| DATE | TIME | INSPECTION / EVENT TYPE | INSTRUCTIONS / COMMENTS | | 2022-08-04 | 17:08:49 | REDUCTION HEARING REQ RECEIVED | LIEN REDUCTION APPL WAS PUT IN ON
08/04/22 PERMIT#22080240
|
| 2022-07-27 | 09:03:35 | AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE | COMPLETED AN AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
DATED 7/26/22 AND TURNED IN FOR
PROCESSING.
|
| 2022-07-27 | 08:59:13 | COMMENTS | IN COMPLIANCE 94-442-C-1 COMPLIANCE DATE
WAS : 07/26/22
LANDSCAPING WAS INSTALLED. THIS PROPERTY
IS NOW IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CASE.
|
| 2022-04-26 | 11:17:13 | PHONE CALL | SPOKE TO OWNER TRICIA RIVERS VIA PHONE,
SHE STATES THAT SHE HAS HAD THE
ARTIFICIAL TURF REMOVED BUT HAS NOT
INSTALLED GRASS OR APPROVED GROUND COVER
YET. I EMAILED HER A LINK TO THE
ARTIFICIAL TURF MAYOR/COMMISIONER WORK
SESSION FROM 080221 AND THE POWERPOINT
THAT SHOWS WHICH PLANTS ARE APPROVED.
|
| 2021-08-02 | 11:16:45 | COMMENTS | LIEN RECORDED 07/14/21 FOR 0.00
BOOK 32688 PAGE 1635
|
| 2021-07-06 | 14:52:59 | COMMENTS | FINE CHANGED 94-442-C-1
START DATE: 06/07/21 FINE AMT: 100.00
|
| 2021-07-01 | 12:55:45 | COMMENTS | ADDED FINE ON 94-442-C-1
START DATE: 06/08/21 FINE AMT: 100.00
|
| 2021-06-15 | 12:24:28 | PHONE CALL | MS. RIVERS CALLED AND ASKED WHAT IS
NEEDED TO BE DONE TO COMPLY THIS CASE
AND TO SEE WHAT HER OPTIONS ARE. I
EXPLAINED THAT THE ORDER FOR THIS CASE
IS TO REMOVE ARTIFICIAL TURF AND INSTALL
GRASS AND/OR APPROVED PLANT MATERIAL,
AND ONCE THIS WAS DONE I CAN BE CALLED
OUT TO REINSPECT AND STOP FINES/COMPLY
THIS CASE. AT THE END OF THE CALL SHE
WAS UNSATISFIED WITH THE INFORMATION AND
STATED SHE WILL BE GETTING A LAWYER.
|
| 2021-06-09 | 16:21:56 | AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE | COMPLETED AN AFFIDAVIT OF NON-COMPLIANCE
AND TURNED IN FOR PROCESSING.
|
| 2021-06-07 | 13:04:29 | REINSPECTION FOR SM ORDER FEES | NO CHANGES AT THE PROPERTY. NO CONTACT
FROM OWNER. ALL VIOLATIONS STILL EXIST.
PHOTOS ATTACHED.
|
| 2021-05-03 | 15:13:23 | PHONE CALL | RETURNED ANOTHER CALL TO MS. RIVERS,
THIS TIME REACHING HER. ADVISED HER I
HAD ALREADY SPOKEN WITH MR. RIVERS AND
THE CITY IS BOUND BY THE MAGISTRATE'S
ORDER SO THIS OFFICE IS NOT AUTHORIZED
TO GIVE AN EXTENSION AFTER THE
MAGISTRATE HAS RULED.
|
| 2021-04-29 | 09:06:07 | PHONE CALL | RETURNED CALL TO MS RIVERS AND SPOKE
WITH SOMEONE ADVISING HE IS MR. RIVERS
(ALTHOUGH LISTED OWNER MS. RIVERS
ADVISED OFFICER PAZMINO SHE IS A SINGLE
MOM) WITH MS. RIVERS AUDIBLE INTHE
BACKGROUND. HE INSISTED ON A NEW
HEARING DATE AND CLAIMED THEY KNEW
NOTHING ABOUT THE CASE. ADVISED HIM THAT
OFFICER PAZMINO SPOKE TO MS RIVERS THE
SAME DAY THE TURF WAS INSTALLED BEFORE
IT WAS IN PLACE AND THEY PROCEEDED
ANYWAY. ALSO THAT THE CERTIFIED MAIL
WAS SIGNED FOR ACCORDING TO THE POST
OFFICE. HE DEMANDED A NEW HEARING AND
WAS ADVISED CASES DO NOT GET HEARD
TWICE. HE STATED THERE'S NO WAY THEY
ARE REMOVING THE TURF AS IT COST $7000.
HE WAS ADVISED IF NOT RESTORED TO GRASS
BY 6/7/21 A FINE WOULD START RIUNNING
AND THEN THERE WOULD BE A LIEN ON THE
PROPERTY. HE STATED HE WAS CALLING AN
ATTORNEY AND WAS ADVISED HE WAS WELL
WITHIN HIS RIGHTS TO DO SO AND HIS
ATTORNEY SHOULD CONTACT OUR LEGAL
DEPARTMENT.
|
| 2021-04-27 | 09:46:36 | PHONE CALL | SPOKE TO OWNER. DISCUSSED THAT THE CASE
WENT TO HEARING ALREADY AND HAD PROPER
NOTICE. DISCUSSED THE ORDINANCE FOR
ARTIFICIAL TURF AND THAT IT IS NOT
ALLOWED IN THE CURRENT ORDINANCE. THE
OWNER WANTS AN ORDER EXTENSION AND
EXPRESSED HARDSHIP WITH BEING A SINGLE
MOTHER, I GAVE HER SUPERVISOR CONTACT
INFO.
|
| 2021-04-07 | 13:04:15 | SPECIAL MASTER ORDER | 60/$100
|
| 2021-04-07 | 12:07:44 | NOTICE OF HEARING | 04/07/2021 HEARING SCHEDULED RPAZMINO
|
| 2021-03-29 | 12:07:44 | REINSPECTION | SEE PHOTOS. NO CONTACT FROM OWNER, NO
CHANGES AT THE PROPERTY.
|
| 2021-02-26 | 11:26:45 | CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIVED | 9171999991703928932810-COVID 19
|
| 2021-02-25 | 14:37:16 | CERTIFIED MAIL SENT | 9171999991703928932810
|
| 2021-02-19 | 12:07:44 | NOTICE OF VIOLATION | NOVFINE PRINTED BY RPAZMINO
|
| 2021-02-19 | 11:54:24 | INITIAL INSPECTION | ARTIFICIAL TURF INSTALLED IN FRONT YARD,
LANDSCAPED AREAS MUST BE GRASS OR
APPROVED GROUND COVER, ARTIFICIAL TURF
LOCATION.
SPOKE TO PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO
ARTIFICIAL TURF BEING INSTALLED. AREAS
WERE BEING PREPPED AT THE TIME, I
INFORMED THE OWNER THAT IT IS NOT
ALLOWED AND IT IS A VIOLATION. THE
PROPERTY CONTINUED WITH INSTALLATION.
|
| 2021-02-19 | 11:54:24 | CREATE INITIAL CASE RECORD | VIOLATION RECORDED RPAZMINO
|
