Plan Review Stops For Permit 04040562 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
48 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-14 |
Time |
13:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-14 |
Time |
13:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-14 13:40:54 | SUBMITTAL ON 7/10/07 FOR ENGINEER'S LETTER ON WIND | | PRESSURES FOR PARAPET CAP WEATHER-PROOFING MEMBRANE BY | | HYDROSTOP, PREMIUM COAT (NOA# 03-0501.11) |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
47 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
13:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-07 13:32:37 | REVISION SUBMITTED ON 6/25/07 FOR SHEET A0.1 REVISED TO | | SHOW PAVER SIDEWALK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
46 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
12:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
12:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-07 13:15:26 | SUBMITTAL ON 7/2/07 FOR LETTER FROM ANDREW MORGAN, | | P.E., DATED 6/28/07, ON BIRDVIEW SKYLIGHTS PRODUCT | | APPROVAL (NOA # 02-0924.07, FL # 5291) |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
45 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
12:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-07 |
Time |
12:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-07 12:57:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | SUBMITTAL ON 7/2/07 FOR LETTER FROM RIZA ALTAN, P.E. | | FOR PARAPET WALL. | | | | 1)RIZA ALTAN, P.E. IS NOT THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR | | THIS PROJECT.ANY DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE | | SHALL BE PREPARED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF | | RECORD, OR MUST INCLUDE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP | | FROM THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE | | PROJECT. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: | | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
44 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-06-24 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-06-24 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-24 13:42:33 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | REVISION SUBMITTED ON 6/14/07 FOR DOME SKYLIGHT PRODUCT | | APPROVAL, AND ATTACHMENT DETAIL FOR GUARDRAIL AT MECH | | EQUIPMENT ACCESS ADJACENT TO SKYLIGHT. | | | | 1) FBC* 104.2.1 AND FBC* 104.2.2ONLY ONE COPY OF THE | | RIZA ALTAN, P.E. DETAIL, FOR ATTACHMENT OF GUARDRAIL AT | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ACCESS ADJACENT TO SKYLIGHT, HAS A | | RAISED SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE.ALL THREE COPIES | | MUST HAVE RAISED SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE. | | | | 2) THE BIRDVIEW SKYLIGHTS PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# | | 02-0924.07 (FL# 5291) HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND DENIED | | TWICE (COPY OF REVIEWS ATTACHED), ON 6/8/06 AND AGAIN | | ON 6/25/06, BECAUSE OF THE DIMENSIONS OF THE SKYLIGHT. | | IT IS NOTED THAT AN ENGINEERING LETTER FROM ANDREW | | MORGAN, P.E. AND A LETTER FROM BIRDVIEW SKYLIGHTS ARE | | NOW BEING SUBMITTED.THESE LETTERS AND THE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL HAVE BEEN FAXED SO THEY ARE NOT LEGIBLE, AND | | THE ANDREW MORGAN, P.E. LETTER DOES NOT HAVE A RAISED | | SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE.ALSO THE LAST SENTENCE OF | | THE ANDREW MORGAN, P.E. LETTER STATES THAT "IT APPEARS | | THAT THE SKYLIGHTS INDICATED IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | ARE SUITABLE FOR THIS LOCATION".THE TERM "IT APPEARS | | THAT...." CANNOT BE ACCEPTED IN AN ENGINEERING LETTER. | | FOR THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL TO BE ACCEPTED FOR THE SIZE | | OF OPENING PROPOSED, IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE | | ENGINEERING LETTER TO SHOW THAT THE ENGINEER HAS | | CONDUCTED A COMPARISON OF WIDTH, LENGTH, AREA, DESIGN | | PRESSURE, AND IMPACT RESISTANCE FOR THE SKYLIGHT, AS | | PROPOSED AND AS TESTED.THE LETTER WILL BE REQUIRED TO | | INCLUDE A STATEMENT TO THE EFFECT THAT BASED ON THE | | ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE THE PROPOSED | | SKYLIGHT IS SUITABLE FOR THIS APPLICATION.SUBMIT A | | NEW ENGINEERING LETTER, AS DESCRIBED, WITH RAISED SEAL | | AND SIGNATURE, TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL FOR THE | | BIRDVIEW SKYLIGHTS LETTER. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: | | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
43 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-06-24 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-06-24 |
Time |
13:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-24 13:40:57 | ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED ON | | 6/14/07 FOR SHEETS A1.3, A1.4, A1,4,1, A2.2 AND S2.2, | | AND SUBMITTAL OF SPEC FOR FIRE-RATED ACCESS DOOR TO | | ELEVATOR SHAFT. | | | | SHEET A1.4 RED-LINED TO REQUIRE SUBMITTAL OF PRODUCT | | APPROVAL AND SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEER'S LETTER FOR | | "BIRDVIEW" DOME SKYLIGHT | | | | SHEET A1.4.1 RED-LINED TO REQUIRE ARCHITECTURAL MOLDING | | TO BE SECURE USING METAL OR OTHER APPROVED | | BRACKETS/FASTENERS PER FBC 1404.1.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
42 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-05-15 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-15 08:56:41 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | SUBMITTAL ON 5/9/07 FOR ACCESS PANELS TO ELEVATOR SHAFT | | AT FOURTH FLOOR | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | 1) FBC* 104.2CONTRACTOR TO HAVE ARCHITECT INCORPORATE | | ELEVATOR SHAFT ACCESS PANELS AS A REVISION TO FOURTH | | FLOOR PLAN, AND THEN RESUBMIT. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: | | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
41 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
07:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-24 |
Time |
07:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-24 07:29:22 | ARCHITECTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED 4/3/07 FOR ROOF PLAN | | AND SKYLIGHT DETAIL SHEET A1.4.REVIEW OF 4/18/07 | | UPDATED FOLLOWING DISCUSSION WITH CONTRACTOR. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
40 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
Time |
19:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
Time |
19:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-18 20:00:15 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | ARCHITECTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED 4/3/07 FOR ROOF PLAN | | AND SKYLIGHT DETAIL SHEET A1.4 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | 1) FBC* 106.4SHEET A1.4, ROOF PLAN AND SKYLIGHT | | DETAILS.THE SUBMITTED PLAN SHOWS 5'-9" DOUBLE DOME | | SKYLIGHTS WHICH DO NOT REFLECT THE SKYLIGHT DIMENSIONS | | AND PROFILES ON THE SUBMITTED SKYLIGHT SHOP DRAWINGS. | | THE SHOP DRAWINGS SHOW THREE DIFFERENT SIZES OF HIPPED | | ROOF SKYLIGHTS.SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | THAT SHOW THE SKYLIGHT SIZES AND PROFILES THAT ARE | | ACTUALLY PROPOSED. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: | | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
39 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
Time |
19:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
Time |
19:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-18 19:44:07 | ARCHITECTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED ON 4/3/07 FOR 1ST AND | | 2ND FLOOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SHEET A1.5 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
38 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-18 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-18 14:53:51 | SUBMITTAL FOR METALS TRUSS SHOP DRAWINGS THAT WERE | | STAMPED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD, ANDREW MORGAN SEVICES ON | | 2/26/07. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
37 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-03 12:25:24 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | REVISION SUBMITTED 4/3/07 FOR ROLL-UP | | SHUTTERS AND FOR METAL TRUSS DETAILS. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | REVISION DENIED | | | | 1) THE COMMENTS MADE ON 6/25/06 HAVE NOT BEEN | | ADDRESSED.NO RATIONAL ANALYSIS WAS SUBMITTED, AS | | REQUESTED, FOR ATTACHMENT OF SIMPSON MTSM16 AND/OR | | MTSM20 TWIST STRAPS TO 18 GAUGE METAL TRUSSES WHEN THE | | SIMPSON CATALOGUE ONLY GIVES CAPACITIES FOR THEIR USE | | WITH WOOD TRUSSES.ALSO THE UPLIFT ON THE GIRDER TRUSS | | FOR THE 14'-0" SQAURE ROOF IS STATED AS 2800 LBF.NO | | RATIONAL ANALYSIS WAS SUBMITTED TO SHOW HOW THE SIMPSON | | HTSM20 TWIST STRAPS, WHICH ARE DESIGNED AND SOLD FOR | | WOOD TRUSSES, WILL RESIST THAT UPLIFT FORCE ON METAL | | TRUSSES.THE ORIGINAL COMMENTS ARE REPEATED BELOW: | | | | FBC 1606.1METAL TRUSSES.ALL THREE | | OF THE TRUSS DETAIL SHEETS SPECIFY THE | | USE OF SIMPSON MTSM16 AND/OR MTSM20 | | TWIST STRAPS TO ANCHOR THE METAL | | TRUSSES.PER THE SIMPSON LITERATURE, | | THESE ANCHORS ARE DESIGNED TO ANCHOR | | WOOD TRUSSES TO CMU OR CONCRETE.THE | | CAPACITIES GIVEN IN THE LITERATURE ARE | | FOR WOOD TRUSSES.HOW WILL THESE STRAPS | | BE FASTENED TO THE DOUBLE METAL STUDS | | WHICH ARE BACK-TO-BACK?THE SIMPSON | | CATALOG SPECIFIES 8-10D (FOR MTSM16) OR | | 10-10D (FOR MTSM20) INTO WOOD TRUSSES. | | WHAT IS THE PROPOSED MEANS OF FASTENING | | THE TWIST STRAPS TO THE 18 GAUGE METAL | | TRUSSES?RATIONAL ANALYSIS WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO JUSTIFY THE UPLIFT | | RESISTANCE OF THE TWIST STRAP-TO-TRUSS CONNECTION. | | | | 2) THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THIS BUILDING IS ANDREW | | MORGAN, P.E.THE TRUSS DESIGN SUBMITTED IS BY RIZA | | ALTAN, P.E. AND MUST RECEIVE A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW AND | | STAMP BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR PLAN REVIEW. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: | | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
36 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-03 11:42:49 | SUBMITTAL ON 3/19/07 FOR HYDRO-STOP PREMIUM COAT SYSTEM | | PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
35 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-03 10:08:32 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | ARCHITECTURAL REVISION FOR SHEET A1.1. | | | | MUST ADDRESS THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROVISO:THE | | PERMIT WAS ISSUED ON 8/18/04.AT THAT TIME SHEET A1.1 | | WAS RED-LINED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH A PROVISO | | THAT THE NEW SIDEWALK SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING ADJACENT | | SIDEWALK MATERIAL.NO REVISION OF THIS SHEET CAN BE | | APPROVED UNLESS IT INCORPORATES A NOTE STATING THAT THE | | NEW SIDEWALK WILL MATCH THE EXISTING ADJACENT SIDEWALK | | MATERIAL. | | | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO TELEPHONE: | | (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
34 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-03 09:57:35 | ARCHITECTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED ON 1/31/07 FOR SHEETS | | A1.5, A2.2, A3.1, A3.2.1, A3.2.2, A4.4.ALL SUBMITTED | | SHEETS EXCEPT A3.2.2 SHOW NO CHANGES AND ARE STILL THE | | SAME REV. # THAT WASREVIEWED PREVIOUSLY.PLANS | | STAMPED AND PROCESSED BECAUSE THEY ARE SIGNED AND | | SEALED LATER THAN THE SHEETS CURRENTLY ON FILE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
33 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
09:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-03 09:53:40 | ARCHITECTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED ON 1/31/07 FOR SHEET | | LS1.1.SUBMITTED SHEET SHOWS NO CHANGES AND IS STILL | | REV. 4 WHICH HAS BEEN REVIEWED PREVIOUSLY.PLAN | | STAMPED AND PROCESSED BECAUSE IT IS SIGNED AND SEALED | | LATER THAN THE SHEET CURRENTLY ON FILE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
32 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-08-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-08-27 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-08-27 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-27 00:00:00 | REVISION SUBMITTED ON 7/21/06 FOR SHEETS | | A1.2 AND A1.3 | | | | OK, BUT MUST SUBMIT A REVISION FOR SHEET | | A4.3 AND A DETAIL SHOWING ACCESSIBILITY | | FOR THE SHOWER, IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | 11-4.21, PER PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | COMMENTS | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
31 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-25 |
Time |
22:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-25 |
Time |
22:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-25 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | REVISION SUBMITTED 4/18/06 FOR ROLL-UP | | SHUTTERS AND FOR METAL TRUSS DETAILS. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | REVISION DENIED | | | | 1) FBC 1606.1ROLL-UP SHUTTERS.THE | | SUBMITTED TOWN AND COUNTRY INDUSTRIES | | ROLL-UP SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVAL | | FL2251-R1 HAS MULTIPLE OPTIONS FOR SLAT | | SPAN, ANCHOR TYPE, STORM BAR, MULLION | | AND HEADER.THE PRODUCT APPROVAL CANNOT | | BE REVIEWED UNTIL IT HAS BEEN MARKED TO | | SHOW WHICH OPTIONS ARE BEING PROPOSED. | | MARK THE PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH THE | | PROPOSED OPTIONS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 2) FBC 1606.1METAL TRUSSES.ALL THREE | | OF THE TRUSS DETAIL SHEETS SPECIFY THE | | USE OF SIMPSON MTSM16 AND/OR MTSM20 | | TWIST STRAPS TO ANCHOR THE METAL | | TRUSSES.PER THE SIMPSON LITERATURE, | | THESE ANCHORS ARE DESIGNED TO ANCHOR | | WOOD TRUSSES TO CMU OR CONCRETE.THE | | CAPACITIES GIVEN IN THE LITERATURE ARE | | FOR WOOD TRUSSES.HOW WILL THESE STRAPS | | BE FASTENED TO THE DOUBLE METAL STUDS | | WHICH ARE BACK-TO-BACK?THE SIMPSON | | CATALOG SPECIFIES 8-10D (FOR MTSM16) OR | | 10-10D (FOR MTSM20) INTO WOOD TRUSSES. | | WHAT IS THE PROPOSED MEANS OF FASTENING | | THE TWIST STRAPS TO THE 18 GAUGE METAL | | TRUSSES?RATIONAL ANALYSIS WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO JUSTIFY THE UPLIFT | | RESISTANCE OF THE TWIST STRAP-TO-TRUSS | | CONNECTION. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
30 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-25 |
Time |
12:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-25 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-25 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED ON 6/22/06 | | FOR SKYLIGHT.SKYLIGHT CURB DETAIL WAS | | ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED ON 5/25/06 AND | | SKYLIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED | | ON 6/6/06.BOTH FAILED PREVIOUS REVIEWS | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | REVISION DENIED: | | | | 1) THE COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY ADDRESSED.THE | | REVISION TO ARCHITECTURAL SHEET A1.4 | | (ROOF PLAN) IS NOTED, BUT IT NOW SHOWS | | SKYLIGHT DIMENSIONS OF 69"X 69".THE | | DRAWING SHEET IN THE SUBMITTED BIRDVIEW | | SKYLIGHTS PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# | | 02-0924.07 (FL# 5291) STATES A MAXIMUM | | ALLOWABLE SKYLIGHT WIDTH OF 50".THAT | | WIDTH IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE PROPOSED | | 69" (5'-9") WIDTH SHOWN ON THE | | ARCHITECTURAL ROOF PLAN FOR THE | | BUILDING. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
29 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-08 |
Time |
20:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-08 |
Time |
20:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-08 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED 5/25/06 | | FOR SKYLIGHT CURB DETAIL AND ALTERNATIVE | | SKYLIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED ON | | 6/6/06 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | REVISION DENIED: | | | | 1) THE DRAWING SHEET IN THE SUBMITTED | | BIRDVIEW SKYLIGHTS PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# | | 02-0924.07 (FL# 5291) STATES A MAXIMUM | | ALLOWABLE SKYLIGHT WIDTH OF 50".THAT | | WIDTH IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE PROPOSED | | 6' WIDTH SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL ROOF | | PLAN FOR THE BUILDING. | | | | 2) THE SKYLIGHT DETAILS ON THE PERMIT | | APPROVED SET OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | SHALL REFLECT THE SHAPE AND CONSTRUCTION | | OF THE SELECTED SKYLIGHT.IF A SUITABLE | | DOME TYPE SKYLIGHT IS PROPOSED (SEE | | COMMENT 1, ABOVE) THE PLANS, INCLUDING | | CROSS-SECTION AND CURB DETAIL, SHOULD | | REVISED TO REFLECT THE CHANGE. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
28 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-08 |
Time |
08:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-08 |
Time |
08:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-08 00:00:00 | REVISION SUBMITTED ON 6/6/06 FOR | | MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM PRODUCT | | APPROVAL AND PLANS FOR APPLICATION OF | | ROOFING SYSTEM TO THE METAL DECK | | OMITTING THE CONCRETE SLAB. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
27 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-01 |
Time |
20:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-01 |
Time |
20:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-01 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | REVISION SUBMITTED ON 4/14/06, AND | | RESUBMITTED ON 5/25/06, FOR MODIFIED | | BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM PRODUCT APPROVAL AND | | PLANS FOR APPLICATION OF ROOFING SYSTEM | | TO THE METAL DECK OMITTING THE CONCRETE | | SLAB. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS | | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN | | REVIEW OF 5/12/06: | | | | 1) THE REVISED SHEETS A1.4.1, A3.2 AND | | A3.2.1 ARE READY FOR PROCESSING BUT THE | | THREE COPIES OF REVISED SHEET A3.1 WERE | | NOT RESUBMITTED ON 5/25/06.IT WAS | | ALREADY REVISED AND READY FOR PROCESSING | | BUT WAS NOT RESUBMITTED.SUBMIT THREE | | SIGNED AND SEALED COPIES OF THE ALREADY | | REVISED SHEET A3.1 | | | | 3) RATIONAL ANALYSIS REQUIRED PER | | MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED.THREE | | COPIES OF THE TEXT FROM RAS 117 WERE | | SUBMITTED.THAT IS THE DOCUMENT THAT | | DESCRIBES HOW TO DO THE CALCULATIONS, SO | | SUBMITTING COPIES OF THE DOCUMENT TEXT | | DOES NOT ADDRESS THE NEED FOR | | CALCULATIONS (RATIONAL ANALYSIS) | | SPECIFIC TO THE USE OF THIS PRODUCT ON | | THIS BUILDING.THE ORIGINAL COMMENT | | TEXT IS REPEATED VERBATIM BELOW, PLEASE | | ADDRESS THE COMMENT: | | | | THE SUBMITTED GAF MODIFIED BITUMEN | | ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 03-0430.12 | | WAS MISSING SHEETS 1 TO 3 AND THE STATE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET FL# 617-R1. | | THESE HAVE BEEN PRINTED FOR YOU TO | | EXPEDITE THE PROCESS.ON SHEET 13 OF | | THE NOA, THE STATED MAXIMUM DESIGN | | PRESSURE IS -60 PSF, WHICH IS ADEQUATE | | TO RESIST THE -43 PSF CALCULATED | | PRESSURE, STATED ON STRUCTURAL PLAN | | SHEET S1.0, FOR ZONE 1 (FIELD) OF THE | | ROOF.AS STATED ON SHEET 13 OF THE NOA, | | THAT IS ACHIEVED USING A FASTENER | | DENSITY OF 1 FASTENER PER 1.5 SQUARE | | FEET FOR ATTACHMENT OF THE INSULATION TO | | THE METAL DECK.HOWEVER, FOR ZONES 2 | | AND 3, STRUCTURAL PLAN SHEET S1.0 STATES | | THAT THE CALCULATED PRESSURES ON THE | | BUILDING ARE -73 PSF AND -107 PSF | | RESPECTIVELY.ALTHOUGH THESE PRESSURES | | EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE -60 PSF MAXIMUM | | DESIGN PRESSURE STATED ON SHEET 13 OF | | THE NOA, THAT SHEET REFERS TO GENERAL | | LIMITATION #7.ON SHEET 31 OF THE NOA, | | GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ALLOWS RATIONAL | | ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE INCREASED | | FASTENER DENSITY REQUIRED TO RESIST THE | | -73 PSF AND -107 PSF WIND PRESSURES IN | | ZONES 2 AND 3.NO RATIONAL ANALYSIS WAS | | SUBMITTED.SUBMIT CALCULATIONS STATING | | THE FASTENER INSULATION LAYER FASTENER | | DENSITY. | | | | 3) ON 5/4/06 A HOLD (REFERENCE #19620) | | WAS PLACED ON THIS PARCEL BY MR EFRAIM | | GARCED FOR AN UNPAID ALARM FEE OF | | $275.00.NO FURTHER PROCESSING OF PLANS | | WILL BE CARRIED OUT UNTIL THAT FEE IS | | PAID AND THE HOLD REMOVED.PLEASE | | CONTACT MR EFRAIM GARCED (TEL: | | 561-822-1320) FOR MORE DETAILS AND | | INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND HAVE THE | | HOLD REMOVED. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
26 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-01 |
Time |
19:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-06-01 |
Time |
19:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-01 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED 5/25/06 | | FOR SKYLIGHT CURB DETAIL. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | REVISION DENIED: | | 1) THE PROPOSED CURB DETAIL BEARS NO | | RESEMBLANCE TO THE ATTACHMENT DETAIL | | SHOWN IN THE SKYLIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | THE SKYLIGHT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAIL SHOWN ON | | SHEET E4 OF THE SUBMITTED NATURALITE | | SKYLIGHTS PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# | | 01-0118.08 (FL# 1500) | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
25 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-05-12 |
Time |
20:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-05-12 |
Time |
19:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-12 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | REVISION SUBMITTED ON 4/14/06 FOR | | SKYLIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL AND | | PLANS/PRODUCT APPROVAL FORAPPLICATION | | OFROOFING SYSTEM TO THE METAL DECK | | OMITTING THE CONCRETE SLAB. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | | | 1) SHEETS A3.1 AND A3.2 WERE REVISED BUT | | SHEET A1.1.4.1, DETAILS 05 AND 08, AND | | SHEET A3.2.1, DETAILS 01, 02 1ND 06 ALSO | | MAKE SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO 'CONCRETE | | SLAB ON METAL DECK'.THESE SHEETS MUST | | ALSO BE AMENDED FOR CONSISTENCY. | | | | 2) THE REVISED SHEETS REFER TO 'BUILT UP | | ROOF' WHILE THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT | | APPROVAL IS FOR 'MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF | | SYSTEM'.AMEND THE PLANS TO CORRECTLY | | STATE THE TYPE OF ROOF SYSTEM TO BE USED | | (I.E. MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF). | | | | 3) RATIONAL ANALYSIS REQUIRED PER | | MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | THE SUBMITTED GAF MODIFIED BITUMEN | | ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 03-0430.12 | | WAS MISSING SHEETS 1 TO 3 AND THE STATE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET FL# 617-R1. | | THESE HAVE BEEN PRINTED FOR YOU TO | | EXPEDITE THE PROCESS.ON SHEET 13 OF | | THE NOA, THE STATED MAXIMUM DESIGN | | PRESSURE IS -60 PSF, WHICH IS ADEQUATE | | TO RESIST THE -43 PSF CALCULATED | | PRESSURE, STATED ON STRUCTURAL PLAN | | SHEET S1.0, FOR ZONE 1 (FIELD) OF THE | | ROOF.AS STATED ON SHEET 13 OF THE NOA, | | THAT IS ACHIEVED USING A FASTENER | | DENSITY OF 1 FASTENER PER 1.5 SQUARE | | FEET FOR ATTACHMENT OF THE INSULATION TO | | THE METAL DECK.HOWEVER, FOR ZONES 2 | | AND 3, STRUCTURAL PLAN SHEET S1.0 STATES | | THAT THE CALCULATED PRESSURES ON THE | | BUILDING ARE -73 PSF AND -107 PSF | | RESPECTIVELY.ALTHOUGH THESE PRESSURES | | EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE -60 PSF MAXIMUM | | DESIGN PRESSURE STATED ON SHEET 13 OF | | THE NOA, THAT SHEET REFERS TO GENERAL | | LIMITATION #7.ON SHEET 31 OF THE NOA, | | GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ALLOWS RATIONAL | | ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE INCREASED | | FASTENER DENSITY REQUIRED TO RESIST THE | | -73 PSF AND -107 PSF WIND PRESSURES IN | | ZONES 2 AND 3.NO RATIONAL ANALYSIS WAS | | SUBMITTED.SUBMIT CALCULATIONS STATING | | THE FASTENER INSULATION LAYER FASTENER | | DENSITY. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
24 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-05-12 |
Time |
20:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-05-12 |
Time |
20:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-12 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6652 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED 4/21/06 | | FOR SKYLIGHT CURB DETAIL. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | 1) FBC 707.1IN CONCEALED SPACES OF | | TYPE IV BUILDINGS ALL WOOD MUST BE FIRE | | RETARDANT TREATED.AMEND THE PLANS. | | | | 2) ONLY TWO COPIES WERE SUBMITTED.THIS | | IS A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR PROJECT SO | | THREE COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS ARE | | REQUIRED. | | | | 3) THIS IS A REVISION AND A REVISION FEE | | IS DUE.THE PLANS WERE BROUGHT IN AS A | | NO FEE SUBMITTAL.THE APPROPRIATE $60 | | REVISION FEE HAS NOW BEEN ADDED TO THE | | FEE SCREEN AND MUST BE PAID BEFORE THE | | REVISION IS BROUGHT BACK FOR REVIEW. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6652ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
23 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-02-06 |
Time |
09:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2006-02-06 |
Time |
09:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-02-06 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 11/23/05 FOR | | STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
22 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
Time |
17:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
Time |
17:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-08-11 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED ON 7/29/05 | | FOR SHEET S2.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
21 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
Time |
17:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
Time |
17:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-08-11 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 7/18/05 FOR | | STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS FOR 2ND FLOOR TO | | ROOF. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
20 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
Time |
12:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-08-11 |
Time |
12:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-08-11 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 7/18/05 FOR | | STAIR FABRICATION SHOP DRAWINGS. | | | | 1) 61G15-31.001 FL. ADMININSTRATIVE CODE | | STRUCTURAL SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND STAMPED BY THE ENGINEER OF | | RECORD BEFORE SUBMITTAL. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
19 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-07-25 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL FOR RINKER 1ST, | | 2ND, 3RD, 4TH AND ROOF VERTICAL LIFT | | DETAILS. SHEETS R201, R301, R302, R303 | | AND R304. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
18 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
Time |
15:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-07-25 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL FOR ROOF-TOP METAL | | FRAMING DETAILS. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | 1) COMPLY WITH THE ENGINEER OF RECORD'S | | COMMENTS.ANDREW MORGAN SERVICES HAVE | | REVIEWED THE DETAILS AND MARKED THEM | | 'REVISE AND RE-SUBMIT'.PLEASE FOLLOW | | THOSE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE RESUBMITTING | | FOR REVIEW.THIS OFFICE CANNOT ACCEPT | | PLANS THAT ARE NOT REVIEWED BY THE | | ENGINEER OF RECORD AND GIVEN A STATUS OF | | 'NO EXCEPTION TAKEN' OR 'REVISE AND | | RESUBMIT'. | | | | 2) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR. | | ONLY TWO COPIES OF THESE PLANS WERE | | SUBMITTED.THIS IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING | | SO THREE COPIES OF THE PLANS AND OTHER | | DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | PERMITTING PURPOSES | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
17 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-06-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-06-30 |
Time |
20:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-06-30 |
Time |
20:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-06-30 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 5/27/05 FOR | | 'STEEL FABRICATORS' SHOP DRAWINGS AND | | 'FILE & FIELD' SHOP DRAWINGS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
16 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-06-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-06-30 |
Time |
20:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-06-30 |
Time |
20:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-06-30 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 5/27/05 FOR | | ANDREW MORGAN, P.E. LETTER ON HOLE | | THROUGH GRADE BEAM |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
15 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-04-12 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-04-12 |
Time |
10:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-04-12 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 4/8/05 FOR | | GRADE BEAM CALCULATION AND SURVEY | | DRAWING SUBMITTED ON 2/23/05 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-04-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-04-05 |
Time |
09:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-04-05 |
Time |
09:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-04-05 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 4/5/05 FOR | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-04-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-04-05 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-04-05 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-04-05 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 2/22/05 FOR | | GRADE BEAM CALCULATION AND SURVEY | | DRAWING SUBMITTED ON 2/23/05 | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | 1) FBC* 104.2.1.2THE TUNNEL LOCATION | | PLAN HAS NOW BEEN SUBMITTED, AS | | REQUESTED UNDER THE LAST REVIEW, BUT THE | | GRADE BEAM CALCULATIONS WERE NOT | | RE-SUBMITTED.A REVIEW CANNOT BE | | CARRIED OUT UNTIL THE TUNNEL LOCATION | | PLAN AND THE GRADE BEAM CALCULATIONS ARE | | SUBMITTED TOGETHER. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-02-22 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-02-22 |
Time |
09:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-02-22 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 2/22/05 FOR | | GRADE BEAM CALCULATION | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | 1) FBC* 104.2.1.2THE CALCULATIONS DO | | NOT INCLUDE A TUNNEL LOCATION PLAN. | | SUBMIT A PLAN SHOWING THE SIZE, LOCATION | | AND ORIENTATION OF THE TUNNEL AND ITS | | POSITION RELATIVE TO PILE CAPS P8, P6A | | AND P6 (AT GRID C1). | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-02-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-02-22 |
Time |
08:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-02-22 |
Time |
08:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-02-22 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 2/2/05 FOR | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN (RE-SUBMITTED | | ON 2/22/05). | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS | | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN | | REVIEW OF 2/10/05: | | | | 1) FBC* 105.13.1THIS COMMENT HAS STILL | | NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.UNDER THE TITLE | | 'SECTION 2: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR PLAN- | | FOUNDATION', THE TYPE OF FOUNDATION | | DESCRIBED DOES NOT REPRESENT THE PILED | | FOUNDATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.AMEND | | THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-02-10 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2005-02-10 |
Time |
08:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-02-10 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 2/2/05 FOR | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | 1) FBC* 105.13.1UNDER THE TITLE | | 'SECTION 2: THRESHOLD INSPECTOR PLAN- | | FOUNDATION', THE TYPE OF FOUNDATION IS | | DESCRIBED DOES NOT REPRESENT THE PILED | | FOUNDATIONS DESCRIBED ON THE PLANS. | | AMEND THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. | | | | 2) 61G15-23.002(2)FL. ADMIN. CODE. | | IT IS NOTED THAT THE LAST SHEET OF THE | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR PLAN IS SIGNED AND | | SEALED BY ANDREW MORGAN, P.E. AS THE | | ENGINEER OF RECORD.DOCUMENTS SIGNED & | | SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, | | WHICH | | ARE FOR PUBLIC RECORD, SHALL INCLUDE | | THE | | PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER AND ADDRESS OF | | THE ENGINEER (471.025 F.S. AND 471.023 | | F.S.). | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-12-22 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-12-22 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-22 00:00:00 | STRUCTURAL SUBMITTAL ON 12/20/04 FOR | | AUGER CAST PILE INSTALLATION MONITORING | | REPORT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-21 00:00:00 | REVISION SUBMITTED 11/8/04 AND | | RE-SUBMITTED 12/15/04 TO ADDRESS | | COMMENTS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-11-19 |
Time |
17:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-11-19 |
Time |
17:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-11-19 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | F.S.= FLORIDA (STATE) STATUTE | | | | REVISION SUBMITTED 11/8/04 | | | | 1) ALL OF THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS (ALSO | | PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL AND | | FIRE PROTECTION PLANS) HAVE AN INCORRECT | | PROJECT ADDRESS.THE CORRECT ADDRESS IS | | 307 EVERNIA ST (NOT 310).THE | | CORRECTION CAN BE MADE BY HAND ON EACH | | SHEET. | | | | 2) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR | | PLANS.ONLY TWO SETS OF REVISED PLANS | | WERE SUBMITTED.SUBMIT A THIRD SET OF | | PLANS FOR THE THRESHOLD INSPECTOR. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-09-17 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-09-17 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-09-17 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | ******PROVISO******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | STRUCTURAL REVISION SUBMITTED 9/1/04 FOR | | CHANGE FROM SPREAD FOOTINGS TO AUGERED | | PILES. | | | | --PROVISO-- | | PILE TEST SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | ASTM D 1143 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-09-14 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-08-17 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
Time |
15:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
Time |
15:52 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2004-08-06 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | | | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS | | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN | | REVIEW OF 7/20/04: | | | | 7) THIS COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY | | ADDRESSED. | | FBC 13-103.1.2BEFORE A BUILDING | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED, SHEET 2 OF THE | | SUBMITTED ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS | | SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OWNER, | | OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED | | AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. | | ALSO, SHEET 1 SHALL STATE THE OWNER'S | | NAME. | | | | 29) PRODUCT APPROVAL: | | (A) CASEMENT WINDOW PRODUCT APPROVAL | | NOA# 03-1006.08 STATES "SMALL MISSILE | | IMPACT" RATING.AS THEY ARE NOT RATED | | FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT, ALL CASEMENT | | WINDOWS LESS THAN 30 FEET ABOVE GRADE | | WILL REQUIRE HURRICANE SHUTTERS. | | ALTERNATIVELY SUBMIT A PRODUCT APPROVAL | | FOR WINDOWS WITH LARGE MISSILE IMPACT | | RATING. ALSO, THE SUBMITTED NOA IS NOT | | APPROPRIATE FOR THE 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR | | 45 MINUTE FIRE-RATED WINDOWS UNLESS A | | FIRE RESISTANCE TEST REPORT IS SUBMITTED | | FIRE-RATED WINDOWS SHALL NOT BE OPENABLE | | EXCEPT FOR MAINTENANCE ONLY (SEE ALSO | | COMMENT (B) BELOW). | | (B) ROLL-UP SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVAL | | NOA# 03-0106.16 STATES THAT THE "ROLL-UP | | MECHANISM IS NOT PART OF THIS APPROVAL". | | HOW ARE THESE SHUTTERS TO BE DEPLOYED | | OVER THE 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR WINDOWS?THE | | PROPOSED CASEMENT WINDOWS OPEN OUTWARD | | AND WOULD OBSTRUCT SHUTTER DEPLOYMENT | | WITH THE WINDOW OPEN (SEE COMMENT (A) | | ABOVE).ALSO, THERE IS ONLY 2 FEET | | (APPROX.) FROM THEBUILDING TO THE | | WEST PROPERTY LINE IF THE SHUTTERS ARE | | TO BE DEPLOYED FROM OUTSIDE.IF THE | | SHUTTERS ARE TO BE MOTOR DRIVEN, THE | | PLANS SHALL STATE THIS. | | | | 34) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR. | | A SIGNED AND SEALED COPY OF THE SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR AGREEMENT AND AFFADAVIT SHALL | | BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE | | ISSUED.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH | | THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, INSPECTION | | COMPANY AND ON-SITE INSPECTOR SHALL BE | | ARRANGED BY CALLING HAROLD PISKURA ON | | 561 805 6711. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-08-03 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-07-16 |
Time |
18:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-07-16 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | | | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS | | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN | | REVIEW OF 6/18/04: | | | | 1) NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. | | COMMENT RESPONSE OF 6/24/04 IS NOTED. | | THE SUBMITTED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS | | FOR "REPLACEMENT OF FIRE STAIRS" UNDER | | PERMIT# 04020595.THAT SCOPE OF WORK | | AND PERMIT NUMBER ARE NOT RELEVANT. | | THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SHALL BE | | RECORDED AT PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE | | AND A COPY SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE | | BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.BLANK | | FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS OFFICE. | | | | 2) IMPACT FEES. | | CONTRARY TO THE COMMENT RESPONSE OF | | 6/24/04, NO RECEIPT FOR IMPACT FEES WAS | | SUBMITTED AND THE PLANS WERE NOT STAMPED | | AS 'ASSESSED'. THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN | | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT | | FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. THEY SHALL BE | | STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE | | PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION | | SERVICES BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 5) SITE SURVEY. | | COMMENT RESPONSE OF 6/24/04 IS NOTED. | | ONLY TWO COPIES OF THE SITE SURVEY | | DRAWING WERE SUBMITTED.SUBMIT A THIRD | | COPY FOR THE THRESHOLD INSPECTOR AS | | REQUIRED BY COMMENT 34. | | | | 7) FBC 13-103.1.2 ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE | | FORM.COMMENT RESPONSE OF 6/24/04 IS | | NOTED. THE COMMENT HAS NOT BEEN PROPERLY | | ADDRESSED.THE FOLLOWING ARE REPEATED: | | (B) THE PROJECT INFORMATION ON EACH COPY | | OF SHEET 1 SHALL INCLUDE THE CORRECT | | PROJECT ADDRESS (307 EVERNIA ST) AND ZIP | | CODE (33401), THE PERMIT NUMBER | | (04040562) AND THE OWNER'S NAME. | | (C) FBC 13-103.1.1.1THE ARCHITECT'S | | LICENSE NUMBER HAS NOT BEEN ADDED TO | | SHEET 2 OF EACH COPY OF THE ENERGY CODE | | COMPLIANCE FORM | | (D) SUBMIT A THIRD COPY OF THE ENERGY | | CODE COMPLIANCE FORM AS REQUIRED BY | | COMMENT 34. | | | | 29) PRODUCT APPROVALS | | THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVALS HAVE | | BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO INCLUDE | | PRODUCTS WITH ADEQUATE DESIGN PRESSURES | | TOGETHER WITH PRODUCTS NOT APPROPRIATE | | FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT.REVIEW THE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA SHEETS AND MARK/ | | HIGHLIGHT, AS APPROPRIATE, TO IDENTIFY | | WHICH PRODUCT OPTIONS/MATERIALS/SIZES | | ARE TO BE USED.THIS APPLIES TO ALL | | THREE COPIES OF EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | 34) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR. | | ONE COPY THE SUBMITTED STRUCTURAL | | INSPECTION PLAN HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO | | HAROLD) ACTING INSPECTION SEVICES | | MANAGER FOR REVIEW/RECORDS. A SIGNED AND | | SEALED COPY OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR | | AGREEMENT AND AFFADAVIT (GUIDELINES AND | | BLANK FORMS ATTACHED) SHALL BE SUBMITTED | | BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.CALL | | HAROLD PISKURA (TEL: 561 805 6711) AS HE | | REQUIRES A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH | | THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, INSPECTION | | COMPANY AND ON-SITE INSPECTOR. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
Time |
21:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-18 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | | | FOR CONSISTENCY, THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS | | ARE NUMBERED AS PER THE BUILDING PLAN | | REVIEW OF 5/13/04: | | | | 1) COMMENT RESPONSE ON 5/20/04 IS NOTED. | | THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SHALL BE | | RECORDED AT PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE | | AND A COPY SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE | | BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.BLANK | | FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS OFFICE. | | | | 2) COMMENT RESPONSE ON 5/20/04 IS NOTED. | | IMPACT FEES. THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN | | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT | | FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. THEY SHALL BE | | STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE | | PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION | | SERVICES BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 3) FBC* 104.6.5BUILDING PERMIT | | VALUATION.AS 2ND, 3RD AND 4TH FLOORS | | ARE TO BE LEFT AS 'SHELL ONLY', FOR | | LATER BUILD-OUT, THE CALCULATED VALUE | | FOR PERMIT FEE ASSESSMENT HAS BEEN | | REDUCED TO $1,239,456.THE OUTSTANDING | | FEES MUST BE PAID BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE | | ISSUED. | | | | 4) FBC* 104.1.5BUILDING ADDRESS.THE | | COMMENT RESPONSE ON 5/20/04 IS NOTED. | | THE SHEETS THAT WERE REVISED IN RESPONSE | | TO COMMENTS NOW SHOW THE CORRECT ADDRESS | | (307 EVERNIA ST).THOSE SHEETS THAT | | WERE NOT REVISED STILL SHOW THE WRONG | | ADDRESS.THE REQUIRED ADDRESS AMENDMENT | | MAY BE MADE TO EACH TITLE BLOCK BY HAND. | | | | 5) FBC* 104.2.4SITE SURVEY.THE | | COMMENT RESPONSE ON 5/20/04 IS NOTED. | | THE SUBMITTED SURVEY DRAWINGS DO NOW | | HAVE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE BUT THEY ARE | | NOT PROPERLY SEALED.THE DRAWINGS SHALL | | BE RE-SEALED(REF: 472.025(1) F.S.) | | | | 7) FBC 13-103.1.2 ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE | | FORM.THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER DATED | | 5/20/04 IS NOTED: | | (A) BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE | | ISSUED, SHEET 2 OF SUBMITTED ENERGY CODE | | COMPLIANCE FORMS SHALL BE SIGNED BY THE | | BUILDING OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT OR | | OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY | | DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER. | | (B) THE PROJECT INFORMATION ON EACH COPY | | OF SHEET 1 SHALL INCLUDE THE CORRECT | | PROJECT ADDRESS (307 EVERNIA ST) AND ZIP | | CODE (33401), THE PERMIT NUMBER | | (04040562) AND THE OWNER'S NAME. | | (C) FBC 13-103.1.1.1THE ARCHITECT'S | | LICENSE NUMBER AND THE LIGHTING SYSTEM | | DESIGNER'S NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER SHALL | | BE ADDED TO SHEET 2 OF EACH COPY OF THE | | ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM. | | | | 11) FBC 1006.2.2EXTERIOR EXIT STAIR. | | THE COMMENT RESPONSE ON 5/20/04 IS NOTED | | REFERING TO THE ADDITION OF A NOTE. BUT, | | SHEETS LS1.2 AND A1.2 SHALL BE AMENDED | | TO SHOW THOSE OPENINGS IN THE EXISTING | | BUILDING THAT ARE WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE | | EXTERIOR EXIT STAIR AND ANNOTATED TO | | STATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR 3/4 HOUR FIRE- | | RESISTANT DOORS AND WINDOWS IN SUCH | | OPENINGS.ALSO THE PLANS SHALL BE | | AMENDED TO SHOW WHETHER EITHER OF THE | | ADJACENT BUILDINGS HAVE EXITS LEADING TO | | THIS EXTERIOR STAIR. | | | | 12) FBC 1007.5SHEET A4.1, STAIR #2 | | SECOND FLOOR PLAN.THE COMMENT RESPONSE | | ON 5/20/04 IS NOTED.THE AMENDED PLANS | | STILL DO NOT GIVE ANY DETAILS FOR A | | HANDRAIL ON EXISTING STAIR FLIGHT FROM | | FIRST TO SECOND FLOOR.AMEND THE PLANS | | TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 14) SHEET S2.4STAIR SUPPORT.THE | | COMMENT RESPONSE ON 5/20/04 IS NOTED | | EXPLAINING THE STRINGER AND LANDING | | SUPPORT AGAINST THE WALL USING ANCHORS. | | IT IS STILL NOT CLEAR WERE SHEET S2.4 | | CONCRETE PADSTONE DETAIL APPLIES TO. | | WHY DOES THE COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER | | REFER TO "EXTERIOR MECHANICAL PAD"? | | ADD A TITLE TO THE CONCRETE PADSTONE | | DETAIL TO CLARIFY. | | | | 16) FBC 1608.2.2GUARDRAIL STRENGTH. | | THE COMMENT RESPONSE, DATED 5/20/04, IS | | NOTED BUT IS APPLICABLE TO HANDRAILS | | ONLY.THE LOADING FOR GUARDRAIL DESIGN | | IS DIFFERENT.THE GUARDRAILS SHALL BE | | DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A | | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED IN | | ANY DIRECTION AT THE TOP OF THE | | GUARDRAIL, A CONCENTRATED HORIZONTAL | | LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED ON A 1 SQ FT AREA | | AT ANY POINT, AND A LINE LOAD OF 50 PLF | | APPLIED HORIZONTALLY AT THE REQUIRED | | GUARDRAIL HEIGHT WITH A SIMULTANEOUS | | LINE LOAD OF 100 PLF APPLIED VERTICALLY | | DOWNWARD ON THE TOP OF THE GUARDRAIL. | | THESE LOADS SHALL NOT BE APPLIED | | SIMULTANEOUSLY (UNLESS NOTED ABOVE) BUT | | SHALL BE APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY TO PRODUCE | | MAXIMUM STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS | | OR SUPPORTS.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS. | | | | 29) FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72. | | A SEARCH AT THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY | | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP | | SHOWS NO MATCHING STATEWIDE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR THE SUBMITTED JOHNS | | MANVILLE MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SYSTEM | | (FOR CONCRETE DECK) PRODUCT APPROVAL | | NOA# 01-0206.19 OR THE SOLAROLL ROLLING | | SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA# 02-0426.04 | | SPECIFY ALTERNATIVES THAT HAVE | | STATEWIDE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | 30) PRODUCT APPROVAL.RULE 9B-72 FAC. | | FOR PRODUCTS WHICH DO NOT HAVE STATEWIDE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | CAN BE ACHIEVED IF THERE IS A QUALITY | | ASSURANCE PROGRAM IN PLACE WITH A STATE | | APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY.IF | | NEITHER IS APPLICABLE, THEN SITE | | SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS REQUIRED.LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL ALLOW A PRODUCT TO | | BE USED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEST | | CRITERIA, THROUGHOUT THE JURISDICTION OF | | WEST PALM BEACH.SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT | | APPROVAL WILL ALLOW A PRODUCT TO BE | | USED ONLY ON THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THAT | | SITE SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GRANTED. | | LOCAL AND SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL | | APPLICATION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM | | THIS OFFICE.APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE | | ENTITIES ARE LISTED ON THE DCA WEBSITE: | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/COMMON/C_ORG_ | | REGI_SRCH.ASP | | | | 31) THE SUBMITTAL OF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | FOR THE ROOF TILE, SKYLIGHT, EXTERIOR | | DOORS, STOREFRONT AND WINDOWS IS NOTED. | | THE APPROPRIATE STATEWIDE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL LISTING HAS BEEN ATTACHED TO | | EACH ONE.NOTE THAT PRODUCT APPROVALS | | ARE NOW REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED LIKE | | THIS.ALSO THREE COPIES (SEE COMMENT | | BELOW ABOUT THRESHOLD BUILDING) OF ALL | | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED.SUBMIT | | TWO FURTHER COPIES OF THE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS COMPLETE WITH THE STATEWIDE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEETS. | | | | 32) SKYLIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE | | STATEWIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL LISTING FOR | | THE SUBMITTED MIAMI-DADE NATURALITE | | ALUMINUM SKYLIGHT PRODUCT APPROVAL | | NOA# 01-0118.02 STATES A SIZE LIMITATION | | OF 7'-0"X 8'-0".THIS SIZE IS EXCEEDED | | BY THAT SPECIFIED ON SHEET A1.4.SUBMIT | | AN ALTERNATIVE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | 33) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | FIXED TRANSOM (AND HORIZONTAL MULLION) | | OVER THE CASEMENT WINDOW TYPE C1 AND | | FOR THE EXTERIOR DOORS 1-001-1, 1-207-1 | | AND 1-307-1 WHICH ARE NOT COVERED BY THE | | STOREFRONT PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | NOTE: FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 (IN | | EFFECT SINCE OCTOBER 1, 2003) REQUIRES | | THAT PRODUCTS HAVE STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR | | SITE-SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE | | SUBMITTAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER (FL###), | | AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY | | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP | | | | 34) FBC* 105.13.1SPECIAL INSPECTOR.A | | STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE | | SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A | | BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF | | A THRESHOLD BUILDING.A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING IS ANY BUILDING WHICH IS | | GREATER THAN THREE STORIES OR 50 FEET IN | | HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY | | OCCUPANCY WITH 5,000 SQFT AREA AND | | GREATER THAN 500 OCCUPANTS.THREE | | COPIES OF THE PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS | | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES | | | | 35) THE OLD SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM | | THE CURRENT PLAN SETS.ONE SET OF THE | | OLD SHEETS SHOULD SUBMITTED SEPARATELY | | AS FOLLOWS: | | TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL | | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO | | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD | | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW | | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD | | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE | | REMAINING OLD SHEETS FOR COMPARISON OF | | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED | | PLANS. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-05-14 |
Time |
17:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-05-13 |
Time |
10:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-05-13 00:00:00 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | *******DENIED******* | | ROBERT BROWN(561) 805 6716 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2001 | | FBC*= FLORIDA BUILD'G CODE (CITY AMEND) | | | | 1) THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT SHALL BE | | RECORDED AT PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE | | AND A COPY SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE | | BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.BLANK | | FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS OFFICE. | | | | 2) IMPACT FEES. THE PLANS SHALL BE TAKEN | | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT | | FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. THEY SHALL BE | | STAMPED AT THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE | | PAID RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH DEPT OF CONSTRUCTION | | SERVICES BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 3) FBC* 104.6.5BUILDING PERMIT | | VALUATION.THE STATED VALUE OF THE | | PROJECT HAS BEEN UNDER-ESTIMATED AT | | $1,200,000.THE VALUE CALCULATED USING | | THE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODE CONGRESS | | INTERNATIONAL (SBCCI) VALUATION TABLES | | IS $1,586,125.THE PERMIT APPLICATION | | FEE HAS BEEN ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY.THE | | OUTSTANDING BALANCE MUST BE PAID BEFORE | | A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 4) FBC* 104.1.5BUILDING ADDRESS. THE | | PROJECT TITLE SHEET STATES THE ADDRESS | | OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AS | | 307 EVERNIA STREET.AMEND SHEET A0.1 TO | | SHOW THE FRONT ENTRANCE LOCATION AND | | ADDRESS FOR THE ADJACENT EXISTING | | 3-STORY AND 5-STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS SO | | VALIDITY OF THE PROPOSED ADDRESS CAN BE | | VERIFIED.ALSO, EVERY DRAWING SHEET | | REFERS TO '310 EVERNIA STREET' WHICH IS | | NOT THE CORRECT ADDRESS.AMEND THE | | SHEETS. | | | | 5) FBC* 104.2.4SITE SURVEY.THE | | SUBMITTED SURVEY DRAWING IS NOT SIGNED | | AND SEALED.ALSO, IT DOES NOT REFLECT | | THE OUTLINE OF THE EXISTING OFFICE | | BUILDINGS THAT WILL REMAIN, SO THAT THE | | DIMENSIONS OF THE SPACE AVAILABLE FOR | | THE NEW BUILDING MAY BE DETERMINED. | | SHEETS A0.1 AND LS1.1 STATE BUILDING | | DIMENSIONS THAT EXCEED THE AVAILABLE | | SPACE AS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED SURVEY. | | SUBMIT A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY | | DRAWING PREPARED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR/ | | MAPPER IS REQUIRED (REF: 472.025(1) F.S) | | AND ENSURE THAT THE PROPOSED BUILDING | | WILL FIT IN THE AVAILABLE SPACE. | | | | 6) FBC* 1804.2.2GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. | | SHEET S1.1, FOUNDATION PLAN NOTE 2 | | REFERS TO A 2/18/2004 TIERA INC. | | GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO 6611-04-032. | | SUBMIT THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TO VERIFY | | THE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL. | | | | 7) FBC 13-103.0ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE | | SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED BY SUBMITTAL OF | | APPROPRIATE CODE COMPLIANCE FORMS | | | | 8) 61G15-23.002(2)FL. ADMIN. CODE. | | SHEETS C-1 TO C-4 SHALL INCLUDE THE | | ADDRESS OF ANTHONY J. MICHUDA, P.E (THIS | | INFORMATION MAY BE HANDWRITTEN/STAMPED | | ON EACH COPY SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING) | | TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL | | ENGINEER SHALL INCLUDE EITHER THE NAME, | | ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE | | ENGINEER OR, THE NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER | | OF THE ENGINEER AND THE NAME, ADDRESS | | AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER | | OF THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS THROUGH | | WHICH THE ENGINEER IS PRACTICING | | (471.025 F.S. AND 471.023 F.S.). | | | | 9) FBC TABLE 600SURVEY DRAWING AND | | SHEETS LS1.1 AND A1.1.WHAT IS THE | | WIDTH OF THE REAR ALLEY USED TO | | DETERMINE THE HORIZONTAL SEPARATION AND | | PROTECTION OF OPENINGS?AMEND THE | | PLANS TO CLARIFY. | | | | 10) FBC 1006.1.4SHEET A4.2, STAIR #1 - | | PARTIAL SECTION (DETAIL 06).THE CLOSET | | (AND COUPON ROOM) UNDER THE STAIR SHALL | | BE SEPARATED FROM THE STAIR BY A MINIMUM | | OF 2 HOUR FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION. | | AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | 11) FBC 1006.2.2EXTERIOR EXIT STAIR. | | AMEND SHEETS LS1.2 AND A1.2 TO SHOW ALL | | OPENINGS IN THE WALLS OF THE ADJACENT | | 3-STORY AND 5-STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS | | WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE EXTERIOR EXIT | | STAIR AND LANDING.ANY SUCH OPENINGS | | MUST HAVE 3/4 HOUR FIRE RESISTANT DOORS | | AND WINDOWS.AMEND THE PLANS TO VERIFY | | THIS.DO EITHER OF THE ADJACENT | | BUILDINGS HAVE EXITS LEADING TO THIS | | EXTERIOR EXIT STAIR?AMEND THE PLANS TO | | CLARIFY. | | | | 12) FBC 1007SHEET A4.1, STAIR PLANS. | | STAIR #2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN.NO WIDTH | | DIMENSION OR HANDRAIL ARE SHOWN FOR THE | | EXISTING STAIR BEING PROPOSED AS THE | | FIRST FLOOR FLIGHT FOR STAIR #2.WHAT | | ARE THE TREAD AND RISER DIMENSIONS FOR | | THIS STAIR FLIGHT?AMEND THE PLANS TO | | DEMONSTRATE FULL COMPLIANCE FOR THIS | | PORTION OF STAIR #2. | | | | 13) FBC 1007.4SHEET A4.1, STAIR PLANS. | | THE STAIR #1 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT | | REFLECT THE LANDING ARRANGEMENT SHOW ON | | SHEETS LS1.3 AND A1.3.AMEND THE DETAIL | | ALSO, THE STAIR #1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN | | SHOWS 14 RISERS FOR THE FIRST FLIGHT | | DOWN TO FIRST FLOOR.SHOULD THIS NOT | | READ 7 RISERS INSTEAD OF 14? | | | | 14) SHEET S2.4STAIR SUPPORT.IS THE | | MC12 STAIR STRINGER TO BE BUILT INTO | | EACH CMU WALL?PROVIDE A TITLE FOR THE | | 'CONCRETE PAD' DETAIL OR ANNOTATE IT AS | | 'TYPICAL' TO CLARIFY WHERE IT APPLIES. | | | | 15) FBC 1608.2.1SHEET A4.2, STAIR | | HANDRAIL DETAILS.THE HANDRAIL SHALL BE | | DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A | | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB AND A LINE | | LOAD OF 50 PLF.THESE LOADS SHALL NOT | | BE APPLIED SIMULTANEOUSLY BUT SHALL BE | | APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY AT ANY POINT, AND | | IN ANY DIRECTION, TO PRODUCE MAXIMUM | | STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS OR | | SUPPORTS.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS. | | | | 16) FBC 1608.2.2SHEETS A4.2 AND A4.5, | | STAIR GUARDRAIL DETAILS AND BALCONY | | GUARDRAILS.THE GUARDRAILS SHALL BE | | DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED FOR A | | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED IN | | ANY DIRECTION AT THE TOP OF THE | | GUARDRAIL, A CONCENTRATED HORIZONTAL | | LOAD OF 200 LB APPLIED ON A 1 SQ FT AREA | | AT ANY POINT, AND A LINE LOAD OF 50 PLF | | APPLIED HORIZONTALLY AT THE REQUIRED | | GUARDRAIL HEIGHT WITH A SIMULTANEOUS | | LINE LOAD OF 100 PLF APPLIED VERTICALLY | | DOWNWARD ON THE TOP OF THE GUARDRAIL. | | THESE LOADS SHALL NOT BE APPLIED | | SIMULTANEOUSLY (UNLESS NOTED ABOVE) BUT | | SHALL BE APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY TO PRODUCE | | MAXIMUM STRESS IN EACH OF THE COMPONENTS | | OR SUPPORTS.AMEND/ANNOTATE THE PLANS. | | | | 17) FBC 11-4.9.4SHEET A4.1, STAIR | | PLANS.THE STAIR #2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN | | DOES NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED HANDRAIL | | EXTENSION AGAINST THE EXTERIOR WALL AT | | THE BOTTOM OF THE FLIGHT. | | | | 18) FBC 11-4.16 SHEET A4.3, WATER CLOSET | | ACCESSIBILTY DIMENSIONS.THE SEAT AND | | SIDE GRAB BAR HEIGHTS ARE LOWER THAN | | THE ALLOWABLE RANGE GIVEN IN THE CODE. | | ALSO, WILL THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE | | DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND LAVATORIES PROVIDE | | THE REQUIRED MINIMUM LEG/KNEE CLEARANCE? | | AMEND THE DETAILS. | | | | 19) FBC 11-4.13.6SHEET A1.1, FIRST | | FLOOR PLAN.THE DOOR TO THE BREAK ROOM | | (1-114) SHALL HAVE A MANEUVERING | | CLEARANCE OF AT LEAST 12", ON THE PUSH | | SIDE, BETWEEN THE ADJACENT WALL AND THE | | STRIKE EDGE OF THE DOOR, IF THE DOOR HAS | | BOTH A CLOSER AND A LATCH (FIG. 25). | | ANNOTATE THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | 20) FBC 1606.1.4HURRICANE MISSILE | | IMPACT PROTECTION.SHEET A6.1, DOOR | | SCHEDULE, STATES THAT ONLY DOOR 1-104-1 | | HAS IMPACT RESISTANT GLAZING.THAT DOOR | | IS SHOWN AS AN INTERIOR DOOR (TO TELLER | | OFFICE) ON SHEET A1.1 AND IS A TYPE F | | DOOR (SHEET A6.1.1) WHICH DOES NOT HAVE | | ANY GLAZING. AMEND THE DOOR SCHEDULE TO | | SPECIFY THE REQUIRED IMPACT RESISTANCE | | FOR DOOR 1-001-1. | | | | 21) FBC 1606.1.4HURRICANE MISSILE | | IMPACT PROTECTION.SHEET A6.1.1, THE | | WINDOW DETAILS DO NOT SPECIFY THE | | REQUIRED IMPACT RESISTANCE FOR THE | | WINDOWS.AMEND THE PLANS. | | | | 22) FBC 2405.2THE FOLLOWING GLAZING IS | | IN A 'HAZARDOUS LOCATION' AND IS | | REQUIRED TO BE SAFETY GLASS SATISFYING | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSUMER PRODUCT | | SAFETY COMMISSION 16, CODE OF FEDERAL | | REGULATIONS, PART 1201 (CPSC 16-CFR, | | PART 1201): | | - GLAZING ADJACENT TO THE FIRST FLOOR | | DOORS AT THE LOBBY, CONFERENCE ROOM | | (1-108), TELLER OFFICE (1-104) AND | | OFFICE (1-103). | | - GLAZING IN THE DOORS. | | SUBMIT DETAILS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE | | | | 23) FBC 2407.3SHEET A1.4, SKYLIGHTS. | | AMEND THE PLANS TO STATE WHICH TYPE OF | | "SAFETY GLASS" IS TO BE USED.IF HEAT | | STRENGTHENED OR FULLY TEMPERED GLASS ARE | | USED, PROTECTIVE SCREENS SHALL BE | | INSTALLED BELOW THE GLAZING, AS REQUIRED | | BY FBC 2407.3, TO PROTECT THE BUILDING | | OCCUPANTS FROM FALLING GLASS IN THE | | EVENT OF BREAKAGE.AMEND THE DETAILS/ | | ANNOTATION TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 24) FBC 3003.4.1STRETCHER ACCESSIBLE | | ELEVATOR.AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | ELEVATOR SHALL ACCOMMODATE AN AMBULANCE | | STRETCHER 76" LONG AND 24" WIDE IN THE | | HORIZONTAL POSITION.THIS ELEVATOR | | SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY SIGNAGE.AMEND | | THE PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 25) FBC* F102.2.6SHEET LS1.1, CODE | | SUMMARY - FIRE RESISTANCE RATING NOTES. | | EXTERIOR WALLS OF TYPE IV BUILDINGS | | LOCATED IN THE FIRE DISTRICT SHALL HAVE | | A FIRE-RESISTANCE OF 2-HOURS OR MORE | | IF LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET OF A COMMON | | PROPERTY LINE OR ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE. | | AMEND THE NOTES AND ALL PLANS TO STATE | | 2-HOUR FIRE RATING FOR THE EXTERIOR | | WALLS. | | | | 26) FBC* F102.2.7ARCHITECTURAL TRIM IN | | FIRE DISTRICT.SHEET A1.4.1 (DETAILS 01 | | AND 02), SHEET A2.1 TO SHEET A2.4 | | (EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS), SHEET A3.2 | | (SECTIONS 01 AND 04), SHEET A3.2.1 | | (DETAIL 01) AND SHEET A4.5 (DETAILS 01 | | 02, 03, 06 AND 07) ALL REFER TO APPLIED | | FOAM MOLDINGS.ARCHITECTURAL TRIM | | TRIM ON BUILDINGS LOCATED IN THE FIRE | | DISTRICT, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF | | APPROVED NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OR | | FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD.AMEND THE | | PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 27) FBC 1606.1.3SHEET S2.3, TRUSS | | BEARING DETAIL.ADD A TRUSS ANCHOR | | SCHEDULE/DETAIL, OR ADD NOTES STATING | | THE CALCULATED TRUSS UPLIFTS AND THAT | | THE METAL TRUSS MANUFACTURER WILL HAVE A | | FLORIDA REGISTERED ENGINEER SPECIFY/ | | DESIGN ANCHORS FOR FOR THOSE UPLIFTS. | | | | 28) FBC 1606.1.4HURRICANE MISSILE | | IMPACT PROTECTION.ANNOTATE THE PLANS/ | | SCHEDULES TO STATE THE PROPOSED MEANS OF | | HURRICANE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION. | | | | 29) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | SKYLIGHTS, WINDOWS, MULLIONS, EXTERIOR | | DOORS, ROOF TILE AND BUILT-UP ROOFING | | SYSTEM.NOTE: FL. ADMIN CODE RULE 9B-72 | | (IN EFFECT SINCE OCT' 1, 2003) REQUIRES | | THAT PRODUCTS HAVE STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR | | SITE-SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL.THE | | SUBMITTAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE STATEWIDE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER (FL###), | | AVAILABLE FROM THE DEPT OF COMMUNITY | | AFFAIRS PRODUCT APPROVAL WEBSITE | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_SRCH.ASP | | | | 30) PRODUCT APPROVAL.RULE 9B-72 FAC. | | FOR PRODUCTS WHICH DO NOT HAVE STATEWIDE | | PRODUCT APPROVAL, LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | CAN BE ACHIEVED IF THERE IS A QUALITY | | ASSURANCE PROGRAM IN PLACE WITH A STATE | | APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE ENTITY.IF | | NEITHER IS APPLICABLE, THEN SITE | | SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS REQUIRED.LOCAL | | PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL ALLOW A PRODUCT TO | | BE USED, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEST | | CRITERIA, THROUGHOUT THE JURISDICTION OF | | WEST PALM BEACH.SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT | | APPROVAL WILL ALLOW A PRODUCT TO BE | | USED ONLY ON THE PROJECT FOR WHICH THAT | | SITE SPECIFIC APPROVAL IS GRANTED. | | LOCAL AND SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL | | APPLICATION FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM | | THIS OFFICE.APPROVED QUALITY ASSURANCE | | ENTITIES ARE LISTED ON THE DCA WEBSITE: | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/COMMON/C_ORG_ | | REGI_SRCH.ASP | | | | 31) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW OF A RESUBMITTAL | | WHICH REQUIRES NEW PLANS IN ORDER TO | | ADDRESS THE ABOVE COMMENTS, THE OLD | | SHEETS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE NEW | | SHEETS INSERTED.ONE COPY OF EACH OLD | | SHEET SHOULD BE STAPLED/CLIPPED TO THE | | REMAINING OLD SHEETS FOR COMPARISON OF | | REVISIONS WHEN REVIEWING THE RESUBMITTED | | PLANS. | | | | **QUOTE PERMIT# ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE** | | | | END OF REVIEW COMMENTS | | THE CODE REFERENCES GIVE ADDITIONAL INFO | | TELEPHONE: (561) 805 6716ROBERT BROWN | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
20 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
10:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-08-09 10:46:00 | REV FOR FEEDERS ON RISER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
19 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-02 |
Time |
18:31 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-08-09 10:42:54 | REV FOR FIRST FLOOR. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
18 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-05-02 |
Time |
09:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-05-02 |
Time |
08:14 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
17 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-04-26 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-04-26 10:28:44 | ** UNSAT ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER WHICH INDICATES A 150AMP OVER | | CURRENT PROTECTION ON THE HE PANEL WHICH IS 100A RATED. | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE FEEDERS WOULD NOT OF SUFFICIENT | | SIZE FOR THE 150AMPS. | | 240.4, 310.16. | | ONLY NEED TO REVISE POSSIBLY 6.1 AND 7.1 | | PLEASE ADJUST AND REVISED. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
16 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-13 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-03-13 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
15 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-02-15 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-28 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-28 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-01-28 16:10:39 | REV FOR FIRST FLR |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
08:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-01-19 |
Time |
07:46 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-01-19 09:00:43 | LV SECURITY NOT PART OF THESE PLANS.(SEPARATE PERMIT). | | | | GROUNDING DETAIL AT DETACHED BLDG IS SHOWN ON 04020656 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-09 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-12-09 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2006-12-09 15:20:37 | **** UNSAT ***** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.66 FOR GROUNDING ELECTRODE | | CONDUCTOR. PLEASE SEE THIS WAS REDLINED ON PREVIOUS | | REVISIONS WHICH WERE SUBMITTED HOWEVER THIS HAS NOT | | BEEN CORRECTED. PLEASE SEE AS THE SEC'S HAVE INCREASED, | | SO SHALL THE GEC. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE A PANEL BEING SHOWN AT THE DRIVE | | THROUGH WILL BE REQUIRED TO MEET 225.31-225.39. PLEASE | | SEE 225.32 AND HOW THIS EQUIPMENT IS READILY | | ACCESSIBLE. | | ** PLEASE SEE THAT THE ORIGINAL PLANS ISSUED FOR PERMIT | | WERE REDLINED FOR THIS, HOWEVER THE INSTALLATION WAS | | DONE PER REDLINED CODES ON PLANS. PLEASE SEE THIS SHALL | | BE REVISED ON THE PERMITTED PLANS FOR THE DETACHED BLDG | | ALSO. | | PLEASE SUPPLY DETAIL FROM MANUFACTURE, SPECS/CUT | | SHEETS. 110.3, 90.7 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.32 FOR GROUNDING AT THE | | DETACHED BUILDING. | | PLEASE SHOW IN DETAIL THE SYSTEM. | | **PLEASE KNOW THE PLANS FOR THE DETACHED BUILDING WILL | | ALSO BE REQUIRED TO BE UPDATED TO THESE COMMENT AND | | CHANGES MADE. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PANEL SCHEDULE FOR | | NEW PANEL FEEDERS. PLEASE SEE PANEL "A" WHICH SHOWS | | 1/0'S AND RISER SHOWS 4/0'S. PLEASE ALSO INDICATE HOW | | THESE SIZE CONDUCTORS WILL BE TERMINATED INTO THE PANEL | | AND BREAKERS AS SHOWN. | | (ADAPTERS OF SOME SORT)? | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-11-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-11-20 |
Time |
11:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-11-20 |
Time |
11:25 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2006-11-20 11:32:53 | *** REV FOR 2.1, OK, | | REDLINED, THE LVALARAM/SECURITY IS UNDER A SEPARATE | | PERMIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-10-21 |
Time |
16:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-10-21 |
Time |
15:35 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2006-10-21 16:24:12 | ** REDLINED 250.66 FOR THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE | | CONDUCTOR TOBE INCREASED AS SEC'S HAVE INCREASED. | | | | REDLINED, 7.1 SHALL BE REVISED FOR TENANT BLD OUTS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-08-09 |
Time |
17:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-08-09 |
Time |
17:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-09 00:00:00 | REV FOR 2.2,2.3, AND 7.1 OK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-05-14 |
Time |
14:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2006-05-14 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-14 00:00:00 | *** UNSAT ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MAX OCP DOES NOT | | CORRELATE WITH MECH PLANS. PLEASE SEE | | 424.3B FOR MIN OCP TO BE 125%, HOWEVER | | PLEASE KNOW, TYOICALLY THE MAX OCP IS | | 150% OR NAMEPLATE. | | PLEASE ADJUST AND CORRLEATE. | | PLEASE ALSO ADJUST MAIN LOAD CALCS. | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY MECHANICAL REVIEW | | NOTES AS THESE MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL | | PLANS. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMAITON FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2005-06-13 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.40 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2005-06-13 |
Time |
14:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-06-13 00:00:00 | REDLINED 250.66 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-12-16 |
Time |
10:40 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-12-16 |
Time |
08:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-06-13 00:00:00 | REDLINED 250.66 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-11-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-11-18 |
Time |
19:22 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-11-18 |
Time |
19:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-11-18 00:00:00 | ******UNSAT ******* | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY TWO SETS OF | | PLANS WERE SUBMITTED. | | THIS IS A THRESHOLD PROJECT AND A MIN OF | | THREE SETS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | PLEASE SEE TWO SETS WERE STAMPED, NEED | | 3RD SET TO BE BROUGHT IN BEFORE ANY | | FURTHER REVIEWS ARE DONE. | | ELECTRICAL IS THE ONLY REVIEW DONE AT | | THIS TIME. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE. IF THERE ARE | | ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-07-15 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-07-15 |
Time |
13:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-07-15 00:00:00 | REDLINED NOTES FOR RISER AS NOTED ON | | PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | STAMPED THIRD SET. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-07-08 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-07-08 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-07-08 00:00:00 | *** NOTE *** | | | | RISER SHOWS A FEEDER FROM HOUSE PANEL | | GOING SOMEWHERE? | | REDLINED THIS AS A QUESTION ON RISER? | | (MISPRINT)? | | | | STAMPED ELECTRICAL SHEETS ON TWO ROLLS,] | | ONE ROLL IN ZONING FOR REVIEW AND UNABLE | | TO STAMP 3RD ROLL AT THIS TIME. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-06-15 |
Time |
19:06 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-06-15 |
Time |
18:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-15 00:00:00 | ************ UNSAT ************** | | | | PLEASE SEE SOME NOTES FROM FIRST REVIEW | | STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE COMMENTS BELOW. | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER STILL SHOWS | | EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS BEING | | INSTALLED FROM METER TO FIRST MEANS OF | | DISCONNECT.PREVIOUS COMMENT MENTIONS | | "NO, EQUIPMENT GRNDS" 250.24 /250.6 | | RESPONSE MENTIONS SEE NOTES, 17/19. | | THE EQUIPMENT GRNDS SHOWN MUST BE | | REMOVED. | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE SEE SEC'S FEEDING 150A | | HOUSE PANEL ARE SHOWN AS 1/0'S. THIS IS | | OK, PLEASE SEE CONDUCTOR SIZE FROM | | METER TO PANEL ARE SHOWN AS 4/0'S. THIS | | IS PERMITTED HOWEVER OVERSIZED. THIS IS | | ONLY A NOTE AND MAY BE DONE. HOWEVER, IF | | SHOWN ON RISER THEN THEY MUST BEINSTALL- | | -ED OR PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED. | | PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS 1/0'S ALSO. | | PLEASE CORRELATE. | | | | 3)NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS, | | PERTAINING TO MISSING EM/EXT LTS AT | | DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. THIS WILL HAVE AN | | AFFECT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | 4)NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL MANY | | SHEETS CONTAINING NOTES ABOUT GENERATOR. | | REPLY LETTER MENTIONS ALL GEN/ATS ETC TO | | BE ELIMINATED. PLEASE REMOVE NOTES. | | | | 5)NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST NOTE FOR GROUNDING | | ELECTRODE TO "FOOTER STEEL". RISER SHOWS | | STRUCT STEEL, WHICH IS REQUIRED IF IN | | CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE SEE 250.50 | | | | PLEASE REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS OUT | | OF SETS. ONLY INSERT NEW SHEETS INTO | | COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | THIS WILL HELP WITH THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | THIS WAS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | PLEASE SEE BLDG REVIEW COMMENTS FOR | | POSSIBLE "THRESHOLD" BLDG. THREE SETS | | OF PLANS WOULD BE NEEDED FOR STAMPING. | | | | PLEASE SEE ATTACHED COPY OF FS 553-80(2) | | (B). THIS IS A NOTICE GIVEN WITH RESPECT | | TO DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. THIS IS ONLY | | GIVEN AS A NOTICE AND DOES NOT AFFECT | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-04-22 |
Time |
07:40 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-04-22 |
Time |
06:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-04-22 00:00:00 | ************** UNSAT **************** | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 700.16 FOR REQ'D | | LTS FOR ROOMS/STAIRS ETC. PLEASE SEE | | FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS. | | STAIR LTS ARE SHOWN ON HOUSE PANEL WHICH | | ARE ON GEN YET, THESE ARE ALSO SHOWN | | AS BATTERY BACK UP? | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE SEE BLDG/STRUCTUAL PLANS, | | THESE INDICATE NO SPACE IN BETWEEN | | EXISTING BLDGS AND NEW. PLEASE SEE | | ELECTRICAL PLANS, THESE SHOW NEW HOUSE | | PANELS AND ATS ON EAST WALL. PLEASE | | CLARIFY HOW THIS IS GOING TO WORK? | | 110.26 ETC. | | | | 3)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.32 AND 225.31 | | FOR GROUNDING AND MEANS OF DISCONNECT | | AT DETACHED STRUCTURE./ ATM BLDG. | | | | 4)NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION | | ON FIRE PUMP/GENERATOR/ ATS ETC. | | MUST MEET 695.4B1, 230.76,230.79 ETC | | THERE IS NO INDICATION OF DISC MEANS | | FROM GENERATOR? | | PLEASE ALSO SUBMIT SPEC SHEETS FOR GEN/ | | ETC. | | | | 5)NOTE: PLEASE ALSO SHOW DISC MEANS FOR | | POWER TO HOUSE PANEL/ATS. THIS IS SHOWN | | AS A MLO PANEL. PLEASE ALSO SEE GROUPING | | PER 230.72. | | | | 6)NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE ROOM DESIGNATIONS | | ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | 7)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.6/250.24 NO, | | EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS INSTALLED | | FROM METER TO MAINS. | | | | 8)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT FPL INFORMATION | | FOR SIZE OF TRANSFORMER/ IMPEDENCE ETC. | | IT IS NOTED THAT AIC CALCS ARE SHOWN. | | | | PLEASE NOTE; DUE TO SOME CHANGES THAT | | WILL NEED TO BE CHANGED ON PLANS, THERE | | MAY OR MAY NOT BE OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mamini |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
Time |
09:09 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mamini |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
Time |
09:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-29 00:00:00 | PASSED WITH PROVISOS: | | 1. WORK WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W REQUIRES A | | SEPARATE PERMIT FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES & | | ENGINEERING PRIOR TO BEGINWORK, SUBMIT | | M.O.T PLANS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION, | | 494-1086, WINDEL PALMER. | | 2. EROSION/SEDIMENTION CONTROL DEVICES | | MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO BEGINING | | DEMOLITION OR OTHER SUCH CONSTRUCTION | | ACTIVITIES. THE DEVICES SHALL BE | | INSTALLED, MONITORED, AND MAINTAINED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, | | STATE,AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. | | | | IF ANY QUESTION PLEASE CONTACT 805-6723 | | MOHAMMAD R. AMINI |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mamini |
Date |
2004-06-16 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
mamini |
Date |
2004-06-16 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-16 00:00:00 | FAILED: | | 1. PLEASE REVISE CIVIL PLANS TO | | IMPLEMENT ALL THE COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC | | UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING AND FROM | | THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENTS. | | IF ANY QUESTION PLEASE CONTACT 805-6723 | | MOHAMMAD R. AMINI |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-05-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mamini |
Date |
2004-05-11 |
Time |
14:23 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mamini |
Date |
2004-05-11 |
Time |
14:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-05-11 00:00:00 | FAILED: | | 1. SURVEYING SHEET MUST HAVE THE | | ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF | | THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. | | 2. CIVIL PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FOR ALL | | THE CONNECTION TO THE CITY SERVICES BY | | THE PUBLIC UTILITIES & ENGINEERING, ATT: | | MANNY GONZALEZ, 659-8040. | | 3. WATER MAIN WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W MUST | | BE DIP, AND PER CITY SPECIFICATION. | | 4. SEPARATION/ CLEARANCE AT CONFLICT | | POINT BETWEEN PIPES MUST BE PER CITY OF | | WPB STANDARD, P-1. | | 5. RECOMMENDED TO LOCATE THE FDC IN THE | | PROPOSED PLANTER AREA, PLEASE VERIFY. | | 6. SITE FOR ALL NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING | | MUST BE DESIGNED PER CITY OF WPB | | CRITERIA FOR STORM WATER. | | 7. M.O.T PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE | | PUBLIC UTILITIES & ENGINEERING FOR THEIR | | APPROVAL FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN | | R.O.W PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. | | 8. SUBMIT PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS AREA | | FOR ENTIRE SITE. | | 9. COVER FOR PUBLIC STORM WATER MANHOLE | | MUST HAVE CITY' LOGO. | | 10. PLEASE SHOW WHERE THE ST2-2, ST-2-3, | | ST-2-1 AS DETAILED ON SHEET C-4 ARE | | GOING TO BE USED. | | 11. CITY STANDARDS MAY BE OBTAIN FROM | | PUBLIC UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING. | | 12. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SITE | | HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED BY PLANNING AND | | ZONING. | | IF ANY QUESTION PLEASE CONTACT 805-6723 | | MOHAMMAD R. AMINI |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
20:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-02-23 |
Time |
20:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-23 20:23:55 | *****REVISION APPROVED***** | | | | PLAN SHEETS A1.5 AND LS1.1 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | DATED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-06-16 |
Time |
09:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2006-06-16 |
Time |
08:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-16 00:00:00 | ***PROVISO*** | | | | NO FIRE PROTECTION OR LIFE SAFETY SHEETS | | SUBMITTED FOR REVISION. PLEASE COMPLY | | WITH OTHER REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, CAPTAIN/WPBFR | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW (561) 805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
Time |
15:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
Time |
15:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-07-28 |
Time |
15:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-07-28 |
Time |
08:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-07-27 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-07-27 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-07-27 00:00:00 | LOCATED WITHIN A LARGE AMOUNT OF | | PAPERWORK A SET OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | PLANS WERE PRESENT. THESE WILL NOT | | BE APPROVED AT THIS TIME SINCE THESE | | PLANS WERE NOT UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT | | AND WERE SUBMITTED WITH PAPERWORK | | FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING. | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | 835-2910 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-03 00:00:00 | 1) MORE DETAILS REQUIRED FOR ALUMINUM | | ROLLING SHUTTERS AND HOW DO THEY | | FUNCTION. WHAT ARE THERE PURPOSE. | | | | 2) FIRE ALARM CIRCUITS SHALL BE CLASS | | A, STYLE D OR BE FULLY ADDRESSABLE. | | END OF LINE RESISTORS ARE SHOWN. | | PLEASE ADVISE. | | | | 3) EXIT SIGN MISSING FROM REAR DOOR | | ON PAGE E-3.1. | | | | 4) EXIT SIGN MISSING FROM PAGE E-2.2 | | NEAR DOOR LEADING TO EXTERIOR. | | | | 5) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHOWN | | IN TWO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. ONE | | INDICATES IT ON THE BACKFLOW THE | | OTHER LOCATION SHOWS IT ON THE | | BUILDING. PLEASE ADVISE. ALSO | | ACCORDING TO DEAN LAUDERMILK OF | | UTILITIES THE BACKFLOW IS IN THE | | WRONG LOCATION. PLEASE CONSULT WITH | | HIM WITH REGARDS TO THI MATTER. | | | | 6) SOME GENERATOR NOTES STILL EXIST | | ON THE ELECTRICAL PLANS. PLEASE | | REMOVE THESE FROM THE DRAWINGS. | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | 835-2910 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-04-09 |
Time |
10:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2004-04-09 |
Time |
10:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-04-09 00:00:00 | 1) ELECTRONIC SWITCHES, CHAIN AND | | LOCK WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE FIRE | | LINE BACKFLOW DEVICE. | | | | 2) THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION | | SHALL HAVE KNOX-BOX LOCKING CAPS | | INSTALLED. | | | | 3) A KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | 4) THE NEW FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE | | UL LISTED FOR CENTRAL STATION SERVICE. | | | | 5) ALL SHAFTS THAT ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR | | PERSONS TO FALL INTO MUST BE MARKED | | SHAFTWAY WITH SIX HIGH LETTERS. | | | | 6) EXIT STAIRS ARE TO BE KEPT UP WITH | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | 7) TEMPORARY STANDPIPE SYSTEMS ARE | | REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING REACHES | | THREE STORIES OR THIRTY FEET IN | | HEIGHT. | | | | 8) PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS FOR THE | | PROPOSED GENERATOR LOCATED ON THE | | ROOF. | | | | 9) PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH | | CLASSIFICATION FOR WALLS AND CEILINGS. | | | | 10) ELEVATOR WARNING SIGNS ARE REQUIRED | | ON EVERY FLOOR NEAR THE ELEVATOR | | OPENING. | | | | 11) BUILDING IS LOCATED IN THE CITY | | FIRE LIMITS. CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS WILL | | APPLY. PLEASE SEE APPENDIX F, LOCAL | | AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | 12) ARCHITECTURAL TRIM LOCATED IN THE | | CITY FIRE LIMTS SHALL BE | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE. FOAM TRIM NOTED ON ROOF | | DETAILS PAGE. | | | | 13) BUILDING ADDRESS REQUIRED ON | | PROPER ELEVATION. A MINIMUM OF 6" | | NUMBERS REQUIRED. | | | | 14) PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE | | STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL HANDRAILS | | AND GUARDRAILS. | | | | 15) IS THE BUILDING A SINGLE OR | | MULTIPLE TENANT ARRANGEMENT. PLEASE | | ADVISE. | | | | 16) PLEASE INDICATE RISER SIZES FOR | | STAIR # 2. | | | | 17) PLEASE DISPLAY SPHERE RESISTANCE | | ON HANDRAIL/GUARDRAIL @ STAIR DETAIL. | | | | 18) DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS ARE REQUIRED | | IN ALL AIR HANDLING SYSTEMS OVER 2000 | | CFM. WHEN ACTIVATED, THESE SYSTEMS SHALL | | CAUSE THESE SYSTEMS TO STOP AND | | ACTIVATE THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. | | | | 19) EMERGENCY LIGHTING REQUIRED IN FIRE | | PUMP ROOM. | | | | 20) 2 1/2 TO 1 1/2 REDUCERS REQUIRED | | ON STANDPIPE SYSTEM. | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | 835-2910 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
61 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
Time |
15:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-08-21 15:57:01 | TO "M" BOX/RESTAMP |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
60 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-08-13 09:53:35 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
59 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-08-09 |
Time |
10:42 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
58 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-01 |
Time |
09:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-01 |
Time |
09:51 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-08-01 09:52:32 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
57 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-19 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-19 |
Time |
08:51 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-07-19 08:51:23 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
56 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-19 |
Time |
08:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-19 |
Time |
08:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-07-27 16:17:55 | TO "COMM" BD#33 | 2007-07-19 08:30:45 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
55 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
10:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-07-03 |
Time |
10:48 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-07-03 10:48:52 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
54 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-26 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-06-26 15:25:28 | TO "Z" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
53 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-06-15 14:19:57 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
52 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
Time |
08:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-23 |
Time |
08:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-24 16:02:16 | | | | | SENT TO R BROWN'S DESK FOR REVIEW. | 2007-05-23 08:33:04 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
51 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
13:35 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-05-17 13:35:41 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
50 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-14 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-14 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-05-14 13:37:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
49 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-01 |
Time |
15:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-05-01 |
Time |
15:10 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-05-01 15:11:04 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
48 |
Status |
|
Date |
2007-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
15:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-01 15:07:42 | TO "COMM" BD#8 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
47 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
14:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-04-23 14:19:58 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
46 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-20 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-20 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-04-20 11:42:15 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
45 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-04-12 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-04-12 11:07:41 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
44 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
18:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-04-03 |
Time |
18:07 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-04-03 18:07:31 | TO ROBERT BROWN |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
43 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-03-26 |
Time |
18:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
spalmer |
Date |
2007-03-26 |
Time |
18:08 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-03-26 18:09:18 | TO RON REGUEIRO |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
42 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-21 |
Time |
15:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-21 |
Time |
15:24 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-03-21 15:24:37 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/1 REV AND 1 SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
41 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-03-10 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-03-10 14:09:52 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
40 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-13 |
Time |
10:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-13 |
Time |
10:08 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-02-13 10:09:42 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
39 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
Time |
12:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-02-05 |
Time |
12:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-05 12:26:38 | LETTER SUBMITTAL FROM MECHANICAL ENGINEER.SENT TO TOM | | GORDON'S DESK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
38 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-02-02 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-16 13:47:55 | 3/16/07--PLANS ROUTED TO "RBROWN" DESK FROM "COMM" | | BD#40 | 2007-02-08 11:30:40 | TO "COMM" BD#40 | 2007-02-02 11:40:37 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
37 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
Time |
11:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-30 |
Time |
11:37 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-01-30 11:37:40 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
36 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-24 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-24 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-01-24 11:26:28 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
35 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-17 |
Time |
12:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-17 |
Time |
12:22 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-01-17 12:23:06 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
34 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-10 |
Time |
10:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-01-10 |
Time |
10:21 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-01-10 10:21:56 | TO "P" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
33 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-12-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-08 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-12-08 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2006-12-08 08:32:08 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
32 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-11-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-13 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-11-13 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-11-13 14:56:02 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
31 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
17:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-10-14 |
Time |
17:46 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2006-10-14 17:47:10 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
30 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-07-22 |
Time |
17:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-07-22 |
Time |
17:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-09 00:00:00 | TO "COMM" BD#49 | 2006-07-22 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD-REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
29 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-23 |
Time |
09:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-23 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-06-23 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
28 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-06-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-07 |
Time |
17:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-06-07 |
Time |
17:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-06-07 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
27 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-05-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-05-03 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-05-03 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-05-03 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
26 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-04-24 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-04-24 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-04-24 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
25 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-04-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-04-19 |
Time |
12:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-04-19 |
Time |
12:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-05 00:00:00 | TO "COMM" BD#41-REV | 2006-04-19 00:00:00 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
24 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-04-17 |
Time |
15:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-04-17 |
Time |
15:06 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2006-04-17 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
23 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2006-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-02-08 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2006-02-08 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2006-02-08 00:00:00 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
22 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-11-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-11-30 |
Time |
08:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-11-30 |
Time |
08:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-11-30 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
21 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-08-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-08-31 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-08-31 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-08-31 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
20 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-29 |
Time |
14:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-29 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-07-29 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
19 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-25 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2005-07-25 00:00:00 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
18 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-07-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-18 |
Time |
12:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-18 |
Time |
12:06 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-07-18 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
17 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-05 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-05 |
Time |
15:52 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-07-05 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
16 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-07-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-05 |
Time |
15:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-07-05 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2005-07-05 00:00:00 | TO "KSTEVENS" BOX/REVISION |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-06-02 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-06-02 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-06-02 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
Time |
08:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
Time |
08:03 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-06-01 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
Time |
08:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
Time |
08:01 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2005-06-01 00:00:00 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REVISION |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-05-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-05-24 |
Time |
18:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-05-24 |
Time |
18:16 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2005-05-24 00:00:00 | TO "KSTEVENS" BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-04-11 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-04-11 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-04-11 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-03-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-03-23 |
Time |
13:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-03-23 |
Time |
13:13 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-03-23 00:00:00 | TO "RBROWN" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-01-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2005-01-20 |
Time |
14:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2005-01-20 |
Time |
14:16 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-01-20 00:00:00 | TO "RB" DESK/LETTERS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
Time |
12:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-21 |
Time |
12:41 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-12-21 00:00:00 | SENT TO "RB" DESK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-15 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2004-12-15 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-15 00:00:00 | SENT TO "COMM BD#45" |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-11-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-11-08 |
Time |
16:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-11-08 |
Time |
16:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-11-08 00:00:00 | TO COMM BD#33 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-09-14 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-09-14 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-09-14 00:00:00 | TO RB DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-08-03 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-08-03 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-08-03 00:00:00 | TO RB DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-28 |
Time |
15:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-28 |
Time |
15:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-28 00:00:00 | TO COMM BD#58 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-03 00:00:00 | TO COMM BD#39 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-05-14 |
Time |
17:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-04-07 |
Time |
16:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-04-07 00:00:00 | TO COMM BD#39 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
15 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
Time |
19:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-08-21 |
Time |
18:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-08-21 18:49:25 | PLANS BROUGHT IN FOR RESTAMP. SOME PAGES ARE NOT THE | | LATEST REVISION. OTHER PAGES ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED | | BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. UNABLE TO RESTAMP AT THIS | | TIME. BELOW IS A LIST OF THE PAGES ALONG WITH THE | | LATEST CORRESPONDING REVISION FOUND IN THE PERMIT SET | | OF PLANS. PROVIDE AN ACCURATE SET OF PLANS FOR RESTAMP | | WHICH HAS ALL THE LATEST PAGES SIGNED AND SEALED. | | | | M0.1 REV 1 4/29/04 | | M2.1 REV 6 4/16/07 | | M2.2 REV 1 10/18/04 | | M2.3 REV 2 10/18/04 | | M3.1 REV 1 10/18/04 | | M3.2 REV 1 10/18/04 | | | | PG M4.1 WHICH WAS PROVIDED FOR RESTAMP HAS REVISIONS | | WHICH ARE NOT IN THE PERMIT SET OF PLANS. THIS PAGE | | MUST BE SUBMITTED (2 COPIES) AND REVIEWED AS A REVISION | | BEFORE IT CAN BE STAMPED. | | | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-04-23 |
Time |
13:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-04-23 13:43:34 | REVISION TO MECHANICAL PLANS PAGE M-2.1. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-03-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-03-27 |
Time |
18:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-03-27 |
Time |
17:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-03-27 18:17:55 | REVISED PG M2.1 | | | | ------------------PROVISO------------------- | | | | VAV 107 IS MISSING DUCT SIZE. PLEASE REVISE AND | | RESUBMIT OR PROVIDE MISSING INFORMATION VIA SIGNED, | | SEALED LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-02-12 |
Time |
08:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-02-09 |
Time |
15:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-12 09:05:00 | ----------------DENIED----------------- | | | | 1. EF 1 RISER HAS BEEN DELETED FROM PLAN. NO PROVISION | | HAS BEEN MADE FOR DISCHARGE OF EXHAUST FROM FIRST FLOOR | | BATHROOMS. PLEASE CLARIFY. PERHAPS A REVISED PAGE M2.1 | | IS NEEDED OR MISSING FROM THIS SUBMITTAL. | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A RISER DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE | | WITH 607.1.3 FIRE DAMPER EXCEPTIONS. PLEASE NOTE: | | EXCEPTION #2 APPLIES TO RETURN RISERS AND A CONSTANT | | UPWARD AIRFLOW IS NEEDED. | | | | 3. PG M-0.1NOTE (U) STATES THAT ABOVE CEILING AREAS | | ARE TO BE USED AS RETURN AIR PLENUMS. EXHAUST DUCTS | | UNDER POSITIVE PRESSURE SHALL NOT EXTEND INTO OR PASS | | THROUGH A PLENUM PER FBC,M 601.3. BY DELETING THE | | ROOFTOP FANS AND USING CEILING MOUNTED FANS, THE | | EXHAUST DUCTS ABOVE CEILING HAVE GONE FROM NEGATIVE | | PRESSURE TO POSITIVE PRESSURE AND SHALL NOT BE LOCATED | | IN A PLENUM. | | | | REVIEWED BY: | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
14:24 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-02-06 |
Time |
14:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-06 14:27:34 | SUBMITTAL FOR FIREWRAP TO WRAP PVC PIPE IN THE RETURN | | AIR PLENUM, REVISION TO PAGE P-0.1 WAS APPROVED PER | | HAROLD MOSER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-01-31 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-01-31 14:30:58 | REVISION TO PAGE P-0.1 FIREWRAP | | *** DENIED *** | | 1) MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING ENGINEER ON FILE IS NELSON | | R. LONG, SO HE WOULD NEED TO SEAL THE SUBMITTAL AND | | REVISED PLAN. | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-07-14 |
Time |
10:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-07-14 |
Time |
10:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-07-14 00:00:00 | DENIED: | | PER DISCUSSION WITH THE BUILDING | | OFFICAL, THIS APPLICATION OF THE | | FIREWRAP+ IS ACCEPTABLE IF THE ENGINEER | | OF RECORD SUBMITS REVISED PLANS | | INDICATING WHAT SYSTEMS WILL REQUIRE THE | | INSTALLATION OF THE FIREWRAP+ TO MEET | | CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-05-26 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-05-26 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-26 00:00:00 | SUBMITTAL FOR FIREWRAP+ FOR THE PURPOSE | | TO WRAP PVC (COMBUSTIBLE PIPE) IN THE | | RETURN AIR PLENUM. | | | | THIS MUST BE SUBMITTED BY THE ENGINEER | | UNDER ALTERNATE METHODS & MATERIALS. | | PROVIDE DETAIL OF EXCACTLY WHAT | | MATERIALS WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE | | FIREWRAP. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2006-05-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-05-15 |
Time |
07:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2006-05-15 |
Time |
07:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-05-15 00:00:00 | DENIED: | | 1.PLAN SHEET M-2.1, EF-1 IS NOW | | TERMINATING AT THE FIRST FLOOR WALL. | | PLAN SHEET M-2.2 AND M-2.3 INDICATE EF-1 | | STILL TERMIATING AT THE ROOF.PLEASE | | REVISE PLANS TO REFLECT THE PROPER | | TERMINATION. | | | | 2.PLAN SHEET M-2.1, SUPPLY & RETURN | | DUCTS TO RTU-1 ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE FIRE | | DAMPERS AT THE FLOOR WHERE THEY LEAVE | | THE RATED SHAFT IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1999 | | NFPA 90A 3-3.4.4 & 2001 FBC 705.6.4. | | | | 3.COMMENT #2 ALSO APPLIES TO PLAN | | SHEET M-2.2 2ND FLOOR WHERE THE DUCT | | PASSES THROUGH THE RATED FLOOR FROM | | RTU-2.PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO INDICATE | | ALL FIRE DAMPER/ACCESS DOORS FOR ALL | | RTU'S. | | | | 4.PLEASE NOTE, SHOULD THE EXHAUST | | SHAFTS FOR EF-3 & EF-2 BE A SUB-DUCT | | METHOD, FIRE DAMPERS WILL NOT BE | | REQUIRED.PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2005-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2005-07-27 |
Time |
11:47 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2005-07-27 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-07-27 00:00:00 | DENIED: | | 1. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVISION ARE NOT | | SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED BY THE ENGINEER | | OF RECORD. PER FS 471.033(J)AN | | ENGINEER SHALL NOT AFFIX SEAL, NAME OR | | SIGNATURE TO ANY DRAWINGS, | | SPECIFICATIONS, OR REPORTS THAT WERE NOT | | PREPARED BY SAID INDIVIDUAL. | | | | 2. ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE | | THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND NUMBER OR TITLE | | BLOCK ON EACH SHEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FAC 61G15-23.002 (2). | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-12-29 |
Time |
09:42 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-12-29 |
Time |
09:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-29 00:00:00 | PROVISO: | | DUCTS THAT EXTEND THROUGH MORE THAN ONE | | FLOOR SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SHAFT | | ENCLOSURE PER 2001 FBC(M)607.4. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
Time |
15:08 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-12-01 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-01 00:00:00 | PLANS ARE CODE COMPLIANT.PLEASE SEE | | COMMENTS BY ROBERT BROWN, BUILDING PLAN | | REVIEW.PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS | | AS REQUIRED. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561)805-6719. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-07-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-07-07 |
Time |
07:46 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-07-07 |
Time |
07:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-07-07 00:00:00 | PROVISO: | | RESPONSE TO PROVISO DATED JUNE 24,2004; | | SHAFT INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL | | DRAWINGS.PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE FIRE | | DAMPERS ON THE DUCT PENTRATING THE SHAFT | | WALLS ON FLOORS 1 THROUGH 3. | | | | FAN SHUT DOWN BY DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS | | REQUIRED PER 2001 FBC(M) 606.2.1. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561) 805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-06-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-06-09 |
Time |
12:42 |
Rev Time |
0.45 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-06-09 |
Time |
12:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-11 00:00:00 | PROVISO: | | DUCTS THAT EXTEND THROUGH MORE THAN ONE | | FLOOR SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SHAFT | | ENCLOSURE PER 2001 FBC(M)607.4. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561) 805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-04-16 |
Time |
07:49 |
Rev Time |
1.10 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-04-16 |
Time |
06:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-04-16 00:00:00 | DENIED: | | 1.PLAN SHEET A3.2 DETAIL 01, INDICATES | | HVAC CHASE WITH FIRE DAMPER.PLEASE | | INDICATE SHAFT ON MECHANICAL PLAN.PER | | 2001 FBC(M) 607.6, SPECIFIC LOCATION OF | | EACH FIRE DAMPER, FIRE DOOR & CEILING | | DAMPER.IDENTIFY FIRE DAMPERS ON THE | | MECHANICAL PLAN. | | | | 2.DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS REQUIRED PER | | 2001 FBC(M) 606.2.1.(NOT SHOWN ON THE | | MECHANICAL PLAN) | | | | 3.NO COMBUSTIBLES ABOVE THE CEILING | | IN THE RETURN AIR PLENUM. | | | | 4.PLEASE CLARIFY THE PURPOSE OF THE | | BARAMETRIC RELIEF SHOWN ON FLOORS 1-4. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE | | CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561) 805-6719. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-08-21 |
Time |
17:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-08-21 |
Time |
17:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-08-21 00:00:00 | SHTS P-2.2, P-2.3, P-3.1, & P-3.2 - OK | | | | | | REVISION FOR PLUMBING APPROVED | | | | REVISION REQUIRED FOR SHT A4.3 TO SHOW | | NEW ARRANGEMENT FOR 2ND, 3RD, AND 4TH | | FLOOR TOILET ROOMS. SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR | | THE SHOWER SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH | | SECTION 11-4.21 AND ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-06-18 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pschmitz |
Date |
2006-06-18 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-06-18 00:00:00 | REVISION P-2.1,P-3.2 AS REQUIRED PER KS | | REVIEW BY PES |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2006-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-02-21 |
Time |
19:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2006-02-21 |
Time |
19:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2006-02-21 00:00:00 | REVISION OK | | | | SHTS P-2.2 & P-3.1 CHANGES TO ROUTING OF | | STORM PIPING AND SANITARY PIPING. | | | | REVISIONS REQUIRED FOR SHEETS P-2.1 AND | | P-2.3 TO REFLECT CHANGES FROM P-2.2 & | | P-2.3. | | | | | | REVISION DENIED | | | | SHT P-3.2 STORM PIPING DOES NOT REFLECT | | THE CHANGES SHOWN ON SHT P-2.2 WHERE THE | | TWO ROOF DRAINS TIE TOGETHER AT COL. | | LINE #2. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 653-2692 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2005-08-03 |
Time |
09:25 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2005-08-03 |
Time |
09:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-08-03 00:00:00 | REVISION/DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1 | | | | | | REVISION FOR SHEET P2.1 APPROVED | | REVISION FOR SHEET P3.1 DENIED - RISER | | DIAGRAM DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 653-2692 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2005-06-01 |
Time |
07:38 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2005-05-31 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2005-06-01 00:00:00 | REVISION OK | | CHANGED ROUTING FOR 1 RWL AND TIED IN IN | | ANOTHER LOCATION. CHANGED ROUTING FOR | | SANT. IN TWO LOCATIONS. ADDED A FLOOR | | DRAIN IN THE MECHANICAL ROOM. - REVISION | | REQUIRED ON THE SANT. RISER DIAGRAM FOR | | CHANGES ON THE SANT. FLOOR PLAN. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-12-29 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.85 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-12-29 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-29 00:00:00 | REVISION OK-5 SHEETS |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-12-03 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-12-03 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-03 00:00:00 | PLANS ARE CODE COMPLIANT, BUT 3 SETS OF | | PLANS ARE REQUIRED. ONLY TWO SUBMITTED | | KSTEVENS - PLANS WILL BE APPROVED AND | | STAMPED AS REVISION WHEN THREE SETS ARE | | SUBMITTED |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-07-21 |
Time |
11:42 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-07-21 |
Time |
11:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
Time |
18:35 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
Time |
18:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-18 00:00:00 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2001 CHAPTER 11 | | | | | | 1) FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.16.2 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.16.3 TOILET HEIGHT. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.19.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.19.4 EXPOSED PIPES AND SURFACES. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.22.3 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.24.2 HEIGHT. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.24.3 KNEE CLEARANCE. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.24.4 DEPTH. | | - SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTION | | 11-4.24.6 EXPOSED PIPES AND SURFACES. | | 2) REMOVE ALL VOIDED SHEETS. SUBMIT TWO | | COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS FOR REVIEW. SUB- | | MIT ONE SET OF OLD SHEETS FOR COMPAIRI- | | SON. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 653-2692 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-04-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-04-26 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
2.50 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-04-26 |
Time |
07:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-04-26 00:00:00 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING | | FBC-2001 FUEL GAS | | FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2001 CHAPTER 11 | | FBC-2001 BUILDING | | | | 1) SHT A4.3 SUBMIT DETAILS FOR SECTIONS | | 11-4.16, 11-4.19, 11-4.22 AND 11-4.24 | | AND ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | 2) SHTS P-2.2 & P-2.3 SANT. RISER #2 AND | | WATER RISER #1 SHOWN AS SAME RISER. | | PLEASE CLARIFY. | | 3) SHTS P-2.1 & P-2.3 (SANT. RISER DIAG- | | RAM) - FLOOR DRAIN IN DUMPSTER PAD NOT | | APPROVED. - STORM WATER SHALL NOT DRAIN | | INTO SANITARY. | | 4) SHT P-3.2 WATER RISER DIAGRAM. PIPE | | SHOWN AS 4" @ 4% THRU 4" @ 1% NOT APPRO- | | VED. - HORIZONTAL DRAINAGE PIPING SHALL | | BE INSTALLED IN UNIFORM ALIGNMENT AT | | UNIFORM SLOPES. SECTION 704.1 - PIPE | | SHALL BE MINIMUM 5" PIPE @ 1% PER TABLE | | 1106.3. | | 5) SEPARATE GAS PERMIT REQUIRED. THE | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR | | GAS PERMIT. | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2001 | | FUEL GAS CODE. | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES. | | C. TYPE OF GAS, (LP OR NATURAL) | | D. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | PER FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. | | E. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | FBC-2001 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2 | | 6) SHTS A1.4 & A1.4.1 INDICATE SIZE OF | | OVERFLOW SCUPPERS. SHOW WIDTH OF OPENING | | ON DETAIL #12 | | 7) SEPARATE IRRIGATION PERMIT/PLANS REQ- | | UIRED. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 653-2692 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
astelly |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
astelly |
Date |
2007-08-22 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-07-02 |
Time |
14:05 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-07-02 14:07:41 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | 1) INSTALLATION OF BRICK PAVERS IN ROW - APPLICANT TO | | MAINTAIN AND CONFIRM THAT BRICK INSTALLATION SMOOTH AND | | FLUSH (NO TRIPPING HAZARDS) | | | | 2) INSTALLATION OF PALMS IN ROW - APPLICANT TO CONFIRM | | PALMS ARE TRIMMED HIGH ENOUGH FOR 8'-0" PEDESTIAN | | CLEARANCE | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-06-08 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-08 08:41:35 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | - REVISION OF STREETSCAPE ONLY TO REFLECT PALMS AND | | BRICK WITHIN PROPERTY LINE | | - SIDEWALK TO REMAIN CONCRETE AS ORIGINALLY APPROVED | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2007-02-21 |
Time |
14:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2007-02-21 |
Time |
14:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-02-21 14:50:58 | SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE, AS APPROVED ON THE ORIGINAL | | PERMIT. | | INTERIOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS DOES NOT NEED ZONING | | APPROVAL UNLESS A MODIFICATION OF THE FACADE IS | | PROPOSED. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT ARE THE CHANGES TO THE | | FACADE, IF ANY, WITH THE PROPOSED TENANT IMPROVEMENTS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mmclean |
Date |
2004-12-28 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mmclean |
Date |
2004-12-28 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-12-28 00:00:00 | APPROVED BY ANA MARIE APONTE, 822-1439 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
agiannio |
Date |
2004-08-16 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
agiannio |
Date |
2004-08-16 |
Time |
10:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-08-16 00:00:00 | PROVISO:SIDEWALK MATERIAL SHALL MATCH | | EXISTING ADJACENT SIDEWALK MATERIAL AND | | STREET TRESS SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED W/ | | EXISTING TREES INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE | | CURB AND SHALL BE SAME SPECIES. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-07-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
Time |
17:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2004-07-13 |
Time |
09:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-07-13 00:00:00 | FINAL ZONING APPROVAL PENDING APPROVAL | | OF AIR RIGHTS AND PARKING RESOLUTIONS | | BY CITY COMMISSION ON JULY 19,2004 | | 1. SOUTHWEST TOWER OVERHANG IS | | ENCROACHING THE NEIGHBOR PROPERTY. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2004-06-11 |
Time |
11:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2004-06-11 |
Time |
11:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-11 00:00:00 | 1. THE BALCONY ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION | | IS ENCROACHING THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY. A | | RESOLUTION FOR THE AIR RIGHTS EASEMENT | | HAS TO BE ISSUED. | | 2. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PARKING | | AGGREAMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED. | | 3. TREES ON THE SIDEWALK HAVE TO BE | | MOVED ADJACENT TO THE CURB. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
agiannio |
Date |
2004-05-10 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
agiannio |
Date |
2004-05-10 |
Time |
15:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-05-10 00:00:00 | SECTION 94-107(A)(4) SIDEWALK STORY SHAL | | BE NO LESS THAN 12' FF TO FC | | SECTION 94-107(B)(2) CONFIRM 10 FT. | | SEPARATION ON DRAWINGS | | SECTION 94-107(D)(1) PROPERTY RECIEVED | | A 21 SPACE ADJUSTMENT BY THE DAC, | | PROPOSED PROJECT IS LARGER AND REQUIRES | | MORE PARKING.PLEASE PROVIDE TABLE | | FOR PARKING REQUIREMENT AND EXECUTED | | PARKING CARD ACCESS AGREEMENT TO RECEIVE | | ZONING APPROVAL |
|
|