| Date |
Text |
| 2023-07-25 10:57:28 | *** THE COMMENTS PROVIDED ARE FOR PB CASE NO. 1837H AND |
| | ISPR CASE NO. 23-01 *** (07.21.2023 RESUBMITTAL PACKET) |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED - IT APPEARS THAT THE PARKING HAS BEEN |
| | MODIFIED; HOWEVER, THE PARKING CALCULATIONS DOES NOT |
| | SEEM TO BE UPDATED. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED CHANGES. |
| | |
| | 1.1. CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS; HOWEVER, THE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CORRECT |
| | (I.E. CALCULATIONS REFLECT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE |
| | HOTEL SITE THAT IS CURRENTLY IN FOR A MAJOR AMENDMENT |
| | ??? PB 1837E). PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOULD ONLY REFLECT |
| | WHAT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND THE PROPOSED CHANGES WITH |
| | THIS APPLCATION. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED - ALL DATA TABLES MUST BE UPDATED TO |
| | REFLECT CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2.1. IT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED PARKING CHANGES TO THE MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR THE |
| | HOTEL SITE (REFERENCE: PB 1837E) SHOULD BE EXCLUDED |
| | FROM THIS MINOR AMENDMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF KEEPING |
| | THE APPLICATION SIMPLIFIED AND IN ADDITION, IT IS |
| | UNCERTAIN TO WHEN PB 1837E WILL MOVE FORWARD OR IF ANY |
| | FURTHER CHANGES WILL BE MADE TO THE PARKING FOR THE |
| | HOTEL SITE THAT WOULD IMPACT THE OVERALL SHARED PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOULD ONLY |
| | REFLECT WHAT HAS BEEN APPROVED TO DATE. |
| | |
| | 3. NEW COMMENT - THE REVISED/UPDATED JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT, REFLECTING THE LATEST SCOPE OF WORK IS |
| | MISSING FROM THE 07.21.2023 RESUBMITTAL PACKET. |
| | |
| | 4. NEW COMMENT - REPONSES TO PPRC???S OUTSTANDING |
| | COMMENTS MISSING FROM THE 07.21.2023 RESUBMITTAL |
| | PACKET. |
| | |
| | 5. NEW COMMENT - ALL PLAN SHEETS MUST BE UPDATED WITH |
| | THE LATEST REVISION DATE. AS DISCUSSED, THIS IS |
| | CRITICAL TO KEEP TRACK OF ALL PLANS WITHIN THE CPD. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED - SHOW SHORTEST POINT OF DISTANCE FROM THE |
| | EDGE OF PAVEMENT OF THE PROPOSED AFFECTED AREA TO THE |
| | EASTERN EDGE OF THE ABUTTING PARKING EASEMENT PARCEL. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED - SHOW THE REALIGNMENT AREA OF THE |
| | REQUIRED 5 FT. WIDE AND/OR PROPOSED LANDSCAPE BUFFER IN |
| | THE PLAN TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE BUFFER WILL IMPACT THE |
| | PARKING EASEMENT PARCEL AND TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY |
| | WITH THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 2.1. LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO SHOW PROPOSED |
| | LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AS PART OF THE AMENDMENT SCOPE. |
| | ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT MUST BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 3. SATSIFIED - PARKING STALLS AND ACCESSIBILITY RAMP |
| | WITHIN THE PROPOSED MODIFIED ROUNDABOUT AREA APPEAR TO |
| | BE IRREGULAR. DIMENSIONS ARE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF |
| | THESE STALLS ARE FEASIBLE AND CAN ALSO MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) FOR STALL STRIPING. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED - DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING FROM THE TROLLEY |
| | PICKUP/DROP-OFF AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED - PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL IS |
| | REQUIRED IN THE PLAN. THE DETAIL MUST BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE STRIPING STANDARDS OF SEC. 94-485 OF THE |
| | ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED - FLOATING NOTES DETECTED WITHIN THE SITE |
| | PLAN THAT DO NOT POINT TO THE APPROPRIATE ELEMENT IN |
| | THE PLAN (I.E. BICYCLE RACK, TRANSFORMER PADS, ETC.). |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 6.1. THE NOTATION FOR THE CHAINLINK FENCE ALONG THE |
| | WEST PROPERTY LINE APPEAR TO BE FLOATING. PLEASE MAKE |
| | SURE ALL NOTATIONS ARE POINTING TO A STRUCTURE/ELEMENT. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE STRUCTURE PROVIDED WITHIN |
| | THE SAME ISLAND AS THE MONUMENT SIGN? PLEASE IDENTIFY |
| | WITH NOTE IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED - TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHALL NOT BE |
| | LESS THAN 8 FT. IN WIDTH (AS MEASURED FROM THE INSIDE |
| | OF THE CURB) AND NOT LESS THAN THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | ADJACENT PARKING STALL. THE TERMINAL ISLAND PROVIDED ON |
| | THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE TROLLEY PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA |
| | DOES NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS |
| | FOR TERMINAL ISLANDS. [ZLDR S.94-443(C)(3)] |
| | |
| | 2. NEW COMMENT - IT APPEARS SHEET LP-1 (OVERALL |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN) HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED FOR CONSISTENCY |
| | WITH THE CHANGES PROPOSED TO THE SITE. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED - THE WEST ELEVATION MAKES REFERENCE TO A |
| | ???DIGITAL SCREEN TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS.??? PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT A DIGITAL SCREEN IS NOT PERMITTED ON THE |
| | ELEVATION AND THE REFERENCE MUST BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 2. NEW COMMENT - NOT ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN |
| | PROVIDED IN THE LATEST 07.21.2023 RESUBMITTAL PACKET. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETE BUILDING ELEVATION SET. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 11 X 17 INCHES, |
| | AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * MAKE SURE THE REVISION DATE ON THE PLAN SHEETS ARE |
| | AMENDED ACCORDING TO THE DATE OF THE CHANGES WITHIN THE |
| | PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | * YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO |
| | ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE |
| | TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE |
| | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT |
| | OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ 561.822.1458 OR [email protected] |
| | IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
