 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 06071722
Plan Review Stops For Permit 06071722 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-03-17 14:37:07 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 06071722 | | ADD: 2823 N AUSTRALIAN AVE | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | TEL: (561) 718-9166 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2NDREVIEW REVISIONREVISION 1 & 3 | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE | | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 | | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN | | THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF | | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY | | WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE | | SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS | | A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D ) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | BUILDING WITH THE2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | 2) THIS IS NEW WORK TO THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT OR | | REVISION PLEASE UPDATE VALUES IN THE JOB, ADDITIONAL | | PERMIT FEES MAY OCCUR. | | CITY OF WPB CODE OF ORDINANCES 3333-00. | | REVISION# 1 NEW COVERED PATIO | | REVISION# 3 NEW ROOF HATCH, LATTER AND GUARD RAIL | | | | 3) REVISION # 1 COMPLIED. | | | | 4)REVISION# 1,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES, 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS | | ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | 1) BUTLER ROOF SYSTEM RULE 9B-72.010 (31)(D) | | 1609.7.1 ROOF DECK. | | THE ROOF DECK SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE WIND | | PRESSURES DETERMINED UNDER EITHER THE PROVISIONS OF | | SECTION 1609.6 FOR BUILDINGS WITH A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT | | NOT EXCEEDING 60 FEET (18 288 MM) OR SECTION 1609.1.1 | | FOR BUILDINGS OF ANY HEIGHT. | | | | 5)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION | | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE | | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT | | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT | | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 6)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | NOTE: THIS ADDITION WILL STILL BY DEFINITION BE | | CONSIDERED A "ENCLOSED WALKWAY" LESS THAN 30 FEET WIDE | | CONNECTING TWO BUILDINGS. | | | | REVISON# 3: | | 7) THE NEW ROOF HATCH, LATTER AND GAURDRAIL SYSTEM. THE | | GUARDRAIL SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO ASCE 7-98 WHICH WAS THE | | 2001 FBC NOT THE CURRENT 2004 FBC. PLEASE CORRECT TO | | THE CURRENT STANDARD ASCE 7-02. | | | | 8) PLEASE HAVE THE ENGINEER OF RECORD JOEL MIDDLEBROOKS | | REVIEW THE GUARDRAIL CALCULATIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, | | BEFORE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 9) REVISION# 3,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES, 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT | | INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS | | ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | 1) ROOF HATCH RULE 9B-72 .010(31)(A) | | | | 10)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT | | APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO | | COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 11)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-26 08:51:13 | REV DATED 2-19-08 SIDEWALKS |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
07:17 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
07:17 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-01-31 08:05:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 06071722 | | ADD: 2823 N AUSTRALIAN AVE | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | TEL: (561) 718-9166 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 1STREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE | | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 | | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN | | THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF | | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY | | WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE | | SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS | | A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D ) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | BUILDING WITH THE2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | 2) THIS IS NEW WORK TO THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT OR | | REVISION PLEASE UPDATE VALUES IN THE JOB, ADDITIONAL | | PERMIT FEES MAY OCCUR. | | CITY OF WPB CODE OF ORDINANCES 3333-00. | | | | 3) THE REVISION OR ADDITION TO THIS PERMIT DOES NOT | | INDICATE TO WHATWIND DESIGN THIS ADDITION WAS | | DESIGNED TO.1609.6.2 WIND DESIGN PROCEDURES | | 1)THE BASIC WIND SPEED, V, SHALL BE | | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1609.3. THE WIND | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO COME FROM ANY HORIZONTAL | | DIRECTION. | | | | 2) AN IMPORTANCE FACTOR, IW, SHALL BE | | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WTIH SECTION1609.5. | | | | 3) AN EXPOSURE CATEGORY SHALL BE DETERMINED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH 1609.4. | | | | 4) A HEIGHT AND EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT COEFFICIENT, | | * SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM TABLE 1609.6.2.1(4) | | | | 5) DETERMINE IF ADDITION IS TO BE DESIGNED AS | | PARTIALLY OPEN OR ENCLOSED. 1609.1.4.1./ 1609.2 | | DEFINITIONS. | | | | 4)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES, 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR | | OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | FOLLOWS: | | 1) BUTLER ROOF SYSTEM | | 1609.7.1 ROOF DECK. | | THE ROOF DECK SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE WIND | | PRESSURES DETERMINED UNDER EITHER THE PROVISIONS OF | | SECTION 1609.6 FOR BUILDINGS WITH A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT | | NOT EXCEEDING 60 FEET (18 288 MM) OR SECTION 1609.1.1 | | FOR BUILDINGS OF ANY HEIGHT. | | | | 5)PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION | | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE | | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT | | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT | | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 6)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | NOTE: THIS ADDITION WILL STILL BY DEFINITION BE | | CONSIDERED A "ENCLOSED WALKWAY" LESS THAN 30 FEET WIDE | | CONNECTING TWO BUILDINGS. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-01-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-09 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-09 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-09 14:40:24 | REVISION# 3 SHEETS A0, 01,1.01, 2.01, 2.02, & 2.03 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-10-26 15:43:01 | REV # 2. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
1.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-08-23 07:37:39 | | | *** ISSUED PERMIT*** | | -PLAN REVIEW HISTORY- | | | | PERMIT# 06071722 | | ADDRESS: 2823 N AUSTRALIAN AVE | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | TELL # (561)718-9166 | | | | THE ATTACHED COMMENTS ARE PART OF THE PERMIT AND PLAN | | REVIEW PACKAGE AND ARE | | NOT TO BE REMOVED FROM THE ISSUED SET OF PLANS.106.1.1 | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/ 06. | | | | BUILDING PROVISOS: | | | | 1)109.3.10* IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION | | ACTIVITY REGULATED BY THIS CODE SHALL BE PERMORMED IN A | | MANNER SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE | | CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, UNLESS SUCH ACTIVITY IS | | PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT | | BY THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER | | TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY | | OWNER.THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTROL | | OF DUST, NOISE, WATER OR DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, | | DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW | | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT | | HISTORIC SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FLOWS SERVING | | ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE SPECIAL DRAINAGE | | DESIGN COMPLYING WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS TO PRESERVE | | THE POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. | | ACCORDINGLY, DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OWNERS OF ALL | | NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, | | POOLS, PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR | | ITEMS, ON EXISTING PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE | | IN EXCESS OF 800SQ FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY | | PARCELL SHALL AS A PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A | | PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY | | INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PARAGRAPH. UPON | | COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A CERTIFICATE FROM A | | LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR | | IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 2) 109.3.10.1 HURRICANE PROTECTION. IT SHALL BE | | UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION RELATED | | MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO REMAIN LOOSE OR | | OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE FROM 24 HRS. | | AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED UNTIL THE | | HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN LIFTED. ALL SUCH | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE | | EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR SECURED IN | | SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE DANGER OF SUCH | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS CAUSING | | DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH WINDS. ANY | | PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR SECURE THE | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS WITHIN 24 | | HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED SHALL BE | | SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00. IN ADDITION | | TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO VIOLATES THIS | | SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO | | SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | 3) BEFORE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED A | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE USE OF ROOF HATCHES SHALLBE | | REVIEWED AND STAMPED BY THE CITY BEFORE | | A COF O WILL BE ISSUED . IF THE MANUFACTURER OF ROOF | | HATCH HAS NOTRECEIVED EITHER STATE APPROVAL OR A | | MIAMI-DADE NOA THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE A LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL WITHIN THIS JURISDICTION. RULE 9B-72. | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-08-16 13:11:43 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 06071722 | | ADD: 2823 N. AUSTRALIAN AV | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | TEL: (561)718-9166 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 4THREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | NOTE-- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1ST REQUEST) PER ARTICLE 13 OF THE UNIFIED LAND | | DEVELOPMENT | | CODE, IMPACT FEES ARE PAYABLE ON THE CHANGE OF USE | | (OCCUPANCY). | | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | ONCE PLANS ARE STAMPED WWITH THE COUNTY IMPACT FEE | | STAMP INDICATING A COUNTY IMPACT FEE REVIEW BUILDING | | WILL BE ABLE TO "PASS" THE PLANS IN THE COMPUTER. | | NOTE , THERE WAS NO ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED | | WILL REQUIRE A SEPERATE PERMIT ASSOCIATED FEES AND | | REVIEW. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
17:35 |
Rev Time |
2.20 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-18 |
Time |
17:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-18 17:37:26 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 06071722 | | ADD: 2823 N. AUSTRALIAN AV | | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS | | TEL: (561)718-9166 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | NOTE-- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1ST REQUEST) PER ARTICLE 13 OF THE UNIFIED LAND | | DEVELOPMENT | | CODE, IMPACT FEES ARE PAYABLE ON THE CHANGE OF USE | | (OCCUPANCY). | | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | 2-6 ) COMPLIED. | | | | 7) 2ND REQUEST,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- | | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | FOLLOWS: | | | | B) WINDOWS- HORIZONTAL SLIDERS SEE COMMENT ON NOAC) | | WINDOWS- CASEMENT SEE COMMEENT ON NOA | | D) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS WITH VIEW PANELSLARGE | | MISSLE IMPACT TESTING , SEE NOA | | E) GLAZED DOORS ALUMINIUM/ GLAZED PANELS/ W SIDE LITES | | SEE NOA | | G)ROOF ACCESS HATCH- PROVISO: REPORT TO BE ISSUED | | BEFORE C.O SUBMIT REPORT. | | H) ROOF ASSEMBLIES.- NOT SUBMITTED | | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- | | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE | | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 8) 2ND REQUEST, | | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 9-21 COMPLIED. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-02-28 |
Time |
14:15 |
Rev Time |
7.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-02-28 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-28 14:40:07 | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 06071 | | ADD: | | CONT: | | TEL: (561)###-#### | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | NOTE-- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- | | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA | | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK | | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1ST REQUEST) PER ARTICLE 13 OF THE UNIFIED LAND | | DEVELOPMENT | | CODE, IMPACT FEES ARE PAYABLE ON THE CHANGE OF USE | | (OCCUPANCY). | | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY | | BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL PERMIT | | SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT | | OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT | | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. | | PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | 2-5 ) COMPLIED. | | | | 6) 2ND REQUEST, PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL | | MODIFICATIONS TO THE | | EXTERIOR WALLS, (INFILL OF ELEVATOR EXTERIOR DOORS, AND | | MODIFICATIONS TO | | ACCEPT NEW DOORS & WINDOWS, ETC). | | | | 6A)STRUCTURAL SHEETS S-0.1-S.2ARE NOT SIGNED NOR | | SEALED. | | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR | | OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND | | BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC | | RECORD SHALL HAVE THE SIGNATURE AND | | SEAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED | | TO THE DOCUMENT. | | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS | | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS | | | | 6B) STRUCTURAL SHEET S0.1 DESIGN LOADS INDICATE ASCE | | 7-98 CORRECT TO THE | | ASCE 7-02. | | | | 6C) S.01 HAS A NOTE INDICATING THIS TO BE A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING. PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF 553.71(7) "THRESHOLD | | BUILDING" MEANS ANY BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN 3 | | STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ FT IN AREA AND AN | | OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. | | THIS BUILDING DOES NOT QUALIFY AS A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING. | | | | 6D) STRUCTURAL PLANS ALSO INDICATE A SHELL PERMIT DATED | | 12-19-06 SEE ATTACHMENT NO SUCH PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | 7) 2ND REQUEST,FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- | | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT | | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | FOLLOWS: | | A) FIXED WINDOWS STOREFRONT | | B) WINDOWS- HORIZONTAL SLIDERS | | C) WINDOWS- CASEMENT | | D) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS WITH VIEW PANELSLARGE | | MISSLE IMPACT TESTING | | E) GLAZED DOORS ALUMINIUM/ GLAZED PANELS/ W SIDE | | LITES | | F)OVERHEAD DOOR | | G)ROOF ACCESS HATCH | | H) ROOF ASSEMBLIES. | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- | | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE | | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 8) 2ND REQUEST, | | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 9-12) COMPLIED. | | | | 13) GENERATOR TO BE UNDER A SEPERATE PERMIT. | | | | 14& 15 ) COMPLIED. | | | | 16) DOORS STILL NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH :11-4.13.6 | | MANEUVERING CLEARENCES | | AT DOORS. MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES | | AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC OR | | POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN | | FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH | | IN THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES SHALL BE | | CLEAR & LEVEL. | | DOORS: 206A, 208A & 217C. | | | | 17) COMPLIED. | | | | 18) 2ND REQUEST,FL S S 713.13 | | NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF | | THE COURT. | | NOTE: 713.13(2) | | IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS | | NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN | | 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS | | NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6)THE POSTING | | OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE | | BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | 19)SHEET A2.01 & A2.02 BOTH INDICATE THE REQUIREMENT | | FOR SMOKE RATED CORRIDORS SINCE THIS IS A FIRE | | SPRINKLERD | | BUILDING. THESE SHEETS INDICATE A "P1" WALL WHERE AS | | THE SMOKE RESISTANT WALLS ARE TO BE A "P2".TABLE | | 1016. | | | | 20) SHEET A2.01 ROOM 110 IS LABELED A "CHILL ZONE" | | AREAS WHERE NORMALLY SUBJECT | | TO STUDENT OCCUPANCY SHALL ALSO REQUIRE EMERGENCY | | ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOWS, SEE 1025.4.1. | | | | 21) FLAT ROOF THE REPORT SUBMITTED, THIS ROOF IS | | MISSING OR NOT IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOW ITEMS: | | | | __X_ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN | | | | ROOF HEIGHT. | | | | ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF | | PITCH. | | | | _X__ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH | | SYSTEM TO BE USED. | | | | _X__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW | | PRESSURE FOR ZONE ___ . | | | | _X__ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES | | LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD THE FASTENER | | RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT | | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED | | FASTENER SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED | | AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOF | | CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED. | | | | _X__THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCED | | FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-09-01 |
Time |
09:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
amorse |
Date |
2006-08-25 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-25 00:00:00 | | | | | DENIED | | | | 1) PER ARTICLE 13 OF THE UNIFIED LAND | | DEVELOPMENT CODE, IMPACT FEES ARE | | PAYABLE ON CHANGE OF USE. BEFORE A | | PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, IS ISSUED IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | THE ACTUAL PERMIT SETS OF PLANS MUST BE | | STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND A COPY OF | | THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION.PLEASE CALL (561) 233-5025 | | FOR MORE INFORMATION | | | | 2) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE OCCUPANCY OF | | BUILDING #1 AS IT EXITS INTO THE SAME | | ENCLOSED CORRIDOR BETWEEN THE TWO | | BUILDINGS. VERIFY THAT THE EXITS WILL | | MEET THE REQUIRED EXIT DISCHARGE | | CAPACITY FOR BOTH BUILDINGS | | | | 3) PROVIDE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN AND DEMO | | PLAN WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SET TO BETTER | | UNDERSTAND THE MODIFICATIONS, ALSO | | PROVIDE THE PREVIOUS OCCUPANCY TYPE | | | | 4) THE EXIT PASSAGEWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS | | 1 AND 2 HAS 2 EXITS DOES THE WEST EXIT | | ENTER INTO AN EGRESS COURT THAT PROVIDE | | ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC WAY AS DEFINED IN | | CHAPTER 10, OR IS IT A FENCED AREA, | | PLEASE CLARIFY | | | | 5) PROVIDE DETAILS OF WALKWAY TO | | EXISTING BUILDING 3 IS IT ALSO ENCLOSED | | OR OPEN | | | | 6) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL | | MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR WALLS | | (INFILL OF ELEVATORS EXTERIOR DOOR, | | MODIFICATIONS TO ACCEPT NEW DOORS OR | | WINDOWS, ETC.) | | | | 7) THE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE | | TWO COPIES OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT | | IS RELEVANT PER 9B-72. THESE SHOULD | | INCLUDE THE FLORIDA STATE APPROVAL COVER | | PAGES, AND THE PRODUCT NOA THAT LISTS | | THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS/ FASTENER LIST | | PAGES, THE PAGES WITH THE CHOSEN | | ASSEMBLY/ SYSTEM TO BE USED AND THE | | GENERAL LIMITATIONS PAGE. ALL CAN BE | | FOUND ON WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | (WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ROOFING, A/C OR | | OTHER EQUIPMENT STANDS AND ALL EXTERIOR | | DOORS, WINDOWS, STOREFRONTS, ROLL UP | | DOORS, ETC.) | | | | 8) THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY | | DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL PER 106.3.3 FBC* | | | | 9) PANIC HARDWARE SHALL COMPLY WITH | | THE REQUREMENTS OF 1027.2.1 FBC | | | | 10) DOOR 106C SHALL MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF 1027.3 AND 1005.2 FBC | | | | 11) FLOORS AND WALLS OF TOILET ROOMS | | SHALL COMPLY WITH 1210 FBC | | | | 12) TOILET ROOMS, FIXTURES AND | | ACCESSORIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 11 | | OF THE 2004 FBC (A6.01 LISTS 1997 ED.) | | | | 13) PROPOSED GENERATOR WILL REQUIRE A | | SOIL REPORT,ENGINEERED EQUIPMENT BASE, | | SURVEY THAT PROPOSED BASE IS 6" ABOVE | | THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR LOCATION. | | ALSO BE AWARE THAT ALL SUBS ARE | | SIGNED ON TO GENERATOR PERMIT AT TIME OF | | APPLICATION (GAS, ELECT, PLUMBING, ETC) | | | | 14) GENERAL FINISH NOTES ON A2.01 SHOWS | | GROUP AS A3, AND THE EXIT ACCESS AS | | CLASS 'C' THIS DOES NOT CORRESPOND WITH | | THE TABLE 803.5 FBC PLEASE CLARIFY | | | | 15) SEE PLUMBING NOTES ON ACCESSABLE | | SINKS IN THE BREAK ROOM AND STAFF LOUNGE | | | | 16) PROVIDE MIN MANUVERING DISTANCE OF | | 18" AT DOORS 121A, 218A AND 225A PER | | 11-4.13.6 AND FIG.25(A). ALSO IF THE MIN | | DISTANCE PROVIDED AT DOOR 202A IS 12" ON | | THE PUSH SIDE THIS DOOR SHALL BE | | PROVIDED WITH A CLOSER AND LATCH PER | | NOTE: FIG. 25(A) | | | | 17) GENERAL DOOR NOTES ON A2.01 SHALL | | PROVIDE HARDWARE THAT MEETS THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF 11-4.13.8 FBC FOR | | ACCESSABLE HARDWARE | | | | 18) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | A PERMIT BEING ISSUED | | | | BLDG PLAN REVIEW | | ADRIAN MORSE | | 561-805-6716 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-12 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-12 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-12 11:32:36 | *** DENIEDREVISION ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE COPY OF ELECTRICAL | | REVISIONS WERE SUBMITTED IN THE TWO SETS OF PLANS | | SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT IN EITHER CASE THE ELECTRICAL | | REVISIONS AS SUBMITTED WITH REVISION DATE OF 11/27/07 | | HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND STAMPED BY | | THIS ELECTRICAL REVIEWER. THESE SAME SHEETS ARE ALREADY | | ON FILE. | | IF NO NEW SHEETS ARE BEING PRESENTED WITH REVISED ITEMS | | THERE IS NO NEED TO SUBMIT THESE SHEETS BACK FOR | | REVIEW. | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-03 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-12-03 09:54:34 | REV 4 AND 5 FOR | | 3.01,4.01, &5.01 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-17 |
Time |
14:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-17 |
Time |
14:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-17 14:42:31 | *** NOTE ** | | | | | | 1) 2ND SET OF SUBMITTALS BROUGHT IN BY CATHERINE FROM | | HEDRICK BROTHERS. OK, STAMPED. | | 2) STAMPED ELECTRICAL PLANS OK. REDLINED OCP FOR | | ELEVATOR TO BE VIF PER 240.21,240.4. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-16 |
Time |
20:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-07-16 |
Time |
19:18 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2007-07-16 20:35:24 | 2007-07-16 20:35:24 | | ** TEMPORARY FAILED STATUS** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: ONLY ONE SET OF EACH THE GENERATOR AND ATS | | SUBMITTALS WERE SUBMITTED WITH PLANS.NEED ONE SET FOR | | 100KW, 150KW AND SPECS FOR THE 300 SERIES TRANSFER | | SWITCHES. | | PLACED A CALL TO CATHERINE FROM HEDRICK BROTHERS AT | | APPROX 8:15PM FOR SECOND SET OF THE ABOVE TO BE BROUGHT | | IN. | | OK TO COME IN W/ NO FEES. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2007-07-16 19:18:57 | 2007-07-16 19:18:57 | | PLANS REMOVED FROM INCOMING AND IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. | | PLANS WILL RETURN TO INCOMING WAITING FOR COMM BOARD | | ONCE ELECTRICLA REVIEW IS COMPLETED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
Time |
21:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-06-04 |
Time |
18:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-04 21:09:29 | ** UNSAT 3RD REVIEW ** | | | | *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SOME EXISTING COMMENTS WHICH | | ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING ALONG WITH SOME NEW | | COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED AND SOME | | ITEMS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME FOR REVIEW. | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE CODES ON E1.01 WERE | | UPDATE TO THE 2005 NEC AND 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS? | | THE TITLE BLOCK MENTIONS THIS WAS DONE PER BLDG | | DEPARTMENT COMMENTS; HOWEVER THERE WERE COMMENTS FROM | | THIS REVIEWER ON EITHER OF THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS | | WHICH REQUESTED THE CODES TO BE CHANGED. PLEASE SEE ANY | | NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH REFERENCE CODE YEARS, | | REFERENCED THE 2002 NEC. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ALL PERMITS APPLIED FOR BEFORE | | DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES PROJECTS UNDER THE 2004 FBC | | W/2005 REVISIONS AND THE 2002 NFPA-70 (NEC). | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WHICH REQUESTED THE SIGNATURE OF | | THE OWNER AGENT( CONTRACTOR) AS STATED ON ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS. THESE WERE SUBMITTED WITHOUT SIGNATURES. | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT | | FROM THE CORRECT VERSION ADOPTED BY THE FBC FOR THIS | | PERMIT. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS EVEN STATE THEY ARE | | ONLY EFFECTIVE AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006. | | PLEASE SEE THAT ALL PERMITS ONCE AGAIN APPLIED BEFORE | | THIS DATE PLACES VERSIONS UNDER THE 2004 FBC W/2005 | | REVISIONS. ( VERSION FOR ENERGY CALCULATIONS 2.1?) | | PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED NEED TO | | CORRELATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL LIGHTING ON PLANS. PLEASE | | SEE THE PLANS DO INDICATE EXTERIOR LIGHTING, HOWEVER | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONSDO NOT INCLUDE ANY EXTERIOR | | LIGHTING ENTERED IN THE SUMMARY/LIGHTINGPERFORMANCE | | OR INPUT DATA REPORT. | | PLEASE REVISE AND ADJUST ALL ENERGY CALCULATIONSPER | | 13-103.1.1.1, 13-415.1.AB.1.1, 13-415.2 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS REQUESTED | | PHOTO-METRICS TO VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE FOR EXIT PATHS | | AND STAIRS. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS WERE REVISED TO | | INCREASE LIGHTING FIXTURES, HOWEVER THE RESPONSE LETTER | | MENTIONS TO SEE THE PHOTO-METRICS ATTACHED, YET NONE | | COULD BE LOCATED AS PART OF THE DESIGNERS SUBMITTED | | PLANS OR ATTACHED SHEETS. | | PLEASE SEE LS 101 2003, 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2. | | AS NONE WERE SUBMITTED, REVIEW CAN NOT BE | | ACCOMPLISHED. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW WHERE | | SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR ATS/ GENERATOR WAS SUBMITTED FOR | | REVIEW. PLEASE CLARIFY THEATS DEVICES IF THEY ARE | | 3-POLE OR 4-POLE. AS THE SHEETS ONLY INDICATE ORDERING | | METHOD FOR TYPE AND THE PLANS ONLY INDICATE 3-PHASE AND | | 4-WIRE. | | IF SD SYSTEMS, RISER WOULD NEED TO COMPLY WITH 250.20, | | 250.50 ETC. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS SEEM TO MENTIONS THE | | GENERATOR BUILDING AS INDEED A SEPARATE *BUILDING*? | | PLEASE SEE 225.31, AND 250.32 FOR THIS IS A SEPARATE | | BUILDING/STRUCTURE, THEN GROUNDING AT THIS BUILDING | | WOULD BE SHOWN AND A DISCONNECTING MEANS IN PANEL GR. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING NOTE FOR MORE CLARIFY FOR THE | | GR PANEL. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENTS SPOKE OF CIRCUITS | | FOR COMMON AREAS.(MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, GENERATOR ROOM, | | OUTSIDE LIGHTING, ROOFTOP RECEPTS)ETC. BRANCH CIRCUITS | | WHICHARE SHOWN COMING FROM TENANT SERVICES WHICH IS | | NOT PERMITTED. | | (EXAMPLE, ROOFTOP BRANCH CIRCUIT FOR WP RECEPTACLES | | TRIPS, HOWEVER THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE OCP/BREAKER IS TO | | THE SECOND FLOOR TENANT WHICH IS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO | | ANYONE) | | PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS CIRCUITS IN THE MAIN | | ELECTRICAL ROOM TO THE PANEL P1 WHICH IN THE PANEL | | SCHEDULE THESE SAME CIRCUITS ARE BLANK? | | PLEASE SEE THERE IS NO PANEL SCHEDULE FOR PANEL GR AND | | YET THE CIRCUITS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON PANEL P1 ACTUALLY | | ARE LABELED TO FEED THE CIRCUITS IN THE GENERATOR ROOM | | WHICH INDICATE CIRCUITS TO A GR PANEL? THIS IS | | CONFUSING AND NOT CLEAR WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE LIGHTING ON THE EXTERIOR OF | | BUILDING AND STAIRS INDICATES CIRCUITS TO A PANEL GP | | WHICH IS NOT ON RISER AND NO PANEL WAS SCHEDULE | | SUBMITTED ETC?? PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THESE ARE BEING | | FED FROM? | | 240.24, 210.25 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2, 215.5, FBC | | 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2, 106.4 | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS THE NEW PANEL GR | | BEING *TAPPED* FROM A DISCONNECT YET THE EQUIPMENT | | COORDINATION SCHEDULE SHOWS THIS BEING *TAPPED* FROM | | THE ATS-1? | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 240.21 FOR THE TAPPED CONDUCTOR | | LIMITS. | | PLEASE SEE THAT BESIDE THE LENGTH NOT PERMITTED ANY | | TAPPED CONDUCTORS MUST TERMINATE IN OVER CURRENT | | PROTECTION AND AS NO PANEL GR SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED NO | | VERIFICATION FOR MCB AND OCP CAN BE VERIFIED. | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE SEVERAL QUESTIONS ON NOTES 5, 6 | | AND 7. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER SHOWS *EQUIPMENT | | GROUNDING CONDUCTORS* FROM THE METER TO THE FIRST MEANS | | OF DISCONNECT WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. 250.6, 250.24 | | (THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN REDLINED IF PLANS WERE NOT COMING | | BACK FOR OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.22 AND CLARIFY THE SEPARATE | | BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR ELEVATOR CAB LIGHTS. IF TAPPED, | | PLEASE INDICATE THE CONDUCTORS AND OCP AT TERMINATION. | | (RISER AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE INDICATE 3-POLE FOR | | LIGHTING?? | | 240.4, 240.21, 310.16. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE 225AMP BREAKER IN PANEL M2 | | IS FEEDING THE 200AMP RATED DISCONNECT FOR THE | | ELEVATOR. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS IS TO AVOID *FALSE | | TRIPPING*? THIS IS NOT CLEAR WHEN THE DISCONNECT IS | | 200AMPS AND THE TAPS FOR WHAT APPEARS TO BE THE | | ELEVATOR CAB LIGHTS IS IN QUESTION PER NOTE #9. | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED FOR ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS TO BE SUBMITTED BACK FOR REFERENCE | | YET NONE WERE SUBMITTED? | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE SAME NOTE WILL APPLY FOR THE | | FOLLOWING REVIEW. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-04 |
Time |
17:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-04 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-04 17:54:34 | ******* UNSAT 2ND REVIEW ****** | | | | *** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | WHICH STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ALONG WITH NEW | | COMMENTS BASED ON CHANGES IN PLANS AND NEW INFORMATION | | AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS. | | | | **** IMPORTANT**** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE NOTES BELOW ARE TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH A *NO*, *OK* OR *NO/OK*. | | | | A) A, NO WILL CONTAIN A FURTHER EXPLANATION AS TO WHY | | THE COMMENT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN FULLY ADDRESSED WITH THE | | PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE BELOW WITH **PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE | | #1** | | | | B) A, OK, WILL HAVE NO COMMENTS EXCEPT PERHAPS A | | REFERENCE TO SEE ** NEW NOTES*. THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | NOTE WILL BE REMOVED. | | | | C) A, NO/OK, WILL HAVE FURTHER EXPLANATION AS PART OF | | THE COMMENT MAY HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER NOT ALL. | | THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE WILL BE NOTED **PREVIOUS | | REVIEW NOTE #1** | | | | D) NEW NOTES WILL BE ADDED TO THE END AND LABELED ** | | NEW NOTES ** | | | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION SPEC ETC WAS | | SUBMITTED FOR ANY EQUIPMENT. | | 110.3, 90.7, FBC 106.1.2 ETC | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SUBMIT ALL MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS ON THE | | GEN, ATS AND DEPENDING ON PRIME MOVER WHETHER OR NOT A | | SUB BASE TANK IS BEING USED ETC. | | THIS INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR BOTH. | | FBC106.1.2 , NEC110.3,90.8 ETC | | | | 2) NOTE: NO/OK PLEASE SEE SOMEINFORMATION WAS | | SUBMITTED FOR LOCATION HOWEVER AS SPECS ETC WAS NOT | | SUBMITTED, REVIEW FOR LOCATION CAN NOT BE CONFIRMED FOR | | CODE COMPLIANCE. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES | | WHICH WILL AFFECT THIS. | | PLEASE PROVIDE FLOOD ELEVATION, AND PLEASE KNOW THAT | | BEFORE ANY FINAL, A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE | | REQUIRED ALSO. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** | | COULD NOT LOCATE A NEW SITE PLAN/SURVEY PLEASE INDICATE | | THE GEN LOCATION ON PLANS.IF IN A FLOOD ZONE PLEASE | | SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS AS ELEVATION IS REQUIRED A | | 6" MIN ABOVE | | BFE. | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE | | REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL. | | | | 3) NOTE: NO/OK, PLEASE PROVIDE CONDUIT AND CONDUCTORS | | FROM FPL TRANSFORMER TO GUTTER. PLEASE CORRELATE | | EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE WITH RISER. PLEASE SEE NEW COMMENTS | | FOR ACCESS AND GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR. | | ** SEEMS TO MATCH UP WITH FIGURE 230.9 IN 230.2 OF THE | | 2002 NEC HANDBOOK. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** | | PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS MORE THAN ONE SERVICE IS BEING | | SHOWN FOR THE ONE BUILDING, HOWEVER COULD NOT LOCATE ON | | PLANS HOW THE SECOND SERVICE BEING PROPOSED CAN BE | | GRANTED UNDER SPECIAL PERMISSION AT THIS TIME. | | | | 4) NOTE: OK. | | | | 5) NOTE:NO, PLEASE KNOW THAT AT THIS TIME BASED ON NO | | INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR THE GENERATOR AND THE SERVICE | | ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS FROM THE FPL TRANSFORMER TO THE | | GUTTER, THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR SIZE CAN NOT | | BE VERIFIED, PLEASE ALSO SEE 250.66. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** | | PLEASECOMPLETE GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM AS REQUIRED | | PER 250.50. | | | | 6) NOTE: NO, PLEASE KNOW AT THIS TIME THE CIRCUITING | | FOR SOME AREAS (STAIRS) WHICH WILL BE UNDER COMMENT #7 | | CAN NOT BE VERIFIED. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW COMMENTS. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SHOW ALL CIRCUITING PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH THE | | SUBMITTED PANEL SCHEDULES AND PANEL SCHEDULES TO BE | | SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE SEE 700.12E FOR CIRCUITING OF | | EM/EXT LTS. | | | | 7) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THE STAIR AREAS ARE NOT | | COMPLETE AT THIS TIME. PLEASE SEE SOME ARE SHOWN WITH | | CONTROLS BY A PHOTO-CELL WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. PLEASE | | SEE OTHER STAIRS WHICH ARE MISSING FROM PLANS ON NORTH | | SIDE OF BUILDING. PLEASE SEE THE CENTER STAIRS FROM | | SECOND FLOOR TO THE FIRST FLOOR SPECIFICALLY CONTAINS A | | NOTE WHICH MENTIONS THIS IS NOT AN EXIT. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT DURING AN EMERGENCY CONDITION OR THE | | PANIC THAT MAY OCCUR DURING A FIRE ETC, THE NORMAL | | BUILDING OCCUPANTS/EMPLOYEES OF THIS SECOND FLOOR WHO | | KNOW THIS IS A STAIR WHICH LEADS TO THE FIRST FLOOR | | WILL UTILIZE THIS AS AN EXIT. UNLESS THIS DOOR IS | | SEALED FROM THE OCCUPANTS SO THAT ACCESS IS NOT | | GRANTED, THEN IF ACCESS IS AVAILABLE THEN THIS STAIR | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET 7.8.1.3 AND 7.9.2. | | PLEASE SEE THE BUILDING REVIEW NOTES WITH RESPECT TO | | THE STAIRS PLACING OCCUPANTS BACK INTO A BUILDING OR IN | | THIS CASE ANOTHER TENANT SPACE. | | PLEASE SEE NO PHOTO-METRICS WERE SUBMITTED FOR MINIMUM | | LEVELS FOR EGRESS PATHS ON FIRST FLOOR OR SECOND FLOOR. | | PLEASE SUBMIT AND BE AWARE OF ANY CHANGES FROM OTHER | | TRADES. CONSULTATION WILL BE FORTH COMING WITH THE FIRE | | MARSHAL FOR THE EXITS AND HOW THEY ARE LABELED. | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW THAT THE FAILURE OF ANY SINGLE OVER | | CURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE OR SWITCHING DEVICE CAN NOT | | LEAVE ANY EGRESS PATH IN TOTAL DARKNESS. PLEASE SEE AS | | STAIRS AS SHOWN WITH CONTROLS BY TIMERS/PHOTO-CELLS | | ETC, THESE DEVICES WOULD CREATE SUCH A LIFE SAFETY | | HAZARD. PLEASE SEE THE FAILURE OF THE DEVICE WOULD NOT | | TRIGGER THE EMERGENCY LIGHT TO COME ON AS THE CIRCUIT | | MAY STILL BE ENERGIZED. | | PLEASE SEE THE SELECTION OF THE TYPE OF OVER RIDE | | DEVICE SHOULD BE CHOSEN CAREFULLY AND WILL BE REQUIRED | | TO CONTAIN A SECOND MEANS OF BACK UP FOR CONTROL. | | PLEASE SEE EXIT FROM SOUTH STAIRS STILL DOES NOT | | PROVIDE DIRECTIONAL FOR EXIT WHEN EGRESS FROM STAIR | | DOOR. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** | | PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THE LIGHTING IS FOR ALL STAIRS. | | PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW SOME LIGHTING IN CENTER STAIRWAY, | | HOWEVER NOT FOR OTHERS. PLEASE ALSO SEE STAIRS ARE | | BEING SHOWN ON TIMED SCHEDULE HOWEVER CONTROLS FOR | | LIGHTING OUTSIDE TIME SCHEDULING SHALL BE PROVIDED BY A | | MIN OF TWO METHODS,(OCCUPANCY SENSORS ON LTS, OCCUPANCY | | SENSORS IN STAIRS , TIMED DOOR CONTACTS ETC.) PLEASE | | KNOW, ENTERING INTO THE EXIT STAIR WAY AND HAVING THE | | LIGHTING SHUT OFF AND LEAVE IN TOTAL DARKNESS IS A LIFE | | SAFETY ISSUE. | | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURES. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE A MINIMUM OF 10 FT CANDLES IS REQUIRED | | UNDER NORMAL AND CAN BE RATED DOWN TO 1FT UNDER EM | | CONDITIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTO-METRICS. (CAN BE | | TYPICAL) | | PLEASE SEE EXITING FROM STAIRS ON SOUTH SIDE OF | | BUILDING SHOWS EGRESS INTO A HALL WAY WITH NO EXIT | | DIRECTIONAL. | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 | | 7.8,7.8.1.3,7.9,7.9.2.2 ETC. | | PLEASE SEE FIREREVIEW COMMENTS. | | FBC CHAPTER 13 | | | | 8) NOTE: OK/NO, PLEASE SEE THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM IS | | NOW SHOWN; HOWEVER PLEASE SEE 620.23 AND 24 FOR | | REQUIRED DEDICATED CIRCUITS. PLEASE SEE THESE ARE ON | | THE SAME CIRCUIT. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE NEW NOTES FOR ELEVATOR DISCONNECT. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | COULD NOT LOCATE THE ELEVATOR MACHINE RM.? PLEASE SEE | | 620.23, 620.24, | | 700.16. ETC | | COULD NOT LOCATE THE MIN CIRCUITING FOR LTS, RECEPTS , | | CAB ETC. | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW, A BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURE OF SOME | | SORT WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT RM. | | 7.8,7.9, 700.16 | | | | 9) NOTE: OK. | | | | 10) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE PLANS INDICATE GFI BEING | | PROVIDED WITH THE EQUIPMENT WHICH IS NOT COMMON. PLEASE | | PROVIDE EQUIPMENT INFORMATION SHOWING THE TAP | | CONDUCTORS, OVER CURRENT PROTECTION, MEANS OF | | DISCONNECT ETC. | | IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, PLEASE SUBMIT AND SHOW THE | | CIRCUITING FOR ALL ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT. CAN NOT RELY ON | | THE EQUIPMENT LEGEND AND PANEL SCHEDULES. | | 110.3, 90.7, 240.21, 240.4, 310.16 ETC. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE MISSING CIRCUITING ON ROOFTOP PLANS FOR | | UNITS AND GFI RECEPTS FOR ROOFTOPQUIPMENT. | | 230.63,210.8 | | | | 11) NOTE: OK. | | | | 12) NOTE: OK. | | | | 13) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ROOMS ON PLANS WHICH | | DO NOT INDICATE ANY DESIGNATIONS. PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES | | WITH RESPECT TO PANEL SCHEDULE(S) AND CIRCUITING ON | | PLANS. | | PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES FOR ROOMS WITH PANELS AND OTHER | | ELECTRICAL ROOMS. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** | | PLEASE PLACE ALL ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS. | | UNABLE TO VERIFY SOME OF THESE ROOMS AT THIS TIME. | | | | 14) NOTE:NO? PLEASE SEE AS SOME OF THE ROOM | | DESIGNATIONS ARE MISSING IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THERE IS AN | | IT ROOM.IT DOES NOT APPEAR THERE WILL BE TRUE IT | | ROOM, HOWEVER PLEASE COMPLETE NOTE #13 ABOVE AND THIS | | SHOULD ALLEAVIATE THIS COMMENT. | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 | | PLEASE SEE PLANS MENTIONS "IT" ROOM ON SECOND FLR. | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-75 AND NFPA-70(NEC) 645 FOR | | REQUIREMENTS. | | | | 15) NOTE: OK. | | | | 16) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE THERE ARE A FEW NOTES | | PERTAINING TO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND LIGHTING | | PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. | | A ) PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE THE ONES | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED WHICH WERE SIGNED BY THE PREVIOUS | | BUILDING CONTRACTOR WHICH IS NO LONGER APART OF THIS | | PROJECT. PLEASE OBTAIN NEW SIGNATURES. | | B) PLEASE SEE THAT NO LIGHTING PERFORMANCE TABLES, | | CHARTS, LEVELS ETC WERE SUBMITTED AND METHOD *A* DOES | | NOT PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION. PLEASE ALSO CLARIFY THE | | USE OF METHOD *A*, AS THE A-SHEETS INDICATE A LEVEL 3 | | ALTERATION, HOWEVER PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES FOR THIS AS | | THIS IS A CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY AND DOES APPEAR TO FALL | | UNDER A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION. PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER | | 13-101.3 | | C) PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH | | INDICATES MANUAL CONTROLS, HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE IF ALL | | LIGHTING CONTAINS AUTOMATED CONTROLS? | | | | **PLEASE SEE NEW NOTES PERTAINING TO LIGHTING | | CONTROLS. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1** | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1, TABLES 415.2.C.1, 415.2.B.1 | | | | 17) NOTE: NO, PLEASE SEE RISER SHOWS THE SECOND FLOOR | | ATS AS BEING LABELED WITH THE SAME DESIGNATION AS THE | | FIRST FLOOR ATS. | | PLEASE SEE THE ELEVATOR CIRCUITS WHICH IS SHOWN AS | | 225AMPS IN PANEL M-2, YET THE EQUIPMENT LEGEND SHOWS | | 200AMP DISCONNECT? | | PLEAS ADJUST AND COORDINATE. | | 240.4, 310.16. | | 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE REVIEW #1 ** | | PLEASE SEE "EQUIPMENT CO-ORDINATION SCHEDULE", PLEASE | | SEE MAINS DISCONNECTS WHICH ARE INDEED MAINS AND PLEASE | | ALSO SEE MAINS FOR EACH FLR ALSO BEING LABELED AS | | "MAINS" 1 AND 2. | | PLEASE ADJUSTED IDENTIFICATION ACCORDINGLY. | | 230.2E | | | | | | ***** NEW NOTES ***** | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ACCESS FOR THE MAIN DISCONNECT AND | | GENERATOR DISCONNECT AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE POWER FOR | | THE SECOND FLOOR TENANT APPEARS TO ONLY BE ACCESSED | | THROUGH THE FIRST FLOOR TENANT SPACE. PLEASE SEE A | | REDESIGN WILL BE REQUIRED AS ACCESS TO THIS EQUIPMENT | | IS REQUIRED FOR THIS 2ND FLOOR TENANT AT ALL TIMES. | | (OUTSIDE DOOR) ETC 240.24B ETC | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTES WITH RESPECT TO | | ROOM DESIGNATIONS, PLEASE SEE ROOM/AREA WHERE PANEL | | *S3* IS LOCATED. | | 110.26, 408.7, 240.24D | | | | 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, | | .1.2 AND .1.3. | | A) PLEASE PROVIDE THE TIME OF DAY SCHEDULING FOR LC | | PANELS. | | B) PLEASE SEE WOMEN'S BATHROOM ON FIRST FLOOR WHICH | | CONTAINS A DEVICE*S UC*WHICH IS NOT ON ANY SYMBOL | | LEGEND. ? | | C) PLEASE SEE A SWITCH WITH A DESIGNATION OF *S M* | | WHICH IS NOT ON ANY SYMBOL LEGEND.? | | D) PLEASE PROVIDE ALL MAXIMUM TIMES ON OVER | | RIDES/OCCUPANCY SENSORS/TIMER TYPE DEVICES. | | E) PLEASE SEE OC TYPE IS 30 MINUTES MAX AND TIMER TYPES | | ARE 4HRS MAX. | | F) PLEASE SEE HALL AREAS WHICH CONTAIN OVER RIDE | | DEVICES WHICH ARE SHOWN AS *S M*, DO THESE PROVIDE | | COMPLETE COVERAGE OF THE ENTIRE HALL WAY AREA BEING | | OVER RIDDEN WHEN TIMED SCHEDULING IS OFF. AS THIS | | DEVICE APPEARS TO BE A MOTION TYPE DEVICE, PLEASE | | VERIFY AS LOCATING *NIGHT LIGHTS* ON PLANS COULD NOT BE | | FOUNDIN THE EVENT OF THESE DEVICES NOT BEING ABLE TO | | DETECT THE OCCUPANT AND LEAVING THE OCCUPANT IN TOTAL | | DARKNESS. | | PLEASE SEE LS 101 7.8 AND 7.9 FOR THIS AS NOTED ABOVE | | IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #7. | | | | 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOULD BE MORE | | DETAILED FOR ROOMS AND AREAS WHICH THEY FEED. PLEASE | | SEE THE BELOW IS TAKEN FROM THE COMMENTARY FROM THE | | HANDBOOK IN 408.4. PLEASE SEE ALL THE CIRCUITS WHICH | | ONLY INDICATE *RECEPTACLES* AND NOT TO ANY ROOMS/OFFICE | | DESIGNATIONS. | | * REQUIRES THAT THE IDENTIFICATION FOR EVERY CIRCUIT | | SUPPLIED BY A PANELBOARD OR SWITCHBOARD BE LEGIBLE AND | | CLEARLY STATE THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE | | CIRCUIT IS USED. CIRCUITS USED FOR THE SAME PURPOSE | | MUST BE IDENTIFIED AS TO THEIR LOCATION. FOR EXAMPLE, | | SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS CAN SUPPLY OUTLETS IN | | THE KITCHEN, DINING ROOM, AND KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS. | | IDENTIFYING THE CIRCUITS AS SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH | | CIRCUITS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE; INSTEAD, THEY SHOULD BE | | IDENTIFIED AS ``KITCHEN WALL RECEPTACLES,'' ``DINING | | ROOM FLOOR RECEPTACLE,'' OR ``KITCHEN COUNTERTOP | | RECEPTACLES LEFT OF SINK.'' CIRCUIT DIRECTORIES | | CONTAINING MULTIPLE ENTRIES WITH ONLY ``LIGHTS'' OR | | ``OUTLETS'' DO NOT PROVIDE THE SUFFICIENT DETAIL | | REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION. | | | | 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT ANY COMMON AREA BRANCH | | CIRCUITS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO BE FED FROM A HOUSE PANEL | | OF SOME TYPE, NOT FROM A TENANT PANEL. | | *GEN ROOM*, *MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM*. | | 104.6 FBC ADMIN SECTION. | | | | 23) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NOTICE TO FS 553.80(2)(B) | | IS GIVEN AT THIS TIME WITH RESPECT TO CODE COMMENTS. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS IS ONLY GIVEN AS A NOTICE AT THIS | | TIME. | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE IS INFORMATION NOT YET | | SUBMITTED, COMMENTS MAY NOT BE COMPLETE AT THIS TIME. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
13:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
10:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-14 00:00:00 | ******** UNSAT ********** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ALL MANUFACTURES | | SPECS/CUT SHEETS ON THE GEN, ATS AND | | DEPENDING ON PRIME MOVER WHETHER OR NOT | | A SUB BSAE TANK IS BEING USED ETC. | | THIS INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR BOTH. | | FBC106.1.2 , NEC110.3,90.8 ETC | | | | 2) NOTE; PLEASE INDICATE THE GEN | | LOCATION ON PLANS.IF IN A FLOOD ZONE | | PLEASE SEE BUIDLING REVIEW COMMENTS AS | | ELEVATION IS REQUIRED A 6" MIN ABOVE | | BFE. | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW A FLOOD ELEVATION | | CERTIFICATE WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE | | FINAL. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS MORE THAN | | ONE SERVICE IS BEING SHOWN FOR THE ONE | | BUILDING, HOWEVER COULD NOT LOCATE ON | | PLANSHOW THE SECOND SERVICE BEING | | PRPOSED CAN BE GRANTED UNDER SPECIAL | | PERMIISION AT THIS TIME. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY ON PLANS WHERE | | M1 AND M2 ARE? CAN NOT VERIFY | | 240.24,110.26 ETC. | | 106.1.2 FBC. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASECOMPLETE GROUNDING | | ELECTRODE SYSTEM AS REQUIRED PER 250.50. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW ALL CIRCUITING | | PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH THE SUBMITTED | | PANEL SCHEDULES AND PANEL SCHEDULES TO | | BE SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE SEE 700.12E FOR CIRCUITING OF | | EM/EXT LTS. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE THE | | LIGHTING IS FOR ALL STAIRS . PLANS | | APPEAR TO SHOW SOME LIGHTING INCENTER | | STAIRWAY,HOWEVER NOT FOR OTHERS. PLEASE | | ALSO SEE STAIRS ARE BEING SHOWN ON TIMED | | SCHEDULE, HOWEVER CONTROLS FOR LIGHTING | | OUTSIDE TIME SCHEDULING SHALL BE | | PROVIDED BY A MIN OF TWO | | METHODS,(OCCUPANCY SENSORS ON LTS, | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS IN STAIRS , TIMED DOOR | | CONTACTS ETC.) PLEASE KNOW, ENTERING | | INTO THE EXIT STAIR WAY AND AHAVING THE | | LIGHTING SHUT OFF AND LEAVE IN TOTAL | | DARKNESS IS A LIFE SAFETY ISSUE. | | PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE BATTERY BACK UP | | FIXTURES. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE A MINIMUM OF 10 FT | | CANDLES IS REQUIRED UNDER NORMAL AND CAN | | BE RATED DOWN TO 1FT UNDER EM | | CONDITIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE | | PHOTO-METRICS. (CAN BE TYPICAL) | | PLEASE SEE EXSTING FROM STAIRS ON SOUTH | | SIDE OF BUILDING SHOWS EGRESS INTO A | | HALL WAY WITH NO EXIT DIRECTIONALS. | | PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 | | 7.8,7.8.1.3,7.9,7.9.2.2 ETC. | | PLEASE SEE FIREREVIEW COMMENTS. | | FBC CHAPTER 13 | | | | 8) NOTE: COULD NOT LCATE THE ELEVATOR | | MACHINE RM.? PLEASE SEE 620.23,620.24, | | 700.16. ETC | | COULD NOT LOCATE THE MIN CIRCUTING FOR | | LTS, RECEPTS , CAB ETC. | | PLEASE ALSO KNOW, A BATTERY BACK UP | | FIXTURE OF SOME SORT WILL BE REQUIRED IN | | THE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT RM. | | 7.8,7.9, 700.16 | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE EQUIPMENT LIST, | | MENTIONS PANELBOARD/CIRCUIT AS FPL, | | HOWEVER PLEASE KNOW EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN | | IS NOT BY FPL FOR MAINS, METER ETC. | | 106.1.2 FBC | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING CIRCUITING | | ON ROOFTOP PLANS FOR UNITS AND GFI | | RECEPTS FOR ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT. | | 230.63,210.8 | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY WHERE LOAD | | CALCUALTIONS ARE SHOWN AND ALL | | CONTINUOUS LOADS/LARGEST MOTORS AT | | 125%.220.3,220.10,220.11,220.13,215.3, | | 230.42 ETC | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE PLEASE PROVIDE PANEL | | SCHEDULES FOR LLC1, AND LLC2 AND | | CORRELATE WITH THE CIRCUITING PLANS. | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE PLACE ALL ROOM AND AREA DESIGNATIONS | | ON PLANS. | | UNABLE TO VERIFY SOME OF THESE ROOMS AT | | THIS TIME. | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS MENTIONS "IT" | | ROOM ON SECOND FLR. PLEASE SEE NFPA-75 | | AND NFPA-70(NEC) 645 FOR REQUIREMENTS. | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.51 FOR | | DISCONNECTING OF ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT. AS | | ROOM IS NOT VERIFIED AT THIS TIME, NOT | | SURE WHERE THIS DISCONNECTING MEANS IS? | | | | 16) NOTE: PELASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1, | | TABLES 415.2.C.1, 415.2.B.1 | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE "EQUIPMENT | | CO-ORDINATION SCHEDULE", PLEASE SEE | | MAINS DISCONNECTS WHICH ARE INDEED MAINS | | AND PLEASE ALSO SEE MAINS FOR EACH FLR | | ALSO BEING LABELED AS "MAINS" 1 AND 2. | | PLEASE ADJUSTED IDENTIFICATION | | ACCORDINLGY. | | 230.2E | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
Time |
12:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
Time |
12:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-07 12:29:37 | *****REVISION 2, APPROVED***** | | | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEET FP-1 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-12-31 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-12-31 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-31 11:19:08 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | THE APPROPIATE REVISED PLAN SHEETS TO BE FIRE-STAMPED | | WHEN THE OTHER REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
13:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
12:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-04 13:08:55 | *****NOT APPLICABLE***** | | | | | | THESE FIRE ALARM PLANS HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY SUBMITTED | | UNDER THE MASTER PERMIT;PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT | | SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT ARE REQUIRED FOR THE | | INSTALLATION AND/OR REMODEL OF THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
16:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-06-05 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-05 16:52:44 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | ALL COMMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ONE BELOW HAVE | | BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED;THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS | | WILL BE STAMPED WHEN ALL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS | | (INCLUDING THOSE OF THE OTHER PLAN REVIEWERS) HAVE BEEN | | SATISFIED. | | | | | | 07.NEW DAMPER INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE DROP TESTED | | PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION.PLEASE INDICATE ON THE | | PLANS | | | | | | PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE (ON THE PLANS) THAT THE ABOVE | | COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE (ON THE PLAN) EACH COMMENT | | WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
Time |
17:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-03-01 |
Time |
17:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-01 18:41:51 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 02.PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY EMERGENCY LIGHTING IN ALL | | COMPONENTS OF MEANS OF EGRESS INCLUDING STAIRS.NO | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING NOTICED IN THE STAIRWAYS ON SHEET | | A1.01 | | | | 05.CLASSROOMS AND SIMILAR SPACES SHALL MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS FOR RESCUE WINDOWS.PLEASE INDICATE ON | | THE PLAN SHEET A5.01 | | | | 07.NEW DAMPER INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE DROP TESTED | | PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION.PLEASE INDICATE ON THE | | PLANS | | | | 10.THE FIRE ALARM PANEL SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE FOR | | EMERGENCY PERSONNEL.SIGNAGE TO BE DISPLAYED ON | | ELECTRICAL ROOM DOOR INDICATING FIRE ALARM CONTROL | | PANEL (FACP) INSIDE.PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | AA.IT IS INDICATED THAT THE BUILDING IS 100%FIRE | | SPRINKLERED.PROVIDE A LAYOUT OF THIS FIRE SPRINKLER | | SYSTEM.SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS WILL BE | | REQUIRED FOR ANY FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION OR | | REMODEL. | | | | BB.ON SHEET A2.01, IT APPEARS THAT THE EXIT ACCESS | | CORRIDOR WILL BE COMPROMISED WHEN THE DOOR(S) TO THE | | STORAGE ROOM [109] AND THE MECHANICAL ROOM [102] ARE | | OPENED AT THE SAME TIME.AS PER NFPA 101- 7.2.1.4.4* : | | DURING ITS SWING , ANY DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL | | NOT LEAVE LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF | | AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, OR A PASSAGEWAY WHEN FULLY OPEN. | | | | CC.ON SHEET A1.01, VERIFY AND /OR INSTALL A | | DIRECTIONAL EXIT SIGN LIGHT INDICATING THE EXIT ONCE | | PERSON(S) ARE IN THE CORRIDOR BETWEEN BUIDING #2 AND | | BUILDING #1. | | | | DD. THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY AS REFERNCE TO A AN | | EXIT DOOR LOCATED AT THE MIDDLE STAIRWAY ON THE SECOND | | FLOOR.IT IS INDICATED AS AN EXIT ON SHEET A1.01, BUT | | IS INDICATED ON SHEET E3.02 THAT IT IS NOT AN EXIT. | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE (ON THE PLAN) EACH COMMENT | | WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
Time |
15:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-10 15:15:58 | ***DENIED*** | | | | 1) EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED AT DISTANCES NOT TO | | EXCEED 100'. SHT A1.01. | | | | 2) PLEASE CLEARLY IDENTIFY EMERGENCY LIGHTING IN ALL | | COMPONENTS OF MEANS OF EGRESS INCLUDING STAIRS. | | | | 3) 2A-10B,C RATED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE MOUNTED | | NOT TO EXCEED 75' TRAVEL DISTANCE. | | | | 4) SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM REMODEL. | | | | 5) CLASSROOMS AND SIMILAR SPACES SHALL MEET | | REQUIREMENTS FOR RESCUE WINDOWS. | | | | 6) PLEASE SHOW ADDRESS ON BUILDING THAT SHALL BE A | | MINIMUM OF 6" IN HEIGHT, 1" WIDTH AND CONTRASTING TO | | THE BACKGROUND. | | | | 7) NEW FIRE DAMPER INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE DROP TESTED | | PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 8) DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL INITIATE A GENERAL FIRE | | ALARM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. | | | | 9) FIRE ALARM SYSTEM TO BE UL CERTIFIED FOR CENTRAL | | STATION SERVICE. | | | | 10) FIRE ALARM PANEL SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE FOR EMERGENCY | | PERSONNEL. SIGNAGE TO BE DISPLAYED ON ELECTRICAL ROOM | | DOOR INDICATING FACP INSIDE. | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW (561) 805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
15:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-11 11:54:47 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | | | 1. SHT P-5.1 INDICATES THE GAS METERS INSIDE THE | | STRUCTURE. THIS IS HIGH PRESSURE AND PER SECTION 402.6 | | THE MAXIMUM DESIGN OPERATING PRESSUREFOR PIPING | | SYSTEMS LOCATED INSIDE BUILDINGS IS 5 PSI.PLEASE | | INDICATE THE SUPPLY PRESSURE TO THE METERS AND/OR MOVE | | THE METERS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING AND RECHECK THE TOTAL | | DEVELOPED LENGTH OF THE GAS PIPING TO THE FURTHEST | | GENERATOR. | | | | NOTE: THERE WAS NO INDICATION THAT A NEW PLUMBING SHEET | | AS ADDED AFTER THE FIRST REVIEW IN THE COMMENT | | RESPONSES SO SHT P-5.1 WAS OVERLOOKED IN THE SECOND | | REVIEW.THAT IS WHY THE GAS REVIEW COMMENTS WERE NOT | | INDICATED ON THE SECOND REVIEW. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
17:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-10 16:31:40 | TO "COMM" BD#7 | 2008-03-07 17:00:38 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
Time |
12:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-22 |
Time |
12:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-22 12:17:21 | TO "COMM" BD#28 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-30 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-30 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-01-30 16:10:32 | TO "JWITME" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
11:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-22 11:47:10 | TO "COMM" BD#13 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-06 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-06 11:54:25 | TO "COMM" BD#23 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-11-29 16:42:11 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:39 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
Notes |
2007-11-29 16:39:56 | TO "F" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-29 |
Time |
16:37 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
Notes |
2007-11-29 16:38:22 | TO "F" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
13:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
13:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-04 10:11:04 | TO "COMM" BD#20 | 2007-09-13 13:47:09 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-08-22 15:42:16 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-10 |
Time |
16:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-24 09:57:27 | TO "COMM" BD#48 | 2007-07-10 16:55:54 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-18 13:40:27 | TO "COMM" BD#42/PLANS ON RACK/2 ROLLS | 2007-05-07 15:58:42 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-01-30 10:45:47 | TO "COMM" BD#56 | 2007-01-19 13:16:22 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-10-10 |
Time |
15:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-08-01 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-11 14:44:35 | ROUTED FROM "COMM" BD TO "Z"--ZONING LAST REVIEWER | 2006-08-11 00:00:00 | TO "COMM" BD#36 | 2006-08-01 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-01-24 |
Time |
16:02 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-01-24 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-24 16:02:47 | MECHANICAL REVISION TO PLANS PAGE M-3. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-07 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
0.10 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-07 |
Time |
16:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-07 16:33:52 | ** MECHANICAL REVISION TO PAGE M-3 ** | | *** DENIED *** | | 1) PAGE M-3 PACKAGED ROOF TOP SCHEDULE SHOWS THE A/C | | SYSTEMS AS 12 SEER, PER 2004 FBC 13-407.1.ABC.3.2.1 THE | | MINIMUM SEER IS 13. WAS EER INTENDED. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 2) PAGE M-3 SPLIT SYSTEM SCHEDULE SHOWS SYSTEM #4 AS | | 12.75 SEER, PER 2004 FBC 13-407.1.ABC.3.2.1 THE MINIMUM | | SEER IS 13. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729 | | E-MAIL; [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-07 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
1.20 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-12-07 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-07 16:30:32 | MECHANICAL REVISION TO PAGES M-1, M-2.1, M-2.2, M-2.3, | | M-4, M-5, AND M-6. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
Time |
12:02 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
Time |
12:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-16 11:03:29 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) SEE ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES REGARDING THE GENERATOR | | AND THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS, PLEASE ADDRESS AND | | CORRECT. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-13 |
Time |
14:38 |
Rev Time |
1.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-09-14 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-09-13 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) MECHANICAL PLANS NEED THE ENGINEERING | | COMPANY'S CITIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION | | NUMBER ON THEM, PER FAC 61G15-23.002 . | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
MEDGAS |
MEDICAL GAS |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
Time |
11:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-07 |
Time |
11:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-07 11:36:43 | SEPARATE MED-GAS PERMIT REQUIRED. CERTIFICATIONS | | REQUIRED FOR THE QUALIFER, INSTALLER, AND BRAZER AT | | TIME OF APPLICATION WITH PICTURE I.D'S |
|
|
Review Stop |
MEDGAS |
MEDICAL GAS |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
10:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-20 15:46:00 | REVISION DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | NFPA 99C-99 | | | | 1. SUBMITISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAMS FOR THE VACUUM | | PIPING AND THE COMPRESSED AIR PIPING. SECTION | | 106.3.5.1.3. | | | | 2. SHT P-3.3 THE VACUUM SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH | | SECTION 4-5.2 AND ALL SUBSECTIONS. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | THE FOLLOWING: | | A. 4-5.2.1.1 SERVICE INLETS SHALL BE EITHER A SHUT | | OFF VALVE WITH A THREADED FEMALE PIPE CONNECTOR, OR A | | QUICK-CONNECT FITTING WITH A SINGLE CHECK VALVE. | | B. 4-5.2.1.2 LIQUID/AIR SEPARATOR (EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | OBTAINED FROM AND BE INSTALLED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF | | A MANUF. OR SUPPLIER FAMILIAR WITH PROPER PRACTICES FOR | | ITS CONSTRUCTION AND USE). (SEE FIGS. 4-5.2.1.2 A THRU | | D. | | C. 4-5.2.1.3 LIQUIDS FROM A LEVEL VACUUM SYSTEM, PER | | 4-5.2.2, SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY | | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. (SEE FIGURES 4-5.2.1.3(A) THRU(B). | | (SEE ATTACHED SHEETS). (SHOWN AS INDIRECT CONNECTION ON | | FIGURE 2 SHT P-3.3). | | D. 4-5.2.1.5 EXHAUST SHALL BE LOCATED REMOTE FROM ANY | | DOOR, WINDOW, AIR INTAKE, OR OTHER OPENING IN THE | | BUILDING ETC. | | E. 4-5.2.1.6 EXHAUST PROTECT AGAINST ENTRY OF INSECTS | | ETC. | | F. 4-5.2.2.1 CLEANOUTS REQUIRED. | | G. 4-5.2.2.3 CLEANOUTS REQUIRED. | | H. 4-5.2.2.5 PIPING TO BE SLOPED . | | | | 3. SHT P-3.3 THE GAS-POWERED DEVICES LEVEL 3 SHALL | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 4-5.1.1 AND ALL SUBSECTIONS. SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | A. 4-5.1.1.3(A)(D)(E)(G)(H) INTAKE SHALL BE FROM THE | | OUTSIDE WHEN PRACTICAL. | | B. 4-5.1.3.3(A) THRU (I) | | | | 4. SEE ATTACHED SHEETS FOR TYPICAL LEVEL 3 VACUUM AND | | AND GAS POWERED DEVICES SUPPLY SYSTEMS. | | | | 5. A SEPARATE MED-GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. | | CERTIFICATIONS FOR THE QUALIFER, THE BRAZER, & | | INSTALLER ARE REQUIRED WHEN APPYING FOR THE PERMIT. | | PICTURE IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED ON THE | | CERTIFICATIONS. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-20 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-20 15:51:16 | REVISION DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | 1. SHTS P-1, P-4, P-5.1, P-5.2 NO REVISION INDICATED OR | | NOTED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
Time |
12:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-11 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
06:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
18:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-16 07:02:01 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | NFPA 99C | | | | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1. OK | | 2. OK | | | | 3. SHTS A2.01 & A2.02 THE FIRST FLOOR | | FINISH SCHEDULE FOR ROOMS 103, 104, 118, | | (WOMEN, UNISEX HDCP, & MEN TOILET ROOMS) | | AS WELL AS ROOMS 202, 205, 208, & 210 | | TOILET ROOMS INDICATE PAINTED MR GWB FOR | | THE WALLS. PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS COMPLIES | | WITH SECTION 1210.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR | | WALLS TO BE HARD & NON-ABSORBENT. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE FINISH SCHEDULE SHALL | | REFLECT THE WALL MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED. | | | | 4. SHT A2.01 THE BREAK ROOM SINK AND SHT | | A2.02 THE STAFF LOUNGE SINK SHALL BE | | ACCESSIBLE. SUBMIT DETAILS SHOWING | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.24 AND ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | (FORWARD APPROACH REQUIRED, | | AND NO CABINET DOORS ALLOWED IN CLEAR | | FLOOR SPACE). | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | FOLLOWING: | | A. 11-4.24.4 SINK DEPTH | | B. 11-4.24.6 EXPOSED PIPES & SURFACES | | | | 5. OK | | 6. OK | | | | 7. SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE | | WITH SECTION 11-4.15 AND ALL SUBSECTIONS | | FOR THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | FOLLOWING: | | A. 11-4.15.2 SPOUT HEIGHT | | | | 8. SHTS P3.1 & P3.2 AND RPZV BACKFLOW IS | | REQUIRED ON THE WATER SERVICE AS CLOSE | | TO THE METER AS POSSIBLE, ON PRIVATE | | PROPERTY. SECTION 608.13.2 AND MUNICIPAL | | ORDINANCE 2853-95. | | ****NO RESPONSE, NOT ADDRESSED | | | | 9. SHT P3.2 FULL OPEN VALVES SHALL BE | | INSTALLED ON THE BASE OF EVERY WATER | | RISER PIPE, AND ON THE TOP OF EVERY | | WATER DOWN-FEED PIPE. SECTION 606.1(3) & 606.1(4). | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE VALVES ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE | | TOP OF EVERY WATER DOWN-FEED PIPE AS REQUIRED. ***CHECK | | BOAF INTERPRETATIONS AND IT INDICATED THE VALVES ARE | | FOR "UPSIDE DOWN RISERS MORE THAN ONE FLOOR" | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-08-22 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-08-21 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-22 00:00:00 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | NFPA 99C | | | | 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE ADDRESS | | OF THE ARCHITECTURAL BUSINESS ON THE | | TITLE BLOCK DOES NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS | | SHOWN ON THE RECORDS AT DBPR. (SEE | | ATTACHED SHEET). PER FAC 61G1-16.004(1) | | THE ADDRESS MUST BE SHOWN IN THE TITLE | | BLOCK. FS 481-2055. | | | | 2. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE SEAL | | SHALL CONTAIN THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF | | THE ARCHITECT. NO NUMBER HAS BEEN | | IMPRESSED ON THE SHEETS IN THE SEAL. FAC 61G1-16.002(1) | | & FS 481.2055. | | | | 3. SHTS A2.01 & A2.02 THE FIRST FLOOR | | FINISH SCHEDULE FOR ROOMS 103, 104, 118, | | (WOMEN, UNISEX HDCP, & MEN TOILET ROOMS) | | AS WELL AS ROOMS 202, 205, 208, & 210 | | TOILET ROOMS INDICATE PAINTED MR GWB FOR | | THE WALLS. PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS COMPLIES | | WITH SECTION 1210.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR | | WALLS TO BE HARD & NON-ABSORBENT. | | | | 4. SHT A2.01 THE BREAK ROOM SINK AND SHT | | A2.02 THE STAFF LOUNGE SINK SHALL BE | | ACCESSIBLE. SUBMIT DETAILS SHOWING | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.24 AND ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | (FORWARD APPROACH REQUIRED, | | AND NO CABINET DOORS ALLOWED IN CLEAR | | FLOOR SPACE). | | | | 5. SHT A6.01 UNISEX TOILET ROOM - 104 | | SHOW THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR THE W/C | | AND LAV, AND SHOW THE TURNING AREA. | | SECTIONS 11-4.16.2, 11-4.16.3, AND | | 11-4.22.3. | | | | 6. SHT A6.01 DETAILS 1, 2, 3, & TOILET | | ACCESSORY LEGEND REFERENCE COMPLIANCE | | WITH 1997 EDITION ACCESSIBILITY. DESIGN | | REQUIRED TO BE COMPLIANT WITH FBC-2004 | | CHAPTER 11. PLEASE CHANGE REFERENCE. | | | | 7. SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE | | WITH SECTION 11-4.15 AND ALL SUBSECTIONS | | FOR THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS. | | | | 8. SHTS P3.1 & P3.2 AND RPZV BACKFLOW IS | | REQUIRED ON THE WATER SERVICE AS CLOSE | | TO THE METER AS POSSIBLE, ON PRIVATE | | PROPERTY. SECTION 608.13.2 AND MUNICIPAL | | ORDINANCE 2853-95. | | | | 9. SHT P3.2 FULL OPEN VALVES SHALL BE | | INSTALLED ON THE BASE OF EVERY WATER | | RISER PIPE, AND ON THE TOP OF EVERY | | WATER DOWN-FEED PIPE. SECTION 606.1(3) & 606.1(4). | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
10:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-13 10:54:16 | ***FAILED - REVISION - ADDING PATIO STRUCTURE WITH | | GUARDRAIL ON ROOFTOP*** | | | | | | 1)PROVIDE A RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, UNIFYING PCN | | #74-43-43-05-01-023-0020 AND PCN | | #74-43-43-05-01-023-0040. | | | | 2)CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK.IS COVERED PATIO STRUCTURE | | EXISTING OR PROPOSED?IF PROPOSED, PLANS SHALL | | INDICATE HOW THE STRUCTURE COMPLIES WITH THE REAR | | SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 15 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. | | | | 3)PROVIDE A DATA TABLE SHOWING THE PROPOSED | | ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE WITH THE EXISTING, REQUIRED | | PARKING, AND PROVIDED PARKING. | | | | 4)PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY SHOWING | | THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
09:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
09:27 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-02-25 09:28:16 | ***APPROVED - REVISION - SUBMITTING SIDEWALK PLAN*** |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
choops |
Date |
2008-01-31 |
Time |
08:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-31 08:24:21 | ***FAILED - REVISION - ADDING COVERED PATIO*** | | | | | | 1)PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY | | SHOWING THE PROPOSED, WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS TO THE | | PROPERTY LINES. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT CHRIS HOOPS, | | ZONING TECHNICIAN (561)805-6720 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
13:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2007-02-16 |
Time |
13:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-10-28 |
Time |
12:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2006-10-28 |
Time |
12:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-10-28 12:35:39 | DENIED, | | 1. PLEASE INDICATE IF THE GENERATOR WILL BE LOCATED IN | | AN ASSIGNED PARKING SPACE. | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE APPROVED PARKING COUNT FOR THE | | LOCATION AND THE AMOUNT OF PARKING THAT IS EXISTING. | | GENERATOR MUST BE SCREENED FROM THE VIEW OF THE | | PUBLIC. | | 3. PLEASE INDICATE IF THERE WILL BE A CHANGE OF | | OCCUPANCY AND WHAT THAT CHANGE WILL BE. | | | | MICHELLE MCLEAN | | ZONING TECHNICIAN | | 805-6720 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |