 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 06090410
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06090410 |
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
Time |
10:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2007-04-13 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-13 10:37:25 | THE SITE ADDRESS FOR THIS STRUCTURE WAS CHANGED FORM | | 3031 OKEECHOBEE BLVD ( WHICH WAS INCORRECT) TO 3023 | | OKEECHOBEE BLVD.THIS ADDRESS WAS ASSIGNED BASED ON THE | | OWNER' S REPRESENTATIVES REQUEST .ON THE REVISED SITE | | PLANS PLEASE MAKE THE NECESSARY CORRRECTIONS TO REFLECT | | THE NEW SITE ADDRESS. | | | | LACRAMIOARA URSU | | MIS - GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | OFFICE:822-1239 | | FAX: 822-1249 | | E-MAIL:[email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-10-16 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2006-10-16 13:11:54 | ASSIGN PERMIT TO EXT #0002 FOR 3021 OKEECHOBEE BLVD |
|
|
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-09-22 00:00:00 | PROJECT UNDER REVIEW |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-09 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-09 |
Time |
14:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-09 14:13:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | ****NO RESUB FEE **IF** NEXT REVIEW IS FOR IMPACT FEES | | ONLY**** | | ****IMPACT FEES**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | 1.) A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 3.) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR | | TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD. PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 7.) FBC* 109.3.7 RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR | | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO KEN CONRAD, | | 561-805-6666. A RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, | | ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | CONSTRUCTION | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | - PILE DRIVING | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS OF | | CONSTRUCTION | | | | ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH KEN CONRAD (INSPECTION | | SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: | | 561 805 6666), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS | | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THREE ORIGINAL | | SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 56.) COMMENTS REGARDING PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | | A. ADDRESSED. | | | | B. SUBMIT FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND ASSOCIATED | | DOCUMENTS (EVALUATION REPORT, INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE FLEMING DOOR (FL3341). | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG FAC9B72. | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | 57. AS DISCUSSED, THE REVIEW OF NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS | | WILL BE DONE AT THE SAME TIME THAT IMPACT FEES ARE | | REVIEWED (CONFIRMATION OF BUILDING SIZE, PAYMENT). A | | REVIEW INVOLVING CODE ISSUES WILL REQUIRE A RESUB FEE. | | AS DISCUSSED, THE ISSUE OF ONE PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL | | NOT DELAY PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PERMIT WOULD BE ISSUED | | WITH PROVISO THAT THE REQUIRED PRODUCT APPROVALS BE | | SUBMITTED AS A REVISION. | | | | IF CODE COMPLIANT PAPERWORK IS NOT SUBMITTED AT THE | | TIME OF IMPACT FEE REVIEW, THE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED | | WITH THE PROVISO THAT THIS BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION | | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | 58. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE 16 PAGE DOCUMENT FOR | | THE FLEMING DOOR (AVAILABLE AT WWW. | | FLORIDABUILDING.ORG) ENTITLED "RECOMMENDED ERECTION | | INSTRUCTIONS FOR STEEL FRAMES" OR THE LETTER REGARDING | | COMPLIANCE TO 2004 EDITION OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | (ISSUED BY UL) WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGE. SHOP | | DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED; IN FACT, SHOULD BE REMOVED | | FROM THE PACKAGE TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE SHOPS | | AND THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. ONLY THE FLORIDA STATE OR | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH ASSOCIATED BACKUP | | DOCUMENTATION (INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS, EVALUATION | | REPORT) OR MIAMIDADE NOA ARE REQUIRED. THREE DOCUMENTS | | ARE SHOWN ON THE INTERNET FOR THIS DOOR; THEY ARE LINKS | | NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THESE | | DOCUMENTS ARE INCLUDED WHEN RESUBMITTING AT THE SAME | | TIME AS IMPACT FEES (TO AVOID A RESUBMITTAL FEE). | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-28 16:47:16 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | ****NO RESUB FEE**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC EB | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE FBC* | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 4-55.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 56.)COMMENTS REGARDING PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | | A.ADDRESSED. | | | | B.SUBMIT FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL AND | | ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS (EVALUATION REPORT, INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS) FOR THE FLEMING DOOR (FL3341). | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORGFAC9B72. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-11-16 |
Time |
17:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-11-16 |
Time |
17:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-16 18:01:59 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | 3ND COURTESY REVIEW FOR 4TH SUBMITTAL | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LISTS: | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 4-55.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 56.)COMMENTS REGARDING PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | | | A.SEE PREVIOUS LISTS IN REGARDS TO OVERHEAD DOOR | | PRODUCT APPROVALS.THE NOAS SUBMITTED DO NOT COMPLY | | WITH DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR D1A (SHEET S10, | | +56/-73).IT IS COMPLIANT FOR D1 ONLY (+56/-61). | | | | B.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE FLEMING DOOR.THE | | PRODUCT APPEARS TO MEET DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OF | | +56/-61, BUT PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMITTED, ONLY | | SHOP DRAWINGS.THE COVER SHEET REFERS TO THREE | | DIFFERENT NOAS.ONLY ONE STEEL DOOR IS BEING | | INSTALLED.PROVIDE THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | (IF AVAILABLE) AND A CURRENT NOA FOR THIS PRODUCT. | | REFERRING TO THE NOA NUMBER IS NOT SUFFICE AS THE | | EVALUATION REPORT AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS ARE | | ALSO REQUIRED. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
17:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-10-10 |
Time |
17:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-10 17:23:51 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | 2ND REVIEW FOR 4TH SUBMITTAL | | ACCEPTED MSP1 AND PRODUCT APPROVALS MID REVIEW | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC EB | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE FBC* | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LISTS: | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 4-6.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 7.)SEE PREVIOUS LISTS REGARDING RESIDENT INSPECTOR | | REQUIREMENT AND A MEETING WITH HAROLD PISKURA, | | 561-805-6711.THE PERMIT CANNOT BE PASSED, STAMPED, | | AND ISSUED UNTIL THIS IS COMPLETED. | | | | 8-27.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 28.)MSP 1 OK; ADDRESSED | | | | 40-55.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 56.)NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED MID REVIEW WILL | | BE REVIEWED AFTER IMPACT FEES HAVE BEEN PAID AND | | PROVISO'D IF NECESSARY. | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | 57.)I AGREED TO ACCEPT MSP1 MID REVIEW TO AVOID | | ADDITIONAL REVIEWS ON RESUBMITTAL.HOWEVER, A102 WAS | | ALSO CHANGED.THIS IS NOT THE SHEET WITH THE PLUMBING | | FIXTURE CALCS (WHICH ARCHITECT ADVISED WOULD BE SWAPPED | | OUT IN ADDITION TO MSP1).WHAT CHANGED ON THIS SHEET? | | THE ONLY CLOUDED REVISION DOES NOT RELATE TO ANY OF MY | | COMMENTS AND IT WAS NOT AGREED THAT THIS SHEET COULD BE | | CHANGED. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
07:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-07-26 |
Time |
07:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-26 07:22:28 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC EB | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE FBC* | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LISTS: | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 4-6.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 7.)SEE PREVIOUS LISTS REGARDING RESIDENT INSPECTOR | | REQUIREMENT AND A MEETING WITH HAROLD PISKURA, | | 561-805-6711.THE PERMIT CANNOT BE PASSED, STAMPED, | | AND ISSUED UNTIL THIS IS COMPLETED. | | | | 8-27.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 28.)THE THIRD RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT ALL LIFE | | SAFETY INFORMATION WAS INCLUDED IN MSP1; THIS FOURTH | | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE INFORMATION IS ON A101. | | I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE OCCUPANT LOAD, SEE FBC 1004.1.2, | | TABLE 1004.1.2.THERE IS A PLUMBING FIXTURE OCCUPANT | | LOAD ON A102, BUT THIS ONLY INCLUDES ONE FLOOR OF THE | | GARAGE.THIS OCCUPANT LOAD DOES NOT INCLUDE THE | | SERVICE AREA OR ROOF PARKING.FOR EGRESS, YOU MUST | | DECLARE OCCUPANT LOAD PER AREA AND IT CANNOT BE LESS | | THAN FBC TABLE 1004.1.2 AS PER REQUIREMENTS OF FBC | | 1004.1.2.THE PLUMBING FIXTURE OCCUPANT LOAD USES | | 200SF PER OCCUPANT, BUT THIS IS FOR PARKING GARAGE | | ONLY, NOT FOR THE SERVICE AREA.OCCUPANT LOAD IS A | | LIFE SAFETY ISSUE (CONFIRM ADEQUATE MEANS OF EGRESS) | | AND CANNOT BE WAIVED, ALSO CANNOT USE THE PLUMBING | | FIXTURE OCCUPANT LOAD AS IT DOES NOT BREAK DOWN | | OCCUPANTS BY FLOOR AND OCCUPANCY AND THAT NUMBER IS | | LESS THAN HALF OF WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR EGRESS.AN | | OCCUPANT LOAD WAS PROVIDED FOR THE LOUNGE/TRAINING, BUT | | THIS NEEDS TO BE DONE FOR EVERY SPACE (OCCUPANT LOAD | | FOR SERVICE AREA, 2ND FLOOR PARKING, ROOFTOP PARKING, | | STORAGE AREAS).IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THE PLUMBING | | FIXTURE OCCUPANT LOAD WOULD INCLUDE ONLY THE SECOND | | FLOOR PARKING GARAGE OF 17,365 AND NOT INCLUDE THE | | SERVICE GARAGE, ROOFTOP PARKING, AND OTHER AREAS. | | | | 40-55.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 56.)REGARDING THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED (FIRST | | REVIEW FOR THE PRODUCT APPROVALS): | | | | THE OVERHEAD DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL IS LIMITED TO A 10' | | WIDE DOOR, +-65PSF.THERE ARE THREE OVERHEAD DOORS | | WHICH ARE WIDER THAN 10' AND ONE WHICH HAS A DESIGN | | PRESSURE WHICH EXCEEDS -65 (HAS A DP OF -73).PLEASE | | ADDRESS. | | | | THE FLEMING DOOR SPECS REFER TO THREE DIFFERENT NOA | | NUMBERS BUT NONE WERE PROVIDED.THE SHOP DRAWINGS | | PROVIDED ARE NOT REQUIRED, BUT THE EVALLUATION REPORT | | (NOA) IS REQUIRED.PLEASE PRINT THE NOA(S) FOR THE | | DOOR(S) YOU WISH TO USE.IT APPEARS THAT THE PRODUCTS | | ARE COMPLIANT WITH THE DP REQUIREMENT OF +56/-61. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-06-22 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
08:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-22 13:55:13 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 4-5.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 6.)THE INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR THE ENGINEER | | FAC61G15-23.002 IS TO BE ON EACH SHEET.THIS COMMENT | | IS FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER ENGINEER.THIS APPLIES TO | | THE CALCS AND THE DRAWINGS.IF AN INDEX SHEET IS NOT | | PROVIDED FOR THE CALCS, EACH SHEET IS TO BE SIGNED, | | SEALED, AND DATED. | | | | 7.) FBC* 109.3.7 RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR | | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, | | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO | | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | CONSTRUCTION | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | - PILE DRIVING | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS | | OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA (INSPECTION | | SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: | | 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS | | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THREE ORIGINAL | | SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | 3RD REVIEW ? ONLY TWO SETS WERE SUBMITTED.NOTE THAT | | ALTHOUGH THIS PLAN HAS PASSED SOME REVIEWS, ANOTHER | | REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED SO THAT THOSE REVIEWERS CAN | | STAMP THEIR SHEETS WHEN THE THIRD SET IS SUBMITTED. | | | | 8.) PROVIDE ORIGINAL SIGNED, SEALED, DATED SOILS | | REPORTS, FBC1802.2.1, 1802.2.3.THREE SETS REQUIRED. | | AS STATED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS, THE SIGNATURE CANNOT | | BE A PHOTOCOPY. | | | | 9.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 10.)ADDRESSED, BUT SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING | | PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | 11.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 12.)IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE EQUIPMENT SHEDS WERE | | INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING CODE SUMMARY.THIS IS THE | | THIRD REQUEST FOR THIS INFORMATION.IS THIS AREA | | INCLUDED IN ONE OF THE OTHER EXISTING BUILDINGS?THE | | PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT SHED AGAINST THIS | | BUILDING.ARE YOU DESIGNING AS ONE BUILDING OR TWO | | SEPARATE BUILDINGS? | | | | 13-17.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 18.)REGARDING MAXIMUM AREA OF EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS, | | OPENINGS AND PERCENTAGES WERE PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING | | BUILDINGS.PROVIDE ALSO FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 704.8.NOTE THAT EAST | | ELEVATION HAS A LARGE AMOUNT OF OPENINGS ON A PORTION | | OF THE WALL.SEE THE ATTACHED COMMENTARY IN REGARDS TO | | UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION. | | | | THE % OF WALL OPENINGS, EXISTING VW SERVICE TO NEW | | SERVICE, SHOULD BE 15%-45%. | | | | EQUIPMENT SHEDS ARE SHOWN.ARE THEY ALSO TYPE II B | | CONSTRUCTION?ONE IS SHOWN CONNECTED TO THE NEW | | SERVICE BUILDING, BUT NOT DETAILS ARE PROVIDED.IS | | THIS AN EXISTING BUILDING?COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE | | 601, FBC TABLE 704.8 IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. | | | | 19.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 20.)MSP1 STATES THAT EXISTING HUMMER BUILDING HAS A 2 | | HOUR WALL.IS THIS THE EXISTING CONDITION, OR WILL THE | | FIRE RESISTANCE OF THE WALL BE INCREASED TO COMPLY WITH | | THE NEW 2 HOUR REQUIREMENT?PROVIDE A DETAIL, EITHER | | CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE OR UL ASSEMBLY FOR THE | | EXISTING WALL.SEE FBC TABLE 602.IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO | | EXCEED CODE COMPLIANCE, BUT B OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT IS | | 1 HOUR.THE NEW SERVICE HAS A 2 HOUR REQUIREMENT. | | | | MSP1 STATES THAT THE EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING HAS A 2 | | HOUR WALL.IS THIS THE EXISTING CONDITION, OR WILL THE | | FIRE RESISTANCE OF THE WALL BE INCREASED TO COMPLY WITH | | THE NEW 2 HOUR REQUIREMENT?PROVIDE A DETAIL, EITHER | | CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE OR UL ASSEMBLY FOR THE | | EXISTING WALL. | | | | PLEASE NOTE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE BUILDING. NOTE | | ON MSP1 AND SHOW REQUIREMENTS ON THE PLAN.MSP1 SHOWS | | 2 HOUR ON THE WALL ADJACENT TO THE HUMMER SHOWROOM, BUT | | DOES NOT SHOW THE 2 HOUR REQUIREMENT FOR THE STORAGE | | AND OIL STORAGE AREAS. | | | | 21.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 22.)WHAT IS BETWEEN THE PROPOSED SERVICE/PARKING AND | | EXISTING VW SERVICE/VW SHOWROOM?THIS WAS DISCUSSED IN | | A MEETING AS BEING A CANOPY. PLEASE LABEL THIS AREA. | | | | 23.)A101 AND OTHER DETAILS, STAIR DOORS A132, A2-03, | | A303, SEE FBC11-4.13 AND FBC FIGURE 11-26, TWO HINGED | | DOORS IN A SERIES. | | | | THIS WAS ADDRESSED ON MOST PAGES.PLEASE ALSO REVISE | | THE ELECTRICAL SHEETS AND CHECK ALL SHEETS. | | | | 24-27.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 28.)RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT ALL LIFE SAFETY | | INFORMATION WAS INCLUDED IN MSP1.I WAS UNABLE TO | | LOCATE OCCUPANT LOAD, SEE FBC 1004.1.2, TABLE | | 1004.1.2. | | | | 34.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 33.)STATE WHETHER THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS AN OPEN | | PARKING GARAGE OR ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE, STATE IN THE | | CODE SUMMARY, FBC406, AND SEE ALL REQUIREMENTS, SHOW ON | | PLAN. | | | | PLEASE INCORPORATE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN AS | | REQUESTED.THIRD REQUEST. THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES | | THAT THIS INFORMATION IS INCLUDED ON MSP1, BUT I WAS | | UNABLE TO FIND THE CLASSIFICATION OF OPEN OR ENCLOSED. | | | | 34-36.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 37.)A101, ROOF PLAN, 2ND FLOOR PLAN, STORAGE IS SHOWN | | WITH AN OPENING INTO THE STAIR.SEE 1019.1.1, OPENINGS | | TO BE LIMITED TO THOSE NECESSARY FOR EXIT ACCESS FROM | | NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACES. | | | | YOUR OBJECTION TO THE COMMENT IS NOTED.PLEASE SEE | | ATTACHED COMMENTARY, INCLUDING THE SENTENCE WHICH | | SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDES STORAGE CLOSETS AS THEY DO NOT | | CONSIDER THIS A "NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACE" REGARDLESS OF | | BUILDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION.ALSO NOTE THAT | | ALTHOUGH YOU ARE PROPOSING ENCLOSED SPACE ON THE ROOF, | | A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR THE ROOF. | | | | 38.)FIRE EXIT, FIRST FLOOR, TO HAVE SEPARATION FROM | | THE OCCUPANCY ABOVE IF AN OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS | | REQUIRED.GG-A108. | | | | YOUR RESPONSE STATES THAT VERTICAL OPENINGS ARE NOT | | REQUIRED TO BE PROTECTED.I WAS REFERRING TO THE FLOOR | | CEILING ASSEMBLY BETWEEN THE FIRE EXIT 1ST FLOOR, S1 | | OCCUPANCY, AND THE RAMP/PARKING GARAGE, S2 ON THE | | SECOND FLOOR.A 2 HOUR IS SHOWN THROUGHOUT THE | | REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING ON SECTION G-G AND APPEARS TO | | ALSO BE SHOWN ON A-A-106.THIS ALSO APPLIES TO MENS | | ROOM F-F A108. | | | | 39.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 40.)PLEASE PROVIDE OCCUPANT LOAD AS PREVIOUSLY | | REQUESTED FOR THE LOUNGE/TRAINING AREA SO THAT EGRESS | | REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE CAN BE DETERMINED. | | | | 41-51.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 52.)PLEASE SUBMIT ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED AT | | THIS TIME.DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMITTED. | | PROVIDE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FBC1603.1.4 INCLUDING | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES. | | | | 53.)THE SIGNATURE FOR AN ENGINEER CANNOT BE A STAMP | | (STRUCTURAL ENGINEER), SEE FAC61G15-23.002, FS471.025. | | | | 54.)PLEASE CLOUD ALL CHANGES AND SUBMIT OLD SHEETS. | | PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | ITEM HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | 55.)FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET, | | FL5723, WAS SUBMITTED FOR SHUTTERS.USE OF REMOVABLE | | SHUTTERS ON COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IS TO BE APPROVED BY | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, SEE ATTACHED POLICY, ITEM 13. | | SUBMIT AN INSTALLATION PLAN WITH ALL REQUIRED | | INFORMATION (SEE POLICY).THIS MAY BE DONE PRIOR TO | | RESUBMITTAL VIA EMAIL.ONCE A PRELIMINARY INSTALLATION | | PLAN IS APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, ORIGINALS | | WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | 56.)IF YOU ARE USING SHUTTERS, AN INSTALLATION | | SCHEDULE IS REQUIRED ALONG WITH A KEY PLAN SHOWING | | INSTALLATION LOCATIONS; SEE ATTACHED.ALSO PRINT THE | | EVALUATION REPORT AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.IT IS | | NOT CLEAR WHY SHUTTERS WERE INCLUDED IN THE PACKAGE | | (NOT CLEAR WHERE THEY WILL BE INSTALLED). | | | | 57.)OLD SHEETS WERE LEFT IN THE PACKAGE.PLEASE MARK | | THESE SHEETS VOID, REMOVE FROM THE SETS, AND SUBMIT | | SEPARATELY FOR REFERENCE. | | | | 58.)S2 SHOWS EXISTING FOOTERS AND FOOTERS WHICH | | APPEAR TO ENCROACH THE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE AND THE | | EXISTING HUMMER BUILDING, 1'6" AWAY.PLEASE CLARIFY. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2007-03-14 |
Time |
16:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2007-03-06 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-14 16:26:58 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC EB | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE FBC* | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.)PROVIDE A SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY, FBC*106.3.4, | | SHOWING PROPERTY LINE AND ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. | | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT A SURVEY HAS BEEN | | INCLUDED BUT IT WAS NOT IN THE PACKAGE. | | | | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 4.)RADON FEES DUE, FS*553.721.SEE ATTACHED.THIS | | FEE MUST BE PAID WHEN THE PLANS ARE PICKED UP. | | | | 5.)DUE TO VALUATION ADJUSTMENT, FEES HAVE BEEN | | INCREASED.SEE ATTACHED.PLEASE PAY AT THE TIME THAT | | THE PLANS ARE PICKED UP. | | | | 6.)FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS REQUIRED IF SPRINKLERS ARE | | REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5), | | FS553.79 (2), ATTACHED LETTER FROM DCA. | | | | THE FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS WERE IN THE PACKAGE, BUT THE | | INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR THE ENGINEER FAC61G15-23.002 | | IS NOT ON EACH SHEET, AND THE SEAL IS ILLEGIBLE. | | | | 7.) FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR | | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, | | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO | | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | CONSTRUCTION | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | - PILE DRIVING | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS | | OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA (INSPECTION | | SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: | | 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS | | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THREE ORIGINAL | | SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | 8.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, FBC1802.2.1, | | 1802.2.3.THREE SETS REQUIRED. | | | | THE SIGNATURE FOR AN ENGINEER CANNOT BE A PHOTOCOPY, | | SEE FAC61G15-23.002, FS471.025. | | | | 9.)THE SEAL IS ILLEGIBLE (ARCHITECT).PLEASE | | ADDRESS, FS481.221. | | | | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED, | | BUT I STILL CANNOT READ THE SEAL. | | | | 10.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY DESIGNER | | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE PRODUCT APPROVALS | | HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD.ONLY ONE | | FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED AND AN NOA | | FOR LOUVERS, WITHOUT THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION | | (EVALUATION REPORT, INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS) TO SHOW | | CODE COMPLIANCE AND FOR INSPECTIONS.THE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS DID NOT HAVE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP. | | APPROVAL IS TO BE IN THE FORM OF A REVIEW STAMP OR A | | COVER LETTER SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO EACH PRODUCT | | APPROVAL IN THE PACKAGE.STATING ?PRODUCT APPROVALS | | HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD? (A STATEMENT | | IN A TYPED RESPONSE LETTER WHICH IS NOT SIGNED AND | | GIVES NO INDICATION WHATSOEVER AS TO WHO PREPARED THE | | DOCUMENT; NO LETTERHEAD, NAME, SIGNATURE) DOES NOT SHOW | | CODE COMPLIANCE; IT DOESN?T STATE WHICH DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS NOR WHICH | | PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED, AND NOTHING SIGNED BY | | THE DESIGNER WHO REVIEWED THE PRODUCT APPROVALS. | | | | 11.)INCLUDE FBC EB IN GOVERNING CODE.THIS PROPOSED | | IMPROVEMENT IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC EB CHAPTER 9; SEE | | ALSO FBC EB 901.2.SOME COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATE TO THIS CODE SECTION. | | | | 12.)INCLUDE A CODE SUMMARY. DECLARE BUILDING TYPE | | FBC6 (INCLUDE A OR B), BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA FBC5, | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC 3 AND AREA PER OCCUPANCY, | | FIRE SPRINKLER INFORMATION.NOTE THAT CANOPIES AND | | EQUIPMENT SHEDS ARE TO BE INCLUDED, SEE FBC 502, | | DEFINITION OF AREA, BUILDING.BUILDING TYPE WILL BE | | BASED ON WORST CASE UNLESS A FIRE WALL SEPARATES THE | | BUILDING AREAS.DETAILS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWING | | FIRE RESISTANCE MAY BE REQUIRED.PLEASE CONTACT ME IF | | YOU ARE UNSURE OF WHICH DETAILS TO INCLUDE. | | | | THIS INFORMATION IS TO BE ON THE PLAN, NOT IN THE | | RESPONSE LETTER.NOTE THAT THE RESPONSE LETTER IS NOT | | ON LETTERHEAD, AND DOES NOT INDICATE WHO PREPARED IT, | | AND IS UNSIGNED.PLANS ARE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE, | | BUT IF LETTERS ARE ACCEPTED AS A SUPPLEMENT TO THE PLAN | | AT OTHER TIMES, THEY ARE TO MEET THE SAME REQUIREMENTS | | AS ANY DOCUMENT PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER | | AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD. | | | | | | A 2 HOUR WALL WAS ADDED ON THE PROPOSED SERVICE | | BUILDING ADJACENT TO THE HUMMER SHOWROOM.IT IS NOT | | CLEAR WHAT DESIGN INTENT IS AS THIS DOES NOT COMPLY | | WITH FBC 705, OPENINGS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC705.8.IF | | YOU ARE USING AN ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN | | BUILDINGS, INFORMATION REGARDING THE HUMMER SHOWROOM | | AND THE VW CANOPY BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 503, FBC TABLE 601, FBC TABLE | | 620, NO OPENINGS ALLOWED. THE SITE PLAN STILL SHOWS | | THIS AS ONE BUILDING.SHEET A102 SHOWS THE EQUIPMENT | | ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED SERVICE BUILDING (ATTACHED), | | | | THIS LIST MAY NOT BE COMPLETE AS DESIGN INTENT IS NOT | | CLEAR.IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS TO BE SEPARATE | | BUILDINGS, BUT OPENINGS ARE SHOWN WITH NO INFORMATION | | REGARDING THE EXISTING BUILDINGS WAS PROVIDED.IF THE | | PROPOSED BUILDING IS TO BE SEPARATED FROM THE EXISTING | | BUILDINGS WITH A FIRE WALL, SEE FBC705 AND SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS. | | | | 13.)REGARDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS, PLEASE SEE | | FBC304, FBC311.2, FBC311.3.OTHER CODE SECTIONS MAY | | APPLY. | | | | SEE ITEM 12 ABOVE.ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS TO BE | | ON THE PLAN.THE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS S1 AND S2, | | BUT IT SHOWS A VEHICLE SHOWROOM, FBC304.INFORMATION | | IN REGARDS TO THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS MUST BE PROVIDED | | TO DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 14.)WHAT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE STORED AND IN | | WHAT QUANTITIES?SEE FBC TABLE 307.7(1), FBC 406.6. | | | | ADDRESS THIS IN THE PLAN.PROVIDE MSDS FOR THE | | HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. | | | | 15.)DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR THE OIL | | STORAGE, SEE FBC TABLE 307.7(1), FBC406.6.NOTE | | QUANTITIES. | | | | THIS IS TO BE DONE ON THE PLAN; DECLARE OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION AND QUANTITIES.THE RESPONSE LETTER | | STATES THAT THIS IS S1, PLEASE STATE QUANTITY OF | | MAXIMUM HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORED ON THE PLAN. | | | | 16.)SHOW HOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 503 HAS BEEN | | ACCOMPLISHED; SEE ALSO FBC 302.IF HEIGHT OR AREA | | MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN USED AS PER FBC 503 THROUGH | | 508, PUT ALL INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS ON THE PLAN. | | INFORMATION PROVIDED SHOULD BE CLEAR IN REGARDS TO | | BUILDING TYPE, BUILDING AREA, AND OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION IN REGARDS TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS | | (INCLUDING AREAS REFERRED TO AS "CANOPY" AND | | "EQUIP.SHED", ETC.) AS WELL AS THE NEW IMPROVEMENT. | | | | THIS IS TO BE DONE ON THE PLAN.SEE OTHER COMMENTS; | | CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. | | | | 17.)IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE EXISTING SERVICE | | SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE MSP-1 WILL BE A PART OF THE NEW | | BUILDING (APPEARS TO BE ATTACHED AT THE NORTHWEST | | PORTION, THE REST OF THE EXISTING SERVICE IS ALONG THE | | RAMP) OR IF IT A SEPARATE BUILDING, TO BE SEPARATED | | WITH AN ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE.IF THIS IS A SEPARATE | | BUILDING, SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602 BY SHOWING | | THE BUILDING TYPE AND OCCUPANCY, ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE, | | DISTANCE OF EACH BUILDING FROM THE ASSUMED PROPERTY | | LINE.COMPLIANCE FOR EACH BUILDING MUST BE SHOWN, | | INCLUDING FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | IF THIS IS NOT A SEPARATE BUILDING, INCLUDE THIS | | BUILDING IN THE CODE SUMMARY, SEE ITEM 3. | | | | NOT ADDRESSED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS | | A SEPARATE BUILDING, BUT NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AS | | REQUESTED. | | | | 18.)SEPARATIONS ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC TABLE 302.3.2. | | AS NO FIRE SPRINKLER INFORMATION OR FBC TABLE 503 | | COMPLIANCE WAS PROVIDED, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE 2 HOUR | | SHOWN BETWEEN B AND S1 IS CORRECT. | | | | INCLUDE SPRINKLER INFORMATION IN A CODE SUMMARY.THE | | RESPONSE LETTER AND PLAN SHOWS THAT THE PROPOSED GARAGE | | WILL BE SPRINKLERED.ARE THE OTHER BUILDINGS FULLY | | SPRINKLERED, INCLUDING THE CANOPY AREA, EQUIPMENT SHED, | | ETC.?IF THIS IS TWO BUILDING SEPARATED AS PER FBC | | TABLE 602, BOTH BUILDINGS MUST COMPLY AND NO OPENINGS | | ALLOWED FBC TABLE 704.8. | | | | 19.)NO HORIZONTAL SEPARATIONS WERE SHOWN. | | | | PLEASE SHOW ALL REQUIRED SEPARATIONS; BETWEEN S1 AND | | THE PARKING GARAGE FBC406.2.7.PROVIDE DETAILS. | | | | 20.)PROVIDE DISTANCE OF ADJACENT BUILDINGS TO THE | | PROPOSED RENOVATED BUILDING.FOR INSTANCE, DISTANCE | | FROM USED CARS TO HUMMER SHOWROOM, USED CARS TO | | EXISTING SERVICE.CONNECTING MULTIPLE BUILDINGS MAY | | AFFECT BUILDING TYPE FBC5, WHICH MAY AFFECT CODE | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602.PROVIDE INFORMATION IN | | REGARDS TO OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND BUILDING TYPE | | FOR OTHER STRUCTURES. | | | | SEE OTHER COMMENTS.DESIGN INTENT IS NOT CLEAR. THE | | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS A | | SEPARATE STRUCTURE, BUT IT SHOWS OPENINGS WHICH ARE NOT | | ALLOWED FBC TABLE 704.8 AND NO INFORMATION PROVIDED IN | | REGARDS TO THE OTHER BUILDINGS. | | | | 21.)MSP-1, BUILDING/LOT COVERAGE ZONING INFORMATION | | REFERS TO AN EXISTING LEVITZ BUILDING BUT THAT BUILDING | | IS NOT REFERENCED ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER REQUESTS THAT I SPEAK WITH | | PLANNING.THE PLANS ARE TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. | | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE BUILDINGS ON | | THE SITE AS REQUESTED IN OTHER COMMENTS.THE CODE | | SUMMARY PROVIDED IS TO CORRELATE WITH THE BUILDING | | NAMES ON THE SITE PLAN.FOR INSTANCE, THE SITE PLAN | | STATES THAT EXISTING LEVITZ BUILDING IS 62,399 SQUARE | | FEET, BUT THERE IS NOTHING LABELED LEVITZ BUILDING ON | | THE PLAN. | | | | 22.)WHAT IS BETWEEN THE PROPOSED SERVICE/PARKING AND | | EXISTING VW SERVICE/VW SHOWROOM? | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THERE ARE EXISTING | | CANOPIES.THIS AREA IS CONSIDERED TO BE BUILDING AREA. | | SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING BUILDING SEPARATION AND | | OPENINGS.SEE OTHER COMMENTS REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT | | THIS IS CONSIDERED ONE BUILDING OR SEPARATE BUILDINGS | | AS THE PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR. | | | | 23.)A101 AND OTHER DETAILS, STAIR DOORS A132, A2-03, | | A303, SEE FBC11-4.13 AND FBC FIGURE 11-26, TWO HINGED | | DOORS IN A SERIES. | | | | THIS WAS ADDRESSED ON MOST PAGES.PLEASE ALSO REVISE | | THE MECHANICAL SHEETS. | | | | 24.)A111E, DOOR TO MENS LOCKER, SHOW MANEUVERING | | SPACE, PULL SIDE, FBC11 FIGURE 25. | | | | THIS SHEET IS NO LONGER IN THE PLAN.WAS THIS A | | DETAILED FLOOR PLAN?PROVIDE OLD SHEETS WHEN | | RESUBMITTING. | | | | 25.)MSP-1 SHOWS A PROPOSED PHASE 2 OF PARKING | | STRUCTURE.NOTE THAT ONLY THE CURRENT IMPROVEMENT IS | | UNDER REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 26.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 27.)MSP-1, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC WAY IS | | SHOWN FBC11-4.1.2(1), SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE ON THE PLAN. | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS HAS BEEN REVIEWED | | UNDER PRIOR PERMIT APPLICATIONS.THIS PLAN IS TO SHOW | | CODE COMPLIANCE.PLEASE ADDRESS THE COMMENT AS | | REQUESTED. | | | | 28.)PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED | | SERVICE/PARKING GARAGE BUILDING, ALL FLOORS SHOWING | | TRAVEL DISTANCE AND EXITS, EGRESS COMPONENT WIDTHS, | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOAD, DISTANCE APART | | OF REQUIRED EXITS, ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION TO | | DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE.THE EXIT DISCHARGE IS TO | | BE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING, INCLUDING OUTSIDE OF | | THE CANOPY COVERED AREAS, AND TRAVEL DISTANCE IS TO | | INCLUDE TRAVEL THROUGH THESE AREAS IF THIS. | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION.THE LIFE | | SAFETY PLAN PROVIDED DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL OF THE ABOVE | | INFORMATION.NO OCCUPANT LOAD WAS PROVIDED, AND THE | | TRAVEL DISTANCE IS SHOWN TO THE CANOPY AREA.TRAVEL | | DISTANCE IS TO BE TO THE OUTSIDE, NOT TO THE BUILDING | | AREA OF AN ADJACENT BUILDING.AS NO OPENINGS WOULD BE | | ALLOWED WITH A 0? TO 3? BUILDING SEPARATION (SEE FBC, | | THE OPEN AREA LEADING TO THE CANOPY WOULD ALSO NOT BE | | ALLOWED.A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE PERFORMED UNTIL | | DESIGN INTENT IS CLEAR. | | | | 29.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 30.)THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING | | ON THE WEST SIDE.INCLUDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWING | | HOW EGRESS WILL BE AFFECTED. | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER PARTIALLY ADDRESSES THIS COMMENT. | | PLEASE INCORPORATE THE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN. | | PLEASE SHOW MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE | | BUILDING; SHOW THAT IT IS NOT THROUGH THE SIDE ADJACENT | | TO THE PROPOSED SERVICE BUILDING AND PARKING | | STRUCTURE. | | | | 31.)PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE EXISTING | | HUMMER BUILDING, FIRST FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR (2 HOUR | | WALL SHOWN ON 2ND FLOOR) IF APPLICABLE. | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER PARTIALLY ADDRESSES THIS COMMENT. | | PLEASE INCORPORATE THE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN. | | PLEASE SHOW MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE EXISTING HUMMER | | BUILDING; SHOW THAT IT IS NOT THROUGH THE CANOPY AREA. | | IF IT IS, AS YOU ARE CLOSING OFF THE CANOPY AREA, THAT | | DISTANCE MUST BE ADDED TO THE TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | 32.)A FOLDING PARTITION IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IN THE | | MEZZANINE/TRAINING AREA.DOES THIS PARTITION CLOSE? IT | | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH EGRESS DOOR REQUIREMENTS, | | FBC1008.1.2, PLEASE ADDRESS.IF IT DOES NOT CLOSE, PUT | | THAT REQUIREMENT ON THE PLAN. | | | | THE PARTITION WAS REMOVED FROM MOST SHEETS BUT STILL | | APPEARS ON THE MECHANICAL PAGES.PLEASE CHECK ALL | | SHEETS. | | | | 33.)STATE WHETHER THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS AN OPEN | | PARKING GARAGE OR ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE, STATE IN THE | | CODE SUMMARY, FBC406, AND SEE ALL REQUIREMENTS, SHOW ON | | PLAN. | | | | PLEASE INCORPORATE INFORMATION INTO THE PLAN AS | | REQUESTED.THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES TO SEE ITEM 12 | | FOR THE CODE SUMMARY, BUT REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT | | PROVIDED.PLEASE INCLUDE IN THE PLAN. | | | | 34.)PROVIDE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GUARD, | | FBC1607.7, FBC1012. | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS WILL BE DONE | | THROUGH SHOP DRAWINGS.DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO | | PROVIDE DETAILS AND DESIGN CRITERIA AS REQUESTED | | FBC*106.1.1. | | | | 35.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 36.)WHAT IS THE 3FT4IN DIMENSION SHOWN AT THE STAIR, | | #303 AND 203?IT APPEARS TO BE AN OPENING, NOT ALLOWED | | IN A VERTICAL EXIT.PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | THIS WAS REMOVED FROM MOST SHEETS BUT STILL APPEARS ON | | THE MECHANICAL SHEETS.PLEASE ADDRESS AND MAKE ALL | | SHEETS CONSISTENT. | | | | 37.)A101, ROOF PLAN, 2ND FLOOR PLAN, STORAGE IS SHOWN | | WITH AN OPENING INTO THE STAIR.SEE 1019.1.1, OPENINGS | | TO BE LIMITED TO THOSE NECESSARY FOR EXIT ACCESS FROM | | NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACES. | | | | THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES, ?THIS SPACE IS A FREQUENTLY | | VISITED STORAGE AREA.OPENINGS TO EXIT STAIR SHOULD BE | | ALLOWED.?PLEASE SHOW IN THE CODE WHERE THIS IS | | ALLOWED. | | | | 38.)FIRE EXIT, FIRST FLOOR, TO HAVE SEPARATION FROM | | THE OCCUPANCY ABOVE IF AN OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS | | REQUIRED.GG-A108. | | | | AN OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR GARAGES, | | FBC406.2.7.FBC302.3.1 STATES THAT FIRE SEPARATIONS | | ARE NOT REQUIRED BETWEEN USES, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY | | OTHER PROVISIONS.YOUR RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT YOU | | HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE MOST STRINGENT REQUIREMENT, BUT | | COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN.PLEASE SEE OTHER | | COMMENTS. | | | | 39.)DECLARE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION, FBC TABLE | | 803.5. | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS ON THE PLAN. | | | | 40.)THE LOUNGE/TRAINING AREA SHOWS A 2 HOUR | | SEPARATION, NO HORIZONTAL SEPARATION.IF THE OCCUPANCY | | SEPARATION IS REQUIRED, HORIZONTAL SEPARATION ALSO | | REQUIRED, PROVIDE CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE FBC7 OR | | TESTED ASSEMBLY, FLOOR AND CEILING. | | | | WHAT IS THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION OF THE | | LOUNGE/TRAINING AREA?PLEASE SEE FBC302.ALSO PROVIDE | | OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS AREA.SEE OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | 41.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 42.)ADDRESSED.PLEASE INCLUDE OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH FBC1607.1 CAN BE | | DETERMINED. | | | | 43.)NO EXIT LIGHTS SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR OR ROOF, | | FBC1006.3. | | | | 44.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 45.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY CALC, | | FBC13. | | | | THIS HAS BEEN DONE, BUT IF THE ENERGY CALCS CHANGE | | THROUGH THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, PLEASE SIGN NEW ENERGY | | CALCS. | | | | 46-49.)THESE COMMENTS RELATE TO PRODUCT APPROVALS | | WHICH WERE NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | 50.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 51.)ADDRESSED ON A201, SHEET A200 NO LONGER IN THE | | PACKAGE. | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | 52.)PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT REVIEWED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | ISSUANCE WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS.NO PRODUCT | | APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT APPLICATION | | PACKAGE. | | | | 53.)THE SIGNATURE FOR AN ENGINEER CANNOT BE A STAMP | | (STRUCTURAL ENGINEER), SEE FAC61G15-23.002, FS471.025. | | | | 54.)PLEASE CLOUD ALL CHANGES AND SUBMIT OLD SHEETS. | | PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH | | ITEM HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-10-13 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
Time |
08:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-13 13:06:43 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE | | FBC2004 | | | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | PERMIT PICKUP, FS713.13. | | | | 2.)PROVIDE A SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY, FBC*106.3.4, | | SHOWING PROPERTY LINE AND ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. | | | | 3.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, 2300 N JOG RD.PLEASE CALL | | 561-233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | 4.)RADON FEES DUE, FS*553.721.SEE ATTACHED. | | | | 5.)DUE TO VALUATION ADJUSTMENT, FEES HAVE BEEN | | INCREASED.SEE ATTACHED. | | | | 6.)FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS REQUIRED IF SPRINKLERS ARE | | REQUIRED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5), | | FS553.79 (2), ATTACHED LETTER FROM DCA. | | | | 7.) FBC* 109.3.7RESIDENT INSPECTOR. SUBMIT INSPECTOR | | RESUME' AND LICENSE DOCUMENTS TO HAROLD PISKURA, | | DIRECTOR OF THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.A RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM IS REQUIRED, ON THIS PROJECT, DUE TO | | ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | - BUILDINGS/ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II | | CONSTRUCTION | | - ANY MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS | | - STRUCTURES IN WHICH THE CONCRETE | | DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE | | STRENGTH (F'C) IN EXCESS OF 3000 PSI | | - PILE DRIVING | | - BUILDINGS OVER 20,000 SQFT IN AREA | | - BUILDINGS OVER 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT | | - BUILDING/STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR METHODS | | OF CONSTRUCTION | | | | ALSO, PLEASE ARRANGE WITH HAROLD PISKURA (INSPECTION | | SERVICES MANAGER - TEL: | | 561 805 6711), A MEETING INVOLVING THE OWNER, RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR, JOB INSPECTOR, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER. THIS | | MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.THREE ORIGINAL | | SETS OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | 8.)PROVIDE A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, FBC1802.2.1, | | 1802.2.3.THREE SETS REQUIRED. | | | | 9.)THE SEAL IS ILLEGIBLE (ARCHITECT).PLEASE | | ADDRESS, FS481.221. | | | | 10.)PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY DESIGNER | | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. | | | | 11.)INCLUDE FBC EB IN GOVERNING CODE.THIS PROPOSED | | IMPROVEMENT IS TO COMPLY WITH FBC EB CHAPTER 9; SEE | | ALSO FBC EB 901.2.SOME COMMENTS AND REQUEST FOR | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATE TO THIS CODE SECTION. | | | | 12.)INCLUDE A CODE SUMMARY. DECLARE BUILDING TYPE | | FBC6 (INCLUDE A OR B), BUILDING HEIGHT AND AREA FBC5, | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FBC 3 AND AREA PER OCCUPANCY, | | FIRE SPRINKLER INFORMATION.NOTE THAT CANOPIES AND | | EQUIPMENT SHEDS ARE TO BE INCLUDED, SEE FBC 502, | | DEFINITION OF AREA, BUILDING.BUILDING TYPE WILL BE | | BASED ON WORST CASE UNLESS A FIRE WALL SEPARATES THE | | BUILDING AREAS.DETAILS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWING | | FIRE RESISTANCE MAY BE REQUIRED.PLEASE CONTACT ME IF | | YOU ARE UNSURE OF WHICH DETAILS TO INCLUDE. | | | | 13.)REGARDING OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS, PLEASE SEE | | FBC304, FBC311.2, FBC311.3.OTHER CODE SECTIONS MAY | | APPLY. | | | | 14.)WHAT HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE STORED AND IN | | WHAT QUANTITIES?SEE FBC TABLE 307.7(1), FBC 406.6. | | | | 15.)DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR THE OIL | | STORAGE, SEE FBC TABLE 307.7(1), FBC406.6.NOTE | | QUANTITIES. | | | | 16.)SHOW HOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 503 HAS BEEN | | ACCOMPLISHED; SEE ALSO FBC 302.IF HEIGHT OR AREA | | MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN USED AS PER FBC 503 THROUGH | | 508, PUT ALL INFORMATION AND CALCULATIONS ON THE PLAN. | | INFORMATION PROVIDED SHOULD BE CLEAR IN REGARDS TO | | BUILDING TYPE, BUILDING AREA, AND OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION IN REGARDS TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS | | (INCLUDING AREAS REFERRED TO AS ?CANOPY? AND | | ?EQUIP.SHED?, ETC.) AS WELL AS THE NEW IMPROVEMENT. | | | | 17.)IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE EXISTING SERVICE | | SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE MSP-1 WILL BE A PART OF THE NEW | | BUILDING (APPEARS TO BE ATTACHED AT THE NORTHWEST | | PORTION, THE REST OF THE EXISTING SERVICE IS ALONG THE | | RAMP) OR IF IT A SEPARATE BUILDING, TO BE SEPARATED | | WITH AN ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE.IF THIS IS A SEPARATE | | BUILDING, SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602 BY SHOWING | | THE BUILDING TYPE AND OCCUPANCY, ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE, | | DISTANCE OF EACH BUILDING FROM THE ASSUMED PROPERTY | | LINE.COMPLIANCE FOR EACH BUILDING MUST BE SHOWN, | | INCLUDING FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR THE EXISTING | | BUILDING. | | | | IF THIS IS NOT A SEPARATE BUILDING, INCLUDE THIS | | BUILDING IN THE CODE SUMMARY, SEE ITEM 3. | | | | 18.)SEPARATIONS IF REQUIRED ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC | | TABLE 302.3.2.AS NO FIRE SPRINKLER INFORMATION OR FBC | | TABLE 503 COMPLIANCE WAS PROVIDED, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF | | THE 2 HOUR SHOWN BETWEEN B AND S1 IS CORRECT. | | | | 19.)NO HORIZONTAL SEPARATIONS WERE SHOWN.SEE | | PREVIOUS COMMENT, NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME IF IT IS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 20.)PROVIDE DISTANCE OF ADJACENT BUILDINGS TO THE | | PROPOSED RENOVATED BUILDING.FOR INSTANCE, DISTANCE | | FROM USED CARS TO HUMMER SHOWROOM, USED CARS TO | | EXISTING SERVICE.CONNECTING MULTIPLE BUILDINGS MAY | | AFFECT BUILDING TYPE FBC5, WHICH MAY AFFECT CODE | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 602.PROVIDE INFORMATION IN | | REGARDS TO OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND BUILDING TYPE | | FOR OTHER STRUCTURES. | | | | 21.)MSP-1, BUILDING/LOT COVERAGE ZONING INFORMATION | | REFERS TO AN EXISTING LEVITZ BUILDING BUT THAT BUILDING | | IS NOT REFERENCED ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | 22.)WHAT IS BETWEEN THE PROPOSED SERVICE/PARKING AND | | EXISTING VW SERVICE/VW SHOWROOM? | | | | 23.)A101 AND OTHER DETAILS, STAIR DOORS A132, A203, | | A303,SEE FBC11-4.13 AND FBC FIGURE 11-26, TWO HINGED | | DOORS IN A SERIES. | | | | 24.)A111E, DOOR TO MENS LOCKER, SHOW MANEUVERING | | SPACE, PULL SIDE, FBC11 FIGURE 25. | | | | 25.)MSP-1 SHOWS A PROPOSED PHASE 2 OF PARKING | | STRUCTURE.NOTE THAT ONLY THE CURRENT IMPROVEMENT IS | | UNDER REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 26.)S4, THERE IS A NOTE FOR 6IN CONCRETE SLAB AT THE | | ELEVATOR AREA.IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE FOR THE | | MEZZANINE?6IN CONCRETE SLAB SHOWN FOR VESTIBULE. | | | | 27.)MSP-1, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC WAY IS | | SHOWN FBC11-4.1.2(1), SHOW MAXIMUM SLOPE ON THE PLAN. | | | | 28.)PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED | | SERVICE/PARKING GARAGE BUILDING, ALL FLOORS SHOWING | | TRAVEL DISTANCE AND EXITS, EGRESS COMPONENT WIDTHS, | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOAD, DISTANCE APART | | OF REQUIRED EXITS, ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION TO | | DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE.THE EXIT DISCHARGE IS TO | | BE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING, INCLUDING OUTSIDE OF | | THE CANOPY COVERED AREAS, AND TRAVEL DISTANCE IS TO | | INCLUDE TRAVEL THROUGH THESE AREAS IF THIS. | | | | 29.)IT APPEARS THAT THE BUILDING AREA BETWEEN THE | | IMPROVEMENT AND VW AREAS IS AN OPEN CANOPY, SO EGRESS | | ON THAT SIDE FOR THE OTHER BUILDING IS NOT AFFECTED. IS | | THIS CORRECT?IF NOT, PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR | | THAT AREA. | | | | 30.)THERE APPEARS TO BE AN EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING | | ON THE WEST SIDE.INCLUDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHOWING | | HOW EGRESS WILL BE AFFECTED. | | | | 31.)PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN FOR THE EXISTING | | HUMMER BUILDING, FIRST FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR (2 HOUR | | WALL SHOWN ON 2ND FLOOR) IF APPLICABLE. | | | | 32.)A FOLDING PARTITION IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IN THE | | MEZZANINE/TRAINING AREA.DOES THIS PARTITION CLOSE? IT | | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH EGRESS DOOR REQUIREMENTS, | | FBC1008.1.2, PLEASE ADDRESS.IF IT DOES NOT CLOSE, PUT | | THAT REQUIREMENT ON THE PLAN. | | | | 33.)STATE WHETHER THIS HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS AN OPEN | | PARKING GARAGE OR ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE, STATE IN THE | | CODE SUMMARY, FBC406, AND SEE ALL REQUIREMENTS, SHOW ON | | PLAN. | | | | 34.)PROVIDE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GUARD, | | FBC1607.7, FBC1012. | | | | 35.)A101, MEZZANINE PLAN SHOWS A PLYWOOD DECK, | | CEILING OVER JANITOR?S CLOSET.AS NO BUILDING TYPE WAS | | DECLARED, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS PERMITTED | | (COMBUSTIBLE).PLEASE CONFIRM PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 36.)WHAT IS THE 3FT4IN DIMENSION SHOWN AT THE STAIR, | | #303 AND 203?IT APPEARS TO BE AN OPENING, NOT ALLOWED | | IN A VERTICAL EXIT.PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | 37.)A101, ROOF PLAN, 2ND FLOOR PLAN, STORAGE IS SHOWN | | WITH AN OPENING INTO THE STAIR.SEE 1019.1.1, OPENINGS | | TO BE LIMITED TO THOSE NECESSARY FOR EXIT ACCESS FROM | | NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACES. | | | | 38.)FIRE EXIT, FIRST FLOOR, TO HAVE SEPARATION FROM | | THE OCCUPANCY ABOVE IF AN OCCUPANCY SEPARATION IS | | REQUIRED.GG-A108. | | | | 39.)DECLARE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION, FBC TABLE | | 803.5. | | | | 40.)THE LOUNGE/TRAINING AREA SHOWS A 2 HOUR | | SEPARATION, NO HORIZONTAL SEPARATION.IF THE OCCUPANCY | | SEPARATION IS REQUIRED, HORIZONTAL SEPARATION ALSO | | REQUIRED, PROVIDE CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE FBC7 OR | | TESTED ASSEMBLY, FLOOR AND CEILING. | | | | 41.)THE NOTE A106 STATES THAT THE FUSIBLE LINK IS TO | | BE MANUALLY OPERATED.CLARIFY. | | | | 42.)PROVIDE DESIGN CRITERIA, LIVE LOADS, FOR | | MEZZANINE AS PER FBC TABLE 1607.1.NOT INCLUDED ON | | S1. | | | | 43.)NO EXIT LIGHTS SHOWN ON FIRST FLOOR OR ROOF, | | FBC1006.3. | | | | 44.)MEZZANINE IS TO BE OPEN TO THE ROOM IT IS LOCATED | | IN, SEE FBC505.4. | | | | 45.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE ENERGY CALC, | | FBC13. | | | | 46.)PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR OVERHEAD DOOR HAS A PRODUCT | | LIMITATION OF -53, S10 SPECIFIES EITHER -61 FOR D1 OR | | -73 FOR D1A. | | | | 47.)PROVIDE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ALL | | PRODUCTS, INCLUDING ONES WITH A NOA.IF IT IS NOT | | AVAILABLE, A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE ISSUED. | | | | 48.)SPEC SHEETS PROVIDED FOR THE FLEMING DOOR. | | PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED.THE DOOR DOES NOT MEET | | DESIGN PRESSURE FOR D1A. | | | | 49.)UNITED ENERTECH LOUVERS APPEAR CODE COMPLIANT. | | SEE ITEM 47 AND 10. | | | | 50.)A200, NOTES FOR HC BAR BACKING REFER TO PT WOOD. | | NOTE THAT THAT IS A COMBUSTIBLE.BUILDING TYPE HAS NOT | | BEEN DECLARED, SO CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE | | DETERMINED. | | | | 51.)A200, ACCESSIBLE SINK IS TO BE A MAX OF 6 1/2 IN | | DEEP, FBC11-4.24. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
16:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
16:09 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-12-28 16:11:29 | **PLANS REDLINED** | | | | 1) AS LOADS FOR LIGHTING HAVE DECREASED DUE TO LESS | | WATTAGE ON FIXTURES, PLEASE REVISE PANELS/LOADS BEFORE | | FINAL. IF OTHER REVISIONS ARE DONE BEFORE ROUGH THIS | | MAY BE REVISED AT THAT TIME FOR INSPECTION. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-18 |
Time |
16:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-18 16:33:37 | | | *** DENIED 5TH REVIEW ***** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THE INPUT | | DATA REPORT IS BEING REVIEWED. | | PLEASE SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT SUBMITTED WITH | | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND BLACK BINDER WHICH WAS NOT | | SUBMITTED AS A RESUB AND ALSO THE NEW INPUT DATA REPORT | | SHEETS LEFT AFTER MEETING HELD ON 10/11/07 DO NOT | | CORRELATE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUMMARY SHEETS | | NOR DO EITHER ONE COORDINATE WITH THE PLANS. | | PLEASE KNOW AS THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THE SHEETS WERE | | SUBMITTED THIS IS THE FIRST ACTUAL REVIEW OF | | DOCUMENTS. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE IDR WHICH WAS RUN ON | | 4/25/07 UNDER THE 3.0 VERSION CONTAINS EXTERIOR | | LIGHTING FIXTURES HOWEVER THE SUMMARY SHEETS STATES | | *NONE ENTERED*. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE TYPE *M* FIXTURES FOR | | PARKING GARAGE WHICH ARE SHOWN AS 1000WATTS ON THE | | PLANS AND FIXTURE LEGEND ARE ONLY 455WATTS ON THE IDR. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE INPUT DATA REPORT DATED | | 9/11/07 DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES | | WHICH ARE NOT POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS CONTAIN NUMEROUS | | INCLUDING THE TYPE *M* AS NOTED ABOVE ALONG WITH | | MISSING TYPE *K*. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE INTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURES | | *J* AND *JQ* WHICH ARE IN SERVICE BAY AREAS IN WHICH | | THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES ON PLANS ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE | | IDR. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE STAIRS (BOTH), HALLWAY | | AREA, VESTIBULE ETC WHICH THESE TOTAL NUMBER OF | | FIXTURES ON PLANS EXCEED THAT AS ON THE IDR. | | | | THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES. PLEASE GO THROUGH THE ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS, PLEASE RUN COMPLETE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | UNDER 2.11 (2004 FBC W/2005 REVISION). | | THIS OFFICE WILL REQUIRE BOTH THE SUMMARY SHEETS AND | | THE INPUT DATA SHEETS TO COORDINATE WITH THE DATES THEY | | HAVE BEEN RUN.\ | | 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.3,13-103.1.1.1 | | | | ** PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. THIS | | WILL BE A RE-SUBMITTAL AND THE RE-SUBMITTAL FEE OF 10% | | OF THE BASE PERMIT FEE WILL BE DUE. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-27 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-27 |
Time |
15:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-27 16:32:54 | | | *** UNSAT 4TH REVIEW *** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH | | REQUESTED THE INPUT DATA REPORT TO BE SUBMITTED AS | | REQUIRED FOR REVIEW. THE RESPONSE LETTER FROM DESIGN | | TEAM MENTIONS THIS WILL BE SUBMITTED HOWEVER COULD NOT | | LOCATE THIS WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS OR OTHER | | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE SUBMIT SO THAT A REVIEW OF SAID ENTERED | | INFORMATION CAN BE REVIEW WITH PLANS. | | 13-415.1.B/13-415.2 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES MENTIONED THAT THE | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WAS STILL BEING SHOWN ON THE | | ADJACENT *BUILDING* ON ELECTRICAL AND OTHER TRADE | | SHEETS.. PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE WAS THAT THIS | | EQUIPMENT WOULD BE MOVED TO ROOF. THIS WAS DONE ON | | ELECTRICAL PLANS HOWEVER THE MECHANICAL PLANS STILL | | INDICATE THIS EQUIPMENT ON THE ADJACENT BUILDING. | | PLEASE ADJUST M-PLANS. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-22 |
Time |
11:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-22 |
Time |
09:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-22 11:16:36 | | | ******* UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ****** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THAT THERE ARE STILL SOME ITEMS FROM | | PREVIOUS REVIEWS WHICH HAVE NOT YET BEEN CLEARED UP AND | | NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE FROM DESIGNERS MENTIONS | | THE ADDRESS WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN BY THE ADDRESSING | | REVIEWER IS THAT OF 3023 AND IS NOW ON ALL TITLE BLOCKS | | ACCORDINGLY, HOWEVER THE TITLE BLOCKS ON ALL SHEETS | | STILL INDICATE 3021? | | PLEASE KNOW IF THIS IS THE ONLY COMMENT ON SOME SHEETS, | | THIS MAY BE HAND PRINTED ON SHEETS BY CONTRACTOR OR | | OTHER DESIGN STAFF. | | PLEASE REVISE ON SHEETS WHICH NEED TO BE CHANGED OUT. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO | | CONTROL OF EGRESS LIGHTING IN STAIRS. RESPONSE MENTIONS | | THAT ONCE ON DEVICE IS ACTIVATED THAT 15MINS IS MORE | | THAN ENOUGH TIME TO EGRESS TO THE NEXT LEVEL, HOWEVER | | THE COMMENT IS FOR THE FAILURE OF ANY ONE SINGLE DEVICE | | (OCCUPANCY SENSORS) CAN NOT LEAVE ANY ONE AREA OF | | EGRESS IN TOTAL DARKNESS. | | PLEASE SEE 7.8.1.2.2 AUTOMATIC, MOTION SENSOR?TYPE | | LIGHTING SWITCHES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE MEANS | | OF EGRESS, PROVIDED THAT THE SWITCH CONTROLLERS ARE | | EQUIPPED FOR FAIL-SAFE OPERATION, THE ILLUMINATION | | TIMERS ARE SET FOR A MINIMUM 15-MINUTE DURATION, AND | | THE MOTION SENSOR IS ACTIVATED BY ANY OCCUPANT MOVEMENT | | IN THE AREA SERVED BY THE LIGHTING UNITS. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE CHAPTER 10 OF THE FBC 1006.1.2 WHICH | | STATES THE SAME. | | IT IS LS 101 7.9.2.2 WHICH MENTIONS THE FAILURE OF A | | SINGLE DEVICE, SWITCHING, TRIPPING OF A BREAKER ETC. | | THIS WOULD REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF TWO OCCUPANCY SENSORS | | OR DEVICES OF SOME TYPE TO DETECT THE OCCUPANT AND TURN | | ON THE LIGHTING. IF AN OCCUPANT WAS TO LEAVE AN UPPER | | FLOOR, AND THE DEVICE WAS NOT IN WORKING ORDER, THEN A | | SECOND DEVICE IS REQUIRED IN THE VICINITY TO DO THE | | SAME AS THE PRIMARY DEVICE. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT AS THIS IS BEING CONSIDERED | | AND CONSTRUCTED AS A SEPARATE BUILDING, AS NOTED ON | | PREVIOUS REVIEW, THE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL | | EQUIPMENT IS STILL BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING ROOF OF THE | | EXISTING BUILDING WHICH IS NOT CONSIDER PART OF THE NEW | | *BUILDING* | | PLEASE RELOCATE. | | PLEASE SEE SOME SHEETS STILL INDICATE THE PREVIOUS WALL | | AND FLOOR LAYOUTS WHICH DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE REST | | OF THE PLANS. (*SITE PLANS*) | | FBC 106.1.2 | | 225.30, 230.3. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOW THERE ARE HAND DRAWN CHANGES TO | | SHEET E-101 WHICH ONE OF THE ITEMS IN THAT OF AN EXIT | | SIGN WHICH IS PLACED SO THAT THE OCCUPANTS IN SOUTHEAST | | STAIR TOWER ARE TO EGRESS INTO THE ADJACENT HUMMER | | BUILDING?? | | NO HAND DRAWN CHANGES ARE PERMITTED TO PLANS FS | | 471.025 | | PLEASE SEE FIRE AND BUILDING REVIEWS. | | PLEASE SEE THE ELEVATION ON A105 SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO | | BE AN EXIT DOORWAY FROM VESTIBULE TO OUTSIDE, SHOULD | | NOT THIS EXIT LIGHT BE LOCATED ABOVE THE EAST DOOR IN | | THIS STAIR TOWER? | | PLEASE SEE OTHER HAND DRAWN CIRCULAR SYMBOL WHICH IS | | ALSO ADJACENT TO THIS SAME AREA? | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE LETTERS MENTIONS THE OVER | | RIDE TIMES AND TIMES HOWEVER COULD NOT LOCATE THE TIMES | | FOR THE OCCUPANCY DEVICES. PLANS DO NOTE THE TIME FOR | | THE OVER RIDE OF THE SERVICE BAY. 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO THE | | MINIMUM LEVELS FOR HORN AND STROBE DEVISE WHICH ARE | | REQUIRED TO BE STATED ON THE BASE SET OF BUILDING PLANS | | FOR FBC ADA COMPLIANCE. IT IS KNOWN THAT ANY FA WORK | | WILL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT HOWEVER BASE BUILDINGS | | MUST INDICATE MINIMUM COMPLIANCE. | | FBC 11-4.28.1,.2 AND .3(4). | | FBC 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW AND RESPONSE | | MENTIONS THAT THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR WIND LOADS FOR | | ROOF TOP LIGHT POLES WILL BE STATED ON PLANS AND TO SEE | | FIXTURE LEGEND HOWEVER THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT | | INDICATE THE *140MPH MINIMUM* DESIGNATION. | | THE CALCULATIONS CAN BE SET UP AS A *PROVISO* WHICH | | WILL ALLOW ISSUANCE AND CALCULATIONS TO BE SUBMITTED | | BEFORE INSTALLATION, HOWEVER PLEASE STATE THE 140. FBC | | 106.1.2 | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE THIRD PARKING | | LEVEL/OUTSIDE/EXTERIOR LIGHTING WHICH STILL INDICATE | | LIGHTING TO A LIGHTING CONTACTOR #3, BUT NO DETAIL WAS | | SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE SHOW. | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WHICH MENTIONED TO | | CORRELATE AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND TO | | VERIFY THE METHOD AS SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE SEE THE FRONT COVER SHEET MENTIONS THAT THE | | INPUT DATA REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH | | COMPLIANCE REPORT, HOWEVER THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.AB.1.1 | | | | 10) NOTE: ** NOT A COMMENT FOR TEELE ENGINEERING. | | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH INDICATED THAT THE | | *S* SHEETS CONTAINED A *RUBBER-STAMP* FOR REQUIRED | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, AND RESPONSE WAS THAT ALL SHEETS | | WILL NOW BE SIGNED, HOWEVER ONLY ONE OF THE *S* SHEETS | | WERE CORRECTED. PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW NOTES AS | | THIS IS ONLY BEING NOTED BY THIS REVIEWER AT THIS TIME | | AND DOES NOT AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | FS 471.025 | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW ON PREVIOUS REVIEW | | WHICH REQUESTED ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS TO BE REMOVED | | FROM THE TWO COMPLETED SETS. ONE SET OF EACH OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED WITH THE TWO SETS | | SEPARATELY AND NOT INCLUDED IN SETS. | | THIS WILL HELP ALLEVIATE ANY CONFUSION FOR NEW AND OLD | | SHEETS , AND WILL HELP TO NOT CAUSE ANY FURTHER DELAYS | | IN THE PROJECT. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE AWARE OF COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH | | MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-01 |
Time |
18:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
18:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-01 18:30:50 | 2007-02-01 18:30:50 | | | | ******* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ****** | | | | *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW | | COMMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN PLANS AND NEW INFORMATION | | AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS. | | | | **** IMPORTANT**** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A *NO*, *OK* OR *NO/OK*. | | | | A) A, NO WILL CONTAIN A FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY | | THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE | | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE BELOW WITH **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE | | #1** | | | | B) A, OK, WILL HAVE NO COMMENTS EXCEPT PERHAPS A | | REFERENCE TO SEE ** NEW NOTES*. THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | NOTE WILL BE REMOVED. | | | | C) A, NO/OK, WILL HAVE FURTHER EXPLANATION AS PART OF | | THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL. | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WILL BE NOTED **PREVIOUS | | REVIEW NOTE #1** | | | | D) NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END AND LABELED ** | | NEW NOTES ** | | | | | | | | | | 1) A) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS HAS NOT YET BEEN | | CHANGED AND PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT A SEPARATE BUILDING | | BY DEFINITIONS OF THE FBC AND MAY OR MAY NOT CONTAIN A | | NEW ADDRESS. THIS HAS BEEN SENT TO THE ADDRESSING | | REVIEWER AS IT IS A CODE RELATED COMMENT. PLEASE SEE | | POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM BUILDING, AND FIRE REVIEWER(S). | | THIS ADDRESS MAY OR MAY NOT BE OK, IT IS UNCERTIAN AT | | THIS TIME. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLANS MENTIONS AND | | SHOWS "3021", HOWEVER THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED ON A | | LEGAL ADDRESS IN OUR SYSTEM OF "3001". | | PLEASE KNOW TITLE BLOCKS SHALL BE REVISED UPON | | CORRECTING OF ADDRESS. | | | | 1) NOTE: OK. | | | | 2) NOTE: OK FOR MEP PLANS, SEE NEW COMMENTS FOR OTHER | | SHEETS WHICH DO NOT APPLY TO TEELE & ASSC. | | | | 3) NOTE: NO/OK, NOTES ADDED FOR ITEMS BELOW 18INCHES, | | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE ROOMS CONTAINING FUEL/LIQUIDS ETC | | WHICH WILL BE A CLASS AND DIVISION LOCATION NEED TO BE | | DESIGNATED. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE NEC 511, AND PLEASE INDICATE ALL RELEVANT AREAS | | AND LAYOUT ON PLANS. | | | | 4) NOTE:NO, PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS FOR STAIRS WERE | | ADDED; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THIS COMMENT IS BASED ON ALL | | EGRESS PATHS WHICH MAY CONTAIN OCCUPANTS WHICH NEED TO | | EGRESS FROM THE BUILDING. | | PLEASE SEE THE EXIT CORRIDOR; PLEASE SEE AREAS OF | | PARKING GARAGE WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO CONTAIN ANY | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IS BEING | | SHOWN ON THESE SAME UPPER LEVELS WITH OUT THE USE OF | | ANY NIGHT LIGHTS OR PHOTO-CELL OVER RIDES EVEN FOR DAY | | TIME OPERATIONS FOR MINIMUM LIGHTING.PLEASE SEE | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO CONTACTORS AND CONTROLS. | | PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE STAIRS ARE SHOWING ONE LEVEL OF | | LIGHTING UNDER NORMAL AND ONE LEVEL OF LIGHTING UNDER | | EMERGENCY WHEN THE FIXTURES ARE THE SAME TYPES AND ARE | | BATTERY BACK UP. DO THESE CONTAIN A REDUCTION OF THE | | LIGHTING LEVELS BUILT IN? | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE STAIR LIGHTING IS BEING SHOWN | | ON OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICES WHICH ARE OK, HOWEVER | | PLEASE SEE DUE TO THE LAYOUT, THE FAILURE OF ONE DEVICE | | WOULD LEAVE ANY ONE AREA IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS PATH IN | | TOTAL WHICH WOULD NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LIGHTING FOR | | LIFE SAFETY. PLEASE ADJUST DEVICES OR CALL TO GO OVER | | OTHER POSSIBLE OPTIONS. | | ** PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING SCENARIO:AN OCCUPANT IS | | LOCATED IN THE PARKING GARAGE ON THE SECOND LEVEL (OR | | OTHER LOCATIONS IN BUILDING) WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN OF | | OVER RIDE(S) FOR LIGHTING WHEN THE LIGHTING SHUTS OFF | | DUE TO THE TIME SET. PLEASE SEE THE AREA FOR MEANS OF | | EGRESS WOULD BE A HAZARD AND SHOULD CONTAIN EITHER | | SENOR DEVICES WHICH PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR OVER RIDE OR | | OTHER MEANS OF LIGHT FOR THE OCCUPANT TO FIN THEIR WAY | | TO THE MANUAL OVER RIDE DEVICE. | | PLEASE PROVIDE TIMES OF SCHEDULING. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, | | 7.9.2.2. PLEASE SUBMIT AND SUPPLY ALL MIN PHOTO-METRICS | | REQUIRED FOR STAIR TOWERS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY | | POWER. | | PLEASE ALSO INDICATE LIGHTING LEVELS (MIN) REQUIRED FOR | | ALL OTHER AREAS OF EGRESS. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE AREAS | | ON PLANS WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS. | | 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE UNDER EM IN | | STAIRS. | | ALL OTHER AREAS 1FT MIN. | | | | 5) NOTE: OK. | | | | 6) NOTE: OK. | | | | 7) NOTE: OK. | | | | 8) NOTE: OK. | | | | 9) NOTE: OK. | | | | 10) NOTE: OK. | | | | 11) NOTE: OK. | | | | 12) NOTE: NO, NOTED ABOVE IN COMMENT #4. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR GARAGE AREAS LTS, | | REQ'D EM BACK UP. | | AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED ABOVE FOR ELECTRICAL REVIEW ALSO. | | LS101 7.9 | | | | 13) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS WHERE INGRESS | | INTO SPACE ARE SHOWN INDICATE A *S* AS FOR A STANDARD | | SWITCH. PLEASE SEE ANY OVER RIDE TYPE SHOWN THIS WAY | | SHOULD BE CLARIFIED ON SYMBOL LEGEND. | | PLEASE SEE SEPARATE AREAS (ELEVATOR PIT) WHICH WILL | | REQUIRE AUTOMATIC MEANS OF SHUT OFF (TIMER). PLEASE SEE | | THERE ARE OVER RIDES SHOWN ON CONTACTOR #1 WHICH DOES | | NOT INDICATE TYPE AND AMOUNT OF TIME ON THE OVER RIDE. | | PLEASE SEE OTHER AREAS WHICH A DEVICE WILL BE REQUIRED | | AND MAXIMUM TIMES FOR ALL DEVICES SHOULD BE INDICATED. | | PLEASE SEE 30MINS FOR OCCUPANCY SENSOR TYPE DEVICES AND | | 4HRS MAX FOR TIMER TYPE. | | PLEASE SEE INPUT DATA IS MISSING FROM THE ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS. | | PLEASE SEE METHOD USED WILL AFFECT THE INFORMATION. | | THESE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE METHOD *B*. | | ** PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES WITH RESPECT TO CONTACTORS, | | CONTROLS AND CIRCUITING ON PLANS AND CONTACTORS. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE FROM REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CHAPTER 13 FOR CONTROLS FOR ALL | | LIGHTING. | | PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW THE SYSTEM BEING PROPOSED. | | PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULING OF SYSTEMS. | | PLEASE PROVIDE OVER RIDES, LOCATIONS, AND AREAS FOR | | SEPARATE CONTROLS REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE FBC | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | PLEASE SEE SHOW AND INDICATE THE TYPE OF OVER RIDE | | DEVICES, AND MAX ALLOWED TIMES. (NOTE: TIMER TYPE (4HRS | | MAX), OCCUPANT SENSOR TYPE 30MINS MAX). | | ALL AREAS WITH FLR TO CEILING HEIGHT PARTITIONS REQUIRE | | SEPARATE CONTROLS. | | PLEASE PROVIDE PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS AND PLEASE SEE | | THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED | | "LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES" (LPD) ALLOWED FOR AREAS. | | PLEASE SEE SPACES AND USE PERMITTED IN TABLES. | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES? 13-415.2.B. | | ALL LPD'S ARE TO BE SHOWN. | | | | 14) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING | | SHEETS WITH RESPECT TO THE WALL(S) FROM THE SHOWROOM OF | | THE EXISTING BUILDING AND THE ADDITION. | | PLEASE SEE THAT A PARTIAL 2HR RATED WALL DOES NOT | | CONSTITUTE A SEPARATE BUILDING BY DEFINITION IN THE | | FBC. THIS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE A 4 HOUR RATED FIRE | | WALL. PLEASE SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF A FIRE WALL IN THE | | FBC. THE PLANS AS SUBMITTED DO NOT COMPLY WITH THIS. | | PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THIS AND COORDINATION OF SHEETS A | | SEPARATE SERVICE FOR THIS ADDITION TO AN EXISTING | | BUILDING IS NOT GRANTED AS PREVIOUSLY STATED. PLEASE | | ALSO SEE THE PLANS STILL INDICATE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT | | FOR THE NEW BUILDING BEING SHOWN INSTALLED ON THE | | EXISTING SHOW ROOM PORTION OF THE BUILDING. | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE NEW NOTES FOR COORDINATION | | FROM ELECTRICAL PLANS TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. | | | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT BEING CONSIDERED A SEPARATE | | "BUILDING" AND IS PART OF THE CURRENT STRUCTURE AS THIS | | NEW STRUCTURE CONTAINS OPENINGS ETC FOR EGRESS ETC. | | PLEASE SEE FBC DEFINITIONS. | | PLEASE SEE NEC 230.2, AS THE NEW PROPOSED SEPARATE | | SERVICE NOT BEING FED FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE | | LOCATION GROUPED ETC IS NOT PERMITTED AS SHOWN. 230.2, | | 230.72 ETC. | | IN ORDER TO GRANT THE NEW SERVICE FOR A NEW "BUILDING", | | THIS WOULD REQUIRE AND | | "FIREWALL", 4 HR RATED, COLLAPSIBLE ON BOTH SIDES WITH | | OUT AFFECTS ON THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF EITHER | | STRUCTURE. BY THE PLANS SUBMITTED, THIS IS NOT ACHIEVED | | AT THIS TIME. | | | | 15) NOTE: OK. | | | | 16) NOTE: OK.. | | | | 17) NOTE: OK. | | | | 18) NOTE: NO? RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED | | ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THIS HOWEVER THIS INFORMATION | | COULD NOT BE LOCATED. | | PLEASE KNOW PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO STATE THE MINIMUM, A | | *PROVISO* MAY BE SET UP TO OBTAIN THE STRUCTURAL | | CALCULATIONS LATER BEFORE ANY INSTALLATION OF BOLTS, | | BASE, ETC FOR POLES. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SUBMIT ALL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF TOP | | LT POLES WITH | | EPA FIGURED FOR ALL LT FIXTURES PROPOSED. | | THE CALCULATIONS AND SPEC FOR POLES WILL BE REVIEWED | | FOR STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS, WIND LOADS ETC BY THE | | STRUCTURAL REVIEWER. | | THEY MUST MEET FBC 2004 140MPH MIN, 3 SEC GUST. | | | | 19) NOTE: NO? RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED PLANS, | | HOWEVER NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND FOR PREVIOUS | | REQUEST. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE SPECS /CUT SHEETS FOR | | THE TANK LESS WATER HEATER. PLEASE BE SURE THEY | | INDICATE THE | | NRTL LISTING. | | 110.3, 90.7. | | | | 20) NOTE:NO, SAME COMMENT. THIS IS NOTED AS THIS IS | | BEING PROPOSED AS A SEPARATE BUILDING, YET THIS IS NOT | | BEING MET AT THIS TIME. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE AS PLUMBING PLANS ALSO INDICATE BEING TIED | | INTO THE EXISTING BUILDING, IT SEEMS THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION WOULD BETTER DESCRIBE PROJECT AS AN | | ADDITION. | | THIS WILL BE DECIDED BY DESIGN FOR NOTES FROM ALL | | REVIEWER(S). | | | | | | ************ NEW NOTES ********* | | | | 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE *S* SHEETS SUBMITTED CONTAIN A | | *RUBBER STAMP* FOR THE REQUIRED ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FROM | | THE ENGINEER. PLEASE SEE THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE 61G15-23.002 AND FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025. THIS | | COMMENT IS MADE AND REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS | | MADE BY OTHER REVIEWER(S). | | PLEASE KNOW ONE SET OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED AS THIS | | COMMENT HAS BEEN MADE TO THIS SAME ENGINEER ON OTHER | | PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY. | | | | 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS DO NOT | | CONTAIN ANY TITLE BLOCK FOR THE ENGINEER WHICH IS | | SIGNING AND SEALING DOCUMENTS. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THAT THE SEAL IS NOT CLEAR AND VISIBLE | | WITH INFORMATION ON SAID SEAL. | | PLEASE SEE THAT EVEN SHADOWING DOES NOT PROVIDE | | INFORMATION. | | FAC 61G15-23.002 AND 61G15-23.001., | | THIS COMMENT IS ALSO REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS | | MADE BY ANY OTHER TRADE(S). | | ONE SET IS BEING RETAINED. | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE FIRE SPRINKLERS EVEN THOUGH | | REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN WITH THE BASE BUILDING PERMITTED | | PLANS WILL STILL BE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE | | PERMIT, PLANS AND FEES AT A LATE DATE. | | | | 23) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE DETAILS FOR FIRE ALARM | | SYSTEM BEING PROPOSED AND HOW THIS SYSTEM WILL BE TIED | | IN THE EXISTING SYSTEM. PLEASE KNOW THE BASE LOCATIONS | | AND DEVICES ARE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME FOR BASE | | BUILDING. | | PLEASE SEE THAT ALL OF THE MINIMUM LEVELS TO MEET FBC | | 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) IS REQUIRED TO BE STATED ON | | PLANS. | | THIS COMMENT WAS NOT MADE ON THE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW | | BY THIS REVIEWER HOWEVER THIS IS NOW REQUIRED AS PART | | OF THE ELECTRICAL REVIEW. | | FBC 106.1.2 AND 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW THAT THE FIRE ALARM SCOPE OF WORK WILL | | STILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT PLANS AND FEES ART A | | LATER DATE. | | | | 24) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL DIFFERENCES ON | | THE ARCH SHEETS, FROM THE ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND | | PLUMBING SHEETS. | | WALLS DO NOT CORRELATE. (DOORS ETC) | | FBC 106.1, 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND | | COORDINATION ANDFBC CHAPTER 11. | | | | | | PLEASE SEE THE STAIRS AS THE ELECTRICAL PLANS SHOW | | DOORS WHICH ARE OPPOSING WHICH DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | REQUIREMENTS FOR ADA. PLEASE SEE STAIRS/VESTIBULE | | AREAS. THE A SHEETS DO NOT SHOW THIS SAME DOOR SWINGS. | | PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 11 AND BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS FOR | | THIS. THIS IS FOR INFORMATION AT THIS TIME AS | | COORDINATION BETWEEN THE SHEETS IS IMPERATIVE. | | | | 25) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THE CIRCUITS AS SHOWN ON THE | | PLANS WHICH ARE NOTED TO THE LIGHTING CONTACTORS ARE | | NOT COMPLETE ON THE LIGHTING CONTACTORS. | | PLEASE SEE THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE CIRCUITS ON THE | | SECOND FLOOR INDICATES TO LIGHTING CONTACTOR #2, | | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE CONTACTOR DETAIL ON THAT SHEET | | IS LABELED *CONTACTOR #1*. | | PLEASE SEE LEVELS ANDFIXTURES WHICH MENTIONS LIGHTING | | CONTACTOR #3, YET NO DETAIL FOR A LC #3 WAS SHOWN. | | PLEASE COORDINATE. | | PLEASE SEE NOTES ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE CONTACTORS | | AND THE OVER RIDE DEVICES REQUIRES AND THE MAXIMUM | | AMOUNT OF TIMES ON THESE OVER RIDES. | | | | 27) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 109.3.6.4.4 | | PLANS WHICH ARE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY AN | | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER SHALL CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT: * | | TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, | | THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE | | MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY | | STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND CHAPTER (FLORIDA | | STATUTES) 633. | | THIS IS REQUIRED WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY | | OTHER TRADES FOR ALL TRADES/TITLE SHEETS FOR EACH TRADE | | AND/OR TITLE BLOCKS. | | | | 28) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE FOR ALL | | EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | WIRED AHEAD OF ANY SWITCHING DEVICES. | | PLEASE KNOW THIS IS NOT A NEW CODE, HOWEVER SINCE THE | | IMPLEMENTATION OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE FBC. THIS | | JURISDICTION HAS HAD NUMEROUS INSTANCES WHERE THE | | EMERGENCY FIXTURES ARE BEING WIRED ON THE LOAD OF THE | | NEW OCCUPANCY SENSORS, OVER RIDES, TIMERS ETC. THIS | | SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE MADE ON PLANS, HOWEVER PLEASE | | PROVIDE A DETAIL CLOUDED OFF OF THE CONTACTOR OR ON A | | SEPARATE DETAIL OF SOME KIND. | | FBC 106.1.2, NEC 700.12E. | | | | 29) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COLOR CODING FOR CONDUCTORS FOR | | 277/480V SHOULD BE BROWN, PURPLE , YELLOW. AS NO | | 277/480V IS BEING SHOWN AS PART OF THIS BUILDING, THIS | | COULD BE REDLINED ON PLANS. | | | | 30) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COPY OF FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH | | RESPECT TO REPEAT CODE COMPLIANT COMMENTS. THIS IS ONLY | | A NOTICE BEING GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | ** PLEASE KNOW BASED ON THE NOTES FOR ALL TRADES, ONE | | COMPLETE SET OF PLANS IS BEING RETAINED BY THIS | | OFFICE. | | | | | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE AWARE OF COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH | | MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-10-02 |
Time |
20:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-09-30 |
Time |
19:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-02 00:00:00 | *******UNSAT ****** | | | | | | 1)A) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PERMIT APPLICATION | | AND PLANS MENTIONS AND SHOWS "3021", | | HOWEVER THIS PROJETC IS LOCATED ON A | | LEGAL ADDRESS IN OUR SYSTEM OF "3001". | | PLEASE KNOW TITLE BLOCKS SHALL BE | | REVISED UPON CORRECTING OF ADDRESS. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE ALL OF THE | | FOLLOWING CODES ARE STATED ON PLANS AT A | | MINIMUM. | | 2002 NFPA-70, 2002 NFPA-72, 2003 | | NFPA-101, NFPA-30A AND 2004 FBC. | | PLEASE KNOW, THERE MAY BE OTHER CODES | | REQUESTED BY OTHER TRADES TO BE STATED | | ON PLANS RELEVANT TO DESIGN. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING LICENSING | | INFORMATION ON TITLE BLOCKS FOR ALL MEP | | PLANS AS REQUIRED PER FAC 61G15-23.002, | | FS 471.023 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE NEC 511, AND PLEASE | | INDICATE ALLRELEVANT AREAS AND LAYOUT | | ON PLANS. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, | | 7.9.2.2. PLEASE SUBMIT AND SUPPLY ALL | | MIN PHOTO-METRICS REQUIRED FOR STAIR | | TOWERS UNDER NORMAL AND EMERGENCY POWER. | | PLEASE ALSO INDICATE LIGHTING LEVELS | | (MIN) REQUIRED FOR ALL OTHER AREAS OF | | EGRESS. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE AREAS ON | | PLANS WHICH DO NOT SEEM TO MEET THIS. | | 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL AND 1FT CANDLE | | UNDER EM IN STAIRS. | | ALL OTHER AREAS 1FT MIN. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE AREAS OF | | EGRESS WHICH IS NOT INDICATING ANY | | EGRESS OR BATTERY BACK UP LTS. PLEASE | | SEE ALL AREAS OF COMMON USAGE | | INCLUDING MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, ELEVATOR | | EQUIPMENT RM AND OTHER AREAS ON PLANS | | WHICH WILL REQUIRE BATTERY BACK UP | | FIXTURES OF SOME SORT. PLEASE SEE | | 700.12E, 700.16, LS 101 7.8, 7.9, STATE | | ELEVATOR CODE. | | ** PLEASE KNOW, EM ILLUMINATION IS | | REQUIRED OUT OF THE BUILDING TO THE | | PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. | | PLEASE ALSO BE SURE TO ADJUST FIXTURE | | SCHEDULE FOR ALL. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE LIST AND IDENTIFY ALL | | LIGHTING FIXTURES ON PLANS AND CORRELATE | | WITH THE SUBMITTED SCHEDULE. | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 ADMINISTRATIVE | | SECTIONS AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF WEST | | PALM BEACH. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE ROOM AND AREA | | DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS FOR ALL SPACES. | | PLEASE KNOW, MANY ITEMS FOR REVIEW OF | | CODE COMPLIANCE MAY NOT BE DONE AT THIS | | TIME. | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 ADMIN SECT. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE ALL CIRCUITING | | ON PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH THE PANEL | | SCHEDULES SUBMITTED. | | 408.4, 310.16, 240.4 | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.23 AND 620.24. | | PLEASE SEE LTS/RECEPTS FOR THE ELEVATOR | | ROOM(S) SHALL CONTAIN DEDICATED CIRCUITS | | AND MAY NOT FEED ANY OTHER AREAS. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SOME LOCATION ON | | PLANS WHERE AN "S" IS SHOWN WHICH IS THE | | SYMBOL FOR "SWITCH" ON LEGEND, HOWEVER | | THEY ARE NOT SHOWN AS CONTROLLING | | ANYTHING? | | PLEASE COMPLETE, OR ADJUST. | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A BATH RM WITH NOT | | LT FIXTURE BEING SHOWN. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE BATH RMS WITH MULTIPLE | | STALLS SHALL ALSO CONTAIN EM BATTERY | | BACK UP FIXTURES. | | LS 101 7.8,7.9 | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIRE REVIEW | | COMMENTS FOR GARAGE AREAS LTS, REQ'D EM | | BACK UP. | | AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED ABOVE FOR ELECTRICAL | | REVIEW ALSO. | | LS101 7.9 | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 2004 FBC CHAPTER 13 | | FOR CONTROLS FOR ALL LIGHTING. | | PLEASE INDICATE AND SHOW THE SYSTEM | | BEING PROPOSED. PLEASE PROVIDE | | SCHEDULING OF SYSTEMS. | | PLEASE PROVIDE OVER RIDES, LOCATIONS, | | AND AREAS FOR SEPARATE CONTROLS | | REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE FBC | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | PLEASE SEE SHOW AND INDICATE THE TYPE OF | | OVER RIDE DEVICES,A ND MAX ALLOWED | | TIMES. (NOTE: TIMER TYPE (4HRS MAX), | | OCCUPANT SENSOR TYPE 30MINS MAX). | | ALL AREAS WITH FLR TO CEILING HEIGHT | | PARTITIONS REQUIRE SEPARATE CONTROLS. | | PLEASE PROVIDE PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS | | AND PLEASE SEE THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED | | "LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES" (LPD) ALLOWED | | FOR AREAS. | | PLEASE SEE SPACES AND USE PERMITTED IN | | TABLES. | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES | | 13-415.2.B. | | ALL LPD'S ARE TO BE SHOWN. | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THIS IS NOT BEING | | CONSIDERED A SEPARATE "BUILDING" AND IS | | PART OF THE CURRENT STRUCTURE AS THIS | | NEW STRUCTURE CONTAINS OPENINGS ECT FOR | | EGRESS ETC. | | PLEASE SEE FBC DEFINITIONS. | | PLEASE SEE NEC 230.2, AS THE NEW | | PROPOSED SEPARATE SERVICE NOT BEING FED | | FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE LOCATION | | GROUPED ETC IS NOT PERMITTED AS SHOWN. 230.2,230.72 | | ETC. | | IN ORDER TO GRANT THE NEW SERVICE FOR A | | NEW "BUILDING", THIS WOULD REQUIRE AND | | "FIREWALL", 4 HR RATED, COLLAPSIBLE ON | | BOTH SIDES WITH OUT AFFECT THE | | STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF EITHER | | STRUCTURE. BY THE PLANS SUBMITTED,THIS | | IS NOT ACHIEVED AT THIS TIME. | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING EXT/EM LT | | AS VEST, FOR EGRESS. | | LS 101 7.8, 7.9 | | PLEASE SEE PLANS ARE REDLINED FOR MANY | | AREAS IN WHICH SOME COMMENTS ARE | | RELEVANT, HOWEVER ARE IN NO WAY ALL. | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.50, AS THE NEW | | FOOTER STEEL SHALL BE PART OF THE | | EXISTING GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM. | | 250.50 | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AREA ON "MEZZ" | | LEVEL WHICH SEEMS TO INDICATE A/C | | EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SEE 210.63 FOR MISSING GFI.210.8B | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ALL WIND LOAD | | CALCULATIONS FOR ROOF TOP LT POLES WITH | | EPA FIGURED FOR ALL LT FIXTURES | | PROPOSED. | | THE CALCULATIONS AND SPEC FOR POLES WILL | | BE REVIEWED FOR STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS, | | WIND LOADS ETC BY THE STRUCTURAL | | REVIEWER. | | THEY MUST MEET FBC 2004 140MPH MIN, 3 | | SEC GUST. | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURE | | SPECS /CUT SHEETS FOR THE TANKLESS WATER | | HEATER. PLEASE BE SURE THEY INDICATE THE | | NRTL LISTING. | | 110.3, 90.7. | | | | 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS PLUMBING PLANS | | ALSO INDICATE BEING TIED INTO THE | | EXISTING BUILDING, IT SEEMS THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION WOULD BETTER DESCRIBE | | PROJECT AS AN ADDITION. | | THIS WILL BE DECIDED BY DESIGN FOR NOTES | | FROM ALL REVIEWER(S). | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW, AS THERE ARE ITEMS NOT | | IN DESIGN AT THIS TIME REQUIRED FOR | | REVIEW, THERE MAY BE COMMENTS ON FURTHER | | REVIEWS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE AWARE OF COMMENTS FROM | | OTHER TRADES WHICH WILL AFFECT | | ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | 2006-10-01 00:00:00 | *** REVIEW IN PROGRESS, PLANS TO GO | | INTO "F" STATUS, NOTES OT FOLLOW. | 2006-09-29 00:00:00 | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW, |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-05-18 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-05-18 |
Time |
11:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
11:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-02 11:25:34 | ACCORDING TO YOUR PERMIT DESCRIPTION YOU PROVIDED US, | | YOU ARE BUILDING A NEW BUILDING FOR PARTS,OFFICES,ETC | | ON 1ST FLOOR AND CAR PARKING GARAGE ON 2ND FLOOR. | | THEREFORE, PLEASEPROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFO. | | | | 2. PLEASE SHOW STANDARDS NOTES OF CITY OF WPB ON | | DRAWINGSFOR SIDEWALK WIDTH , ITS SLOPE, DRIVEWAY, | | PARKING, HANDICAP PARKING, PAINTPER CITY CODES ETC.,, | | MUST MEET PER ADA,,ETC., | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | 4. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, CENTER LINE OF ROAD , | | SIDEWALK ELEVATION MUST MEET FL BLDG CODE, PLEASE SHOW | | ON THE DRAWINGS. | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,AND GEO TECH | | REPORT. | | 6.PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, WHAT CRITERIA | | YOU ASSUMEDFOR RUNOFF CAL.,, LIKE 1" OVER ENTIRE SITE | | OR2.5"CRITERIA, ?PERVIOUS AREA, LIKE GREEN, | | LAKES, ETC,IMPERVIOUS AREA CAL., | | 7. WHAT IS THE SITE AREA, YOU ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS | | PROJECT ONLY ? SO, WE CAN CHECK PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS | | CAL. PLEASE SHOW PRE & POST CHANGE IN | | PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AREA. | | 8. HOW YOU CONNECT TO THE STORM WATER PIPES IN YOUR | | SITE? ITS DETAILS.PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES | | AROUND YOUR SITE SO, WE CANSEE THE BEST PIPE TO | | CONNECT WITH THE STORM WATERFROM ALL OTHER STORM | | WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE CONTROL | | STRUCTURES WITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | ELEVATION, ETC DID YOU USE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ? | | 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT FENCE AROUND THE SITE | | 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED | | 11. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2006-10-23 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2006-10-23 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-23 13:48:30 | FAILED FOR FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | NEED CIVIL DRAWINGS, WHAT WE NEED IN CIVIL DWGS ARE AS | | FOLLOWS | | | | 1. POLLUTION PREVENTION PLANS, & DETAILS | | 2. STORM WATER CAL.,PERVIOUS,IMPERVIOUS AREA | | CAL.,RUNOFF CAL.,GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS,SFWMD PERMIT | | 3.UTILITY REVIEW FROM 45TH STREET (MANNY G.) | | 4. SIDEWALK,DRIVEWAY ,APPROACH, PARKING, ADA | | REQUIREMENTS, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, ETC., PER CITY OF WPB | | STANDARDS | | 5.SITE ELE.,CENTER LINE ROAD ELE, SIDEWALK ELE, FIRST | | FLOOR ELE, ETC., FOR FLOOD CONTROL | | 6. PLEASE SHOW STORM WATER INLET,OUT FALLS ETC., | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM TO EXPEDITE THE PERMIT | | PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI 805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
17:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
16:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-13 17:04:33 | **APPROVED***** | | | | | | ALL COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS HAVE | | BEEN SATISFIED;PLAN SHEETS A-105, E- 100, 101, 102, | | 103, AND 200 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-17 15:37:57 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | 03.ON PAGE E-103 ONLY TWO ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS | | EXIST.EXIT SIGNAGE IS USED TO DIRECT PERSONS TO EXITS | | EVEN WHEN THEY ARE NOT CLEARY OBVIOUS.DISPLAY NEW | | EXIT SIGN PLACEMENT SUCH THAT NO POINT IN AN EXIT | | ACCESS CORRIDOR IS IN EXCESS OF THE RATED VIEWING | | DISTANCE OR 100 FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM THE | | NEAREST SIGN. | | | | 04.NO EMERGENCY SIGN LIGHTING DECLARED ON PAGE E-103. | | PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF THESE DEVICES | | | | 09.BUILDING ADDRESS WITH A MININIMUM OF 6" IN HEIGHT | | AND 1" IN WIDTH REQUIRED.IN ADDITION TO THE HEIGHT | | REQUIREMENT AS SHOWN ON SHEET A-5, THE WIDTH | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE ADHERED ALSO. | | | | 15.CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION | | OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241.INDICATE ON | | APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | 16.DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. | | INDICATE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | 17.A KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING. | | INDICATE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET THAT THE KNOX BOX | | WILL BE INSTALLED IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION AND/OR | | WHERE DIRECTED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL. | | | | NEW COMMENT | | | | AA.IT IS NOTED AS PER LILU URSA THAT THE NUMERICAL | | ADDRESS IS 3023;HOWEVER3021 IS LISTED IN THE TITLE | | BLOCK OF SOME OF THE SUBMITTED PLAN SHEETS. | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE (ON THE PLANS) EACH COMMENT | | WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-02-23 10:18:31 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | REVIEW OF 10/25/2006 STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 01.INDICATE THE TYPES OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS THAT ARE | | PLANNED FOR THE BUILDING.PLEASE BE SPECIFIC | | | | 02.SPRINKLER PLANS WERE SUBMITTED, HOWEVER, SEE | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW NOTE #22 IN REFERENCE TO THE | | SIGNING AND SEALING OF DOCUMENTS. | | | | 03.ON PAGE E-103 ONLY TWO ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS | | EXIST.EXIT SIGNAGE IS USED TO DIRECT PERSONS TO EXITS | | EVEN WHEN THEY ARE NOT CLEARY OBVIOUS. ADD EXTRA EXIT | | SIGN LIGHTIN PARKING AREA DIRECTING PERSONS TO THE | | NEAREST EXIT. | | | | 04.NO EMERGENCY SIGN LIGHTING DECLARED ON PAGE E-103. | | PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF THESE DEVICES | | | | 06.PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE CO | | DETECTORS PLANNED FOR USE. | | | | 09.BUILDING ADDRESS WITH A MININIMUM OF 6" IN HEIGHT | | AND 1" IN WIDTH REQUIRED.PLEASE DISPLAY/SHOW ON THE | | APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION | | | | 12.NO PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS PROVIDED.SHOW THE | | LOCATION OF THE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS WHICH SATISFY THE | | 75' TRAVEL DISTANCE | | | | 13.PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGHT REQUIREMENTS | | FOR ALL HANDRAILS, GUARDRAILS, AND CABLE RAIL SYSTEMS. | | INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THIS INFORMATION ON THE | | SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL SHEET(S) | | | | 15.CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION | | OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241.INDICATE ON | | APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | 16.DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. | | INDICATE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | | | 17.A KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING. | | INDICATE ITS LOCATION ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR | | ELEVATION | | | | 19.PLEASE DECLARE DISTANCE FROM EXHAUST TERMINATION | | POINTS TO ANY BUILDING OPENINGS.SHOW THE DISTANCE OF | | EXHAUST FUMES BEING EMITTED TO THE NEAREST WINDOWS, | | DOORS, AIR INTAKES, OR SIMILAR OPENINGS | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE (ON THE PLANS) EACH COMMENT | | WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2006-10-25 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2006-10-25 |
Time |
14:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-25 14:48:51 | 1. PLEASE INDICATE THE TYPES OF AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS THAT | | ARE PLANNED FOR THE BUILDING. | | 2. PLANS SEEM TO INDICATE THAT THE BUILDING WILL BE | | FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED HOWEVER NO FIRE SPRINKLER | | PLANS WERE NOTED. | | 3. ON PAGE E-103 ONLY TWO ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS EXIST. | | EXIT SIGNAGE IS USED TO DIRECT PERSONS TO EXITS EVEN | | WHEN THEY ARE NOT CLEARLY OBVIOUS. | | 4. NO EMERGENCY LIGHTING DECLARED ON PAGE E-103. 5. NO | | EXIT SIGN MARKINGS SHOWN ON PAGE E-200. | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE CO | | DETECTORS PLANNED FOR USE. DO THEY COME FACTORY SET OR | | WILL CALIBRATION GAS BE NEEDED TO SET THESE POINTS. 7. | | NO EMERGENCY LIGHTS DISPLAYED FOR MEZZANINE ON PAGE | | E-102. | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF CHEMICALS AND THEIR AMOUNTS | | PLANNED FOR THE BUILDING. | | 9. BUILDIND ADDRESS REQUIRED . A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 6" | | IN HEIGHT AND 1" IN WIDTH. | | 10. PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR | | WALLS AND CEILINGS IN NON AUTOMOTIVE WORK AREAS. 11. | | SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR FIRE SPRINKLER | | AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. | | 12. NO PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS PROVIDED. | | 13. PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS | | FOR ALL HANDRAILS, GUARDRAILS, AND CABLE RAIL SYSTEMS. | | 14. PLEASE DECLARE OCCUPANCY TYPE AND OCCUPANT LOADS | | FOR THE BUILDING. | | 15. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | WITH NFPA 241. | | 16. DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. 17. A | | KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING. 18. IS THE | | BUILDING CONSIDERED OPEN OR CLOSED FOR DESIGN | | PURPOSES. | | 19. PLEASE DECLARE DISTANCE FROM EXHAUST TERMINATION | | POINTS TO ANY BUILDING OPENINGS. | | 20. PLEASE INDICATE HOW FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBE LIQUIDS | | WILL BE STORED, HANDLED, AND DISPOSED OF WITHIN THE | | BUILDING. | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, CHIEF FIRE PREVENTION OFFICER 804-4709 | | | | MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS, FIRE PREVENTION CAPTAIN 805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-08 |
Time |
14:57 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-09-08 14:58:28 | TO "SHILL" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
spalmer |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
spalmer |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-01-10 08:45:28 | TO SAMANTHA HILLS DESK |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
15:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
15:16 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-12-28 15:16:43 | TO DEWEY PALMERS DESK |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-16 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-16 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-27 11:39:22 | TO "COMM" BD#53 | 2007-07-16 11:43:35 | WAITING FOR " COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-17 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-17 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-17 15:28:47 | TO "COMM" BD#48 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-12 |
Time |
09:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-12 |
Time |
09:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-01-29 08:53:44 | TO "COMM" BD#48 | 2007-01-12 09:28:31 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2006-10-25 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-09-25 00:00:00 | TO "COMM" BD#45 | 2006-09-14 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-02 |
Time |
09:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-02 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
Time |
10:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-05-09 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-02-14 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-02-14 |
Time |
15:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-14 15:42:53 | COMMENTS LIST BELOW IN RELATION TO PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW | | COMMENTS AS WELL AS RESPONSES. | | | | 1. OK | | | | 2. AIR FROM SERVICE GARAGE MAY NOT BE USED FOR | | VENTILLATION OF MEN'S LOCKER ROOM PER FBC,M 403.2.1(3). | | VENTILLATION SHOULD COME DIRECTLY FROM THE OUTDOORS. | | | | 3. FBC,M 804.3.5 APPLIES TO CHIMNEYS AND VENTS FOR | | SOLID FUEL BURNING APPLIANCES AND DOS NOT APPLY IN THIS | | CIRCUMSTANCE. A MINIMUM OF 10' BETWEEN GARAGE EXHAUST | | FANS AND INTAKE OPENINGS IS REQUIRED PER FBC,M | | 401.5.1. | | | | 4. OK | | | | 5. OK | | | | 6. OK | | | | 7. SEE COMMENT #3 | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW BY: | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | 561-805-6734 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-10-18 |
Time |
07:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-10-18 |
Time |
06:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-18 08:32:40 | DENIED: | | 1.PLEASE NOTE PERMIT APPLICATION INDICATES 2 STORY | | PARKING GARAGE WHEREAS THE THE PLANS APPEAR TO HAVE THE | | REPAIR OR SERVICE GARAGE ON THE FIRST FLOOR WITH | | PARKING ABOVE. | | | | 2.PLAN SHEET M-100,THE DOOR INTO THE MEN'S LOCKER | | ROOM (A111) IS INDICATED AS "LOUVERED BOTH SIDES". | | PLEASE CLARIFY IS THIS AIR MAKE-UP?PLEASE SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | 3. PER 2004 FMC 401.5.1 OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE OPENINGS | | SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 10FT FROM ANY HAZARDOUS | | EXHAUST.AIR FROM THE GARAGE SHALL NOT BE | | RECIRCULATED. | | | | 4. 2004 FMC 404.3 CONNECTING WAITING ROOMS, OFFICES AND | | SIMILAR USES THAT ARE ACCESSORY TO THE PUBLIC GARAGE | | SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A POSITIVE PRESSURE. | | | | 5. 2004 FMC 502.14,THE EXHAUST FROMA REPAIR GARAGE | | SHALL RUN CONTINUOUSLY. | | | | 6.PLEASE PROVIDE FRESH AIR CALCULATIONS FOR ALL AREAS | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2004 FMC TABLE 403.3. | | | | 7.PLAN SHEET A-109 THE EXHAUST APPEARS TO TO BE | | WITHIN 10 FT OF THE FRESH AIR INTAKE LOUVERS, AIR | | REMOVED BY BY THE EXHAUST SHALL BE DISCHARGED OUTDOORS | | AT A POINT WHERE IT CAN NOT BE READILY DRAWN BACK INTO | | THE BUILDING. | | | | 8.PLEASE PROVIDE CLEARANCES FROM OTHER BUILDINGS ON | | THE SAME LOT, FRESH AIR INTAKES, DOORS, WINDOWS, ETC. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS | | AT (561)805-6719 OR E-MAIL [email protected]. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
10:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-28 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-08-28 10:17:41 | STAMPED 3RD SET OF PLANS COPIED FROM ONE SET AND | | RESEALED & RESIGNED BY THE ENGINEER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
10:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
10:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-12 |
Time |
17:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-12 |
Time |
17:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-12 14:39:15 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE IMPRESSION SEAL SHALL | | IMPRESS INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC 61G1-16.002(1) & FS | | 481.2055 ON EACH SHEET. | | *****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION SHALL | | BE IMPRESSED ON EACH SHEET, AND THE INFORMATION SHALL | | BE LEGLBLE. NOT ALL INFORMATION IS LEGIBLE. | | | | 2. OK | | | | 3. SHT A-104 INDICATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND OCCUPANCY | | OF THE SERVICE AREA, OIL STORAGE ARE, AND BUSINESS | | AREAS. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES FOR | | EACH OCCUPANCY PER TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. SEPARATE | | FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH SEX PER SECTION 403.2. | | ONLY MEN'S FACILITIES ARE SHOWN. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE INFORMATION IS NOT LOCATED | | ON SHT A-104. ALSO RESPONSE "ALSO PLEASE SEE RESPONSES | | TO BUILDING PLAN REVIEW" IS NOT TOO CLEAR AS BUILDING | | HAS 51 COMMENTS. PLEASE INDICATE WHICH COMMENT WILL | | RESPOND TO MY COMMENT. THIS WILL HELP EXPEDITE THE PLAN | | REVIEW PROCESS. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE SOME AREAS | | THAT ARE NOT STORAGE. THE PARTS WARRANTY AREA, AND THE | | LOUNGE/TRAINING AREA.--SECTION 403.3 STATES THAT | | THE REQUIRED WATER CLOSETS, LAVS, SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED | | EQUALLY BETWEEN THE SEXES.THE OCCUPANT LOAD SHALL BE | | COMPOSED OF 50 PERCENT OF EACH SEX, UNLESS STATISTICAL | | DATA APPROVED BY THE CODE OFFICIAL INDICATE A DIFFERENT | | DISTRIBUTION OF THE SEXES. | | | | 4. SHT A-200 SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR THE FOLLOWING:FOR | | W/C'S | | A. OK | | B. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT DETAILS 18 & 31 SHOW THE FLUSH | | CONTROL ON THE WALL SIDE. | | FOR TOILET STALL | | A. OK | | FOR THE URINAL | | A. OK | | FOR LAVS | | A. 11-4.19.2 CLEARANCES | | ****NOT ADDRESSED | | B. 11-4.19.5 FAUCETS | | ****NOT ADDRESSED | | | | 5. SHT A-201 SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR THE FOLLOWING:FOR | | KIT. SINK | | A. 11-4.24.5 CLEAR FLOOR SINK (FORWARD APPROACH | | REQUIRED) | | ****NOT ADDRESSED | | B. OK | | | | 5. OK | | | | 6. SHT P-100 BECAUSE OF THE AUTOMOBILE SERVICE WORK AN | | OIL/GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT | | LYNN MASSON, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANAGER FOR A | | DETERMINATION. CONTACT HER AT (561) 822-2271, OR BY FAX | | (561) 822-2279, OR BY E-MAIL [email protected]. WASTE | | ORD. 3434. | | ****WAITING FOR WORD FROM ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AS | | THEY WILL HAVE TO ISSUE THE RESULTS OF THE REQUIREMENT. | | THERE ARE STILL SERVICE SINKS AND IT WILL BE THEIR | | DETERMINATION. | | | | 7. SHT P-101 SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE | | INSTANT-FLOW WATER HEATER FOR THE KITCHEN SINK. SPECS. | | SHALL SHOW A LISTING FOR THE W/H. SECTIONS 106.1.2 & | | 303.4. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS | | WERE NOT LOCATED. | | | | 8. SHT P-200 SHOW THE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION | | 1101.8 FOR THE STORM RISERS. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE CLEANOUTS FOR SECTIONS | | 708.3.1, 708.3.2, 708.3.3, & 708.3.4 WERE NOT SHOWN ON | | THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR ON THE RISER DIAGRAMS. | | | | 9.OK | | 10. OK | | | | 11. AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER SUPPLY TO | | THE BUILDING. SECTION 608.13.2. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON | | EACH BUILDING. PLEASE INDICATE A BACKFLOW PRIOR TO THE | | WATER SERVICE ENTERING THE BUILDING TO SHOW | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | 12. SHT P-200 WATER RISER DIAGRAM. FULL OPEN VALVES | | REQUIRED ON EACH WATER DOWN-FEED PIPE. SECTION | | 606.1(4). | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE VALVES ARE NOT SHOWN AT | | FIXTURES P1, P2, P3, P4, P4, P6 & P9. | | | | 13. OK | | 14. OK | | 15. OK | | 16. OK | | | | ************NEW COMMENT************* | | | | 1B. SHTS A-200 & A-201 ARE OUT OF SEQUENCE IN ONE SET | | OF PLANS. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
15:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-14 16:51:48 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE IMPRESSION SEAL SHALL | | IMPRESS INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC 61G1-16.002(1) & FS | | 481.2055 ON EACH SHEET. | | | | 2. ALL PME SHEETS SHALL SHOW THE CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER ON EACH SHEET. SOME SHEETS HAVE | | OTHERS DO NOT. FAC 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. | | | | 3. SHT A-104 INDICATE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND OCCUPANCY | | OF THE SERVICE AREA, OIL STORAGE ARE, AND BUSINESS | | AREAS. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM FACILITIES FOR | | EACH OCCUPANCY PER TABLES 1004.1.2 & 403.1. SEPARATE | | FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH SEX PER SECTION 403.2. | | ONLY MEN'S FACILITIES ARE SHOWN. | | | | 4. SHT A-200 SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR THE FOLLOWING:FOR | | W/C'S | | A. 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | B. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | FOR TOILET STALL | | A. 11-4.17.3 EXCEPTION(1) - 60" REQUIRED FROM WALL | | NEXT TO THE W/C TO THE SIDE OF THE LAV. SEE FIG. | | 11-30(E) | | FOR URINAL | | A. 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS | | FOR LAVS | | A. 11-4.19.2 CLEARANCES | | B. 11-4.19.5 FAUCETS | | | | 5. SHT A-201 SHOW COMPLIANCE FOR THE FOLLOWING:FOR | | KIT. SINK | | A. 11-4.24.5 CLEAR FLOOR SINK (FORWARD APPROACH | | REQUIRED) | | B. 11-4.24.7 FAUCETS (VIEW 1 SHOWS A DIFFERENT FAUCET | | TYPE FROM THE COUNTER DETAIL PLEASE CORRELATE TO | | REQUIRED TYPE FAUCET). | | | | 5. SHT P-100 INDICATES EXISTING SANITARY BLDG DRAIN. | | THIS WAS PROBABLY INSTALLED AS A SEWER FROM THE HUMMER | | BLDG. ORIGINALLY. PLEASE INDICATE THE MATERIAL THAT WAS | | INSTALLED, AS THE MATERIAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY | | WITH TABLES 702.1 & 702.2. INDICATE THE DRAINAGE | | FIXTURE UNITS FROM THE HUMMER BUILDING. A COPY OF THE | | HUMMER BUILDING PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO VERIFY DFU'S IN ORDER TO PROPERLY SIZE THE | | BUILDING DRAIN FOR THE SERVICE/PARKING BUILDING. | | INDICATE IF THE CLEANOUT REQUIRED BY SECTION 708.3.5 | | NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE BLDG DRAIN AND THE BLDG SEWER | | OF THE HUMMER BLDG HAS BEEN DELETED. SECTION 106.1.1 & | | TABLE 710.1(1). | | | | 6. SHT P-100 BECAUSE OF THE AUTOMOBILE SERVICE WORK AN | | OIL/GREASE INTERCEPTOR MAY BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT | | LYNN MASSON, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANAGER FOR A | | DETERMINATION. CONTACT HER AT (561) 822-2271, OR BY FAX | | (561) 822-2279, OR BY E-MAIL [email protected]. WASTE | | ORD. 3434. | | | | 7. SHT P-101 SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE | | INSTANT-FLOW WATER HEATER FOR THE KITCHEN SINK. SPECS. | | SHALL SHOW A LISTING FOR THE W/H. SECTIONS 106.1.2 & | | 303.4 | | | | 8. SHT P-200 SHOW THE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION | | 1101.8 FOR THE STORM RISERS. | | | | 9. SHT P-200 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN ON RISERS RD1, | | RD3, & RD4 DOES NOT REFLECT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE SHOWN ON | | THE ROOF PLUMBING PLAN. PLEASE CORRELATE RISERS AND | | ROOF PLAN. SECTION 106.1.1 & TABLE 1106.3. | | | | 10. SHT P-200 EWH PIPING SCHEMATIC. SHOW COMPLIANCE | | WITH SECTION 607.3.2 THERMAL EXPANSION CONTROL. | | | | 11. AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER SUPPLY TO | | THE BUILDING. SECTION 608.13.2. | | | | 12. SHT P-200 WATER RISER DIAGRAM. FULL OPEN VALVES | | REQUIRED ON EACH WATER DOWN-FEED PIPE. SECTION | | 606.1(4). | | | | 13. SHT P-200 SANT. RISER DIAGRAM INDICATE IF CLEANOUT | | REQUIRED BY SECTION 708.3.5 FROM HUMMER BLDG HAS BEEN | | DELETED. SHOW THE CLEANOUT REQUIRED BY SECTION 708.3.5 | | NEAR THE JUNCTION OF THE BLDG DRAIN AND THE BUILDING | | SEWER FOR THE SERVICE/PARKING BUILDING. SHOW THE DFU'S | | AS THEY ACCUMULATE THE THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE DFU'S | | FROM THE HUMMER BUILDING. TABLE 710.1(1) & SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | | | 14. SHT P-200 PLUMBING SPECIFICATIONS #5(A) INDICATES | | CPVC AS AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTATUTE FOR THE SANITARY | | WASTE. THIS IS NOT APPROVED PER TABLES 702.1 & 702.2. | | | | 15. SHT P-200 PLUMBING SPECIFICATIONS #5(F) AIR | | CHAMBERS ARE NOT APPROVED. DELETE FROM REFERENCE. | | SECTION 604.9. | | | | 16. SHT P-200 SANT., STORM, AND WATER RISER DIAGRAM | | REFER TO THE CIVIL PLANS. THE CIVIL PLANS WERE NOT | | SUBMITTED. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CIVIL PLANS. | | SECTION 106.1.2. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-08-08 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-08-08 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
Time |
09:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-05-08 |
Time |
09:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
Time |
16:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-02-05 16:18:12 | 1) RESPONSE NOTED, HOWEVER, THE ORIGINAL COMMENT | | STANDS. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED | | AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | 2) RESPONSE NOTED, HOWEVER, SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS | | CONTINGENT UPON ZONING COMPLIANCE REVIEW AT THE TIME OF | | PERMITTING. | | | | 3) PLEASE CLARIFY THE 9 SPACES SOUTH OF THE VW | | SHOWROOM. THEY?RE DESIGNATED AS CUSTOMER PARKING; | | HOWEVER, THEY ALSO APPEAR TO BE COUNTED AS DISPLAY | | SPACE. | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER AT 561-822-1435 | | WITH ANY QUESTIONS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2006-10-04 |
Time |
16:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2006-10-04 |
Time |
16:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-04 00:00:00 | ** FAILED ** | | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF BUILDING | | PERMIT. | | | | AS SHOWN, PHASE I PARKING TABLE DOES NOT | | MATCH THE PARKING SHOWN ON THE SITE | | PLAN. THE TABLE STATES | | THAT 75 PARKING SPACES ARE PROVIDED | | WHILE ONLY 63 PARKING SPACES HAVE BEEN | | DESIGNATED TO COUNT TOWARD THE REQUIRED | | PARKING. THE TOTAL PARKING REQUIREMENT | | IS 69 SPACES, LEAVING THE SITE 6 | | PARKING SPACES SHORT OVERALL. | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, PLANNER, | | AT (561) 822-1435 OR [email protected] | | WITH ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |