| Date |
Text |
| 2023-07-17 23:54:37 | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS |
| | 1) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE AVAILABLE |
| | 2) PAGE 18, BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, CORRECT |
| | FUTURE BUILD-OUT YEAR FROM 2025 TO 2026 |
| | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE DRI TOTAL AND CONVERTED TRIPS WORKING |
| | FILE. SPECIFICALLY: PROVIDE AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET |
| | SHOWCASING TOTAL NUMBER OF VESTED TRIPS/SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | ALLOWED PER LANDUSE TYPE, AND CURRENT BALANCE. THIS IS |
| | A SIGNIFICANT ITEM FOR TRIP GENERATION VERIFICATION AND |
| | VALIDATION PURPOSES |
| | 4) A MORE ROBUST AND COMPREHENSIVE VALET OPERATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS, INCLUSIVE OF PROPER GRAPHICS DEPICTING |
| | VEHICLE PATHS BETWEEN VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AND GARAGE |
| | PARKING STALLS MUST BE PROVIDED. THE SITE CIRCULATION |
| | AND CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT SHEETS WOULD BE A GREAT |
| | STARTING POINT AND SHOULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE VALET |
| | OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS DOCUMENT. VALET LOCATIONS SHOULD |
| | BE IDEALLY DESIGNATED EITHER PICK-UP OR DROP-OFF ONLY, |
| | DEPENDING ON VALET ROUTES, SO TO MINIMIZE CONGESTION. |
| | LASTLY, THE U-TURN VALET MANEUVER DEPICTED IN THE SITE |
| | CIRCULATION SHEET FOR THE HIBISCUS LOCATION SHOULD BE |
| | AVOIDED/FORBIDDEN, OR AT THE VERY MINIMUM AUTOTURN |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED TO PROVE SAFETY AND |
| | FEASIBILITY OF SUCH MOVEMENT |
| | 5) IN THE CASE VALET SERVICE IS OFFERED TO ANY PATRONS |
| | OF NEIGHBORING RETAIL AND RESTAURANT FACILITIES, THEN |
| | HISTORICAL DATA MUST BE PROVIDED TO CORROBORATE |
| | FEASIBILITY AND OPERABILITY OF THE PROPOSED VALET |
| | LOCATIONS. AS CURRENT ANALYSIS SEEMS TO SIGNIFICANTLY |
| | UNDERESTIMATE POTENTIAL DEMAND. MOREOVER, GIVEN |
| | RECURRING LOCAL EVENTS ENTAILING ROAD CLOSURES (I.E. |
| | ROSEMARY AVE WEEKEND CLOSURE BETWEEN OKEECHOBEE AND |
| | HIBISCUS), ANALYSIS SHOULD PROVIDE CONTINGENCY AND |
| | ALTERNATIVE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 6) PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) |
| | MEASURES WOULD NEED REFINEMENT AND FINALIZATION. A TDM |
| | AGREEMENT, SUCH AS THE ONE DRAFTED FOR THE 360 ROSEMARY |
| | DEVELOPMENT, SHOULD BE DISCUSSED WITH PLANNING AND |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | 7) TROLLEY SERVICE HAS BEEN DISCONTINUED AND IN THE |
| | MIDST OF BEING REPLACED BY NEWER SERVICE VEHICLES AND |
| | ROUTES; PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT |
| | AUTHORITY AND CITY MOBILITY MANAGER FOR LATEST |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE REVISE TRANSIT ASSUMPTIONS IN THE |
| | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ACCORDINGLY |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS |
| | 8) TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN COMMENTS: ROSEMARY VALET |
| | LOCATION NOT CALLED OUT/MARKED, SEVERAL DIMENSIONS |
| | MISSING (E.G. ROADWAY, CROSSWALK, SINGLE TRAVEL LANE), |
| | UTILIZE A MUCH LIGHTER GRAY COLOR FOR PAVEMENT TEXTURED |
| | PATTERNS, REMOVE REDUNDANT OR OBVIOUS CALLOUTS (E.G. |
| | PROPERTY LINE, CROSSWALK, PAVER), REMOVE SETBACK LINES, |
| | REMOVE ELEVATION DATA |
| | 9) EXTRA INFORMATION AND DETAILS PERTAINING SIGNAGE AND |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE HORIZONTAL |
| | CONTROL PLAN. THERE IS NO CLEAR DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN AND THE HORIZONTAL CONTROL |
| | PLAN; APPLICANT COULD MAKE BETTER USE OF EACH |
| | 10) PROVIDE MORE DETAILS OF THE SIDEWALK AREA FRONTING |
| | THE 575 ROSEMARY DEVELOPMENT. BASED ON THE SUBMITTED |
| | PLANS, IT SEEMS THAT NO PARKING STALLS NOR TRANSIT STOP |
| | ARE PRESENT |
| | 11) WHAT IS THE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER WITH THE |
| | HARDSCAPE PLAN DEPICTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK DETAILS? |
| | 12) GIVEN THE HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC WITHIN AND NEARBY |
| | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, SIDEWALK WIDTHS SHOULD BE |
| | MORE THAN THE MINIMUM 8-FEET REQUIREMENT, AT THE VERY |
| | LEAST 10-FEET ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ON HIBISCUS AND |
| | ROSEMARY, UNOBSTRUCTED (METERS, PLANTERS AND LIGHT |
| | POLES SHOULD BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND TAKEN INTO |
| | ACCOUNT). PORTIONS OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG GARDENIA ARE |
| | NOT COMPLIANT (5-FEET), PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 8-FEET AND REMOVE PARKING STALLS IF NECESSARY |
| | 13) AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHEET T-110 AND 111. DRAWING IS |
| | NOT CLEAN, ESPECIALLY NEARBY THE DRIVEWAY. PLEASE |
| | REMOVE ANY ITEMS, LAYERS, ELEMENTS NOT PERTINENT TO THE |
| | ANALYSIS (E.G. ELEVATION, PROPERTY, EASEMENT, AND |
| | SETBACK LINES), WHILE CLEARLY DEPICTING BUILDING WALLS |
| | AND FEATURES THAT MAY ENCROACH WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC |
| | ENVELOPE. WHAT IS THE MERIT OF THE DELIVERY PLAN? |
| | 14) PAVEMENT MARKINGS NEARBY AND ALONG THE THREE LANES |
| | SECTION OF THE ROAD WEST OF THE QUADRILLE AND HIBISCUS |
| | INTERSECTION NEED TO BE MORE DETAILED, SO TO REDUCE |
| | VEHICULAR CONFLICTS AND PROVIDE SAFER AND OPTIMAL |
| | CIRCULATION TO/FROM THE ABUTTING GARAGE DRIVEWAYS |
| | 15) ON HIBISCUS, DUE TO THE CURBLESS ROAD |
| | CONFIGURATION, PLEASE REDUCE THE NUMBER OF |
| | OPENINGS/CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN AREAS AND |
| | VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANES BY MEANS OF PLANTERS/LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLANDS OR OTHER STREET FURNITURES/ELEMENTS (E.G. |
| | BENCH, ARTWORK, BARRIER, ETC.). AT THE SAME TIME, |
| | PROVIDE A WIDER MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK THAN THE ONE |
| | PROPOSED |
| | 16) PROVIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALKS ON ROSEMARY AND |
| | GARDENIA |
| | 17) GIVEN THE EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE TWO EASILY ACCESSIBLE |
| | MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND |
| | PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO |
| | THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V / |
| | 10,000W CIRCUIT). NOTE: THOSE ARE GENERAL MICROMOBILITY |
| | AREAS AND MAY NOT BE DEDICATED TO EXISTING |
| | MICROMOBILITY MODES (I.E. BRIGHT BIKES) |
| | 18) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA |
| | AND BICYCLE ONES. PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET NUMBER |
| | CONTAINING SUCH INFORMATION |
| | 19) LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPOSED VALET |
| | OPERATIONS ON HIBISCUS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO OPTIMAL |
| | CIRCULATION NOR A SAFE TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENT GIVEN |
| | THE SLANTED ALIGNMENT AND ITS VICINITY TO A VEHICULAR |
| | BOTTLENECK/LANE-REDUCTION AREA. MOREOVER, THE CURBSIDE |
| | MANAGEMENT PLAN SHOWCASES VEHICLE PATH ENCROACHMENT |
| | WITH THE OPPOSITE TRAVEL LANE WHEN DEPARTING FROM VALET |
| | STAND. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING AND/OR ESTABLISHING |
| | VALET OPERATIONS ON GARDENIA, AS WELL AS INTERNALIZING |
| | VALET OPERATIONS, ESPECIALLY PICK-UPS, IN THE GARAGE |
| | 20) ON-STREET VALET PICK-UP/DROP-OFF LOCATION SHOULD BE |
| | A MINIMUM OF 12-FEET WIDE, FOR SAFETY PURPOSES |
| | 21) BASED ON THE COORDINATION WITH DDA AND CITY |
| | MOBILITY MANAGER, INCLUDE EXISTING AND PLANNED TRANSIT |
| | ROUTES IN THE CIRCULATION MAP, AS WELL AS DEPICTING AND |
| | MAKING PROVISION FOR TRANSIT STOP LOCATIONS. PLEASE |
| | KEEP THE REVIEWER COPIED IN EACH CORRESPONDENCE ON THE |
| | MATTER. |
| | 22) PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF EXISTING METERED STALLS THAT |
| | ARE BEING REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED, IF ANY |
| | 23) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA |
| | AND BICYCLE ONES. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME/SHEET |
| | NUMBER CONTAINING SUCH INFORMATION |
| | 24) ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, CLEARLY |
| | SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 25) ARE THERE ANY TRANSIT STOPS BEING IMPACTED? |
| | 26) PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE |
| | REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS |
| | 27) PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1) - IN THOSE CASES |
| | WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL, |
| | FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, THE |
| | STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET - PLEASE REVIEW ALL PROPOSED GARAGE |
| | STALLS AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY, IF NEEDED |
| | 28) SHEET TE-A-005.02. DIRECTIONAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON |
| | THE EAST SIDE OF THE GARAGE DRIVE AISLE ARE INCORRECT, |
| | PLEASE REVISE |
| | 29) PROVIDE AND CLEARLY MARK TURN-AROUND SPACES AT EACH |
| | DEAD END OF THE GARAGE, ESPECIALLY WITH RESPECT TO |
| | LEVEL 4 AND ABOVE IN THE WEST TOWER |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
