Plan Review Stops For Permit 04031090 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-08-13 |
Time |
12:00 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-08-13 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-07-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-07-13 |
Time |
12:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-07-13 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | ALL COMMENTS ARE REGARDING THE | | APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, | | STEEL EDGE OUTSWING GLAZED ENTRY DOOR. | | NOTE - SEE ATTACHED CHECKLIST FROM THE | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG WEBSITE. | | | | 1.)INDICATE APPROVAL METHOD (LINE 1). | | | | 2.)PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF | | INDEPENDENCE FOR THE EVALUATOR (CERTIFI- | | CATION AGENCY), FAC9B72.040(5)(G), | | FAC9B72.110 (SEE ATTACHED). | | | | 3.)PROVIDE AN ORIGINAL APPLICATION | | FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | ***NO RESUB FEE*** |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-25 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-23 |
Time |
15:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-23 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | 1.)THE COVER SHEET CONTAINS THE NAME | | OF DAVID LAWRENCE ARCHITECTURE INC. | | A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION IS | | REQUIRED, SEE PREVIOUS LIST. | | | | 2.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #3.THE | | SHUTTER SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN DO NOT | | CORRELATE WITH THE FLOOR PLAN.FOR | | INSTANCE, OPEINING D ON THE FLOOR PLAN | | IS SHOWN AS A 2'8X5'3 WINDOW; ON THE | | SHUTTER SCHEDULE IT IS OPENING 6, 78X80. | | OPENING #7 IS ALSO INCORRECT.PLEASE | | CHECK ALL OPENING SIZES. | | | | 3.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #5.NOW | | THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS AN | | APPROVED STATUS BUT THE TEST REPORT | | IS MISSING FOR THE MULLIONS. | | | | 4.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #4. PROVIDE | | THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE | | ODL DOOR.I WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE | | WHICH PRODUCT APPROVAL, IF ANY, WAS THE | | CORRECT ONE ON THE FLORIDA STATE | | WEBSITE.CONTACTING THE ODL TECHNICAL | | REPRESENTATIVE, [email protected], MAY | | ASSIST IN DETERMINING THE CORRECT | | PRODUCT APPROVAL AND TEST REPORT THAT | | YOU NEED TO SUBMIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-06-22 |
Time |
19:22 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-04 |
Time |
08:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-04 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | 1.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST.DAVID | | LAWRENCE ARCHITECTURE INC. IS REQUIRED | | TO HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION | | (SHEET 1).PLEASE PROVIDE.MASTERS | | CANNOT BE REDLINED, SEE SHEET 9.1 TITLE | | BLOCK. | | | | 2.)EMERGENCY ESCAPE SHALL BE PROVIDED | | DURING THE THREAT OF A STORM, TO BE | | PROVIDED ON THE FIRST FLOOR, FBC1005.4.5 | | THE IMPACT DOOR IS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. | | | | 3.)THE SHUTTER SCHEDULE AND KEY PLAN | | DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE FLOOR PLAN. | | THE DOOR APPEARS TO BE IN THE WRONG | | LOCATION, 2ND FLOOR.EMERGENCY ESCAPE | | IS REQUIRED FBC1005.4.5. | | | | 4.)DO NOT STAPLE DIFFERENT PRODUCT | | APPROVALS TOGETHER.EACH PRODUCT | | APPROVAL SHOULD INCLUDE THE FLORIDA | | STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR SITE SPECIFIC WITH | | A TEST REPORT.SEE PREVIOUS LIST IN | | REGARDS TO THE ODL DOOR, STILL NO | | STATE APPROVAL SUBMITTED. | | | | 5.)THE STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | THE MULLIONS IS PENDING.PLEASE PROVIDE | | A CURRENT (APPROVED STATUS) PRODUCT | | APPROVAL.ALSO THE DRAWINGS ARE FOR | | NORANDEX, NOT SIMONTON MULLIONS. | | | | 6.)PROVIDE A TITLE BLOCK FOR THE | | ENGINEER ON THE TRUSS LAYOUT PAGE. | | SEE DESIGN CRITERIA, MASTERS CANNOT BE | | REDLINED. | | | | 7.)TRUSS LOADING ON SHEET 3.1 | | CONFLICTS WITH THE ENGINEERING.REVISE | | EITHER THE PLAN OR THE TRUSS ENGINEERING | | SO THAT THE TWO ARE CONSISTENT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
Time |
16:33 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-05-04 |
Time |
09:46 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2004-05-04 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | 1.)DAVID LAWRENCE ARCHITECTURE INC. | | IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION.PROVIDE THE NUMBER | | (SHEET 1).IF YOU REMOVE THE NAME, | | MASTERS CANNOT BE REDLINED (CLEAN | | ORIGINALS REQUIRED), EACH SHEET. | | | | 2.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #4.THE | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR DOUBLE | | DOORS ARE INSWING OR IMPACT.ARE YOU | | USING IMPACT FOR THE REAR DOUBLE DOOR | | AS WELL AS THE FRONT? | | | | 3.)WHERE IS THE KEY PLAN FOR THE | | HURRICANE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE?IS | | THE DOOR REQUIRED TO BE IMPACT STILL ON | | THIS SCHEDULE? | | | | 4.)FLORIDA STATEWIDE, LOCAL OR SITE | | SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR | | ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS.PLEASE PROVIDE | | FOR THE ODL IMPACT DOOR. | | | | 5.)THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR | | THE SINGLE IMPACT GLASS DOOR IS LIMITED | | TO 3'0, DOOR ON THE PLAN IS 3'3". | | | | 6.)THE NON IMPACT DOOR PRODUCT | | APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS ALSO LIMITED IN | | SIZE TO 3'0.THE 2ND FLOOR DOOR IS 3'3. | | | | 7.)THE SIMONTON WINDOW PRODUCT | | APPROVALS ARE ILLEGIBLE AND REQUIRE | | FL STATE, LOCAL OR SITE SPECIFIC | | PRODUCT APPROVAL.ONE SHEET WAS FOR | | A FIXED WINDOW, NO WINDOWS OF THAT | | TYPE ON THE PLAN.THE OTHER WAS FOR | | A SINGLE HUNG; THERE IS ALREADY AN | | APPROVED SINGLE HUNG WINDOW IN THE | | PACKAGE (TRACO).IS THIS AN ALTERNATE? | | | | 8.)PROVIDE WINDOW MULLION PRODUCT | | APPROVALS.FL STATE, LOCAL OR SITE | | SPECIFIC REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE | | TEST REPORT. | | | | 9.)THE TRUSS SHEETS SUBMITTED ARE | | LOOSE.COLLATE, SUBMIT TWO IDENTICAL | | BOUND (STAPLED) COPIES.SOME SHEETS | | ARE LACKING A TITLE BLOCK.A FULL | | SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED, NOT INITIALS PER | | FBPE AND BUILDING OFFICIAL.BCLL IS | | SHOWN AS 0; REVISE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH | | THE PLANS AND FBC TABLE 1604.1. | | | | 10.) ADDITIONAL FEES DUE $190, SEE | | ATTACHED BZ238899.THIS IS A MAJOR | | WORKING DRAWING REVIEW, NOT A PERMIT | | APPLICATION WITH RESUBS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-04-27 |
Time |
19:41 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-03-29 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-03-29 00:00:00 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | | | 1.)ONE MEANS OF EGRESS TO BE PROVIDED | | IN THE EVENT OF A HURRICANE, FBC1005.4.5 | | | | 2.)GENZ ENGINEERING MUST HAVE A | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION TO | | PRACTICE ENGINEERING.THIS CA NUMBER | | IS TO BE ON EACH SHEET, FAC61G15-23.002. | | | | 3.)DOCUMENTS ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT | | AND FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO | | BE SEALED (ENERGY CALC), FAC61G1-16.001. | | | | 4.)THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED | | WERE FOR INSWING DOORS; PLAN SPECIFIES | | OUTSWING.CLARIFY WITH ARCHITECT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-07-01 |
Time |
13:26 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-07-01 |
Time |
13:24 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
Time |
13:00 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-06-22 |
Time |
19:17 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-06-22 00:00:00 | ***** UNSAT ***** | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #1 FROM PREVIOUS | | REVIEW. BATH RECEPT IS STILL SHOWN | | CONNECTED TO AN ADDTIONAL HALLWAY RECEPT | | PLEASE SEE 210.52D,210.11C3 | | NO OTHER RECEPTS ARE PERMITTED ON THIS | | GFI CIRCUIT. | | | | THESE PLANS ARE FOR A"MASTER" AND NO | | REDLINES CAN BE DONE. PLANS MUST BE 100% | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-06-03 |
Time |
16:33 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-06-03 00:00:00 | *** UNSAT *** | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE RECEPT SHOWN FOR | | SECOND FLOOR BATH. NOW SHOWS RECEPT IN | | BATH CONNECTING TO RECEPT IN HALL UP- | | -STAIRS. APPEARS TO BE A MISPRINT? | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE ADD NOTE TO RISER NOTE | | #1 TO BE IN SLAB. | | | | CALLED FOR NEW SHEET. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-02 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2004-04-27 |
Time |
19:41 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-04-27 00:00:00 | *** UNSAT *** | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASE SEE 40A OCP FOR OVEN ON | | #10 AWG. | | | | 2)NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE LOAD SHOWN FOR | | AHU, PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS 11KW AND LOAD | | CALCS INDICATE 10KW. NOTE, MOST "10KW" | | HEATSTRIPS ARE ACTUALY 9.6 AND .4 FOR | | MOTOR OR THERE-ABOUTS. | | MECH PLANS SHOW OCP FOR A/C COND UNIT | | AT 25A'S. | | | | THESE PLANS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR | | MASTER PLANS AND CAN NOT BE REDLINED. | | | | PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR | | REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, | | PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | CONSTUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2004-03-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-04-27 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2004-03-25 |
Time |
12:07 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-03-25 00:00:00 | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS | | FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR | | REVIEW. | | | | 1} THE CONDUCTOR SIZE FOR THE SERVICE ON | | THE RISER DIAGRAM IS UNDERSIZED PER | | 210.15(B)(6). MUST BE MINIMUM #2/0. | | | | 2} PLEASE SEE 250.50 FOR GROUNDING AND | | AMMEND NOTE #4 ON RISER NOTES TO | | INCLUDE COLD WATER PIPE. | | | | 3} THE LOAD CALCULATION IS INCORRECT, | | PLEASE RECALCULATE PER 220.3. | | | | 4} THE OVEN CALCULATION MUST COMPLY WITH | | 220.19, (8 KW MIN). | | | | 5} THE NEUTRAL CALCULATION IS INCORRECT | | PER 220.22, SEE REVIEWED SET OF PLANS. | | | | 6} THE AMPERAGE FOR ON THE PANEL | | SCHEDULE FOR THE AHU AND THE CU. DO NOT | | CORRELATE WITH THE MECHANICAL PLANS, | | PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 7} A RECEPTACLE MUST BE ADDED AT THE CU | | PER 210.63. | | | | 8} A SMOKE DETECTOR MUST BE ADDED IN | | "CLOSE PROXIMITY" OF THE STAIRWELL PER | | NFPA-72, AND 905.2.2 FBC. | | | | 9} THE SMOKE DETECTOR NEAR THE UPPER | | BATH #2 MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 3' AWAY | | FROM THE DOOR PER 8-1.4.2 NFPA-72. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | 561/805-6718 | | [email protected] | | FAX/:561/659-8026 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2005-09-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-09-27 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2005-09-27 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2005-09-27 00:00:00 | TO "SHILL" DESK |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-08-06 |
Time |
15:49 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-08-06 00:00:00 | TO SH DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
Time |
12:55 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2004-06-29 00:00:00 | TO DP DESK |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-25 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-25 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-06-25 00:00:00 | TO SH DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-06-18 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2004-06-18 00:00:00 | TO DP DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-02 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-02 |
Time |
12:49 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2004-06-02 00:00:00 | TO DP DESK |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-05-27 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-05-27 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-05-27 00:00:00 | TO SH DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-04-27 |
Time |
11:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-04-27 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
alange |
Date |
2004-04-22 |
Time |
12:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
alange |
Date |
2004-04-22 |
Time |
12:37 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-04-22 00:00:00 | TO SH DESK |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-03-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-03-25 |
Time |
11:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2004-03-25 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2004-03-25 00:00:00 | ROUTED TO WT DESK FOR ELEC REVIEW WITH | | 03111252 (SAME PLAN) |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-03-19 |
Time |
14:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
csiegber |
Date |
2004-03-19 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-03-19 00:00:00 | TO SH DESK/MASTER |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-05-04 |
Time |
10:08 |
Rev Time |
0.35 |
Received By |
pkrauss |
Date |
2004-06-29 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2004-05-04 00:00:00 | APPROVED 3-16-04 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2004-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-03-26 |
Time |
14:29 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2004-03-26 |
Time |
14:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2004-06-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2004-06-02 |
Time |
12:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2004-06-02 00:00:00 | MASTER - DO NOT ISSUE | | NO ZONING REQUIRED |
|
|