| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-06 13:15:04 | PASS, TRAFFIC COMMENTS #2, #15, #16, #17, AND #18 TO BE |
| | SATISFIED PRIOR TO ROW PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | SUZANNE BERGLUND |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING TO DISCUSS |
| | FURTHER TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND PARKING |
| | ANALYSES |
| | 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE |
| | RECEIVED - WILL REQUIRE WITH ROW PERMIT |
| | [email protected] |
| | 3) SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE ANALYSIS, |
| | TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE |
| | ENCOURAGED |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE |
| | PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION |
| | RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, |
| | PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, |
| | GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & |
| | DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY |
| | LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED |
| | T-1.0. |
| | 5) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF |
| | THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. NOTE: |
| | EVEN THOUGH NO CHANGES TO ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK |
| | GEOMETRIES ARE PROPOSED, BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN |
| | MOVEMENTS MAY BE IMPACTED OR COULD BE IMPROVED. THUS, |
| | THE NECESSITY OF A SITE PLAN SHOWCASING THE SIDEWALK |
| | AND ROADWAY AREAS |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING |
| | PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH |
| | PLAN COULD BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION ONE. NOTE: |
| | EVEN THOUGH NO CHANGES TO ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK |
| | GEOMETRIES ARE PROPOSED, BOTH VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN |
| | MOVEMENTS MAY BE IMPACTED OR COULD BE IMPROVED. THUS, |
| | THE NECESSITY OF A SITE PLAN SHOWCASING EXISTING |
| | SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS ALONG THE SIDEWALK AND |
| | ROADWAY AREAS |
| | 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT |
| | COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. |
| | 8) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH |
| | THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) |
| | TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V / |
| | 10,000W CIRCUIT) |
| | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 10) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, |
| | PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, |
| | IF ANY |
| | 11) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 12) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY |
| | MEETING |
| | 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS OR TRANSIT STOPS BEING |
| | IMPACTED? |
| | 14) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN |
| | EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY? |
| | 15) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A |
| | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE |
| | 86-246 FOR DETAILS WILL REQUIRE WITH ROW PERMIT |
| | [email protected] |
| | 16) THE PROPOSED ACCESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE |
| | THROUGH OLIVE MAY NOT BE FEASIBLE NOR SAFE FOR EXIT |
| | PURPOSES, DUE TO THE PROPOSED BACK-OUT MANEUVER OF THE |
| | TRUCKS. THUS, PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE MOT THAT HAS |
| | TRUCKS ENTERING FROM OLIVE AND EXITING ON DIXIE; SUCH |
| | PLAN WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN THE CASE UNSAFE TRAFFIC |
| | OPERATIONS ARE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION WILL REQUIRE |
| | WITH ROW PERMIT [email protected] |
| | 17) COORDINATE WITH PARKING DEPARTMENT, AND COPY |
| | ENGINEERING IN THE CORRESPONDENCE, WITH RESPECT TO THE |
| | IMPACTED PARKING STALLS WITHIN THE 300 BLOCK. PROVIDE A |
| | NARRATIVE PERTAINING THE USE OF SUCH STALLS IN THE CASE |
| | THEY ARE BAGGED WILL REQUIRE WITH ROW PERMIT |
| | [email protected] |
| | 18) COORDINATE AND PROVIDE A NARRATIVE ON HOW LOCAL |
| | BUSINESSES VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE BLOCK WILL BE |
| | HANDLED, SUCH AS JIMMY JOHN DELIVERY DRIVERS OR ANY |
| | OTHER ENTITY/OPERATIONS BEING SIGNIFICANTLY AND |
| | NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY THE ROAD CLOSURE WILL REQUIRE |
| | WITH ROW PERMIT [email protected] |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
