: YOU NEED TO SHOW SILT FENCEAROUND WHOLE | | SITE ON THE DRAWING. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-06-22 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-06-22 |
Time |
09:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-22 09:54:43 | PLEASE PROVIDE FOLLOWING INFO: | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS, THE STANDARD NOTES OF CITY | | OF WPB ARE MINIMUM STANDARDS. YOU CAN UPGRADE CITY'S | | STANDARDS BUT, STILL WE WOULD LIKE YOU TO SAY ON THE | | DRAWING THAT YOU WILL MEET MINIMUM CITY'S STANDARDS FOR | | SIDEWALK WIDTH , ITS SLOPE, DRIVEWAY, PARKING, HANDICAP | | PARKING, PAINT ETC. PER CITY CODES OR BETTER APPROVED | | BY THE CITY., MUST MEET PER ADA,,ETC., | | 2.DUMPSTER LOCATION MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP | | TRUCK. | | 3.PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGTHE SITE AREA, YOU ARE | | DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT, PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS | | AREAS, LAKE AREA,PARKING& SIDEWALK AREA, ETC. ON | | DRAWINGS. | | 6. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURES WITH | | ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU | | USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? GARYSHEA, PLEASE SEND ME | | YOUR REVISED WATER QUALITY CALS, FOR 5,10,25,100 YEAR | | FLOOD ALONG WITH FLOOD ZONE TO DETERMINE FIRST FLOOR | | ELEVATION. | | 7. PLEASE SHOW ON PLANS, POLLUTION PREVENTION SILT | | FENCE AROUND THE WHOLE SITE, CATCH BASINS,EXISTING LAKE | | ETC.POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,HEIGHT OF THE SILT | | FENCE, ATLEAST 5' OR MORE,TYPE OF CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | ETC., | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
14:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-16 14:27:51 | PLEASE PROVIDE FOLLOWING INFO: | | | | 1. STANDARD NOTES OF CITY OF WPB ARE MINIMUM STANDARDS. | | YOU CAN UPGRADE CITY'S STANDARDS BUT, STILL WE WOULD | | LIKE YOU TO SAY ON THE DRAWING THAT YOU WILL MEET | | MINIMUM CITY'S STANDARDS FOR SIDEWALK WIDTH , ITS | | SLOPE, DRIVEWAY, PARKING, HANDICAP PARKING, PAINT ETC. | | PER CITY CODES OR BETTER APPROVED BY THE CITY., MUST | | MEET PER ADA,,ETC., | | 2.DUMPSTER LOCATION MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP | | TRUCK. | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT OR MODIFIED | | PERMIT, | | 4. YOU SAID IN YOUR RESPONSE THAT YOU SENT STORM WATER | | CALCULATION TO WINDEL PALMER. WINDEL PALMER DOES NOT | | REVIEW STORM WATER. EITHER MYSELF OR STEVE SARLEY | | REVIEW STORM WATER. I TALKED TO STEVE SARLEY HE DOES | | NOT HAVE STORM WATER CALCULATION FOR THIS PROJECT. | | PLEASE PROVIDE STORM WATER CALCULATIONS FOR WATER | | QUALITY. WHAT CRITERIA YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, | | LIKE 1" OVER ENTIRE SITE OR2.5"CRITERIA, ? | | PERVIOUS AREA, LIKE GREEN, LAKES, ETC,IMPERVIOUS AREA | | CAL., | | 5. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | PROJECT ONLY ? SO, WE CAN CHECK PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS | | CAL. | | 6. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURES WITH | | ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU | | USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? | | 7. POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,HEIGHT OF THE SILT | | FENCE, CLOTHES USED FOR SILT ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT | | FENCE AROUND THE SITE | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2006-11-17 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2006-11-16 |
Time |
18:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-11-17 08:51:17 | PLEASE PROVIDE FOLLOWING INFO: | | 1. SHEA ENG. NEEDS TO SEAL & SIGN ALL CIIVIL DWGSAS | | P.E. | | 2. PLEASE SHOW STANDARDS NOTES OF CITY OF WPB ON | | DRAWINGSFOR SIDEWALK WIDTH , ITS SLOPE, DRIVEWAY, | | PARKING, HANDICAP PARKING, PAINTPER CITY CODES ETC.,, | | MUST MEET PER ADA,,ETC., | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | 4. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD , | | SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FL BLDG CODE, PLEASE SHOW | | ON THE DRAWINGS. | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT, | | 6.PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, WHAT CRITERIA | | YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" OVER ENTIRE SITE | | OR2.5"CRITERIA, ?PERVIOUS AREA, LIKE GREEN, | | LAKES, ETC,IMPERVIOUS AREA CAL., | | 7. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | PROJECT ONLY ? SO, WE CAN CHECK PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS | | CAL. | | 8. HOW YOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN YOUR | | SITE? ITS DETAILS.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES | | AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE BEST PIPE TO | | CONNECT WITH THE STORM WATERFROM ALL OTHER STORM | | WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL | | STRUCTURES WITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? | | 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT FENCE AROUND THE SITE | | 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED | | 11. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-29 |
Time |
15:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-29 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-29 15:44:34 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | PLAN SHEETS C8, C10, L1, A0.10, A2.2, FP.02 THRU FP.05, | | E1.1, E1.2, E1.3, E1.7, E1.8, E1.9, AND E2.1 WERE | | FIRE-STAMPED ON 05/15/2008;SHEET FP.01 STAMPED, | | INITIALED, AND DATED AS THE ENGINEER OF RECORD REDLINED | | COMMENTS PERTAINING TO THE BELOW COMMENTS: | | | | 1.ADDITIONAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS #1 BE CHANGED TO | | READ WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE, NOT PALM BEACH COUNTY | | FIRE RESCUE. | | | | 2.ELIMINATE FLOW TEST DATA CONDUCTED BY PALM BEACH | | COUNTY FIRE RESCUE.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE FLOW | | TEST DATA TO BE DETERMINED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE | | PREVENTION BUREAU. | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-05-15 |
Time |
12:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-15 13:19:44 | ****UNSAT***** | | | | PLAN SHEETS C8, C10, L1, A0.10, A2.2, FP.02 THRU FP.05, | | E1.1, E1.2, E1.3, E1.7, E1.8, E1.9, AND E2.1 WERE | | STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED;FIRE PLAN REVIEW WILL | | BE APPROVED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FOLLOWING | | CORRECTIONS BE MADE TO SHEET FP.01 | | | | 1.ADDITIONAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS #1 BE CHANGED TO | | READ WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE, NOT PALM BEACH COUNTY | | FIRE RESCUE. | | | | 2.ELIMINATE FLOW TEST DATA CONDUCTED BY PALM BEACH | | COUNTY FIRE RESCUE.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE FLOW | | TEST DATA TO BE DETERMINED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE | | PREVENTION BUREAU. | | | | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THIS IS THE SIXTH TIME THAT THIS | | ITEM BE ADDRESSED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
14:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
13:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-04 13:37:58 | ****PROVISO***** | | | | THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE | | OTHER REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED,AND WITH THE | | UNDERSTANDING THAT THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS BE MADE TO | | SHEET FP.01 | | | | 1.ADDITIONAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS #1 BE CHANGED TO | | READ WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE, NOT PALM BEACH COUNTY | | FIRE RESCUE. | | | | 2.ELIMINATE FLOW TEST DATA CONDUCTED BY PALM BEACH | | COUNTY FIRE RESCUE.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE FLOW | | TEST DATA TO BE DETERMINED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE | | PREVENTION BUREAU. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
Time |
13:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
Time |
13:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-21 13:20:34 | ****UNSAT***** | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT TAKEN FROM THE 3RD FIRE PLAN | | REVIEW STILL HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | 1.ON SHEET FP.01, UNDER FLOW TEST DATA, WHY WAS DATA | | PROVIDED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FIRE RESCUE IN LIEU OF | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE (AHJ)? | | | | | | *ALL OTHER COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS | | HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.* | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
16:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-07-11 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-11 16:57:23 | ****UNSAT***** | | | | THE COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS | | HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.PLEASE ADDRESS NEW COMMENT. | | | | | | NEW COMMENT | | | | 1.ON SHEET FP.01, UNDER FLOW TEST DATA, WHY WAS DATA | | PROVIDED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY FIRE RESCUE IN LIEU OF | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE (AHJ)? | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
18:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-06 18:50:10 | ****DENIED***** | | | | | | MOST OF THE COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | REVIEW OF 12/14/2006HAVE BEEN SATISFIED WITH THE | | EXCEPTION OF THE FOLLOWING WHICH STILL NEED TO BE | | ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 4.LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT OR INTERFERE WITH | | FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.PROPER CLEARANCES SHALL BE | | MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES.ADD NOTATION TO SHEET L-1 | | | | | | 9.SHOW/DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING | | ON THE PROPER ELEVATION.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, | | NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND 1" IN | | WIDTH CONTRASTING TO THEIR BACKGROUND.ALTHOUGH THE | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS IS ON A MONUMENT SIGN OR MARQUEE, | | HOWEVER, AS PER WPB CODE A NUMERICAL ADDRESS IS STILL | | REQUIRED ON THE BUILDING. DISPLAY ON THE APPROPIATE | | EXTERIOR ELEVATION | | | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE LAYOUT OF THE (A.) FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM | | AND (B.) FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FOR THE BUILDING.(A.)AS | | PER AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE,CHAPTER 1, | | ADMINISTRATION, 2004 EDITION 106.3.5.1.1(5) CITY | | AMENDMENTS, FIRE SPRINKLER SCHEMATIC/LAYOUT REQUIRED | | FOR PLAN REVIEW(B.)PROVIDE A SCHEMATIC/LAYOUT OF | | THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM INDEPENDENT OF THE ELECTRICAL | | PLANS | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A.WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-12-14 |
Time |
19:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-12-14 |
Time |
19:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-12-14 20:44:09 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | | | 1.ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF 20 | | FT AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 13FT 6IN. | | THE ROADS SHALL ALSO BE DESIGNED AND MAINTAINED TO | | SUPPORT 32 TONS OF FIRE APPARATUS. | | | | 2. WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE | | PROVIDED, THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN | | SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WORK. | | | | 3.CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL NOT INTERFERE OR | | HINDER EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY OR VICINITY | | THEROF. | | | | 4.LANSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT OR INTERFERE WITH | | FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT.PROPER CLEARANCES SHALL BE | | MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. | | | | 5.PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT PANIC HARDWARE REQUIRED | | ON ALL EXIT DOORS THAT HAVE AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR | | MORE PERSONS TRAVELING THROUGH THEM. | | | | 6.FIRE EXTINGUISHERS TO BE 2A:10 BC RATED. | | | | 7.THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FIRE | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF BEING | | MONITORED BY A LICENSED CENTRAL STATION APPROVED FOR | | CENTRAL STATION SERVICE. | | | | 8.KNOX BOX FOR THE BUILDING WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | 9.SHOW/DISPLAY THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS OF THE BUILDING | | ON THE PROPER ELEVATION.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, | | NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND 1" IN | | WIDTH CONTRASTING TO THEIR BACKGROUND. | | | | 10. FIRE DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 80. | | | | 11. PROVIDE LAYOUT OF THE FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM | | SYSTEM FOR THE BUILDING.A SEPARATE PERMIT AND PLAN | | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH. | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A.WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-15 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-15 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-15 15:50:08 | TO "COMM" BD#29-PLANS ON RACK/2 ROLLS/1 BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-29 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-29 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-29 10:11:45 | TO "COMM" BD#6/PLANS ON RACK/1 ROLL AND 1 BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
08:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-05 11:07:13 | TO"COMM" BD#24/PLANS ON RACK/1 ROLL, BINDERS AND BOOKS | 2007-10-04 08:27:20 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
Time |
09:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-29 08:38:50 | TO "COMM" BD#47/PLANS ON RACK--3 ROLLS AND PAPERWORK | 2007-05-23 09:40:17 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-01-30 10:55:29 | TO "COMM" BD#44/PLANS ON RACK--1 ROLL AND 5 BOXES | 2007-01-19 16:42:16 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-12-14 |
Time |
19:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2006-10-26 |
Time |
15:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-31 09:47:19 | TO "COMM" BD#17--PLANS ON RACK/2 ROLLS AND 3 BOOKS | 2006-10-26 15:12:33 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-06-02 |
Time |
15:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-06-02 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
Time |
14:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-02-28 |
Time |
15:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-01 14:47:53 | -----------------2ND REVIEW-------------- | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER | | RESPONSES: | | | | COMMENT #1: THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC,M 307.2.1 AND | | 307.2.2 HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. HOWEVER, THE ISSUE OF | | AUXILIARY AND SECONDARY DRAIN SYSTEMS (FBC,M 307.2.3) | | HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED. THERE ARE NO | | PROVISIONS FOR THE RTU'S, WHICH HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO | | OVERFLOW INTO THE BUILDING SHOULD THE PRIMARY DRAIN | | CEASE TO FUNCTION. THERE IS ALSO NO INDICATION THAT THE | | FLOOR IN STORAGE ROOMS 117 AND 129 ARE DESIGNED IN SUCH | | A WAY AS TO ENSURE THAT CONDENSATE OVERFLOW WILL BE | | DIRECTED ONLY IN THE DIRECTION OF THE FLOOR DRAIN, THUS | | PREVENTING CONDENSATE OVERFLOW FROM DAMAGING ANY | | BUILDING COMPONENTS. THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER LEVEL | | DETECTION DEVICE IN THE PRIMARY PAN OF THE AHUS AND THE | | RTUS WOULD BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 307.2.3(2). | | | | COMMENT #2: PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS THAT THE RTU AND | | ACCU ROOF ATTACHMENTS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO MEET THE | | 140MPH WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS OF FBC CHAPTER 16. | | | | COMMENT #3: OK | | | | COMMENT #4: ADDRESSED IN COMMENT #2. | | | | COMMENT #5: OK |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2006-11-04 |
Time |
14:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
Time |
19:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-11-04 14:14:06 | ------------------DENIED------------------- | | | | FBC 2004 | | FBC,M 2004 | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ALL CONDENSATE DISPOSAL TO BE IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 307.2.1 THROUGH 307.2.3 AND FBC | | 1503.6 | | | | 2. PG M3.1 DETAIL 4: MINIMUM CLEARANCE UNDER ROOFTOP | | EQUIPMENT IS TO BE DETERMINED BY FBC TABLE 1509.7. | | ALSO, PLEASE INDICATE WHETHER ATTACHMENTS ARE IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS OF | | FBC CHAPTER 16. | | | | 3. PG M3.1 DETAIL 2: THE MINIMUM ALLOWED WIDTH OF | | SUPPORTS FOR FLEXIBLE DUCT IS 1.5" PER FBC,M | | 603.5.6.6(6) | | | | 4. PG M3.2 DETAIL 1: NO STRUCTURAL DETAIL FOR CURB | | ATTACHMENT COULD BE LOCATED IN THIS SET OF PLANS. | | | | NOTE: OFFICES 107,109,143 AND 144 ARE NOT DESIGNED TO | | MEET THE BALANCED RETURN EXCEPTIONS OF FBC,M 601.4. A | | FIELD TEST WILL BE REQUIRED AT FINAL INSPECTION TO SHOW | | THESE ROOMS MEET THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PRESSURE | | DIFFERENTIAL OF 0.01" WC (2.5 PASCALS) | | | | REVIEWED BY: | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6734 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
Time |
08:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
Time |
08:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-11 09:02:55 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1. OK | | | | 2. SHT 2 0F 2 SHALL BE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED AS | | REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA STATUTES AND SECTION 106.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHT 202 IS NOT SIGNED, SEALED, | | DATED AS REQUIRED. | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SEAL, SIGNATURE NOT DATED. | | THE DATE THE SEAL IS AFFIXED SHALL BE INDICATED BELOW | | THE SIGNATURE. ALSO SEE SHT 1 OF 2 FOR MISSING DATE ON | | SEAL. | | | | 3. OK | | 4. OK | | 5. OK | | 6. OK | | 7. OK | | 8. OK | | 9.OK | | 10. OK | | 11. OK | | | | 12. SHTS A4.10 & A4.11 SHOW THE FOLLOWING ACCESSIBLE | | REQUIREMENTS: | | FOR THE W/C'S: | | A. OK | | B. OK | | C. OK | | FOR THE STALLS: | | A. OK | | FOR THE URINALS: | | A. OK | | B. OK | | FOR THE LAVS: | | A. 11-4.19.2 HEIGHT & CLEARANCES | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT ALL LAVS SHALL BE 2'10" HIGH | | AND SHALL HAVE A KNEE CLEARANCE OF 2'9". SHOW ON ALL | | LAVS. | | ******NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED | | B. OK | | C. OK | | FOR THE SHOWERS: | | A. 11-4.21.2 SIZE & CLEARANCES | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SHOWERS SHALL BE 36"X36". | | SHOWERS ARE SHOWN AS 38"X38". | | ******NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED | | B. OK | | C. OK | | D. OK | | E. OK | | | | 13. SHT A4.23 FINISH SCHEDULE. INDICATE HOW PAINTED GWB | | COMPLIES WITH THE "HARD" SURFACE REQUIRED IN SECTION | | 1210.2. THE REQUIREMENT IS FOR A SMOOTH, HARD, | | NONABSORBENT SURFACE. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT "EPOXY PAINT" DOES NOT COMPLY | | WITH THE REQUIREMENT. | | ******NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED | | | | 14. OK | | 15. OK | | 16. OK | | 17. OK | | 18. OK | | 19. OK | | 20. OK | | 21. OK | | 22. OK | | 23. OK | | 24. OK | | 25. OK | | | | **********NEW COMMENT********** | | | | 1B. SEE ATTACHED SHEET CONCERNING THE DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL AND FLORIDA STATUTE 533.80(2)(B). THIS IS | | GIVEN AS A ONE TIME NOTICE ONLY. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. SUBMITTING ONE SET | | OF PLANS FROM THIS REVIEW SEPARATELY, FOR COMPARISON, | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT ALSO. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | ******NO RESPONSE/NOT ADDRESSED | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
17:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
17:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-15 18:08:05 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1. OK | | | | 2. SHT 2 0F 2 SHALL BE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED AS | | REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA STATUTES AND SECTION 106.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SHT 202 IS NOT SIGNED, SEALED, | | DATED AS REQUIRED. | | | | 3. OK | | 4. OK | | 5. OK | | 6. OK | | 7. OK | | | | 8. SHT A2.2 DETAIL 2/A2.2 DOES NOT REFLECT THE LOWER | | ROOF PLAN SHOWN ON SHT A1.30. THE LOWER ROOF PLAN | | INDICATES 2 10" DIA. SCUPPERS ON THE EAST ELEVATION. | | THE DETAIL SHOWS 1 RECTANGULAR SCUPPER. PLEASE | | CORRELATE THE DETAIL & ROOF PLAN INFORMATION. SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT ELEVATION 2/A2.2 NOW SHOWS 2 | | RECTANGLES. | | | | 9.OK | | 10. OK | | 11. OK | | | | 12. SHTS A4.10 & A4.11 SHOW THE FOLLOWING ACCESSIBLE | | REQUIREMENTS: | | FOR THE W/C'S: | | A. OK | | B. OK | | C. OK | | FOR THE STALLS: | | A. OK | | FOR THE URINALS: | | A. OK | | B. OK | | FOR THE LAVS: | | A. 11-4.19.2 HEIGHT & CLEARANCES | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT ALL LAVS SHALL BE 2'10" HIGH | | AND SHALL HAVE A KNEE CLEARANCE OF 2'9". SHOW ON ALL | | LAVS. | | B. OK | | C. OK | | FOR THE SHOWERS: | | A. 11-4.21.2 SIZE & CLEARANCES | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SHOWERS SHALL BE 36"X36". | | SHOWERS ARE SHOWN AS 38"X38". | | B. OK | | C. OK | | D. OK | | E. OK | | | | 13. SHT A4.23 FINISH SCHEDULE. INDICATE HOW PAINTED GWB | | COMPLIES WITH THE "HARD" SURFACE REQUIRED IN SECTION | | 1210.2. THE REQUIREMENT IS FOR A SMOOTH, HARD, | | NONABSORBENT SURFACE. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT "EPOXY PAINT" DOES NOT COMPLY | | WITH THE REQUIREMENT. | | | | 14. OK | | 15. OK | | 16. OK | | | | 17. SHT P1.1 RWL TO BE 10" @ 10,666SF. TABLE 1106.3. - | | 10" @15,566SF TO READ 16,566SF. RECHECK ADDITION. | | SECTION 106.1.1. - 15" @28,862SF TO READ 26,862SF. | | PLEASE RECHECK ADDITION. SECTION 106.1.1. ****RESPONSE | | NOTED, BUT ADDITION NOT CORRECT. PLEASE RECHECK | | ADDITION OF AREA AND VERTICAL WALL CONTRIBUTION, AND | | TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AS IT ACCUMULATES IN THE SYSTEM. | | | | 18. OK | | 19. OK | | 20. OK | | 21. OK | | | | 22. SHT P2-1 SANITARY RISER 3R/P2-1 NO P1 FIXTURE SHOWN | | & SHOWER IS INDICATED AS A FLOOR DRAIN. PLEASE | | CORRELATE RISER AND FLOOR PLAN. SECTION 106.1.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT NOW A FIXTURE P-1 IS MISSING | | FROM THE RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | 23. OK | | 24. OK | | | | 25. SHT P2-2 STORM RISER DIAGRAM. 15" @ 28,862SF TO | | READ 15" 26,862SF. PLEASE CHECK ADDITION. SECTION | | 106.1.1. - 10" @ 15,566SF TO READ 10" 16,566SF. - 8" @ | | 10,666SF IS REQUIRED TO BE 10" ON THE HORIZONTAL ABOVE | | AND BELOW RISER. TABLE 1106.3. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT ADDITION STILL INCORRECT. | | PLEASE RECHECK ALL ADDITION IN SYSTEM. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. SUBMITTING ONE SET | | OF PLANS FROM THIS REVIEW SEPARATELY, FOR COMPARISON, | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT ALSO. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-12-19 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-12-14 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-12-19 12:58:24 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | | | 1. PER ADDRESSING, THE ADDRESS FOR THE STILES-NICHOLSON | | CENTER IS 2395 NORTHWOOD UNIVERSITY DRIVE. ALL SHEETS | | WITH AN ADDRESS IN THE TITLE BLOCK SHALL BE CORRECTED, | | INCLUDING THE FRONT COVER SHEET. THE ADDRESS SHALL BE | | CORRECTED ON THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT AS WELL. | | | | 2. SHT 2 0F 2 SHALL BE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED AS | | REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA STATUTES AND SECTION 106.1. | | | | 3. ALL CIVIL SHEETS SHALL BE SIGNED, SEALED, AND DATED | | AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA STATUTES AND SECTION 106.1. | | | | 4. SHT C8 METER ASSEMBLY DETAIL INDICATES A 2" RPZV | | BACKFLOW WITH A 2-1/2" WATER SERVICE. PER TABLE | | 603.1(D), ALL SECONDARY BACKFLOWS AND ASSEMBLIES SHALL | | BE AT LEAST THE SAME SIZE AS THE LINE IN WHICH THEY ARE | | INSTALLED. A 2-1/2" BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED. | | | | 5. SHTS L1, L2, I1, & I2. THE FIRM NAME, ADDRESS & | | PHONE NUMBER ARE REQUIRED IN THE TITLE BLOCK. FAC | | 61G1-16.004(1) & FS 481.306. | | | | 6. SHT A0.10 - OCCUPANCY IS INDICATED AS MIXED, A3 & B. | | SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES FOR EACH | | OCCUPANCY PER TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. INDICATE THE | | SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH OCCUPANCY. INDICATE COMPLIANCE | | WITH SECTION 403.1.1 POTTY PARITY FOR THE A3 | | OCCUPANCY. | | | | 7. SHT A1.30 SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR PRIMARY AND | | SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS. SHOW THE SQUARE FOOT AREA OF | | EACH ROOF DRAIN, WITH 1/2 AREA OF ALL VERTICAL WALLS | | ADDED, AS WELL AS ANY ROOF AREA THAT DRAINS ONTO THE | | ROOF AREAS FROM ABOVE IN THE CALCULATIONS. SECTIONS | | 1106 & 1107 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | | | 8. SHT A2.2 DETAIL 2/A2.2 DOES NOT REFLECT THE LOWER | | ROOF PLAN SHOWN ON SHT A1.30. THE LOWER ROOF PLAN | | INDICATES 2 10" DIA. SCUPPERS ON THE EAST ELEVATION. | | THE DETAIL SHOWS 1 RECTANGULAR SCUPPER. PLEASE | | CORRELATE THE DETAIL & ROOF PLAN INFORMATION. SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | | | 9. SHT A4.01 DETAIL 1. THE ACCESSIBLE STALLS DO NOT | | MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENT FOR NEW STALLS. A LAV IS | | REQUIRED IN THE ACCESSIBLE STALL. PLEASE SEE SECTION | | 11-4.17.3 EXCEPTION(1)(2) AND FIG. 11-30(E). (ALSO | | CORRECT STALL CONDITION ON SHEETS A0.10, A1.10, A1.11, | | A1.13, AND ANY RELEVANT PLUMBING SHEETS. | | | | 10. SHT A4.01 BOYS (114 - 138) & GIRLS (115 - 137) | | TOILET ROOMS, THE TURNING AREA SHALL BE SHOWN IN THE | | TOILET ROOM, NOT THE ACCESSIBLE STALL. SECTION | | 11-4.22.3. | | | | 11. SHT A4.01 SHOW THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR THE | | ACCESSIBLE URINALS IN TOILET ROOMS 114 & 138 PER | | SECTION 11-4.18.3. | | | | 12. SHTS A4.10 & A4.11 SHOW THE FOLLOWING ACCESSIBLE | | REQUIREMENTS: | | FOR THE W/C'S: | | A. 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | B. 11-4.16.3 HEIGHT | | C. 11-4.16.6 DISPENSERS | | FOR THE STALLS: | | A. 11-4.17.3 SIZE & ARRANGEMENT (EXCEPTION NEW CONST. | | (1)(2)) & FIG. 11-30E. | | FOR THE URINALS: | | A. 11-4.18.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | B. 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS | | FOR THE LAVS: | | A. 11-4.19.2 HEIGHT & CLEARANCES | | B. 11-4.19.4 EXPOSED PIPES & SURFACES | | C. 11-4.19.5 FAUCETS | | FOR THE SHOWERS: | | A. 11-4.21.2 SIZE & CLEARANCES | | B. 11-4.21.3 SEAT | | C. 11-4.21.4 GRAB BARS | | D. 11-4.21.5 CONTROLS | | E. 11-4.21.6 SHOWER UNIT | | | | 13. SHT A4.23 FINISH SCHEDULE. INDICATE HOW PAINTED GWB | | COMPLIES WITH THE "HARD" SURFACE REQUIRED IN SECTION | | 1210.2. THE REQUIREMENT IS FOR A SMOOTH, HARD, | | NONABSORBENT SURFACE. | | | | 14. SHT P0.1 WATER HEATER "A" DETAIL THERMAL EXPANSION | | CONTROL IS REQUIRED BY SECTION 607.3.2. INDICATE | | METHOD. | | | | 15. SHT P0.1 PLUMBING NOTES #5. AIR CHAMBERS ARE NOT | | APPROVED. PLEASE DELETE REFERENCE. SECTION 604.9 & | | PDI-WH 201. | | | | 16. SHT P1.1 SANT. LINE TO WASH MACHINE BOX SHALL BE 3" | | PER SECTION 406.3. | | | | 17. SHT P1.1 RWL TO BE 10" @ 10,666SF. TABLE 1106.3. - | | 10" @15,566SF TO READ 16,566SF. RECHECK ADDITION. | | SECTION 106.1.1. - 15" @28,862SF TO READ 26,862SF. | | PLEASE RECHECK ADDITION. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 18. SHTSP1.2 & P1.3.8" RWL 10,666SF TO BE 10" ON | | THE HORIZONTAL BLDG DRAIN AND THE HORIZONTAL BRANCH | | DRAIN PRIOR TO A DOWNSTREAM OF RWL. TABLE 1106.3. | | | | 19. SHT P2.1 RISER 2R/P2-1 DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR | | PLAN. NO PIPING TO HOSE BIBBS SHOWN AND NO PIPING TO | | THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHOWN. PLEASE CORRELATE RISER & | | FLOOR PLAN. INDICATE "REVERSE FOR TOILET ROOMS 114 & | | 115. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 20. DOMESTIC WATER RISER 11R/P2-1 NO WATER SUPPLY | | PIPING SHOWN TO THE WASH MACHINE CONNECTION BOX. PLEASE | | CORRELATE. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 21. SHT P2-1 SANITARY RISER 10R/P2-1 DRY HORIZONTAL | | VENTS ARE NOT APPROVED PER SECTIONS 905.3 & 905.4. (SEE | | RED LINE EXAMPLE ON SHEET TO CORRECT CODE VIOLATION. | | | | 22. SHT P2-1 SANITARY RISER 3R/P2-1 NO P1 FIXTURE SHOWN | | & SHOWER IS INDICATED AS A FLOOR DRAIN. PLEASE | | CORRELATE RISER AND FLOOR PLAN. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 23. SHT P2-1 WATER RISER 4R/P2-1 WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS | | SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE FIXTURE IN AN "EFFECTIVE | | RANGE" NOT IN THE CEILING AS SHOWN. PDI-WH 201 AND | | MANUF. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | 24. SHT P2-1 SANITARY WASTE RISER DIAGRAM, 1R/ P2-1 | | INDICATE ON THE PLANS THAT THE RISER IS "REVERSE FOR | | TOILET ROOMS 114 & 115". | | | | 25. SHT P2-2 STORM RISER DIAGRAM. 15" @ 28,862SF TO | | READ 15" 26,862SF. PLEASE CHECK ADDITION. SECTION | | 106.1.1. - 10" @ 15,566SF TO READ 10" 16,566SF. - 8" @ | | 10,666SF IS REQUIRED TO BE 10" ON THE HORIZONTAL ABOVE | | AND BELOW RISER. TABLE 1106.3. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. SUBMITTING ONE SET | | OF PLANS FROM THIS REVIEW SEPARATELY, FOR COMPARISON, | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT ALSO. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
17:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
17:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-29 17:20:44 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. SITE PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRED ON OCTOBER 26, 2008. NEW | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REQUIRED. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-03-05 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-03-04 |
Time |
08:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-05 15:42:42 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-10-23 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-23 11:42:58 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1.PROVISOS WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE RESUBMITTED | | PLANS.CIVIL DRAWINGS STILL SHOW INCORRECT PARKING | | STALL DETAILS.STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS STILL SHOW | | INCORRECT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WALL DETAIL.ALL PLANS | | SHALL SHOW SAME CONDITIONS.PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 2.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE APPROVED ON A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
16:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
16:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-01 16:33:42 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***APPROVED WITH PROVISO*** | | | | 1.PROVISO PARKING DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET SP1 SHALL | | GOVERN, AND NOT THE ONE ON SHEET C7. | | | | 2.PROVISO DUMPSTER WALL DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET SP1 | | SHALL GOVERN, AND NOT THE ONE ON SHEET S7.2 | | | | 3.PROVISO ALL SIGNS SHALL BE APPROVED ON A DIFFERENT | | PERMIT (SIGN PERMIT). | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
12:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-02-01 |
Time |
12:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-02 13:00:45 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***PASSED*** | | | | 1. PROVISO PARKING DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET SP1 SHALL | | GOVERN, AND NOT THE ONE ON SHEET C7. | | | | 2. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE APPROVED | | ON A DIFFERENT PERMIT (SIGNAGE PERMIT). | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. | | OR ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2006-11-03 |
Time |
09:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2006-11-02 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-11-03 08:55:59 | 11/03/2006 PLANNING AND ZONING ***FAILED*** | | | | 1) PROVIDE LATEST COPIES OF SITE PLANS, LANDSCAPE | | PLANS, AND ALL OTHER PLANS WHERE APPLICABLE.PLEASE | | NOTE THAT ALL PLANS (CIVIL, IRRIGATION, ETC.) SHALL | | CONFORM TO THE LATEST VERSION OF THE SITE PLAN. | | | | 2) SIGNS SHALL BE APPROVED ON A DIFFERENT PERMIT. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA AT | | 822-1435. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |