| Plan Review Stops For Permit 06100172 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-10 15:00:04 | CALLED CONTRACTOR. LETTER SPECIFYING NAIL SPACING IS | | | CONFUSING. NEED CLARIFICATION. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
Time |
16:17 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2006-10-05 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2006-10-05 00:00:00 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | | 1- PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL | | | ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS | | | AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7. | | | SEE PAGE 34 OF DADE COUNTY NOA | | | SUBMITTED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS | | | TO FBC 2004. | | | (NOTE: I RAN SOME CALCULATIONS IN THE IN | | | HOUSE PROGRAMAND THE NAIL SPACING | | | NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED BECAUSE THERE IS | | | A MIN. FASTENER SPACING THAT CAN BE | | | USED. SEE RAS 117 STANDARD FOR | | | LIMITATIONS ON FASTENER SPACING AND | | | REVISE PROPOSED SPACING AS REQUIRED). | | | | | | 2- SPECIFY HOW MUCH AREA IS GOING TO BE | | | FLAT AND HOW MUCH IS PITCH TO VERIFY | | | BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. SEE ATTACHED | | | COPY OF CITY POLICY FOR ROOFING PERMITS | | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
|
