| Date |
Text |
| 2023-07-07 16:17:54 | *** THE COMMENTS PROVIDED ARE FOR PB CASE NO. 1837H AND |
| | ISPR CASE NO. 23-01 *** |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - IT APPEARS THAT THE PARKING |
| | HAS BEEN MODIFIED; HOWEVER, THE PARKING CALCULATIONS |
| | DOES NOT SEEM TO BE UPDATED. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES. |
| | |
| | 1.1. CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS; HOWEVER, THE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CORRECT |
| | (I.E. CALCULATIONS REFLECT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE |
| | HOTEL SITE THAT IS CURRENTLY IN FOR A MAJOR AMENDMENT |
| | ??? PB 1837E). PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOULD ONLY REFLECT |
| | WHAT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND THE PROPOSED CHANGES WITH |
| | THIS APPLCATION. |
| | |
| | 2. NOT SATISFIED - ALL DATA TABLES MUST BE UPDATED TO |
| | REFLECT CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2.1. IT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED PARKING CHANGES TO THE MAJOR AMENDMENT FOR THE |
| | HOTEL SITE (REFERENCE: PB 1837E) SHOULD BE EXCLUDED |
| | FROM THIS MINOR AMENDMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF KEEPING |
| | THE APPLICATION SIMPLIFIED AND IN ADDITION, IT IS |
| | UNCERTAIN TO WHEN PB 1837E WILL MOVE FORWARD OR IF ANY |
| | FURTHER CHANGES WILL BE MADE TO THE PARKING FOR THE |
| | HOTEL SITE THAT WOULD IMPACT THE OVERALL SHARED PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHOULD ONLY |
| | REFLECT WHAT HAS BEEN APPROVED TO DATE. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED - SHOW SHORTEST POINT OF DISTANCE FROM |
| | THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OF THE PROPOSED AFFECTED AREA TO |
| | THE EASTERN EDGE OF THE ABUTTING PARKING EASEMENT |
| | PARCEL. |
| | |
| | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SHOW THE REALIGNMENT AREA OF |
| | THE REQUIRED 5 FT. WIDE AND/OR PROPOSED LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER IN THE PLAN TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE BUFFER WILL |
| | IMPACT THE PARKING EASEMENT PARCEL AND TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 2.1. LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE PROVIDED TO SHOW PROPOSED |
| | LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT AS PART OF THE AMENDMENT SCOPE. |
| | ANY PROPOSED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT MUST BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 3. SATSIFIED - PARKING STALLS AND ACCESSIBILITY RAMP |
| | WITHIN THE PROPOSED MODIFIED ROUNDABOUT AREA APPEAR TO |
| | BE IRREGULAR. DIMENSIONS ARE REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF |
| | THESE STALLS ARE FEASIBLE AND CAN ALSO MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) FOR STALL STRIPING. |
| | |
| | 4. NOT SATISFIED - DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING FROM THE |
| | TROLLEY PICKUP/DROP-OFF AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED - PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL IS |
| | REQUIRED IN THE PLAN. THE DETAIL MUST BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE STRIPING STANDARDS OF SEC. 94-485 OF THE |
| | ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - FLOATING NOTES DETECTED WITHIN |
| | THE SITE PLAN THAT DO NOT POINT TO THE APPROPRIATE |
| | ELEMENT IN THE PLAN (I.E. BICYCLE RACK, TRANSFORMER |
| | PADS, ETC.). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 6.1. THE NOTATION FOR THE CHAINLINK FENCE ALONG THE |
| | WEST PROPERTY LINE APPEAR TO BE FLOATING. PLEASE MAKE |
| | SURE ALL NOTATIONS ARE POINTING TO A STRUCTURE/ELEMENT. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE STRUCTURE PROVIDED WITHIN |
| | THE SAME ISLAND AS THE MONUMENT SIGN? PLEASE IDENTIFY |
| | WITH NOTE IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED - TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHALL NOT |
| | BE LESS THAN 8 FT. IN WIDTH (AS MEASURED FROM THE |
| | INSIDE OF THE CURB) AND NOT LESS THAN THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | ADJACENT PARKING STALL. THE TERMINAL ISLAND PROVIDED ON |
| | THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE TROLLEY PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA |
| | DOES NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS |
| | FOR TERMINAL ISLANDS. [ZLDR S.94-443(C)(3)] |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: |
| | |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED - THE WEST ELEVATION MAKES REFERENCE |
| | TO A ???DIGITAL SCREEN TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS.??? |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT A DIGITAL SCREEN IS NOT PERMITTED ON |
| | THE ELEVATION AND THE REFERENCE MUST BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE REDUCED COPY IN 11 X 17 INCHES, |
| | AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * MAKE SURE THE REVISION DATE ON THE PLAN SHEETS ARE |
| | AMENDED ACCORDING TO THE DATE OF THE CHANGES WITHIN THE |
| | PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | * YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO |
| | ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE |
| | TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE |
| | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT |
| | OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ 561.822.1458 OR [email protected] |
| | IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
