Plan Review Stops For Permit 01090101 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2001-11-05 |
Time |
15:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2001-11-05 00:00:00 | SEE STOP R 11-5-01 RM |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2001-10-02 |
Time |
08:18 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2001-10-02 00:00:00 | *************BUILDING UNSAT************* | | | | 1) IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM | | BEACH COUNTY, PLANS STAMPED BY THEM AND | | COPY OF RECEIPT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT, | | BEFORE A BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 2) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT MUST BE SUBMITTED BEFORE A | | PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 3) PROVIDE (2) COPIES OF RECENT SURVEY, | | SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED. | | | | 4) PROVIDE SOIL TEST PER SEC. 1804.2.2 | | OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO 1997 SBC. | | | | 5) THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT (AVERAGE HEIGHT | | OF HIGHEST ROOF ABOVE FINISH GRADE) | | LISTED ON THE DESIGN CERTIFICATION FORM | | IS NOT CORRECT IT SHOULD BE 17'AND BASIC | | VELOCITY PRESSURE WILL BE 25.6. PLEASE | | CORRECT. | | | | 6) PLEASE REVIEW THE TYPICAL WALL | | SECTION ON SHEET A-4. THE CITY OF WPB | | AMENDMENTS TO THE 97 SBC REQUIRE FLOOR | | ELEVATION TO BE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES | | ABOVE THE FINISH GRADE. | | | | 7) THE REFERENCE MARKS FOR DETAILS 9,10, | | 11 AND 12 ON SHEET A-6 ARE INCORRECT. | | THESE DETAILS ARE LOCATED ON SHEET A-5. | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 8)PROVIDE (2) CURRENT AND COMPLETE | | COPIES OF SBCCI OR METRO-DADE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS FOR: | | - ROOFING | | - STORM PANELS | | - SH AND FIXED GLASS WINDOWS | | - DOUBLE OUTSWING DOORS | | - STRUCTURAL MULLIONS | | - SLIDING GLASS DOORS | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)659-8096 EXT.8202 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-05-09 |
Time |
07:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2002-05-09 |
Time |
07:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-09-11 |
Time |
16:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2001-09-11 |
Time |
16:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-09-06 |
Time |
17:45 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2001-09-06 |
Time |
17:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2002-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-02-28 |
Time |
15:56 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2002-02-28 |
Time |
15:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2002-02-28 00:00:00 | REVISIONS OK - SANT RISER DIAGRAM |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2001-09-06 |
Time |
18:50 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2001-09-06 |
Time |
18:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2001-12-27 |
Time |
10:10 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2001-12-27 00:00:00 | REVISIONS (A-5 & A-6) AND TRUSSES | | DENIED | | | | 1) DETAIL 9 ON A-5 STATES (2) 5/8" DIA. | | THRU- BOLTS EACH GIRDER AND INDICATES | | (2) TWO MEMBER GIRDER TRUSSES JOINED IN | | THE STEEL COLUMN SEAT. GIRDER SG-1 IS | | (1) TWO MEMBER GIRDER TRUSS WITH THE | | STEEL COLUMN SEAT LOCATED AT AN | | INTERMEADIATE POINT OF ITS SPAN. | | THEREFORE, THE 4 THRU-BOLTS INDICATED | | WILL BE LOCATED IN THE 2X6 WEB OF THE | | GIRDER TRUSSES. PLEASE REVIEW THE | | SPECIFIED BOLT SPACING OF THE STEEL | | COLUMN SEAT AND REVISE IF REQUIRED. | | | | 2) THERE ARE NO CONNECTORS INDICATED ON | | SHEET A-6 FOR THE HJ7C OR HJ7 TRUSSES. | | PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 3) THE UPLIFT FOR TRUSS H1 (1608#) | | EXCEEDS THE CAPACITY OF THE (2) TC-3S | | (721# EA.) SPECIFIED. | | | | 4) TRUSSES H2,H5,AND T1 EXCEED UPLIFT | | CAPACITIES OF SPECIFIED CONNECTORS. | | | | 5) TRUSS CJ6A (UPLIFT 468#) EXCEEDS THE | | CAPACITY OF THE SPECIFIED TC1 CONNECTOR | | (417#). | | | | 6) TRUSS M3 (UPLIFT 504#) EXCEEDS THE | | CAPACITY OF TC-1 (417#). | | | | 7) TRUSS M3A (UPLIFT 1503#) EXCEEDS THE | | CAPACITY OF TC-8 (1410#). | | | | 8) TRUSS GR1 (UPLIFT 977# @ JOINT 12) | | EXCEEDS THE CAPACITY OF TC-3 (721#). | | | | 9) TRUSS S4 (UPLIFT 1500#) EXCEEDS THE | | CAPACITY OF TC-8 (1410#). | | | | 10) TRUSS S8 (UPLIFT 784#) EXCEEDS THE | | CAPACITY OF TC-3 (721#). | | | | 11) THERE IS NO TRUSS CONNECTOR GIVEN | | ON REVISED SHEET A-6 FOR TRUSS GR6 WITH | | UPLIFT 971# @ JOINT 14. | | | | THE UPLIFT CAPACITIES OF THE CONNECTORS | | MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE CALCULATED | | UPLIFTS OF THE TRUSSES. PLEASE REVIEW | | AND CORRECT ALL ITEMS LISTED. | | PLEASE CALL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)659-8096 EXT.8202 |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-11-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2001-11-28 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2001-11-28 00:00:00 | REVISION FOR LINTELS OK 11-28-01 |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2001-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2001-11-21 |
Time |
09:44 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2001-11-26 00:00:00 | TRUSSES | | DENIED | | | | 1) NO CONNECTOR IS INDICATED ON SHEET | | A-6 FOR TRUSS HJ7 (786# UPLIFT). THERE | | ARE SEVERAL OTHER HIP TRUSSES WITH NO | | CONNECTORS INDICATED. | | | | 2) THE TRUSS ENGINEER IS IMPROPERLY | | SIGNING AND SEALING COPIES OF ANOTHER | | ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS (ROOF VALLEY DETAIL, | | PIGGY-BACK CONNECTION DETAIL, LATERAL | | BRACE DETAIL, STANDARD FALSE BOTTOM | | DETAIL, ETC.) THE CRITERIA SITED IS ALSO | | INCORRECTLY GIVEN AS TPI-92 &SSBC-91. | | SHOULD BE TPI 1-95 AND SBC-97. | | | | 3) THE UPLIFT FOR TRUSS H1 (1608#) | | EXCEEDS THE CONNECTOR (TC-8, 1410#) | | DESIGN CAPACITY. | | | | 4) TRUSS H2 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. | | | | 5) TRUSS H5 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. | | | | 6) TRUSS T1 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. | | | | 7) THE PLANS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE | | TRUSS LAYOUT FOR TRUSSES S8 THROUGH S11. | | | | 8) NO UPLIFT VALUES ARE LISTED ON THE | | TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR TRUSSES S4,S5,S6 AND | | S7. | | | | 9) TRUSS CJ6A EXCEEDS CAPACITY OF | | SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. | | | | 10) TRUSS M3 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. | | | | 11) TRUSS M3A EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. | | | | 12) TRUSS S14 EXCEEDS CONNECTOR RATING. | | | | 13) TRUSS SG1 (UPLIFT 6871#) EXCEEDS | | UPLIFT OF 4225# GIVEN ON SHEET A-6 FOR | | STEEL COLUMN. | | | | 14) MOST OF THE OTHER TRUSSES' UPLIFTS | | ALSO EXCEED THE SPECIFIED CONNECTORS | | LISTED CAPACITIES. | | PLEASE REVIEW ALL TRUSS CONNECTORS AND | | UPLIFT VALUES FOR ALL TRUSSES AND | | PROVIDE REVISED TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE | | AND/OR ROOF FRAMING PLAN (A-6). PLEASE | | NOTE THAT WHEN TWO OR MORE CONNECTORS | | ARE LOCATED WITHIN 8" OF EACH OTHER IN | | A CONCRETE BEAM THE CAPACITY VALUES ARE | | REDUCED. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)659-8096 EXT.8202 |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2001-11-05 |
Time |
13:20 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2001-11-05 00:00:00 | ************BUILDING PROVISO************ | | | | 1) STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN "A0" FLOOD | | ZONE. A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL | | BE REQUIRED. | | | | 2)PROVIDE SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL | | SUBMITTAL FORMS THAT ARE SIGNED, SEALED | | AND DATED BY THE ENGINEER CERTIFYING THE | | COMPONENT AND THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR | | THE STRUCTURE APPROVING THE PRODUCT FOR | | USE IN THEIR STRUCTURE. THE DRAWINGS | | SUBMITTED FOR THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS | | AND WINDOW MULLIONS WERE MISSING THESE | | FORMS. | | | | 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL FORMS | | FOR THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS MUST BE | | SEALED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD AND THE | | ENGINEER, IN ADDITION TO THE DATE, | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL, SHALL LEGIBLY | | INDICATE THEIR NAME, ADDRESS AND NUMBER | | ON EACH DOCUMENT. 61 G15- 23.002 FAC | | | | 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTAL FORMS | | FOR THE OUTSWING EXTERIOR DOORS MUST BE | | SEALED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. THE | | WET SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER IS | | REQUIRED. A COPY OR SIGNATURE STAMP IS | | NOT ACCEPTABLE. | | | | 4) PROVIDE SOIL TEST PER SEC. 1804.2.2 | | OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO 1997 SBC. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2001-10-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2001-10-24 |
Time |
10:13 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|