| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-20 01:48:47 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING |
| | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | ACCORDING TO COUNTY ARTICLE 12. NOTE: EXCEPTION FROM |
| | COUNTY CONCURRENCY DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO |
| | REQUEST FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | WITH CORRESPONDING IMPACTS, IF ANY |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION |
| | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, |
| | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND |
| | DIMENSIONS IN SHEET C2.3 ARE INCOMPLETE |
| | 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE |
| | PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. |
| | DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, |
| | ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS |
| | IN SHEET C2.3 ARE INCOMPLETE |
| | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE |
| | SITE. SUCH PLAN COULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN. PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND |
| | DIMENSIONS IN SHEET C2.3 ARE INCOMPLETE, PLEASE |
| | SHOWCASE EACH TRAVEL LANE AND EACH ON-STREET PARKING |
| | STALLS, AND THEIR CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS. MOREOVER, |
| | PLEASE SHOWCASE EXACT PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE |
| | WITHIN THE GARAGE FOR THE 1ST, MIDDLE AND TOP FLOORS. |
| | DESIGNATE AND PROPERLY MARK THE TURNAROUND SPACE AT |
| | EACH DEAD-END, IF ANY |
| | 7) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL |
| | PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. |
| | PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) |
| | CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, |
| | T-3.0) |
| | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 9) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, |
| | PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, |
| | IF ANY |
| | 10) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 11) NOT SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY |
| | MEETING. PLEASE PROVIDE A MEMO DETAILING AND |
| | SUMMARIZING VALET OPERATIONS, INCLUSIVE OF FIGURES |
| | DEPICTING VALET PODIUM LOCATION AND VEHICLE PATHS |
| | TO/FROM IT. THE VALET OPERATIONS PROPOSED IN THE MEMO |
| | WILL BE BINDING, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO ANALYZE ANY |
| | POTENTIAL FUTURE CHANGE/EXPANSION OF THE SERVICE. A |
| | SAMPLE VALET ANALYSIS CAN BE PROVIDED, IF REQUESTED. |
| | 12) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED? |
| | 13) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN |
| | EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY? |
| | 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. |
| | PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS. |
| | 15) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC94-111(C)(1): ???IN |
| | THOSE CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO |
| | A WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, |
| | THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET.??? |
| | 16) THE LEFT-TURN VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | FLAGLER DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE FORBIDDEN; SUCH DRIVEWAY |
| | SHOULD BE RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ONLY. PLEASE INSTALL A |
| | TRAFFIC ISLAND AND CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE TO ENFORCE |
| | SUCH OPERATIONS |
| | 17) BASED ON USE TYPE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE, TWO 10X25 |
| | FEET LOADING ZONES ARE REQUIRED. IF ALREADY PLANNED, |
| | PLEASE PROPERLY DEPICT THEM AND PROVIDE DOCUMENT |
| | NAME/SHEET NUMBER |
| | 18) THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN RECOMMENDS SEPARATED |
| | BICYCLE LANE ALONG N FLAGLER DR. PLEASE DEPICT SUCH |
| | BICYCLE FACILITY ACCORDINGLY. IT IS SUGGESTED TO |
| | COORDINATE WITH THE NEARBY CURRIE PARK REDEVELOPMENT |
| | PROJECT |
| | |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
