| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-29 17:01:12 | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1.SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND PALMS |
| | IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR RELOCATED. |
| | ANSI 300 (PART 5) STANDARDS SPECIFY EXAMPLES OF |
| | SUITABILITY RATINGS OF GOOD, MODERATE, OR POOR FOR |
| | RELOCATION. MITIGATION SHOULD BE RECALCULATED UPON |
| | RECEIPT OF ARBORIST REPORT. |
| | |
| | APPLICANT RESPONSE: DUE TO THE AREA CONSTRAINTS OF THE |
| | SITE (LIMITED SPACE TO PLANT) AND THE QUALITY OF THE |
| | EXISTING LANDSCAPING PROPOSED, ONLY ONE TREE IS |
| | PROPOSED TO BE SAVED. ALL OTHERS WILL BE REMOVED. SEE |
| | THE ARBORIST REPORT INCLUDED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | TREE RATINGS AND DETAILS. |
| | |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] TREE DISPOSITION CHART ON LP-1 LISTS |
| | TREES 1,8,9, AND 11 IN GOOD CONDITION. TREES IN GOOD |
| | CONDITION MUST BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED ON SITE. THE |
| | TREES LISTED ON THE DISPOSITION ARE NOT NUMBERED THE |
| | SAME AS THE ARBORIST REPORT SO IT IS DIFFICULT TO TELL |
| | WHICH TREE IS WHICH AS THE REPORT CONFLICTS WITH THE |
| | RATINGS ON THE CHART. THE TREE RATINGS (SHOULD BE |
| | LISTED AS GOOF, FAIR, POOR, ETC AND NOT IN A |
| | PERCENTAGE) SHOULD COME FROM THE ARBORIST REPORT. |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: TREE CANOPY SIZE LISTED ON THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION ARE INACCURATE AND DO NOT MATCH THE TREES |
| | SHOWN IN THE IMAGES OF THE ARBORIST REPORT. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE CORRECT TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING |
| | TREES. STAFF WILL SPOT CHECK IN THE FIELD TO VERIFY. |
| | |
| | |
| | CONDITION OF APPROVAL: ARTIFICIAL TURF CANNOT BE VIEWED |
| | FROM THE STREET OR ROAD. SCREENING SUBJECT TO FINAL |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | |
| |
Print |
