Plan Review Stops For Permit 05120772 |
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-07-17 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lursu |
Date |
2006-07-17 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-17 00:00:00 | REQUEST FROM THE APPLICANT TO REMOVE 311 | | CLEMATIS AS AN ADDRESS INITIALLY SET UP | | FOR THE SECOND LEVEL AND HAVE ONLY 309 | | TO REMAIN ;SITE PLANS NECESSARY .311 IS | | NOT IN OUR SYSTEM AS A EXTENSION. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2006-11-21 11:22:49 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE | | FBC2004 | | | | 1.)THE ENGINEER'S TITLE BLOCK IS TO HAVE ALL | | INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002 (NAME OF THE | | PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENT IS TO BE ON EACH SHEET). | | | | 2.)TWO SETS OF SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS | | REQUIRED (ONLY ONE SEALED SET SUBMITTED). | | | | 3.)THE PLANS APPEAR CODE COMPLIANT, BUT THEY DO NOT | | MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS.PLEASE REVISE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-11-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-11-06 |
Time |
08:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-11-06 |
Time |
08:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-11-06 08:50:10 | RESTAMP, STRUCTURAL 8 1/2 X 11 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-08-03 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-08-03 |
Time |
16:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-03 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL DETAILS 7/2/06 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-07-10 |
Time |
08:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-07-10 |
Time |
08:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-10 00:00:00 | ***PROVISO***PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURES, | | SEP PERMIT DOORS & SHUTTERS |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-07-06 |
Time |
13:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-07-06 |
Time |
12:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-06 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED | | | | 2-5.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 6.)THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCT APPROVALS | | FOR THE FRENCH DOORS.PRODUCT APPROVALS | | WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE IMPACT | | PROTECTION.CODE COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE | | DETERMINED AS ITEM #10 HAS NOT BEEN | | PROPERLY ADDRESSED. | | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3. | | | | | | 7-9.) | | | | 10.)PROVIDE WIND DESIGN INFORMATION | | FBC1603.1.4.PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURES | | FOR THE NEW DOORS.THIRD REQUEST. | | | | STATING THAT THE DOORS WILL WITHSTAND | | 155 AND 175 MPH IS NOT PROVIDING DESIGN | | PRESSURES (ENGINEER), OR PROVIDING ALL | | INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FBC1603.1.4. | | THE ARCHITECT PROVIDED A COMPUTERIZED | | SHEET (WRONG CODE, FBC2001 RATHER THAN | | FBC2004) WITH SOME OF THE INFORMATION, | | BUT IT CONFLICTS WITH THE ENGINEER'S | | INCOMPLETE WIND INFORMATION, AND THE | | ARCHITECT'S COMPUTERIZED WIND CALCS ARE | | NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | | THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO | | DETERMINE CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 11.)THERE IS A HALF PARTITION WALL | | STILL SHOWN BETWEEN COLUMNS F1 AND G1. | | THIS SHOULD BE A TENANT PARTITION WALL, | | FIRE RATED.WHY IS A HALF HIGH WALL | | SHOWN?A-1.1. | | | | 12-13.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 14.)THIRD REVIEW - THE RAMP IS TO | | COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.8.NO DETAIL OR | | SLOPE WAS PROVIDED.IF HANDRAILS ARE | | REQUIRED, THEY ARE TO COMPLY WITH | | FBC11-4.8.5. PROVIDE SLOPE AND ELEVATION | | CHANGE.THE LEGEND SHOWS THE HEAVY | | SINGLE DASHED LINE AS DELINEATING | | EXISTING AND RENOVATED AREAS.IS THERE | | A WALL BETWEEN THE EXISTING KITCHEN AND | | THE STAGE 108? | | | | THE ELEVATIONS PROVIDED STATE "SLOPE TO | | WALL" OR "SLOPE TO SLAB".THE SLOPES AT | | THE RAMPS ARE NOT CLEAR.THERE ARE NO | | LANDINGS SHOWN, NO DIMENSION FOR THE | | RAMP, ONLY AN ELEVATION CHANGE OF 5.16". | | AS I DO NOT HAVE THE RUN DIMENSION I | | CANNOT DETERMINE THE SLOPE. | | | | 15.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 16.)HOW IS THE STAGE ACCESSIBLE?IT | | IS NOT CLEAR IF THE DARK LINE IS A WALL | | OR IF IT IS DELINEATING THE LINE BETWEEN | | THE AREA OF WORK AND AREA NOT INCLUDED | | IN THE REMODEL. | | | | VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED, EITHER | | IN THE FORM OF A PERMANENT RAMP OR A | | LIFT, FBC11-4.1(1), 11-4.1.2(2), | | 11-4.1.6(1)(B). | | | | 3RD REVIEW - THE ARCHITECT'S LETTER | | STATES THAT THE STAGE DETAILS HAVE BEEN | | REMOVED, BUT THEY ARE STILL ON THE PLAN, | | ALL SHEETS.IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO HOW | | ACCESSIBILITY HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | 17.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-5.NO | | DETAILS IN REGARDS TO ACCESSIBILITY WERE | | SHOWN. | | | | SEE ITEM 16.THE RAMP PREVIOUSLY SHOWN | | ON THE PLAN IS NO LONGER ON THE PLAN. | | THE RAMP IMPLIES A CHANGE OF ELEVATION. | | OLD SHEETS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS | | RESUB.SHOW ELEVATION CHANGES ON THE | | PLAN, INCLUDING IN THE AREA HATCHED AS | | AN AREA NOT PART OF THE REMODEL.THERE | | STILL MUST BE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM | | THE NEW AREA TO THE EXISTING AREA. | | | | 18.-19.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 20.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X | | PLAN REVIEW FEE HAS BEEN CHARGED AS | | REQUIRED. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-04-18 |
Time |
09:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-04-18 |
Time |
09:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-04-18 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED | | | | 2-5.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 6.)WHERE IS THE EXTERIOR WALL AT THE | | ENTRY?IS THIS LOCATION CHANGING?ARE | | THE FRENCH ENTRY DOORS SHOWN NEW OR | | EXISTING?IF THEY ARE NEW, PROVIDE | | PRODUCT APPROVALS.NOTE THAT IMPACT | | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FBC EB 507.3, | | FBC16091.4.USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS | | FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MUST BE | | APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF THIS IS YOUR | | INTENT.RESUBMITTING WITH PLANS SHOWING | | USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTES WITHOUT AN | | APPROVED INSTALLATION PLAN WILL RESULT | | IN A DELAY OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | NOT ADDRESSED.IT IS NOW DETERMINED | | THAT AN EXTERIOR WALL IS BEING RELOCATED | | AND THAT NEW DOORS ARE BEING INSTALLED. | | NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED.PRODUCT | | APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER | | OF RECORD, FBC*106.3.3.AGAIN, FAILURE | | TO PROPERLY ADDRESS THIS COMMENT WILL | | RESULT IN A DELAY OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | 7-8.) ADDRESSED. | | | | 9.)IF THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO BE | | SPRINKLED BY CODE, SUPPLY FIRE SPRINKLER | | PLANS. | | | | NOT ADDRESSED.HAVING A SUBCONTRACTOR | | SUBMIT SHOPS AT A FUTURE DATE IS NOT | | SHOWING CODE COMPLIANCE ON THIS PLAN. | | PROVIDE A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN AS | | REQUIRED BY FBC*106.3.5.1.1(5) AND | | FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | 10.)DECLARE GOVERNING CODE.IF | | EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN | | THIS PROJECT, PROVIDE WIND DESIGN | | INFORMATION FBC1603.1.4. | | | | THE ARCHITECT REFERS TO THE STRUCTURALS, | | THE ENGINEER HAS STATED THAT NO EXTERIOR | | WORK IS TO BE DONE.YOU ARE RELOCATING | | AN EXTERIOR WALL AND INSTALLING EXTERIOR | | DOORS.THIS IS EXTERIOR WORK.PROVIDE | | INFORMATION REQUESTED, INCLUDING DESIGN | | PRESSURES FOR THE NEW DOORS. | | | | 11-13.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 14.)THE RAMP IS TO COMPLY WITH | | FBC11-4.8.NO DETAIL OR SLOPE WAS | | PROVIDED.IF HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED, | | THEY ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.8.5. | | PROVIDE SLOPE AND ELEVATION CHANGE.THE | | RAMP APPEARS TO LEAD TO THE REAR AREA, | | WHICH WOULD IMPLY THAT THE HEAVY DASHED | | LINE IS NOT A WALL.PLEASE PROVIDE A | | LEGEND FOR CLARIFICATION. | | | | YOU HAVE CHANGED THE LINE FROM A DASHED | | TO A SOLID, AND A LETTER STATING THAT | | HIS DELINEATES THE WORK AREA.PROVIDE A | | LEGEND ON THE PLAN AS REQUESTED AS A | | RESPONSE LETTER IS TO ASSIST IN PLAN | | REVIEW, NOT TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE, AND | | THE LETTER IS NOT A PART OF THE PLAN. | | | | PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AS REQUESTED.THE | | ARCHITECT HAS RESPONDED THAT HANDRAILS | | ARE NOT NECESSARY.ACCESSIBILITY | | REQUIRED TO ALL AREAS.PROVIDE THE | | INFORMATION REQUESTED.THE PLANS ARE TO | | SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 15.)ADDRESSED. | | | | 16.)HOW IS THE STAGE ACCESSIBLE?IT | | IS NOT CLEAR IF THE DARK LINE IS A WALL | | OR IF IT IS DELINEATING THE LINE BETWEEN | | THE AREA OF WORK AND AREA NOT INCLUDED | | IN THE REMODEL. | | | | VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED, EITHER | | IN THE FORM OF A PERMANENT RAMP OR A | | LIFT, FBC11-4.1(1), 11-4.1.2(2), | | 11-4.1.6(1)(B). | | | | 17.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-5.NO | | DETAILS IN REGARDS TO ACCESSIBILITY WERE | | SHOWN. | | | | SEE ITEM 16.THE RAMP PREVIOUSLY SHOWN | | ON THE PLAN IS NO LONGER ON THE PLAN. | | THE RAMP IMPLIES A CHANGE OF ELEVATION. | | OLD SHEETS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS | | RESUB.SHOW ELEVATION CHANGES ON THE | | PLAN, INCLUDING IN THE AREA HATCHED AS | | AN AREA NOT PART OF THE REMODEL.THERE | | STILL MUST BE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM | | THE NEW AREA TO THE EXISTING AREA. | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | 18.)TWO COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED.ONLY ONE SET OF ENGINEERING | | WAS SUBMITTED. | | | | 19.)WAS A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT | | DONE TO DETERMINE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY? | | IF IT WAS, PROVIDE TWO SIGNED, SEALED | | ORIGINALS.IF NOT, THIS PERMIT WILL BE | | ISSUED WITH A PROVISO THAT A SOILS | | INVESTIGATION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED | | BEFORE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | 20.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B).A 4X | | PLAN REVIEW WILL BE CHARGED IF THE | | COMMENTS ARE NOT PROPERLY ADDRESSED IN | | THE THIRD REVIEW. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-02-01 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
1.50 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2006-01-27 |
Time |
08:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-02-01 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE | | FBC*CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | 1.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED | | | | 2.)SOME OF THE SHEETS ON A THIRD SET | | OF ENGINEERING ARE NOT SEALED.ONLY TWO | | SETS ARE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING; EITHER | | HAVE THE UNSEALED SHEETS SEALED OR | | RETAIN THEM AND SUBMIT TWO SETS. | | | | 3.)THE SITE PLAN HAS TWO SEPARATE | | PARCELS HIGHLIGHTED, BOTH 313 AND 309 | | CLEMATIS AND PART OF301 CLEMATIS, | | ENDING IN PARCEL ID NUMBERS 0170, 0180, | | AND 0190 RESPECTIVELY.THE APPLICATION | | IS FOR 309 CLEMATIS.CLARIFY.THE | | IMPROVEMENT CANNOT CROSS OVER PROPERTY | | LINES. | | | | 4.)THE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN PREPARED BY | | THE ENGINEER SHOWS ONE TENANT SPACE. | | THE ARCHITECT?S PLAN HAS A DASHED LINE | | WHICH APPARENTLY SHOWS SCOPE OF WORK. | | IS THIS CORRECT?OR IS THIS A WALL WITH | | A TENANT SEPARATION?USUALLY THE DASHED | | LINE AS SHOWN DEPICTS A 1 HOUR | | SEPARATION.NO WALL LEGEND WAS | | PROVIDED. | | | | 5.)AREA 100, OUTDOOR PATIO, IS TO | | MATCH THE ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING | | SIDEWALK.WHAT IS THE ELEVATION | | DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NEW OUTDOOR PATIO | | AND THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE INTERIOR | | (ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE/EXIT)?SEE FBC11. | | | | 6.)WHERE IS THE EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL | | AT THE ENTRY?IS THIS LOCATION | | CHANGING?ARE THE FRENCH ENTRY DOORS | | SHOWN NEW OR EXISTING?IF THEY ARE NEW, | | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS.NOTE THAT | | IMPACT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FBC EB | | 507.3, FBC1609.1.4.USE OF REMOVABLE | | SHUTTERS FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MUST | | BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF THIS IS YOUR | | INTENT.RESUBMITTING WITH PLANS SHOWING | | USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS WITHOUT AN | | APPROVED INSTALLATION PLAN WILL RESULT | | IN A DELAY OF PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | 7.)NO DETAIL WAS PROVIDED FOR THE | | WALLS/COLUMNS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE | | ENTRY DOORS.IS THIS NEW OR EXISTING? | | | | 8.)DECLARE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOT AREA | | FOR THE SPACE, OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION | | FBC 3, OCCUPANT LOAD FBC1004, BUILDING | | TYPE, SPRINKLED OR UNSPRINKLED. | | | | 9.)IF THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO BE | | SPRINKLED BY CODE, SUPPLY FIRE SPRINKLER | | PLANS. | | | | 10.)DECLARE GOVERNING CODE.IF | | EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN | | THIS PROJECT, PROVIDE WIND DESIGN | | INFORMATION FBC1603.1.4. | | | | 11.)WHY IS THERE A DIFFERENT WALL TYPE | | DEPICTED BETWEEN COLUMN LINES D AND F, | | WEST SIDE?IS THIS A WALL OR OPEN? | | | | 12.)SHOW ALL REQUIRED FIRE | | SEPARATIONS, VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL, | | AND NOTE HOW THIS RENOVATION WILL AFFECT | | THE FIRE SEPARATIONS.SCOPE OF WORK IS | | NOT CLEAR FROM THE PLAN. | | | | 13.)WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE NEW | | COLUMNS AND BEAMS?SPECIFY DESIGN | | LOADS.DECLARE OCCUPANCY OF THE SECOND | | FLOOR, WHICH THIS BEAM IS NOW APPARENTLY | | SUPPORTING. | | | | 14.)THE RAMP IS TO COMPLY WITH | | FBC11-4.8.NO DETAIL OR SLOPE WAS | | PROVIDED.IF HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED, | | THEY ARE TO COMPLY WITH FBC11-4.8.5. | | PROVIDE SLOPE AND ELEVATION CHANGE.THE | | RAMP APPEARS TO LEAD TO THE REAR AREA, | | WHICH WOULD IMPLY THAT THE HEAVY DASHED | | LINE IS NOT A WALL.PLEASE PROVIDE A | | LEGEND FOR CLARIFICATION. | | | | 15.)PROVIDE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO | | THE STAGE CONSTRUCTION. | | | | 16.)HOW IS THE STAGE ACCESSIBLE?IT | | IS NOT CLEAR IF THE DARK LINE IS A WALL | | OR IF IT IS DELINEATING THE LINE BETWEEN | | THE AREA OF WORK AND AREA NOT INCLUDED | | IN THE REMODEL. | | | | 17.)SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC11-5.NO | | DETAILS IN REGARDS TO ACCESSIBILITY WERE | | SHOWN. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-06-29 |
Time |
10:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-06-29 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-29 00:00:00 | REDLINED 600.5 | | | | TO BE FIELD VERIFIED, COULD NOT LOCATE | | ON PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-04-03 |
Time |
14:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-04-03 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-04-03 00:00:00 | REDLINED 600.5 | | | | TO BE FIELD VERIFIED, COULD NOT LOCATE | | ON PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-01-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-01-20 |
Time |
19:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-01-20 |
Time |
19:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-01-20 00:00:00 | ****UNSAT **** | | | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE NEW | | CIRCUTING ON PLANS AND CORRELATE WITH A | | PANEL SCHEDULE TO BE SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE SEE NEW BAR ARE ETC. | | 215.5, 408.4 | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 700.12E FOR CIRCUITING | | OF EM AND EXT LTS. THESE SAHLL BE | | CIRCUITED TO THE LOCAL BRANCH CIRCUIT | | FEEDING LOCAL LIGHTING. | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE A NEW OR | | EXISTING SIGN CIRCUIT AS REQUIRED PER | | 600.5 | | | | 3)NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE SWITCHING | | FOR LIGHTING, FANS ETC ON PLANS. | | | | 4)NOTE: PLANS SHOULD REFLECT THE CURRENT | | CODES IN EFFECT AS FOLLOWS. | | NFPA-101 2003, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-70 | | 2002. | | | | 5)NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ANY NEW OR | | EXISTING LOADS BEING ADDED. PLEASE SE | | THE NUMBER OF RECEPTS BEING ADDED IS | | GREATER THAN THE EXISTING. PLEASE | | INCLUDE THE ADDED LOADS TO SERVICE AND | | VERIFY LOAD ON EXISTING SERVICE. | | 220,215.5 | | | | PLEASE SEE ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM | | OTHER TRADES WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL | | PLANS. | | | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING | | THIS OFFICE. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-07-03 |
Time |
14:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-07-03 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-03 00:00:00 | RESUBMITTED PLANS INDICATE AN OCCUPANT | | LOAD OF LESS THAN 300. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-04-19 |
Time |
10:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-04-19 |
Time |
10:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-04-19 00:00:00 | ******APPROVED****** | | | | 1) EXISTING DOORS ARE TO BE REINSTALLED. | | PANIC HARDWARE IS REQUIRED IF SERVING AN | | AREA WITH OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN | | 100. | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, CAPTAIN/WPBFR | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW (561) 805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-01-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-01-20 |
Time |
14:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-01-20 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-01-20 00:00:00 | ******DENIED****** | | | | 1) HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED ON BOTH SIDES | | OF THE RAMP. | | | | 2) IT APPEARS THAT THE EMERGENCY LIGHT | | LOCATED NEAR THE MANTLE MAY BE | | OBSTRUCTED BY THE WALLS ON EITHER SIDE. | | | | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT LOAD. A | | NEW SIGN MAY BE OBTAINED BY THE BUREAU | | OF FIRE PREVENTION PRIOR TO OR AT THE | | TIME OF THE FIRE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 4) PLEASE PROVIDE INTERIOR FINISH | | CLASSIFICATIONS OF WALLS AND CEILINGS IN | | TERMS OF CLASS A,B,OR C ETC. | | | | 5) SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED FOR | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM REMODEL IF | | APPLICABLE. | | | | 6) LIFE SAFETY TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, | | 2003 EDITION. | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, CAPTAIN/WPBFR | | FIRE PLANS REVIEW (561) 805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-21 |
Time |
09:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-11-21 09:58:40 | TO "SHILL" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-04 |
Time |
18:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-04 |
Time |
18:19 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-11-04 18:19:45 | TO "SHILL" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
Time |
13:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-16 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2006-08-16 00:00:00 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-03 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-08-03 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-08-03 00:00:00 | TO "SHILL" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-07-24 |
Time |
09:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-07-24 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-07-24 00:00:00 | TO "Z" BOX/SUBMITTAL | 2006-07-12 00:00:00 | 7/12/06--WHEN APPL. COMES BACK FOR | | RESUB, MATTHEW FLIS TO SEE PLANS FIRST, | | HIS REVIEW MAY BE MINIMAL.ADARROUGH |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-20 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-20 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-29 00:00:00 | TO "COMM" BD#19 | 2006-06-20 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-03-07 |
Time |
12:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-03-07 |
Time |
12:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-04-05 00:00:00 | TO "COMM" BD#24 | 2006-03-07 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2006-02-01 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2005-12-19 |
Time |
10:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-01-19 00:00:00 | TO "COMM" BD#20 | 2005-12-19 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2006-12-21 |
Time |
17:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2006-12-21 |
Time |
17:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-12-21 17:20:56 | PLAN DENIED | | NO DUCT SIZE,CFM,GRILLSIZE ON PLANS .PLANS AER NOT | | COMPLETE | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-01-26 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-01-26 |
Time |
10:58 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-01-26 00:00:00 | NO MECHANICAL PLANS OR CONTRACTOR | | INDICATED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION. | | PLEASE INDICATE SCOPE OF WORK.ANNOTATE | | IF A MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE | | PROVIDING PLANS WITH MECHANICAL PERMIT | | APPLICATION.ADDITIONAL PERMITS | | REQUIRED FOR HOOD, FIRE SUPPRESSION OR | | WALK-IN COOLERS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-08-21 |
Time |
08:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2006-08-21 |
Time |
08:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-21 00:00:00 | REVISION; | | CHANGED EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS IN BAR AREA. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-07-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-07-12 |
Time |
07:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-07-13 |
Time |
08:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-12 00:00:00 | PAUL SCHMITZ | | [email protected] | | FBC 2004 PLUMBING CODE PLAN REVIEW | | FBC2004 FUEL GAS CODEPLAN REVIEW | | FBC 2004 CH 11, FL ACESSIBILITY CODE | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | CHAPT.1, ADMINISTRATION, 2004 EDITION | | | | | | 1) SEE SHT A-1.2 WATER RISER,DWV. | | | | CONTACTED MIKE SCHMIDT PEACOCK & LEWIS | | 772-220-9909 | | END OF COMMENTS, QUESTIONS 561-805-6692 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-04-11 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-04-11 00:00:00 | PAUL SCHMITZ | | [email protected] | | FBC 2004 PLUMBING CODE PLAN REVIEW | | FBC2004 FUEL GAS CODEPLAN REVIEW | | FBC 2004 CH 11, FL ACESSIBILITY CODE | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, | | | | CHAPT.1, ADMINISTRATION, 2004 EDITION | | UNSAT | | | | 1( SEC106.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: | | PLUMBING RISER FOR DRAIN WASTE AND VENT, | | WATER PIPING DIAGRAM, PIPE SIZES, TYPE | | OF MATERIAL. | | FLOOR SINKS FOR ALL INDIRECT WASTE. | | FLOOR DRAINS IN WALK AREA. | | CONTACTED MIKE SCHMIDT PEACOCK & LEWIS | | | | 772-220-9909 | | END OF COMMENTS, QUESTIONS 561-805-6692 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-01-26 |
Time |
10:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-01-26 |
Time |
10:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-01-26 00:00:00 | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW, PAUL SCHMITZ | | DENIED | | FBC 2004 SEC.104.2 DRAWINGS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS. | | RELOCATING BAR: | | 1)TWO OR MORE COPIES OF SPECIFICATIONS, | | AND DRAWINGS DRAWN TO SCALE WITH | | SUFFICENT CLARITY AND DETAIL TO INDICATE | | THE THE NATURE AND CHARACTER OF THE | | WORK. SHALL ACCOMPANY THE APPLICATION | | FOR PERMIT. | | END OF COMMENTS, QUESTIONS 561-805-6692 | 2006-01-20 00:00:00 | NEW BAR AREA. VERIFY SINKS? |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-08-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-08-02 |
Time |
09:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-08-02 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-02 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL DETAILS ONLY; ZONING REVIEW | | NOT APPLICABLE. NO CHANGE IN PLANS. | | | | MJF |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-07-14 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-07-14 |
Time |
11:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-14 00:00:00 | RESUB OF ARCHITECTURAL FOR BUILDING | | ELEVATION REVIEW - SINGLE SHEET. | | -MJF |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-07-11 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-07-11 |
Time |
11:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-11 00:00:00 | ACCORDING TO SECT 94-108(E)(5) - "THE | | FACADES ON RETAIL FRONTAGES AT SIDEWALK | | LEVEL SHALL BE DETAILED AND GLAZED AS | | STOREFRONTS. STOREFRONTS SHALL BE | | DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM SIDEWALKS. | | STOREFRONTS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZED | | AREAS BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM | | THE GROUND, EQUAL TO A MINIMUM OF 70 | | PERCENT OF ITS FACADE LENGTH." PLEASE | | MODIFY ELEVATIONS AT ENTRY TO REFLECT | | THIS CODE REQUIREMENT. | | | | -MJF |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-05-26 |
Time |
16:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2006-05-26 |
Time |
16:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-26 00:00:00 | PLANS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS | | OF FRONT FACADE INDICATE | | DESIGN/MATERIALS OF NEW FACADE. MJF |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2006-02-09 |
Time |
09:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2006-02-09 |
Time |
09:20 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|