| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-29 06:28:12 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. |
| | 2) CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. A CONDITION WILL BE PLACED |
| | ON THIS ITEM, SPECIFICALLY: OWNER TO INSTALL A |
| | SOUTHBOUND LEFT-TURN LANE IN THE CASE OF INCREASING |
| | TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON CLEARWATER PARK RD OR SIGNIFICANT |
| | VEHICULAR CONFLICTS BY THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CAUSING |
| | CONGESTION AND/OR SAFETY ISSUES AS DETERMINED BY THE |
| | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. SUCH CONDITION SHALL EXPIRE |
| | AFTER 5-YEARS FROM PROJECT COMPLETION DATE. |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION |
| | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, |
| | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD |
| | BE NAMED T-1.0. SIDEWALK WIDTHS ARE MISSING. |
| | 4) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF |
| | THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE |
| | SITE. SUCH PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW |
| | AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0). |
| | PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAILS PERTAINING THE PASSENGER |
| | LOADING ZONE, AS WELL AS A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF ITS |
| | PARKING POLICY, MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT, IF ANY |
| | 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR |
| | GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND |
| | OUT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC |
| | ENVELOPES AND WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED |
| | IN DIFFERENT COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE |
| | SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF |
| | THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED |
| | ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0). ENCROACHMENT WITH CURB |
| | SHOWN WHEN BACKING OUT. |
| | 7) CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING |
| | REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED |
| | TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, |
| | SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL, ETC.). TO BE |
| | SATISFIED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING STAGE. |
| | 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN |
| | EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM |
| | 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION |
| | READINESS WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH |
| | SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL |
| | PULL BOX (240V / 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE INSERT THIS |
| | FEATURE IN THE T-1.0 OR T1.1 SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | ITS DIMENSIONS. |
| | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 10) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, |
| | PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, |
| | IF ANY |
| | 11) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 12) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY |
| | MEETING |
| | 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED? |
| | 14) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN |
| | EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY? |
| | 15) CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION |
| | MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR |
| | DETAILS. TO BE PROVIDED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING |
| | STAGE. |
| | 16) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN |
| | THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO |
| | A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, |
| | THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? |
| | 17) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LOADING ZONE(S), IF REQUIRED, |
| | SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, NOT |
| | ON PUBLIC ROW. RESPONSE SEEMS INCOMPLETE; PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING AN SU-30 VEHICLE |
| | MODEL MANEUVERING IN AND OUT OF THE LOADING ZONE |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected]. |
| | |
| |
Print |
