2002-06-10 00:00:00 | |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| PERMIT: 02041957 |
| ADD: LOT#48 SEC#5 RENAISSANCE |
| CONT: HOME DYNAMICS CONSTRUCTION |
| TEL: (954)275-8569 |
| FL BLD CODE= 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| |
| 1)FL BLDG 1909.3 (EXEPTION# 2) |
| CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE CONTAINING 6X6/ |
| W1.4XW1.4 WELDED WIRE REINFORCEMENT |
| FABRIC LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE TO THE |
| UPPER 1/3RD OF THE SLAB SHALL BE SUP- |
| PORTED BY APPROVED MATERIALS OR SUPPORTS |
| AT SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 3 FT OR IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPEC. |
| |
| 2)1804.1.3 THE BOTTOM OF THE FOUNDA- |
| TION SHALL EXTEND NO LESS THAN 12" |
| BELOW FINISH GRADE. SHEET A-4, TYPICAL |
| WALL SEC NOTE 1821.1.1 IS FOR "HIGH WIND |
| AREAS". |
| |
| 3) FL BLD CODE 1804.2.2 QUESTIONABLE |
| SOILS, WHERE THE BEARING CAPACITY IS |
| NOT DEFINETLY KNOWN OR IS IN QUESTION. |
| THE REPORT SUBMITTED INDICATES ON PAGE |
| #9"THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS |
| REPORT IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR A FINAL |
| DESIGN OF THE FOUNDATION" |
| |
| SHEET A-1 BOTTOM RIGHT OF CENTER, |
| DISSCREPANCY, PLANS CONFORM TO 2001FBC |
| /ASCE 5-95, SHOULD READ 7-98. |
| |
| 5) PLANS INDICATE CHANGES IN BLACK INK, |
| QUESTIONABLE AS TO WHOS CHANGES THESE |
| ARE? PRESSURE ZONES , ARE ALSO ADDED |
| WITHOUT THE ARCHETECTS INTITIALS OR |
| ACCOMPANYING SIGNED / SEALED LETTER. |
| |
| 6) ACOPY OF THE ASSOCIATIONS COVENANT, |
| THE ROOF IS OVER THE ZERO-SIDE PROPERTY |
| LINE. |
| |
| 7) FL BLD CODE 1606.1.5: COMPONENTS & |
| CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESH- |
| OLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) OF PRODUCT |
| TESTING REPORT, SBCCI OR DADE COUNTY |
| REPORT ARE ACCEPTED. |
| A) ROOFING REPORT, PROVIDE A CURRENT |
| ROOFING ASSEMBLY REPORT. |
| B) GARAGE DOOR,OVERHEAD DOOR, HIGHLIGHT |
| THE MODEL TO BE USED. |
| C) FRONT ENTRY DOOR, 2 COPIES |
| D) GLASS BLOCK, TO BE 1 HOUR RATED!!! |
| THE GLASS BLOCK ARE LOCATED ON A 1HR. |
| RATED WALL, NO OPENINGS ALLOWED NO |
| DERATING FOR OPENINGS. |
| E) STORM SHUTTERS PROVIDE A KEY PLAN |
| W/ TESTING REPORT. |
| F) 1707.4.5.1 MULLIONS OCCURRING |
| BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL WINDOW AND GLASS |
| DOOR ASSEMBLIES. TESTING REPORTS ARE |
| REQUIRED BY AN APPROVED TESTING |
| LABORATORY OR BE ENGINEERED. |
| |
| 8)1707.4.5.2 MULLIONS SHALL BE DESIGN- |
| ED TO TRANSFER THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS |
| APPLIED BY THE WINDOW OR DOOR ASSEMBLIES |
| TO THE ROUGH OPENING SUBTRATE. |
| |
| 9)1707.4.4.1 ANCHOR REQUIREMENTS: |
| WINDOW & DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE ANCHOR |
| ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLISHED |
| MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO |
| ACHIEVE THEDESIGN PRESSURE SPECIFIED. |
| SUBSTITUTE ANCHORING SYSTEM USED FOR |
| THE SUBSTRATE NOT SPECIFIED BY THE |
| FENESTRATION MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE |
| EQUAL OR GREATER ANCHORING AS DEMONSTRA- |
| TED BY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. |
| SHEET A-4 DETAILS INDICATE A DIFFERENT |
| METHOD OF ATTACHMENT THAN SPECIFIED BY |
| THE PRODUCT APPROVAL,CHECK ALL REPORTS |
| VS DETAILS! |
| |
| 10)FL BLD CODE CHAP 13 ENERGY EFFICENCY |
| PROVIDE ENERGY CALS/ W MANUAL "J" |
| 11) |
| SHEET A-2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN, DOES NOT |
| PROVIDE THE MAGNITUDE OF FORCES THAT |
| ARE TO BE RESISTED, VERTICAL, HORIZONTAL |
| OR GRAVITY. |
| |
| 12) TRUSS ANCHOR SCHEDULE NOT INCLUDED, |
| INDICATE MANUFACTURER, AND MODEL, DELETE |
| ALL NOTES FOR SEMCO AND HUGHES, THESE |
| MANUFACTURERS ARE NO LONGER IN BUSINESS. |
| |
| 13) SHEET A-4 NO IDENTIFICATION AS TO |
| WHAT TYPE OF LATH IS TO BE USED FOR THE |
| STUCO SOFFIT, FL BLDG CODE 2504.2.2. |
| 2504.2.2 INSTALLATION OF EXTERIOR |
| LATHING AND FRAMING SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| ASTM C-1063. |
| |
| 14) SHEET A-4 SECTION 1 TYPICAL 2-STORY |
| TABLE 600 FOOTNOTE "I" THE FIRE RESIS- |
| TANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALLS |
| WITH 5' OR LESS IN HORIZONTAL SEPERATION |
| SHALL BE BASED UPON BOTH INTERIOR AND |
| EXTERIOR FIRE EXPOSURES. |
| 709.6.2.2 THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF |
| A WOOD FRAMED ASSEMBLY IS EQUAL TO THE |
| SUM OF THE TIME ASSIGNED TO THE MEMBRANE |
| ON THE FIRE EXPOSED SIDE, THE TIME |
| ASSIGNED TO THE FRAMING MEMBERS AND THE |
| TIME ASIGNED FOR ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION |
| BY OTHER PROTECTIVE MEASURES SUCH AS |
| INSULATION. THE MEMBRANE ON THE |
| UNEXPOSED SIDE SHALL NOT BE INCLUDED IN |
| DETERMINING THE FIRE RESISTANCE OF THE |
| ASSEMBLY. |
| |
| 15) THIS SECOND FLOOR DETAIL NEEDS CLARI |
| FICATIONA CONTINIOUS LOAD PATH OF RESIS- |
| TANCE NEEDS TO BE ACHEIVED, USE A CURREN |
| T MANUFACTURER OFTHE HURRICANE RESIS- |
| TANT STRAP,DELETE THE NOTE" STRAP |
| EMBEDED 6" INTO CONCRETE, WHERE A WOOD |
| TO WOOD CONECTION IS REQUIRED! |
| THIS SAME DETAIL INDICATES NO RIM |
| JOIST, BAND BOARD, WHAT WILL THE STRAP |
| BE FASTENED TO? CONTINIOUS PATH! |
| ALSO 2X4 BLOCKING , IF THE STUD STRAPP- |
| ING IS TO FASTEN TO THE BLOCKING, HOW |
| WILL CONTINIOUS PATH OCCUR? |
| |
| 15) SHEET A-2 NOTE#3 THE ARCHETECT OF |
| RECORD NOTES THAT " THE TRUSS BRACING ON |
| THIS PLAN SUPERCEDES THE BRACING SHOWN |
| ON THE TRUSS ENGINEER'S SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| DOES THIS MEAN IF THERE IS A FAILURE DO |
| TO BRACING THE ARCHETECT SHALL RESUME |
| RESPONSIBILITY? |
| |
| 16) THE SIDE ENTRY GATE & WALL DEPICTS |
| A 5'-0" SECTION, TO BE INCLUDED UNDER |
| THIS PERMIT. |
| |
| 17)ACOPY OF THE CALCULATED FEES ARE |
| ATTACHED. |
| |
| 18)BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE |
| ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM |
| BEACH CO.,THE PERMIT PLANS STAMPED BY |
| THEM AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE |
| PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| |
| 19)A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF |
| COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A |
| PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. |
| |
| ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL, |
| JIM WITMER |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| (561) 659-8096 EXT. 8412 |