| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-20 16:59:54 | 6/20/23 - FAILED |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING: |
| | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG |
| | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). |
| | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF |
| | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: |
| | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE LAST RECORDED WARRANTY |
| | DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY OWNER |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE APPLICATION AND THE |
| | OWNER???S CONSENT FORM DO NOT MATCH THE PROPERTY OWNER |
| | INFORMATION IN THE WARRANTY DEED SUBMITTED. [NOT |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | G. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE SURVEY. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | H. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENGINEERING |
| | (WATER/WASTEWATER-SPECIFIC) PLAN. [SATISFIED] |
| | I. PLEASE PROVIDE PHYSICAL HARDCOPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS. [SATISFIED] |
| | J. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | K. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY |
| | DETERMINATION (SCAD) PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | L. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CITY SERVICE AND PUBLIC UTILITY |
| | LETTERS (FROM FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES, FLORIDA POWER & |
| | LIGHT COMPANY, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATION) FOR THE |
| | SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | M. IF A REZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BEING |
| | REQUESTED, THEN A SEPARATE REZONING TYPE OF APPLICATION |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | N. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | O. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | PLANS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 1. IN REFERENCE TO REVIEW COMMENT M., THE PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED INDICATE A PROPOSED REZONING OF THE SUBJECT |
| | PROPERTY. THEREFORE, PLEASE CONFIRM IF A REZONING IS |
| | BEING REQUESTED. IF SO, A SEPARATE REZONING TYPE OF |
| | APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED. IF NOT, PLEASE CORRECT |
| | THE INFORMATION INDICATED IN THE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 306-22, THE MF32 |
| | ZONING DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT REGULATIONS APPLY TO |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT. BASED ON THE CITY???S ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SECTION |
| | 94-77(A)(3), THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWANCE OF THE MF32 |
| | ZONING DISTRICT. THEREFORE, PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED |
| | JUSTIFICATION LETTER BECAUSE THE REQUESTED VARIANCE TO |
| | THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWANCE IS NOT NECESSARY. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE EXISTING/PROPOSED |
| | EASEMENTS ON THE PLANS. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART ON THE PLANS. [WITHDRAWN] |
| | 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS WITHIN 250 FEET |
| | OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES ON THE PLANS. [SATISFIED] |
| | 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES / ABOVE GROUND |
| | APPURTENANCES ON THE PLANS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, |
| | HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF THE PROPOSED OUTDOOR |
| | ILLUMINATION ON THE PLANS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | 8. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZLDR SECTION 94-485(Q), |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES ON THE PLANS. |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF BICYCLE |
| | PARKING IN THE PARKING TABULATION. [PARTIALLY |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | 9. IN REGARDS TO THE PROVIDED JUSTIFICATION LETTER FOR |
| | THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT |
| | LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY CENTER DISTRICT. THE CITYWIDE |
| | DISTRICT SPECIFIC MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | SUBJECT JUSTIFICATION LETTER. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 10. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF THE DRIVEWAYS, CURB CUTS, AND TURNING LANES ADJACENT |
| | TO OR ACROSS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE PLANS. |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS/ELEVATIONS |
| | OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING ON THE PLANS. [NOT |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC TRANSIT FACILITIES |
| | WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY |
| | ON THE PLANS. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 13. IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 306-22, PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE |
| | DESIGNATED DWELLING UNITS IN THE SITE CALCULATIONS. |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 14. IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 306-22, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE THE DENSITY CALCULATIONS IN THE SITE |
| | CALCULATIONS. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 15. IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 306-22, PLEASE |
| | CONFIRM THE RESTRICTED UNIT???S AFFORDABILITY PERIOD. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE CONSISTENT INFORMATION ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN (SHEET NO. SP-1) AND ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN |
| | (SHEET NO. A100.00) FOR RESUBMITTAL OR DO NOT PROVIDE |
| | AN ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AS PART OF THE RESUBMITTAL. |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 17. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 6., PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED SPECIAL UTILITY |
| | STRUCTURES / ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE SITE |
| | PLANS, LANDSCAPE PLANS, AND UTILITIES PLANS. |
| | 18. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 7., PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING THE LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF THE |
| | PROPOSED OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON THE SITE PLANS, |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS, AND UTILITIES PLANS. |
| | 19. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 8., PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING |
| | FACILITIES ON THE SITE PLANS AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING |
| | INFORMATION IN THE PARKING TABULATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | KEVIE DEFRANC |
| | SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1449 |
| | |
| |
Print |
