| 2005-09-29 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | PERMIT: 05071227 |
| | ADD: 1515 S FLAGLER DR |
| | CONT: CAROSEL DEV |
| | TEL: (561)966-0056 |
| | FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW |
| | ACTION: DENIED |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY |
| | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER |
| | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUM- |
| | BER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICA |
| | TION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK |
| | YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1A) COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW |
| | NUMBER 2A) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, |
| | 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE |
| | AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS |
| | WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT |
| | LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM |
| | THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE |
| | STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICA- |
| | TION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE |
| | SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. SEE |
| | ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1B) COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, |
| | 2B)FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| | OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| | TESTING REPORTS,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | A)1) SLIDING DOORS - REPORT SUBMITTED |
| | AL-FAROOQ CORP. ARE MISSINGTHE |
| | |
| | FL COVERSHEET |
| | A)2) SUBMITTED AL-FAROOQ REPORTS ARE |
| | FOR NON-IMPACT AND SMALL MISSLE |
| | TESTING ONLY. |
| | A)3) THE MIAMI-DADE REPORTS SUBMITTED; |
| | 04-1014.01 THIS REPORT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED WITHOUT THE TECHNICAL |
| | DRAWINGS, NO PRESSURES GIVEN!!! |
| | A)4) THE MIAMI-DADE REPORT SUBMITTED; |
| | 04-0819.02(LARGE MISSLE) THE TYPE |
| | OF GLAZING TO BE USED NOT |
| | HIGHLIGHTED, NOR IS THE SILL |
| | HEIGHT INDICATED WHICH LIMITS THE |
| | |
| | PRESSURE. |
| | A)5) IF EITHER OF THE MIAMI-DADE |
| | REPORTS ARE TO BE USED, THEY ARE |
| | NOT LISTED ON THE FL STATE WEB |
| | SITE REQUIRING LOCAL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL. APPLICATION ATTACHED. |
| | |
| | |
| | B)1) HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS NO |
| | REPORT WAS SUBMITTED, THE |
| | CONTRACTOR INDICATED THAT THIS WAS |
| | |
| | TO BE A CUT DOWN VERSION OF THE |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR. |
| | B)2) THE SAME ISSUES AS LISTED ABOVE |
| | GLAZING TO BE HIGHLIGHTED TO WHICH |
| | TYPE OF GLAZING WILL BE USED. |
| | B)C) INDICATE THE TYPE OF BOTTOM TRACK |
| | (HEIGHT) TO BE USED, LIMITS |
| | PRESSURE. |
| | |
| | |
| | C)1) EFIS SYSTEMS- STO SUBMITTED FL |
| | COVERSHEET, MISSING THE BACK UP |
| | MIAMI-DADE REPORT. |
| | C)2) NOTE SINCE CONTRACTOR FAILED TO |
| | SUBMIT ONE OF THE REPORTS LISTED |
| | UNDER THE FL COVERSHEET THE |
| | BROCHURE SUBMITTED DOES STATE THAT |
| | THIS PRODUCT WAS TESTED WITH BOTH |
| | GYPSUM SHEATHING & PLYWOOD |
| | SHEATHING. THIS IS A MINIMUM TYPE |
| | I BUILDING, NO COMBUSTIBLE |
| | MATERIAL IN EXTERIOR WALL,SEE |
| | TABLE 600. |
| | D)1) CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED MANUFACTURES |
| | CUT SHEETS ON DENSGLASS GOLD |
| | EXTERIOR SHEATHING PANELS, BUT NO |
| | |
| | SUBMITTALS FILED UNDER THE FL. |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM |
| | (COVERSHEET) NOR ES LEGACY REPORT |
| | D)2) RICHARDSON ENGINEERING SHEET LGN |
| | INDICATES THE GOVERNING DESIGN |
| | FOR WIND PRESSURE FOR LIGHT GAGE |
| | SYSTEM COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| | = -123PSF. PROVIDE REPORTS WITH |
| | SUCH VALUES. |
| | D)3) SHEET LGN STATES NOTE L-2 THAT |
| | SIGNED & SEALED CALCULATIONS MUST |
| | BE SUBMITTED FOR ALL EXTERIOR |
| | LIGHT GAGE FRAMING VERIFYING |
| | MEMBER SIZE & GAGE, LIGHT GAGE |
| | CONNECTIONS & CONNECTIONS OF |
| | LIGHT GAGE TO THE BUILDING |
| | STRUCTURE.NO CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | D)4) NOTE, MOST EFIS REPORTS INDICATE |
| | THAT THIS SYSTEM IS NOT TO BE |
| | USED ON HORIZONTAL SURFACES. |
| | |
| | 3)COMMENT #3 FROM THE PREVIOUS REIEW; |
| | FL BLD CODE 104.2.1.2 |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, PLANS |
| | DO NOT INDICATE IF NEGATIVE PRESSURES |
| | TAKEN ARE END ZONE PRESSUES AND WHAT |
| | TRIUTARY AREA (WINDOWS AND DOORS) WORST |
| | CASE 20 SQ FT. |
| | 3)A) A WIND DESIGN SHEET FROM FRANK L. |
| | |
| | BENNARDO WAS SUBMITTED WITH |
| | POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PRESSURES. A |
| | |
| | COPY OF THIS FORM IS TO BE |
| | RETAINED AND POSSIBLY BE |
| | FORWAARDED TO THE STATE FOR PEER |
| | REVIEW BY THE ENGINEERING BOARD. |
| | 3)B)PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS,REPORTS OR |
| | OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY THE |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AND BEING FILED |
| | |
| | FOR PUBLIC RECORD SHALL HAVE THE |
| | SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL AFFIXED TO THE |
| | DOCUMENT. |
| | FL STATE STAT: 61G15-23.002 ENGINEERS |
| | FL ATATE STAT: 61G16.003 ARCHITECTS |
| | 3)C) THIS FORM STATES IT IS TO BE USED |
| | FOR DETERMINING PRELIMINARY DESIGN |
| | AND IS INTENDED FOR ESTIMATING |
| | PURPOSES ONLY!THE FORMAT USED IN |
| | THIS SIMPLIFIED VERSION CAN ONLY BE |
| | |
| | USED IN A BOX TYPE DESIGN.THIS IS |
| | METHOD 1 UNDER SECTION 6.4 ASCE |
| | 7-98. |
| | 3)D) METHOD 2 CAN NOT BE APPLIED SINCE |
| | 6.5.1(1) REQUIRES THE BUILDING TO |
| | BE OF A REGULAR SHAPE, DEFINITION : |
| | A BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTUE HAVING |
| | NO UNUSUAL GEOMETRICAL IRREGULARITY |
| | |
| | IN SPATIAL FORM. |
| | 6.5.1(2) THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE |
| | DOES NOT HAVE RESPONSE |
| | CHARACTERISTICS MAKING IT SUBJECT TO |
| | |
| | ACROSS-WIND LOAADING, VORTEX |
| | SHEDDING, INSTABILITY DUE TO |
| | GALLOPING OR FLUTTERING OR DOES NOT |
| | HAVE A SITE LOCATION FOR WHICH |
| | CHANNELING EFFECTS OR BUFFETING IN |
| | THE WAKE OF UPWIND OBSTRUCTIONS |
| | WARRENT SPECIAL CONSIDERATION. |
| | 3)E) METHOD 3 IS A WIND TUNNEL TEST!! |
| | |
| | 3)F) ASCE 7-98 6.5.6.5.2 BUILDINGS WITH |
| | |
| | A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT GREATER THAN 60' |
| | SHALL BE DESIGNED USING THE EXPOSURE |
| | |
| | RESULTING IN THE HIGHEST WIND LOADS |
| | FOR ANY WIND DIRECTION AT THE SITE. |
| | 3)G) 1606.2.3 EDGE STRIPS AND END ZONES |
| | PROVIDE ELEVATIONS INDICATING WHICH |
| | AREAS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS END |
| | ZONES AND INTERIOR ZONES. TAKE WORST |
| | |
| | CASE 20 SQ. FT. |
| | |
| | 4) FL. BLD CODE 1606.1.7 THE FOLLOWING |
| | INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND SHALL BE |
| | SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, |
| | 1)- BASIC WIND SPEED, MPH |
| | 2)- WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR, & BUILDING |
| | CATEGORY |
| | 3)- WIND EXPOSURE |
| | 4)- INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT, |
| | 5)- COMPONENTS & CLADDING, THE DESIGN |
| | WIND PRESSURES IN TERMS OF PSF. |
| | |
| | 5) COMMENT # 5 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | STO DETAIL SHEETS INDICATE A SUPPORTING |
| | SUBSTRATE OR SUBSHEATHING, THE PLANS DO |
| | NOT IDENTIFY THIS MATERIAL, PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY. SEE TYPE I SECTION 603 OR TYPE |
| | II SECTION 604 & TABLE 600. |
| | CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED A STO BROCHURE BUT |
| | PLANS NEED TO IDENTIFY WHAT THIS |
| | MATERIAL SHALL BE. |
| | |
| | 6) ONCE THE STO PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE |
| | SUBMITTED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR 2603.6 |
| | WILL BE REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| | JIM WITMER |
| | TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| | FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE : WORKING ON THE EXTERIOR OF THIS |
| | BUILDING WILL RESULT IN PAYING 4X THE |
| | FEE FOR WORKING WITHOUT A PERMIT!!!!!!! |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | STATES THAT A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL |
| | IMPOSE A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE FEE FOR |
| | PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED THREE |
| | OR MORE TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
