Plan Review Stops For Permit 04080391 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2005-02-03 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
1.50 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2005-02-03 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2005-02-03 00:00:00 | ****PROVISO**** | | QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY'S FINAL | | FINDINGS REPORT BEFORE CO | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-01-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2005-01-18 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2005-01-18 |
Time |
09:11 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2005-01-18 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | 1.)PENDING LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | APPLICATION FORWARDED TO BILL STAPLES' | | DESK FOR APPROVAL. | | | | 2.)THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS | | EXPIRED (MORE THAN 90 DAYS WITHOUT | | COMMENCING WORK), FS713.13(2). | | | | | | ****NO RESUB FEE**** |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-12-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-12-14 |
Time |
08:34 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-12-14 |
Time |
07:10 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2004-12-14 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, | | ITEMS | | #3 AND #4 WERE NOT ADDRESSED.PLANS | | ARE | | DATED 8/3 AND 8/6, SAME PLANS AS | | REVIEWED PREVIOUSLY WITH NO REVISIONS. | | | | FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, THE PREVIOUS | | COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | 1.)PROVIDE DESIGN LOAD INFORMATION ON | | THE PLAN AS WELL AS THE INFORMATION | | REQUIRED BY FBC1609.1.72003 | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | 2.)SHOW FBC TABLE 500 COMPLIANCE; | | PROVIDE AREAS OF EXISTING BUILDING, | | ADDITION AREA, DECLARE BUILDING TYPE, | | SPRINKLED OR NONSPRINKLED AND | | OCCUPANCY. | | | | 3.)SHOW HOW THE PANELS MEET FIRE | | RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS.CANOPIES IN | | THE FIRE DISTRICT ARE TO CONFORM WITH | | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | TO THE FBC, SECTION F102.2.8.ROOF | | PANELS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE FIRE | | RESISTANCE RATING UNLESS FIRE | | RESISTANCE | | RATING IS REQUIRED FBC1604.5(2).ROOF | | FIRE RESISTANCE RATING IS REQUIRED CITY | | OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE | | FBC | | F102.2.4. | | | | 4.)SHOW HOW QUALITY ASSURANCE WILL BE | | ADDRESSED (LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | APPLICATION), FAC9B-72. | | | | 5.)SEE ATTACHED FS553.80(2)(B). | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2004-12-01 00:00:00 | ***LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | APPLICATION*** | | | | ****NOT A PLAN REVIEW**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | 1.)ORIGINAL TEST REPORTS AND | | ENGINEERING REQUIRED. | | | | 2.)THIRD PARTY QUALITY ASSURANCE | | ENTITY CANNOT BE THE MANUFACTURER (THEN | | IT WOULDN'T BE A THIRD PARTY).SEE | | FAC9B72.010(6). | | | | 3.)PLEASE SIGN THE APPLICATION. | | | | 4.)INDICATE METHOD 1 OR METHOD 2 (ITEM | | #1 ON APPLICATION). |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-11-17 |
Time |
12:14 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-11-17 |
Time |
12:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-11-17 00:00:00 | ****INFORMATIONAL ONLY**** | | | | AS PER DISCUSSION WITH A TESTING | | LABORATORY (JIM, 800-381-7744), THE | | FOLLOWING HAS BEEN ADDRESSED IN REGARDS | | TO THE SKYLIGHT ROOF PANELS: | | | | 1.)PURSUANT TO FAC9B-72, LOCAL OR | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED. | | | | 2.)FBC CHAPTER 2, DEFINITIONS, THE | | SKYLIGHT ROOF PANELS ARE POLYCARBONATE | | SO WOULD THEREFORE FALL UNDER THE | | DEFINITION OF PLASTIC, ROOF PANELS. | | | | 3.)FBC1706.1, ESTABLISHED TEST | | PROCEDURES, ASTM E 72, CONDUCTING | | STRENGTH TESTS OF PANELS FOR BUILDING | | CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE APPLICABLE. | | | | 4.)IT IS ADVISED THAT THE LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL APPLICATION BE FILLED | | OUT AND BE SUBMITTED BY FAX FOR A | | PRELIMINARY REVIEW; 561-653-2692 ATTN | | SAMANTHA. | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-08-31 |
Time |
14:28 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-08-31 |
Time |
14:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-08-31 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | 1.)THE PLANS SHOW A "FUTURE GARAGE". | | PLEASE NOTE THAT COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | BUILDING CODE OR CODES WHICH WILL BE IN | | EFFECT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL HAS NOT | | PERFORMED FOR THIS FUTURE STRUCTURE | | RELATIVE TO THIS AWNING. | | | | 2.)FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR THE ROOF,FAC9B-72. | | SEE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.AN | | APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED BUT IS | | INCOMPLETE.PLEASE NOTE THAT ITEM | | #2, 7 THROUGH 10 ARE INCOMPLETE.PLEASE | | SEE ATTACHED APPLICATION WITH CHECKLIST. | | ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED, INCLUDING | | SEALED TEST REPORT.A COPY OF A TEST | | REPORT WHICH I FOUND ON THE INTERNET | | IS INCLUDED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE.IT | | IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGNER | | TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS | | THE PRODUCT YOU WISH TO INSTALL. | | ALSO PLEASE SEE THE VALIDATION CHECKLIST | | TO ASSIST YOU IN FILLING OUT THIS FORM. | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS ALSO | | AVAILABLE IN THE RULE 9B-72 FOUND AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | | | 3.)PROVIDE DESIGN LOAD INFORMATION | | ON THE PLAN AS WELL AS THE INFORMATION | | (WIND LOAD) REQUIRED BY FBC1609.1.7, | | 2003 AMENDMENTS. | | | | 4.)YOU ARE CONNECTING TWO EXISTING | | BUILDINGS TO BECOME ONE STRUCTURE. | | PROVIDE AREAS OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS, | | DECLARE BUILDING TYPE AND OCCUPANCY, | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC TABLE 500. | | | | 5.)THE TEST REPORT WHICH I OBTAINED | | FROM THE INTERNET (ENCLOSED) INDICATES A | | FAILURE OF THE PANELS AT 161.2.THE | | DECK CONNECTION ANALYSIS SHOW A DESIGN | | PRESSURE OF -128.2 FOR ZONE 3.WHERE | | IS THE SAFETY FACTOR FOR THE PANELS, | | WHICH DO NOT APPEAR TO BE COMPLIANT | | FOR ZONE 3 (ALTHOUGH THE CONNECTORS | | ARE APPARENTLY COMPLIANT)?IS THIS | | TEST FOR THE SAME PRODUCT? | | | | 6.)DELEGATED ENGINEERING IS TO BE | | REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD, | | PLEASE REVIEW FAC61G15-30.005, .006. | | DESIGN PERFORMED BY DELEGATED ENGINEER | | IS TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLAN, | | WHICH IS LACKING DESIGN CRITERIA. | | | | 7.)FOR THE CONNECTOR CALCS, A TITLE | | BLOCK WITH ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED | | BY FAC61G15-23.002 IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-08-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-08-23 |
Time |
16:28 |
Rev Time |
0.27 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-08-23 |
Time |
16:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-08-23 00:00:00 | NO ELECTRICAL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW | | NO ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SIGNED ON | | APPLICATION. | | ANY ELECTRICAL WORK/LIGHTING ETC TO BE | | UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND FEES. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
nmccray |
Date |
2004-12-09 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
nmccray |
Date |
2004-12-09 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
nmccray |
Date |
2004-09-15 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
nmccray |
Date |
2004-09-15 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-09-15 00:00:00 | *************DENIED********************* | | | | 1) WHAT IS THE FLAMESPREAD OF THE | | PLASTIC ? | | | | 2) WILL THERE BE CARS STORED UNDERNEATH | | THESE CANOPIES ? | | | | NATE MCCRAY, CAPTAIN | | 561-835-2910 OR 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2005-01-12 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2005-01-12 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-01-12 00:00:00 | TO "SH" DESK/RESUB" |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-12-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-02 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-02 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-12-03 00:00:00 | SUBMITTAL WAS PERMIT APPLICATION AND | | LOCAL PA - PUT W/PKG, #21 | | DID NOT REVIEW PA BECAUSE IT IS PENDING | | LETTER FROM ENGINEER TO DO QUALITY | | ASSURANCE, TO SUBMIT NEXT WEEK | 2004-12-02 00:00:00 | TO "SH" DESK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
Time |
17:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
Time |
17:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-01 00:00:00 | SENT TO COMM BD#21 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-09-20 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-08-12 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-08-12 00:00:00 | TO COMM BD#14 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-08-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjoyce |
Date |
2004-08-30 |
Time |
09:43 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
gjoyce |
Date |
2004-08-30 |
Time |
09:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|