2006-12-05 18:41:12 | **** UNSAT 2ND REVIEW *** |
| |
| ** PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW ARE |
| STILL IN QUESTION. PLEASE ALSO SEE ANY NEW NOTES DUE TO |
| PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| ** PLEASE SEE A NOTE OF "NO" OR "OK" IS BEING NOTED AT |
| EACH NOTE WHICH IS TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. |
| PLEASE SEE IF NO, A FURTHER EXPLANATION IS NOTED TO |
| BETTER CLEAR UP COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. PLEASE |
| KNOW SOME MAY SHOW NO/OK, THIS MAY BE THAT PART OF THE |
| COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED AND PART OF THE COMMENT MAY STILL |
| BE OUTSTANDING. |
| |
| |
| 1) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE BASED ON THE LIGHTING |
| DENSITIES SHOWN, PLEASE SEE TABLES IN 13-415.2.ABC.1, |
| 415.2.B.1. |
| PLEASE BE SURE ALL SEPARATE SPACES INDICATE A CONTROL |
| DEVICE. |
| PLEASE SEE THAT ALL MAXIMUM TIMES ON DEVICES SHOWN BE |
| NOTED ON THE LEGEND. |
| PLEASE SEE IF THE EXISTING CORRIDOR IS GOING TO BE PART |
| OF THE TENANT SPACE, SEE THAT CONTROLS WILL BE |
| REQUIRED. |
| PLEASE SEE THAT A DETAIL OR NOTE IS PROVIDED TO |
| INDICATE THE CIRCUITING OF ALL EM/EXT LTS SHALL BE |
| WIRED TO ANY LOCAL BRANCH CIRCUIT AHEAD OF ANY CONTROL |
| SWITCHING DEVICES. PLEASE SEE 700.12E. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND |
| .1.3. |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1. PLEASE SEE THIS SPACE |
| WAS A "SHELL" SPACE AND IS NOW BEING BUILT OUT UNDER |
| THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE ADJUST AS NEEDED. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: NO, THIS IS NOT CLEAR YET AS TENANT SPACES |
| WITH RATE WALL ETC ARE STILL BE SHOWN, PLEASE SEE NOTE |
| #3. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE SEE ALL AREAS WHICH ARE BEING SHOWN AS "COMMON |
| AREAS" MAY NOT BE FED FROM PANELS WHICH ARE FOR TENANT |
| SPACE.210.25 |
| |
| 3) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS IS ALL |
| GOING TO BE ONE TENANT SPACE, HOWEVER PLANS CLEARLY |
| STILL INDICATE TWO TENANTS. PLEASE SEE NOTE #1 WHICH |
| SPEAKS OF CIRCUITING OF FIXTURES FOR EXISTING CORRIDOR |
| AND CIRCUITING TO RECESSED LIGHTS ETC? |
| PLEASE SEE TENANT SEPARATION WALLS AND MULTIPLE TENANTS |
| ARE STILL BEING SHOWN. IF THIS "IS" ONE TENANT, PLEASE |
| ADJUST PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| PLEASE SEE ELECTRICAL PANELS MAY NOT BE IN RATED EXIT |
| CORRIDOR SEE FBC BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS. IF INDEED |
| THIS IS GOING TO BE TWO TENANT SPACES PLEASE VERIFY AS |
| ONLY ONE METER IS BEING SHOWN AND MAY NOT FEED TWO |
| TENANTS/SEPARATE OCCUPANCIES FROM ONE METER/MAIN. |
| PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER REVIEWS WHICH MAY AFFECT |
| THE AMOUNT OF TENANTS ALLOWED PER FLOOR, CORRIDORS |
| ETC. |
| PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE COMMON |
| AREA NOT BEING FED OR CONTAINING THE ELECTRICAL FROM |
| TENANT PANEL. |
| |
| 4) NOTE: NO, MAY NOT USE A "PLUG-IN" FOR THE REQUIRED |
| DISCONNECTING MEANS. THIS WAS CHANGED IN THE CODE |
| BEFORE THE 93 CODE. PLEASE SEE BASED ON THE LOAD AS |
| SHOWN A HARDWIRED DISCONNECT IS REQUIRED. PLEASE KNOW |
| IF THE EXISTING INST-HOT IS A PLUG TYPE, THE LOAD MUST |
| BE LESS THAN 750VA. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE CLARIFY THE PANEL SCHEDULE MENTIONS AN |
| INSTA-HOT., YET COULD NOT FIND THIS ON PLANS. PLEASE |
| SEE 430.30, 430.31 ETC AS LOAD OF THIS SIZE WHEN UNIT |
| IS REQUIRED TO CONTAIN A DISCONNECT. A PLUG MAY NOT BE |
| USED. PLEASE ALSO VERIFY IF THE DISCONNECTING MEANS |
| CONTAINS OCP, IF SO, PLEASE SEE 110.26. |
| |
| 4) NOTE: OK, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE NOTE ABOVE AS IF THE |
| SPACE IS ONE, THEN CIRCUITING WILL BE REVISED AND WILL |
| RESULT IN SOME CHANGES TO CIRCUITS ON PLANS AS WELL AS |
| POSSIBLE PANEL SCHEDULE REVISIONS. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC ROOMS AND AREAS ON PANEL |
| SCHEDULE WHICH WILL CORRELATE WITH THE PLANS AND |
| LAYOUT. 408.6, PLEASE ALSO BE SURE TO INDICATE ALL |
| CONDUCTOR SIZES ON PANEL SCHEDULE. |
| 310.16, 240.4 |
| FBC 106.1.2. |
| |
| 5) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE THE APPLIED VALUE ON THE |
| APPLICATION ALONG WITH THE CORRECT SQ FOOT FOR BUILD |
| OUT MUST BE ADJUSTED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO CORRELATE |
| WITH PLANS. PLEASE SEE A VALUE HAS BEEN ADJUST TO $50K, |
| HOWEVER THIS VALUE MAY STILL BE ADJUSTED BY THE |
| BUILDING REVIEWER BASED ON THE TABLES AS SET FORTH IN |
| THE FBC. THIS VALUE AMY NOT BE FINAL. |
| FEES WERE NOTE PAID FOR ADDITIONAL VALUE AND ALL FEES |
| ARE DUE AT THE TIME OF SUBMITIAL UP TO A VALUE OF |
| $200K.ONLY THEN CAN A VALUE OF OVER 200K BE ALLLOWED |
| TO PAY A % UPFRONT. PLEASE KNOW PLANS WILL NOT BE |
| REVIEWED IF ALL FEES ARE NOT PAID BEFORE RESUBMITTING |
| PLANS. THIS IS STATE IN 108.3 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE |
| CODE AS ADOPTED INTO CITY ORDINANCEANDADMIN CODE. |
| |
| **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** |
| PLEASE SEE VALUE FOR COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL BE |
| BASED ON ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS EVEN IF OWNER |
| SUPPLIED. |
| FBC 108.3 |
| PLEASE SEE $25K IS WAY LOW. PLEASE KNOW, USING TABLES |
| BASED ON THE FBC ONE WILL BE ASSESSED. FEES WILL BE |
| OWED. |
| PLEASE KNOW, ONCE THE SQ FT HAS BEEN VERIFIED FOR |
| ACTUAL SCOPE OF WORK, THIS VALUE MAY CHANGE. |
| |
| 6) NOTE: NO, SEE THE MASTER PERMIT # FOR THE BUILDING |
| WAS REMOVED FROM BEING REFERENCE IN OUR SYSTEM AND |
| NOTES WERE ADDED THAT A NEW RECORD NOC WAS NEEDED. |
| PLEASE KNOW THIS IS REQUIRED BEFORE PICKING UP PERMIT. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE KNOW THIS INTERIOR BUILD OUT WILL REQUIRE A NEW |
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS THE ONE UNDER THE BUILDING |
| HAS EXPIRED AND IS NOT PART OF THIS SCOPE OF WORK. FS |
| 713.13 |
| |
| 7) NOTE:OK, HOWEVER SEE LOAD CALCULATIONS AS |
| SUBMITTED DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PANEL SCHEDULE. |
| PLEASE ALSO SEE WHEN THE RECEPT LOADS ARE KNOWN, PLEASE |
| SEE 220.13. |
| |
| ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** |
| PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW ON LOAD SUMMARY AND |
| CALCULATIONS ALL CONTINUOUS LOADS AT 125%. |
| 215.3, 230.42 |
| |
| ** NEW NOTE ** |
| |
| 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.28.1,.2 AND .3(4). PLEASE |
| DETAIL ALL NEW HORNS AND STROBES AT THE MINIMUM LEVELS |
| AS REQUIRED IN CHAPTER 11 OF THE 2004 FBC. |
| THIS WAS NOT NOTED IN PREVIOUS REVIEW AS IT HAS NOW |
| BECOME AN ELECTRICAL REVIEW ITEM TO BE REVIEWED FOR. |
| |
| 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO |
| REPEAT COMMENTS. PLEASE SEE THIS ONLY BEING GIVEN AS A |
| NOTICE AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| ** PLEASE KNOW, AS PLANS FOR MANY ITEMS WILL CHANGE, |
| ALL NOTES MAY NOT BE COMPLETE AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| * ** IMPORTANT** |
| ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE |
| PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE |
| SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED |
| SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED |
| SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW |
| AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. |
| PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE |
| OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND |
| AVOID ANY DELAYS. |
| |
| ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF |
| THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, |
| NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO |
| NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS |
| REVIEWER. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| DEWEY PALMER |
| ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| 561-805-6717 |
| [email protected] |
| |