Plan Review Details - Permit 03090979
Plan Review Stops For Permit 03090979
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2005-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2005-05-17 Time 09:15 Rev Time 1.00
Received By shill Date 2005-05-16 Time 17:50 Sent To PC
Notes
2005-05-17 00:00:00REVISED 1.1 AND PRODUCT APPROVAL AS PER
 PROVISO
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2004-10-07 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2004-10-07 Time 10:03 Rev Time 2.00
Received By shill Date 2004-10-07 Time 10:03 Sent To PC
Notes
2004-10-07 00:00:00***PROVISO***
 1.) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE
 OUTSWING DOOR
 2.) SUBMIT NEW ENERGY CALCS WITH CORRECT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE
 3.) SUBMIT REVISION WITH A DECLARED
 BUILDING TYPE OF VI AS PER TELEPHONE
 CONVERSATION WITH ARCHITECT
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2004-10-06 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2004-10-06 Time \5:21 Rev Time 3.00
Received By shill Date 2004-10-06 Time 15:21 Sent To  
Notes
2004-10-06 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
 1.)PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS LISTS IN
 REGARDS TO THE ADDRESS.A RESPONSE WAS
 GIVEN THAT THE ADDRESS WOULD BE CHANGED
 BUT THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE.
  
 2.)IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.THE PLANS MUST BE STAMPED
 AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 APPLICATION.
  
 3.)SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE
 SECOND BUILDING AND THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE.
  
 4.)ZONING APPROVAL REQUIRED BEFORE A
 PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.PLEASE NOTE THAT
 ZONING HAS NOT YET PASSED THIS PLAN.
  
 5.)WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE REMOVE
 VOIDED SHEETS AND SUBMIT SEPARATELY.
  
 6.)SEE PREVIOUS LISTS IN REGARDS TO
 TEST REPORTS AND FLORIDA STATE, LOCAL
 OR SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVALS
 REQUIRED.ANY REPORTS NOT SUBMITTED
 BEFORE ISSUANCE WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE
 PERMITS WITH A SEPARATE APPLICATION AND
 FEES FOR THOSE ITEMS.
  
 7.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, ITEM #15.AS
 PER THE BUILDING OFFICIAL NEIL K. MELICK
 THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD IS NOT
 CONSIDERED A PUBLIC WAY.THEREFORE,
 THE TABLE 600 REQUIREMENT OF 0%
 OPENINGS IS REQUIRED (WALL EXHAUST FAN
 SHOWN ON WEST SIDE).
  
 8.)NOTES ON THE PLAN SHOULD BE JOB
 SPECIFIC.TO AVOID CONFUSION, PLEASE
 REMOVE REFERENCE TO THE HAZARD OCCUPANCY
 SEPARATION (LS, NOTE 7B).
  
 9.)PLEASE REVISE SHEET 101 AND ANY
 OTHER APPLICABLE SHEETS TO REFLECT THE
 NEW LL OF 125# (SHEET 400).
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2004-10-05 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2004-10-05 Time 12:43 Rev Time 4.00
Received By shill Date 2004-09-23 Time 13:47 Sent To PC
Notes
2004-10-05 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
 1.)THE PLANS (SHEET 3.1) SHOW 6747 SF,
 IMPACT FEE STAMP IS FOR 6020, ENERGY
 CALCS ARE FOR 6700.ALL THREE SHOULD
 BE THE SAME.PLEASE PROVIDE THE RECEIPT
 SHOWING THAT THE IMPACT FEES ASSESSED
 HAVE BEEN PAID.
  
 2.)REGARDING PRODUCT APPROVALS
 SUBMITTED:
  
 PGT SINGLE HUNG WINDOW; NO SINGLE HUNG
 WINDOWS ARE ON THE PLAN.THE
 ELEVATIONS AND SHEET 10.1 SHOW FIXED
 GLASS.
  
 RUSKIN LOUVER SHOPS; APPEAR TO BE CODE
 COMPLIANT.PROVIDE DADE COUNTY NOA
 01-0328.04 REFERRED TO ON THE SHOPS.
 THIS MAY BE AVAILABLE AT WWW.MIAMIDADE.
 GOV (FIND A DEPT, BUILDING CODE
 COMPLIANCE, SEARCH).
  
 OVERHEAD DOOR; PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 NOA 02-0712.01 IS MISSING SHEETS 7 & 8.
  
 THE SINGLE DOOR IS NOT APPROVED FOR
 USE WHERE WATER INFILTRATION REQUIREMENT
 IS NEEDED; PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 3.)SIGN THE OWNER/AGENT LINE OF THE
 ENERGY CALC.
  
 4.)TYPE V CONSTRUCTION IS DECLARED
 (1.1).EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TO BE OF
 NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, 3-6.1
 SHOWS A WOOD GABLE (FBC607).
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2004-08-09 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2004-09-15 Time 10:24 Rev Time 4.00
Received By shill Date 2004-08-03 Time 15:20 Sent To  
Notes
2004-08-04 00:00:00****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
  
 THIRD REVIEW, ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DATED
 12/22/03, STRUCTURAL PLANS DATED
 12/19/03.
  
 1.)SEE PREVIOUS TWO LISTS.PROVIDE A
 SURVEY.THE SITE PLAN, SHEET 2.1 STILL
 DOES NOT HAVE ANY HORIZONTAL CONTROL
 DIMENSIONS TO LOCATE THE BUILDING.
 PROPERTY LINES ARE NOT IDENTIFIED.SEE
 ATTACHED IN REGARDS TO FS553.80(2)(B).
 CODE COMPLIANCE FOR TABLE 600 CANNOT
 BE DETERMINED WITHOUT A DIMENSIONED
 SITE PLAN.DESIGNER OF RECORD IS
 RESPONSIBLE TO SUBMIT ALL PLANS IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC104.3.1.1.SEE
 SECTION (1), SITE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 2.)THE SHEETS PREPARED BY WE SCHIPSKE
 PE CONTAIN A PHOTOCOPY OF A SIGNATURE.
 THIS MUST BE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
 FAC61G15-23.002.THE EMBOSSED SEAL IS
 TO BE LEGIBLE.
  
 3.)THE FP SHEETS AND CALCS LACK A
 TITLE BLOCK REQUIRED BY FAC61G15-23.002.
  
 4.)6-S3, STUCCO IN A VERTICAL
 APPLICATION OVER WIRE LATH IS TO BE
 7/8" MIN, FBC2405.2.2, ASTM C926.CHECK
 ALL DETAILS (WILL REDLINE).
  
 5.)SEE PREVIOUS LIST, CORRECTIONS
 6 THROUGH 10.NOT ADDRESSED.FOR YOUR
 CONVENIENCE, THEY ARE:
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE
 HIGH LIFT GROUTING CALLED OUT IN NOTE
 J(3) ON S3.
  
 COLUMNS SHOWN AS MC1 ARE NOT ON THE
 COLUMN SCHEDULE ON SHEET S3.
  
 THE REQUESTED COLUMN CONNECTINS FOR THE
 TS COLUMNS SHOWN ON SHEETS S1 AND S2
 HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED.
  
 SHEET S3 ROOF WIND ZONE SKETCH.DID
 THE ENGINEER USE THE SIMPLIFIED METHOD
 IN ASCE7-98 SUBSECTION 6.4 OR THE
 ANALYTICAL METHOD IN SECTION 6.5?IN
 EITHER CASE, HOW WERE THE EDGE AREAS OF
 4' AND 5' DETERMINED FOR A BUILDING WITH
 A LEAST DIMENSION OF 73' AND A MEAN
 ROOF HEIGHT OF 16.5'?
  
 SEE FBC 13-400.3 FOR COMPUTER BASED
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE ATTENDANT
 METHODS TO BE USED.ALSO, THE 6020 SF
 GROSS AREA INPUT DOES NOT AGREE WITH THE
 PLANS' 6700+ SQUARE FEET CONDITIONED
 AREA.PLEASE REVISE AS NECESSARY.
  
 THE IMPACT FEES AND NOAS CALLED OUT
 IN THE FIRST CHECKLIST REMAIN
 APPLICABLE.
  
 6.)BEFORE RESUBMITTING, PLEASE
 CONFIRM THAT THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING
 PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED COMPLY WITH
 THE DESIGN CRITERIA ON SHEET 4.1.
 SHINGLES
 STEEL DOORS, DOUBLE AND SINGLE
 OVERHEAD DOOR
 LOUVERS
 IMPACT PROTECTION
 WINDOWS
  
 7.)I SEE FROM THE RESPONSE LETTER
 DATED 12/22/03, ITEM #12, IT INDICATES
 THAT THE DETAIL 11/10.3 DOES NOT EXIST.
 WHY DOES IT STILL APPEAR ON THE BUILDING
 PLANS?THERE IS STILL NO DETAIL FOR
 THE COLUMN.EXPLAINING IN A LETTER
 THE DESIGN INTENTION FOR THAT COLUMN
 DOES NOT PUT THAT ON THE BUILDING PLANS.
 PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE
 MISSING 11-10.3 ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN
 AND INCLUDE THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT
 FOR W10X22 TO THE MC1.
  
 8.)A RESPONSE WAS MADE THAT EACH
 MC1 ON REVISED S1 IS NOW MC4.THE PLANS
 STILL SHOW MC1.EITHER PROVIDE A
 SPECIFICATION FOR MC1 ON THE COLUMN
 SCHEDULE OR CHANGE THE MC1S ON THE PLAN
 TO MC4.
  
 9.)A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE
 FILED WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS BEFORE A
 PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED.
  
 10.) FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING
 THE IMPACT FEES REQUIRED, CALL 233-5025.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2004-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By hpiskura Date 2004-01-16 Time 14:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hpiskura Date 2004-01-16 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2004-01-16 00:00:00SECOND CHECKLIST
 ARCHITECTUAL PLANS DATED 12/22/03 AND
 STRUCTURAL PLANS DATED 12/19/03.
  
 THE PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED SURVEY AND SITE
 PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED.SHEET 2.1
 TITLED SITE PLAN, DOES NOT HAVE ANY
 HORIZONTAL CONTROL DIMENSIONS TO LOCATE
 THE BUILDING OR ANYTHING ELSE ON THE
 PROPERTY.PROPERTY LINES ARE NOT
 IDENTIFIED. SECTION 2, ON SHEET 2.1
 SHOWS A SITE WALL DETAIL WITH THE NOTE
 THAT THE FF ELEV.IS 27.25' NGVD.IS
 THIS OF RELEVANCE TO THE SITE WALL?
  
 2THE ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER
 DATED 12/22/03 STATES THAT A "FIRE
 RISERSCHEMATIC" CAN BE FOUND ON REVISED
 SHEET ME2. SHEET ME2 DATED 12/19/03
 FROMCHANE, INC. HAS NO FIRE SPRINKLER
 DESIGN INFORMATION ON IT.
  
 3RESPONSE #3 OF THE ARCHITECT'S
 LETTERSTATES THAT THE ATTIC SPACE WILL
 HOUSE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, SEE SHEET
 M1 NOTE 5A FOR GRAVITY LOADS.SHEETS
 M1 AND M2 ARE BEREFT OF ANY NOTES.
  
 4ARCHITECTS RESPONSE #5 RE: THE
 OUTDATED CODE STANDARDS TO REFER TO
 REVISED SHEET S3.THE S3 SHEET STILL
 CONTAINS ERRONEOUS AND OUTDATED
 INFORMATION.IT IS PARTICULARLY
 TROUBLESOME TO ME THAT A PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEER USES AN OUDATED PRESCRIPTIVE
 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN FOR A COMMERCIAL
 BUILDING.
  
 5THE PREVIOUS REQUEST FOR HIGH LIFT
 GROUTING HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED.SHEET
 S3 REFERS TO SPECIFICATIONS THAT WERE
 NOT FOUND.
  
 6COLUMNS SHOWN AS MC1 ARE NOT IN THE
 COLUMN SCHEDULE ON SHEET S3.IS THE
 12/22/03 LETTER FROM THE ARCHITECT
 INTENDED TO BE MADE A PART OF THE
 PERMIT PLANS SINCE THOSE RESPONSES HAVE
 SOME OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS ABSENT
 FROM THE PLANS?
  
 7THE REQUESTED COLUMN CONNECTIONS FOR
 THE TS COLUMNS SHOWN ON SHEETS S1 AND
 S2 HAVENOT BEEN PROVIDED.
  
 8SHEET S3 ROOF WIND ZONE SKETCH.DID
 THE ENGINEER USE THE SIMPLIFIED METHOD
 IN ASCE 7-98 SECTION 6.4 OR THE
 ANALYTICAL METHOD IN SECTION 6.5?IN
 EITHER CASE, HOW WERE EDGE AREAS OF 4'
 AND 5' DETERMINED FOR A BUILDING WITH A
 LEAST DIMENSION OF 73' AND A MEAN ROOF
 HEIGHT OF 16.5'?WHERE ARE ZONES 4&5?
  
 9SEE FBC 13-400.3 FOR COMPUTER BASED
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE ATTENDANT
 METHODS TO BE USED.ALSO, THE 6020 SF
 GROSS AREA INPUT DOES NOT AGREE WITH
 THE PLANS' 6700 + SQUARE FEET
 CONDITIONED AREA.PLEASE REVISE AS
 NECESSARY.
  
 10THE IMPACT FEES AND NOA'S CALLED OUT
 IN THE FIRST CHECKLIST REMAIN
 APPLICABLE.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2003-10-21 Cont ID  
Sent By hpiskura Date 2003-10-21 Time 09:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hpiskura Date 2004-01-16 Time 14:55 Sent To ENG
Notes
2003-10-21 00:00:00PLEASE PROVIDE A RECENT PROPERTY SURVEY
 AND A SITE PLAN WITH DIMENSIONS LOCATING
 THE PROPOSED BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY.
 SEE FBC 104.2.4.
  
 PLEASE SHOW THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
 ON THE PLANS, INCLUDING SPRINKLER
 DESIGN. SEE FBC 104.3.1.1.
  
 SHEET S2.WHAT WILL THE ATTIC SPACE BE
 USED FOR AND WHAT ARE THE DESIGN LIVE
 AND DEAD LOADS?
  
 WHAT WILL THE VAULT SHOWN ON SHEET 3.1
 BE USED FOR?
  
 THE STANDARDS CITED ON SHEET S3, LIKE
 ACI, ARE NOT THE EDITIONS INVOKED BY
 THE FBC.SEE FBC 3501 AND REVISE AND
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE AS NECESSARY.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE
 HIGH LIFT GROUTING CALLED OUT IN NOTE
 J(3) ON S3.
  
 NOTE P3 ON S3 CITES SSTD 10-97 WHICH IS
 NEITHER CURRENT OR APPLICABLE TO THIS
 BUILDING FOR DESIGN OF THE ROOF
 DIAPHRAGM SYSTEM.PLEASE REVISE AND
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 2310.
 (DO NOT QUOTE CODE SECTIONS)
  
 THE DOORS SHOWN AS 110 & 111 AND 108
 ON SHEET 3.1, SWINGING INTO CORRIDORS
 109 AND 106 RESPECTIVELY, ARE
 PROHIBITTED BY FBC 1012.1.4.
  
 THE WINDOW SCHEDULE AND SHEET 10.1
 DECLARES A DESIGN WIND SPEED OF 110
 MPH.THECITY OF WEST PALM BEACH IS IN
 A 140 MPH WIND ZONE.PLEASE REVISE AS
 NECESSARY.
  
 THE ROOF ZONE SKETCH ON SHEET S3 IS NOT
 CLEAR.SEE ASCE 7-98 TABLE 6-5B.WHERE
 ARE THE WALL PRESSURES ZONES 4 & 5 ?
 WHAT IS THE BASE VELOCITY PRESSURE?
 HOW WERE THE DOOR AND WINDOWS PRESSURES
 SHOWN DETERMINED?
  
 SHEET S3 SECTION 5, PLEASE SPECIFY THE
 WELDS TO USED FOR THE HURRICANE STRAPS.
  
 SHEET S2, HOW IS THE W 10X22 CONNECTED
 TO THE MC 1 COLUMN?WHERE IS SECTION
 11/10.3 FOUND?
  
 MC 1 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE COLUMN
 SCHEDULE.
  
 SHOW THE ATTIC ACCESS AND ATTIC
 VENTILATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC
 2309.6 AND 2309.7.ALSO SHOW THE FREE
 AREA CALCULATION AND NOTE WHETHER THE
 LATH FREE AREA TOGETHER WITH THE SCREEN
 AREA HAS BEEN USED.
  
 SHOW THE COLUMN CONNECTIONS, TOP AND
 BOTTOM, FOR THE STEEL COLUMNS DEPICTED
 ON SHEET S.2.
  
 SHEET 8.1, SHOW THE FIRE BLOCKING AS
 PROVIDED FOR IN FBC 705.3.1.1 FOR THE
 CHASEWALL SHOWN AS [D], OR THE FIRE
 STOPPING METHOD.
  
 THE ENERGY CODE INPUT DATA SHEET SHOWS
 VALUES FOR THE ROOF CONSTRUCTION
 MATERIAL.FBC 13-404.1ABCD REQUIRES
 THE CEILING TO BE USED WHEN THERE IS A
 VENTED CAVITY.PLEASE REVISE AS
 NECESSARY.
  
 IF TEST REPORTS AND/OR NOA'S FOR THE
 DOORS, WINDOWS AND ROOF COVERING ARE
 NOT INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION, SEPARATE PERMIT(S), FEES
 AND INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MAY BE
 ISSUED IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO THE
 COUNTY, THE PERMIT PLANS STAMPED BY
 THAT OFFICE AND A COPY OF THE PAID
 RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION.CALL (561) 233-5025 FOR
 MORE INFORMATION.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2004-07-27 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2004-07-27 Time 14:52 Rev Time 0.33
Received By dpalmer Date 2004-07-27 Time 14:45 Sent To  
Notes
2004-07-27 00:00:00** REDLINED **
  
 CONDUCTORS FROM GUTTER TO PANEL "T" TO
 BE SIZED PER 310.16 (75) DEGREE COL.
 350MCM AS SHOWN IS NOT LARGE ENOUGH.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2004-01-02 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2004-01-02 Time 06:13 Rev Time 0.33
Received By dpalmer Date 2004-01-02 Time 06:13 Sent To  
Notes
2004-01-02 00:00:00*************** UNSAT **************
  
 1)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT/SHOW THE GROUNDING
 ELECTRODE SYSTEM PER 250.50 BLDG/FOOTER/
 CWP ETC. FIRST REVIEW NOTE.
  
 2)NOTE: PLEASE SHOW/CLARIFY EQUIPMENT
 GROUNDING BETWEEN MAINAND GUTTER AND
 GUTTER AND PANELS. 250.110, 250.24, SIZE
 PER 250.122
  
 3)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATING FOR
 MAIN. NOTE MENTIONS FPL FAULT CURRENT
 AND PANELS ARE SHOWN WITH BRANCH BRKRS
 RATED AT 42K. 110.9/215.5
  
 4)NOTE: RISER SHOWS PARALLEL RUNS TO
 METER YET NOT FROM METER TO MAIN AND
 GUTTER. PLEASE CLARIFY. SAME CONDUCTORS
 ETC ARE CARRIED THROUGH.
  
 PLEASER SEE PLANS ARE COMING BACK FOR
 FIRE REIVEW COMMENTS. PLEASE SEE.
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS,
 PLEASE CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2003-10-07 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2003-10-07 Time 06:31 Rev Time 1.50
Received By dpalmer Date 2003-10-06 Time 16:53 Sent To  
Notes
2003-10-07 00:00:00************** UNSAT ***************
  
 1)NOTE: PLEASE CORRELATE ALL CIRCUITING
 ON PLANS WITH PANEL SCHEDULES.
 THERE ARE A SOME CIRCUITS THAT DO NOT
 CORRELATE,SEE A COUPLE OF CIRCUITS SHOWN
 ON PLAN AND NOT ON PANEL SCHEDULE.
  
 2)NOTE; PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND PANEL
 (S). PANEL S IS TETC.
 PLEASE CORRECT CONDUCTOR SIZES ACCORD.
 TO PANEL.
  
 3)NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT PANEL "T" IS
 SHOWN HAVING NO NEUTRAL, HOWEVER THE
 NEUTRAL IS REQ'D TO TERMINATE IN PANEL
 EVEN IF IT IS GOING TO USED.
  
 4)NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT THERE IS NO
 GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM SHOWN?
 PLEASE SEE 250.50/250.66
  
 5)NOTE: PLEASE SEE TOTAL AMPS SHOWN FOR
 "C" PHASE ON PANEL "S". 9595A'S
  
 6)NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT AIC RATINGS FOR
 MAIN ETC. 110.9
  
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE ABOVE INFORMATION FOR
 REVIEW. 215.5 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS
 PLEASE CALL.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2003-12-24 Cont ID  
Sent By mamini Date 2003-12-24 Time 11:03 Rev Time 1.00
Received By mamini Date 2003-12-24 Time 11:03 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2003-10-22 Cont ID  
Sent By hpiskura Date 2003-10-21 Time 11:02 Rev Time 1.00
Received By mamini Date 2003-10-22 Time 14:27 Sent To  
Notes
2003-10-22 00:00:00FAILED:
 1. PLEASE NOTE THAT A SEPARATE PERMIT
 APPLICATION AND FEES FOR" UNDERGROUND
 UTILITIES AND SITE WORK" IS REQUIRED,
 SUBMIT CIVIL PLANS ONLY,SIGNED & SEALED.
 2. CIVIL PLANS MUST INCLUDE DRANAGE SYS.
 IT MUST BE DESIGNED PER CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH CRITERIA AND REQUIREMENT.
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT STORM WATER CALCULATION
 ,IT SHOULD INCLUDE CALC. FOR PERVIOUS,
 IMPERVIOUS AND TOTAL SITE AREA,(SIGNED &
 SEALED).
 3. PLEASE INCLUDE POLLUTION PREVENTION
 PLANS IT SHOULD BE INSTALLED IN FIELD
 PRIOR TO ANY EARTH/SITE WORK.
 4. PLEASE LABEL F.D.C AS SHOWN, SITE
 PLAN 1 OF 2.
 5. ALL PIPES CONNECTING TO CITY SERVICES
 MUST BE SIZED, METER,BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
 ,DDCV,PIPES, ETC..
 6. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO SETS OF CIVIL PLANS
 TO PUBLIC UTILITIES & ENGINEERING ATT:
 JIM SPEACH, FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE
 CONNECTIONS TO THE CITY SERVICES.
 659-8040 EXT. 2317
 7. ALL THE CITY STANDARD MAY BE OBTAINED
 FROM PUBLIC UTILITIES & ENGINEERING
 659-8040,JIM SPEACH.
 IF ANY QUESTION PLEASE CONTACT 805-6723
 MOHAMMAD R. AMINI
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2004-09-23 Cont ID  
Sent By nmccray Date 2004-09-23 Time 11:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By nmccray Date 2004-09-23 Time 11:56 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2004-07-28 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 2004-07-28 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 2004-07-28 Time 15:10 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2003-12-29 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 2003-12-29 Time 16:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 2003-12-29 Time 16:42 Sent To  
Notes
2003-12-29 00:00:001) ALL DOORS THAT COULD BE SUBJECT
 TO TRAFFIC OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS
 SHALL HAVE PANIC HARDWARE. DOORS
 103A, 104A, AND 109 SHOULD ALSO HAVE
 PANIC HARDWARE.
  
 2) FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED
 AT TIME OF PERMIT.
  
 3) COULD NOT LOCATE PAGE 3.2.
  
 MIKE CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 835-2910
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2003-09-19 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 2003-09-19 Time 16:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 2003-09-19 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
2003-09-19 00:00:001) NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS OR
 HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS PROVIDED WITH
 DRAWINGS. THE CODE SUMMARY BOX
 INDICATES THAT THE BUILDING WILL BE
 FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED.
  
 2) PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED OCCUPANT
 LOAD FOR THE BUILDING.
  
 3) PANIC HARDWARE IS REQUIRED ON
 EXIT DOORS IF 100 OR MORE PERSONS
 ARE EXPECTED.
  
 4) PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH
 CLASSIFICATION FOR WALLS AND CEILINGS.
  
 5) THE ACCORDIAN FOLDING PARTITION IS
 COMPRISED OF WHAT CONSTRUCTION.
  
 6) BUILDING ADDRESS IS REQUIRED ON
 PROPER ELEVATION. A MINIMUM OF 6"
 NUMBERS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 7) AT LEAST TWO OF THE DOORS APPEAR
 TO SWING TOO FAR INTO THE CORRIDOR.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN RATIONALE.
  
 8) PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL FIRE SAFETY
 EQUIPMENT AND OR DEVICES ARE SHOWN
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 MIKE CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 835-2910
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2004-09-15 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2004-09-15 Time 10:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By csiegber Date 2004-09-15 Time 10:24 Sent To B
Notes
2004-09-15 00:00:00TO COMM BD#40
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2004-07-14 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2004-07-14 Time 15:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By csiegber Date 2004-07-14 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2004-07-14 00:00:00TO COMM BD#39
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2003-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2003-12-23 Time 11:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By csiegber Date 2003-12-23 Time 11:29 Sent To  
Notes
2003-12-23 00:00:00TO COMM BD#3
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2003-09-19 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2003-09-19 Time 08:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By csiegber Date 2003-09-19 Time 08:41 Sent To  
Notes
2003-09-19 00:00:00ON COMM BD#
 ON COMM BD #17
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2003-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By sgraham Date 2003-09-18 Time 10:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By csiegber Date 2003-09-17 Time 14:05 Sent To Z
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2004-07-21 Cont ID  
Sent By pkrauss Date 2004-07-21 Time 07:37 Rev Time 0.45
Received By pkrauss Date 2004-07-21 Time 06:59 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2004-01-06 Cont ID  
Sent By pkrauss Date 2004-01-06 Time 07:14 Rev Time 0.35
Received By pkrauss Date 2004-01-06 Time 07:03 Sent To  
Notes
2004-01-06 00:00:00DENIED:
 PLEASE NOTE THE VAULT ROOM IS INDICATED
 AS A 3 HR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING.FIRE
 DAMPERS ARE NOT INDICATED AT THE WALL
 PENETRATION OR CEILING PENETRATIONS.
 PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE
 CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561) 805-6719.
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2003-10-10 Cont ID  
Sent By pkrauss Date 2003-10-10 Time 12:59 Rev Time 0.55
Received By pkrauss Date 2003-10-10 Time 12:59 Sent To  
Notes
2003-10-10 00:00:00DENIED:
 FAN SHUTDOWN BY DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS
 AS PER 2001 FBC(M) 606.2.1 WITH
 NOTIFICATION TO ALARM/STROBE IN
 NORMALLY OCCUPIED AREAS AS PER NFPA 90A
 4-4.4.3.
  
 ROOF STANDS FOR THE CONDENSING UNITS
 SHALL COMPLY WITH 2001 FBC 1511.7 SEE
 ATTACHED.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE
 CONTACT PATTY KRAUSS AT (561) 805-6719.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2004-07-30 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2004-07-30 Time 08:24 Rev Time 0.75
Received By kstevens Date 2004-07-30 Time 08:24 Sent To  
Notes
2004-07-30 00:00:00PASSED/PROVISO
  
 AN RPZ BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER
 SERVICE & THERMAL EXPANSION CONTROL IS
 REQUIRED. 608.13.2/607.3.2
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2004-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2004-01-13 Time 18:44 Rev Time 1.00
Received By kstevens Date 2004-01-13 Time 18:39 Sent To  
Notes
2004-01-13 00:00:00DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 PLUMBING
 FBC-2001 BUILDING
  
 1) PER CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN RESPONSE
 TO 1ST REVIEW, MORE FIXTURES WILL BE RE-
 QUIRED PER TABLE 403. WITH THE CHURCH
 OCCUPANCY BEING 2958 DEVIDED BY 7 NET =
 422.57 ROUNDED UP TO 423 DIVIDED BY 2 =
 111.5 ROUNDED UP TO 112. PER POTTY PARI-
 TY THAT IS 2 FOR MEN & 3 FOR WOMEN. THE
 BUSINESS AREA IS 2824 DIVIDED BY 100 =
 28.24 ROUNDED UP TO 29 IS ONE WATER
 CLOSET AND STORAGE IS 965 DIVIDED BY
 300 (TABLE 1003.1) = 3.21 ROUNDED UP TO
 4. ADDED TO THE 29 FROM BUSINESS THERE
 WILL STILL BE ONE MORE WATER CLOSET REQ-
 UIRED MINIMUM. IF ADDED TO THE MENS
 TOILET ROOM THEN POTTY PARITY IS NOT
 BEING ADDRESSED.
 2) SHT ME2 HAS NOT CHANGED. INFORMATION
 HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO SHT ME1 AND ME2
 STILL HAS INCORRECT WATER RISER. A NEW
 SHEET SP-1 HAS BEEN ADDED FOR INFORMAT-
 ION PREVIOUSLY ON SHT ME1. PLEASE
 CLAIRFY, AS THE INFORMATION CAN NOT BE
 APPROVED.
 3) ENGINEERS NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER
 MISSING FROM SHTS ME2 AND SP-1.
 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 653-2692
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2003-10-15 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2003-10-15 Time 12:27 Rev Time 1.25
Received By kstevens Date 2003-10-15 Time 12:27 Sent To  
Notes
2003-10-15 00:00:00DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2001 BUILDING
 FBC-2001 PLUMBING
 FBC-2001 CHAPTER 1
 FBC-2001 CHAPTER 11
  
 1) PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM
 FIXTURE FACILITIES PER TABLE 403.1
 PLUMBING AND TABLE 1003.1 BUILDING.
 SHOW SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH OCCUPANCY
 OF THE BUILDING, ASSEMBLY, BUSINESS, &
 STORAGE.
 2) SECTION 4.3.1.1 IN ASSEMBLY OCCUPAN-
 CIES, RESTROOMS WHICH ARE OPEN TO THE
 PUBLIC MUST HAVE A RATIO OF 3 TO 2 W/C'S
 PROVIDED FOR WOMEN AS THE COMBINED TOTAL
 OF W/C'S AND URNALS PROVIDED FOR MEN. AS
 IT SHOWN, A MINIMUM OF 5 W/C'S WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR WOMEN. (3 X 1.5 = 4.5 ROUND
 UP TO 5).
 3) SHT ME2 WATER ISOMETRIC, AIR CHAMBERS
 ARE NOT APPROVED. SECTION 604.9
 DELETE AIR CHAMBERS FROM ISOMETRIC.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 653-2692
 E-MAIL [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2003-09-18 Cont ID  
Sent By csiegber Date 2003-09-17 Time 14:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By sgraham Date   Time   Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved