Plan Review Stops For Permit 06040040 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2007-03-30 |
Time |
19:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2007-03-30 |
Time |
19:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-30 19:01:08 | MARCH 12TH REVISION OK |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rnuquist |
Date |
2006-12-10 |
Time |
13:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rnuquist |
Date |
2006-12-10 |
Time |
13:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
alange |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
Time |
08:06 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
alange |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
Time |
08:06 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2006-10-17 08:12:36 | DENIED | | | | | | 1.PERMIT VALUATION IS TO LOW AND | | SHOULD INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. | | ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEES ARE DUE.FEES | | PAID TO DATE REFLECT ONLY A $12,000 | | VALUATION.ADJUST VALUE AND PAY FEES | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING PLANS. | | | | C.COMPLETE A SHUTTER SCHEDULE, SEE | | SAMPLE ATTACHED. | | | | D.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR AN | | INSWING ENTRY DOOR. | | | | E.SUBMIT TWO SETS PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL | | STRAPS AND TIE-DOWNS USED.ONLY ONE SET OF FL 503 | | SUBMITTED. | | | | F.WINDOW AND DOOR PRESSURES NOT SHOW | | ON ALL ELAVATIONS. | | | | G.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | OVERHEAD DOORS. | | | | | | K.SCOPE OF WORK IS STILL NOT CLEAR AND | | DOES NOT MATCH PERMIT APPLICATION. | | CLEARLY SHOW ON PLANS AREAS THAT WILL | | NOT HAVE ANY WORK DONE AND SHOW AS | | EXISTING.APPLICATION SHOWS ROT REPAIR | | YET PLANS SHOW FIRE DAMAGE? | | | | L.THOSE PRODUCT APPROVALS WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.WPB | | AMENDMENT TO FBC 106.3.3. | | NOTE:NOT ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE BEEN STAAMPED AND | | NONE HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IN | | WRITING. | | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. SUBMIT ONE COPY OF | | OLD PAGES FOR REFERENCE. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET | | OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES | | CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | ART LANGE | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6672 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
alange |
Date |
2006-08-17 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
alange |
Date |
2006-08-17 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-17 00:00:00 | DENIED | | | | | | 1.PERMIT VALUATION IS TO LOW AND | | SHOULD INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. | | ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEES ARE DUE.FEES | | PAID TO DATE REFLECT ONLY A $12,000 | | VALUATION.ADJUST VALUE AND PAY FEES | | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING PLANS. | | | | 2."R" VALUES ON ENERGY CALS DO NOT | | MATCH THOSE ON PLANS. | | | | A.STATE PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR | | STANLY DOOR. | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS | | THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- | | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE | | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE | | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | B.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | MULLIONS. | | | | C.COMPLETE A SHUTTER SCHEDULE, SEE | | SAMPLE ATTACHED. | | | | D.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR AN | | INSWING ENTRY DOOR. | | | | E.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL | | STRAPS AND TIE-DOWNS USED.INFORMATIONS | | SUBMITTED IS ONLY SIMPSON SPEC. SHEETS. | | | | F.WINDOW AND DOOR PRESSURES NOT SHOW | | ON ALL ELAVATIONS. | | | | G.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | OVERHEAD DOORS. | | | | H.PLANS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO THE 2004 | | FORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.SEE PLUMBING | | PAGE NOTE. | | | | I.SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN | | THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: R 313.1 | | 1.IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM. | | 2.OUTSIDE EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING | | AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE | | BEDROOMS. | | 3.ON EACH ADDITIONAL STORY OF THE | | DWELLING, INCLUDING BASEMENTS BUT NOT | | INCLUDING CRAWL SPACES AND UNINHABITABLE | | ATTICS. IN DWELLINGS OR DWELLING UNITS | | WITH SPLIT LEVELS AND WITHOUT AN | | INTERVENING DOOR BETWEEN THE ADJACENT | | LEVELS, A SMOKE ALARM INSTALLED ON THE | | UPPER LEVEL SHALL SUFFICE FOR THE | | ADJACENT LOWER LEVEL PROVIDED THAT THE | | LOWER LEVEL IS LESS THAN ONE FULL STORY | | BELOW THE UPPER LEVEL. | | WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM IS | | REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN AN | | INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE ALARM | | DEVICES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED IN SUCH | | A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM | | WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS IN THE | | INDIVIDUAL UNIT. THE ALARM SHALL BE | | CLEARLY AUDIBLE IN ALL BEDROOMS OVER | | BACKGROUND NOISE LEVELS WITH ALL | | INTERVENING DOORS CLOSED. | | ALL SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE LISTED AND | | INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND THE | | HOUSEHOLD FIRE WARNING EQUIPMENT | | PROVISIONS OF NFPA 72. | | | | J.SAFETY GLASS REQUIRED IN WINDOWS IN | | BATHROOM NEAR TUB LOCATIONSR-308.1 | | | | K.SCOPE OF WORK IS STILL NOT CLEAR AND | | DOES NOT MATCH PERMIT APPLICATION. | | CLEARLY SHOW ON PLANS AREAS THAT WILL | | NOT HAVE ANY WORK DONE AND SHOW AS | | EXISTING.APPLICATION SHOWS ROT REPAIR | | YET PLANS SHOW FIRE DAMAGE? | | | | L.THOSE PRODUCT APPROVALS WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.WPB | | AMENDMENT TO FBC 106.3.3. | | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. SUBMIT ONE COPY OF | | OLD PAGES FOR REFERENCE. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET | | OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES | | CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | ART LANGE | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6672 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
alange |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
alange |
Date |
2006-07-05 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-05 00:00:00 | DENIED | | | | | | 1.PERMIT VALUATION IS TO LOW AND | | SHOULD INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. | | ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEES ARE DUE. | | | | | | 2.PREPARER SHALL SIGN ENERGY CALCS | | SUBMITTED. | | | | 3.REMOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AND ANY | | PAGES SHOWING NEW WINDOWS AND DOORS | | SINCE THEY WILL BE ON A SEPERATE PERMIT. | | | | 6.A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OR AN OWNER | | MUST ELECT ONE OR A COMBINATION OF | | LEVELS OF ALTERATION PURSUANT TO | | SECTIONS 303, 304 AND 305 OF THIS CODE. | | SHOW HOW PLANS WILL COMPLY WITH THE | | SECTION(S) SELECTED.2004 FBC EXISTING | | BUILDING 301.5 | | | | 8.PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE BEEN | | SUBMITTED FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS.PLANS | | SPEC THEM TO DONE BY OTHERS.IF THEY | | WILL BE ON A SEPERATE PERMIT PLEASE | | REMOVE FROM THIS PLAN. | | NEW COMMENT: PLANS DO NOT REFLECT WORK | | DESCRIBED ON APPLICATION.IF YOU WILL | | BE DOING ONLY ROT REPAIR UNDER THIS | | PERMIT SHOW REPAIRS TO BE MADE. | | STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS MAY BE NEEDED.IF | | NEW FRAMING IS GOING TO BE DONE. SHOW | | NEW AND EXISTING ON PLANS.WILL THERE | | BE NEW INSULATION AND DRYWALL? | | INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED FOR A | | COMPLETE REVIEW. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. SUBMIT ONE COPY OF | | OLD PAGES FOR REFERENCE. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET | | OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES | | CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | COOPERATION. | | | | ART LANGE | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6672 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
alange |
Date |
2006-05-01 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
alange |
Date |
2006-05-01 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-01 00:00:00 | DENIED | | | | | | 1.PERMIT VALUATION IS TO LOW AND | | SHOULD INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. | | ADDITIONAL PERMIT FEES ARE DUE. | | | | | | 2.SIGN TWO COPIES OF ENERGY CALCS | | SUBMITTED. | | | | 3.PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR | | IMPACT PROTECTION. | | | | 4.ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | QUALITY ASSURANCE SHALL HAVE THE | | FOLLOWING STATE APPROVAL ATTACHED. | | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION | | PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | SHEETS THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY | | NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT | | DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT | | AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 5.THOSE PRODUCT APPROVALS WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.WPB | | AMENDMENT TO FBC 106.3.3. | | | | 6.A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OR AN OWNER | | MUST ELECT ONE OR A COMBINATION OF | | LEVELS OF ALTERATION PURSUANT TO | | SECTIONS 303, 304 AND 305 OF THIS CODE. | | SHOW HOW PLANS WILL COMPLY WITH THE | | SECTION(S) SELECTED.2004 FBC EXISTING | | BUILDING 301.5 | | | | 7. ALL PLANS SUBMITTED AFTER OCTOBER, 1, | | 2005 SHALL BE DESIGNED TO THE 2004 | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | 8.PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE BEEN | | SUBMITTED FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS.PLANS | | SPEC THEM TO DONE BY OTHERS.IF THEY | | WILL BE ON A SEPERATE PERMIT PLEASE | | REMOVE FROM THIS PLAN. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. SUBMIT ONE COPY OF | | OLD PAGES FOR REFERENCE. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET | | OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES | | CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | COOPERATION. | | | | ART LANGE | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6672 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
17:18 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
17:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
11:02 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
13:23 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-02-27 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-11-16 |
Time |
06:37 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-11-16 |
Time |
06:37 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-09-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-09-27 |
Time |
06:47 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-09-27 |
Time |
06:47 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2006-09-27 00:00:00 | SEE NOTES FROM 8/16 THEY HAVE NOT | | CHANGED EXCEPT FOR THE NOTE ABOUT THE | | PERSON WHO DREW THESE. | | | | JAKE LEAHY644-7291 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
Time |
07:54 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
Time |
07:54 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2006-08-16 00:00:00 | PROVISO: THESE PROBLEMS NEED TO BE FIXED | | BEFORE FINAL OR NO POWER WILLL BE | | RELEASED TO THE BUILDINGS.JLEAHY | | | | | | RISER DIAGRAM ONLY SHOWS 2/0 WIRE IF THE | | LOAD CALCULATION FOR THE UNITS IS A 138 | | EACH THEN THE 2/0S ARE TOO SMALL. PLEASE | | RESUBMIT NEW CLACULATIONS OR A NEW RISER | | DIAGRAM. | | | | ON PAGE 4-7 RISER SHOWS TWO 200A AMIN | | ACCORDING TO THE NOTES IN THE PANEL | | SCHEDULE, BUT ON THE BUILDING YOU SHOW 1 | | AT 200 AND 1 AT 150????? PLEASE FIX | | BEFORE FINAL ELECTRICAL INSPECTION. | | | | PAGE 5-7 RISER SHOWS 200AMP MAIN, PANEL | | SCHEDULR SHOWS 150AMP MAIN. PLEASE FIX | | BEFORE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | NEED THE PERSON WHO HAS DRAWN THESE TO | | SIGN AND DATE THESE PLANS FOR THE ELEC. | | | | THESE ARE THE SAME COMMENTS THAT WHERE | | GIVEN TO YOU ON 8/19 PLEASE FIX OR YOU | | WILL NOT GET POWER TO THE UNITS/OR HAVE | | POWER SHUT OFF TO THE UNITS!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-06-14 |
Time |
09:42 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-06-14 |
Time |
09:42 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2006-06-14 00:00:00 | PAGE 5-7 | | | | RISER SHOWS TWO MAINS OFF ONE RISER | | WIRE IS GOOD FOR 200A, HOW IS SECOND | | METER FED? | | | | NO PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWN FOR SECOND | | PANEL.NO LOAD CALCULATION SHOWN FOR | | THE SPACE INVOLVED!!!!!!!!! | | | | NO LOAD CALCULATION FOR BOTH UNITS SHOWN | | PER NEC. | | | | YOU HAVE TWO PAGES 5-7 PLEASE CHANGE ONE | | OR YOU WILL FAIL AGAIN. | | | | IF STORAGE UNIT IS FOR BOTH TENANTS YOU | | NEED A SEPARATE METER AND PANEL FOR THAT | | ROOM!!!! | | | | CHECK YOUR LOAD CALCULATIONS SHOW THAT | | BOTH UNITS ARE 1200 SQFT??????????????? | | | | NEED THE PERSON WHO DESIGNED THIS PLAN | | TO SIGN IT AND DATE IT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2006-04-10 |
Time |
08:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-04-10 00:00:00 | RISER SHOWS INDIVIDUAL METERS LOCATIONS | | FOR UP AND DOWN MAINS TO BE GROUPED | | 230.72 | | | | PLANS ALSO SHOW DUPLEX METER ON BUILDING | | BUT NOT ON THE ELECTRICAL PLAN. | | | | | | CALL PHILLIP PETTY805-6742 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
14:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-06-20 14:37:38 | TO "JLEAHY" DESK/RESTAMP |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
08:27 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-04-23 08:28:03 | TO "JLEAHY" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
10:48 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-03-19 10:49:30 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-12 |
Time |
13:12 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-03-12 13:12:41 | TO"LMARTINEZ" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-04 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-04 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-12-04 10:59:01 | TO "LMARTINEZ" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-11-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-12 |
Time |
15:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-12 |
Time |
15:00 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2006-11-12 15:01:21 | TO "JLEAHY" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
10:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-09-22 |
Time |
10:22 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2006-09-22 00:00:00 | TO "JLEAHY" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
09:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-14 |
Time |
09:11 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2006-08-14 00:00:00 | TO "JLEAHY" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-06-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-07 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-07 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2006-06-07 00:00:00 | TO "JLEAHY" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
alange |
Date |
2006-05-01 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
alange |
Date |
2006-04-04 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-04-04 00:00:00 | TO "E" BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-29 |
Time |
07:53 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-29 |
Time |
07:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-29 07:54:04 | REVISION TO MECH. PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-03-19 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-19 12:09:12 | MECHANICAL REVISION | | *** DENIED *** | | 1) THE ORIGINAL MECHANICAL PLANS ON FILE ARE SEALED BY | | ANENGINEER (GORDON F. BUCK) SO ONLY HE CAN MAKE | | REVISIONS TO THE MECHANICAL PLANS. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
Time |
09:23 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-10-17 |
Time |
09:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
Time |
11:04 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-08-16 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) AS REQUESTED IN LAST TWO REVIEW, | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE | | SIGNED BY THE PREPARER ALSO. A STAMP IS | | NOT A SIGNATURE, PER 2004 FBC | | 13-600.3.ABC.1.1 . | | | | 2) PLEASE SEE ATTACHED NOTICE REGARDING | | FS 553.80(2)(B) FOUR TIMES THE FEE. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
0.30 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-06-19 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) AS REQUESTED IN LAST REVIEW 4-10-06 | | NOTE #1, ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE | | SIGNED BY THE PREPARER ALSO. | | | | 2) AS REQUSTED IN LAST REVIEW 4-10-06 | | NOTE #2 ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE CALLING | | FOR UNIT #2 HEATER TO BE 5 KW, | | MECHANICAL PLANS ARE CALLING FOR UNIT #2 | | HEATER TO BE 8.5 KW, THE TWO MUST | | COINSIDE PLEASE CORRECT THE ENERGY | | CAL'S. OR THE MECHANICAL PLANS. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-04-10 |
Time |
10:36 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2006-04-10 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2006-04-10 00:00:00 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) ENERGY CAL'S. NEED TO BE SIGNED BY | | PREPARER AND OWNER/AGENT. | | | | 2) ENERGY CAL'S. ARE CALLING FOR A/C #2 | | TO HAVE 5 KW HEAT, ELECT. AND MECH. | | PLANS ARE CALLING FOR 8 KW HEAT, PLEASE | | CORRECT. | | | | 3) SHOW ON MECH. PLANS HOW AHU #2 IS | | GETTING ITS RETURN AIR AND ACCESS FOR | | SERVICE. | | | | 4) SHOW ON MECH. PLANS LOCATION OF | | CONDENSER UNIT #2. | | | | 5) BOLTH A/C SYSTEMS ARE LISTED AS #1 ON | | MECH. PLANS, PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 6) WHITE OUT CAN NOT BE USED ON PLANS | | PLEASE SUBMIT CORRECTED PLANS WITH OUT | | (WHITE OUT) ON THEM. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
07:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
07:25 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-06-19 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
Time |
08:27 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-04-11 00:00:00 | DENIED; | | 1.SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM AND FLAT | | DRAWING DO NOT MATCH; | | A.FIRST FLOOR TUB AND SHOWER ARE | | | | NOT VENTED. | | B.FLAT DRAWING, SECOND FLOOR BATH- | | ROOM SHOWER IS NOT VENTED. | | C. KITCHEN SINK SHOULD BE DOWN | | STREAM OF BATHROOM GROUP SEC. | | 909.1 | | D. RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT MATCH | | FLOOR PLAN. | | 2. PLANS ARE BEING REVIEW UNDER THE | | FBC-2004 EDITION NOT 2001 PLEASE CHANGE | | NOTES. | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW BY; | | JOHN LEECH | | 805-6695 |
|
|