| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-02 10:48:36 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT: A) ADDRESS OF THE AFFECTED AREA (1401 |
| | BRANDYWINE RD. APPEARS TO BE THE ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT |
| | PROPERTY - NOT 1901 VILLAGE BOULEVARD). B) THE STORAGE |
| | SPACE CALCULATIONS ARE INACCURATE IN THE PROPERTY |
| | HISTORY SECTION. |
| | |
| | 2.) A LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY - TRAFFIC |
| | DIVISION, STATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE |
| | TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY IS |
| | REQUIRED PRIOR TO MOVING FORWARD TO THE PUBLIC HEARING |
| | STAGE. |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. THE LETTER PROVIDED IN THE |
| | APPLICATION IS OUTDATED AND WILL NOT SUFFICE. PLEASE |
| | CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT (561-494-1040) ON HOW TO OBTAIN THE |
| | REQUIRED LETTER. |
| | |
| | 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL AND |
| | COMCAST. THE LETTERS PROVIDED IN THE APPLICATION IS |
| | OUTDATED AND WILL NOT SUFFICE. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IT SHOULD BE NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN WHICH BUILDINGS |
| | ARE EXISTING, PROPOSED FOR DEMO AND RE-BUILT TO THE |
| | SAME FOOTPRINT AND PROPOSED NEW FOR CLARITY WITH THE |
| | SCOPE/DESCRIPTION OF WORK. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE THE BUILDING SETBACK FROM PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | #3 TO THE PROPERTY LINE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE SHALL BE MEASURED AS THE SHORTEST DISTANCE FROM |
| | THE FACE OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 3.) WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN THE |
| | EXISTING COVERED WASHING STATION (CANOPY) AND PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING #3? PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FOR THE |
| | BUILDING SEPARATION IN THE PLAN. THE BUILDING |
| | SEPARATION MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 15 FT. [ZLDR S.94-202] |
| | |
| | 4.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR: A) THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOTED AS |
| | 30 FT., HOWEVER, THE BUILDING HEIGHT OF THE TALLEST |
| | PROPOSED STRUCTURE APPEARS TO BE CLOSER TO 16 FT. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. B) CLARIFICATION IS |
| | NEEDED ON THE 110.5 SQ. FT. PREFABRICATED STORAGE |
| | BUILDING ATTACHED TO PROPOSED BUILDING #3 (AS NOTED IN |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS). IF THE INTENT IS TO PROVIDE |
| | THIS PREFAB BUILDING, THE ADDITIONAL STORAGE SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR IS NOTED AS 30 FT.; HOWEVER, THE PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT (ACCORDING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | DRAWINGS) APPEAR TO BE CLOSER TO 16 FT. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 6.) ALL PROPOSED STRUCTURES (I.E. LIGHT POLE FIXTURES, |
| | ETC.) MUST BE SHOWN IN THE PLANS AT THIS TIME TO |
| | DETERMINE IF THE LOCATION/PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURES |
| | CONFLICT WITH UTILITIES LANDSCAPING, ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AN "EXISTING PREFAB CHEMICAL STORAGE UNIT" IS SHOWN |
| | ATTACHED TO PROPOSED BUILDING #3 ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF |
| | THE BUILDING; HOWEVER, THIS IS STORAGE UNIT IS NOT |
| | REFLECTED IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS, THE SITE |
| | PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, CIVIL PLAN OR SURVEY. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 2.) LABELED ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDING #3 (CHEMICAL |
| | STORAGE BUILDING) APPEAR TO BE INCORRECT. PLEASE REVIEW |
| | SHEETS A1.2 AND A5.2 AND ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 3.) LABELED ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDING #1 (MAINTENANCE |
| | BUILDING) APPEAR TO BE INCORRECT. PLEASE REVIEW SHEETS |
| | A1.1 AND A5.1 AND ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKDOWN ON SHEET LP.1 |
| | IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON SHEET |
| | SP.1. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE FLOATING NOTE "PROPOSED WASH DOWN STATION" |
| | NEEDS TO BE REMOVED ON SHEET LP.1. THIS NOTE IS FROM |
| | THE PREVIOUS (EXPIRED) APPROVAL (REFERENCE: PB 770F), |
| | WHICH IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE TO THIS APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT ALEXIS SANGELEER, PLANNER, WILL BE |
| | THE PROJECT PLANNER ON THIS APPLICATION MOVING FORWARD. |
| | |
| | * PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN REVISING ANY PLAN SHEETS, PLEASE MAKE SURE ANY |
| | CHANGES ARE REFLECTED IN ALL PLAN SETS. |
| | |
| | * WHEN REVISING ANY PLAN SHEETS/SETS, PLEASE BE SURE TO |
| | PROVIDE THE REVISION DATE. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X |
| | 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY |
| | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO |
| | ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE |
| | TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE |
| | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20 PERCENT |
| | OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT ALEXIS SANGELEER @ (561) 822-1443 IF THERE |
| | ARE ANY QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
