| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-11 14:51:55 | ZONING AND PLANNING |
| | PROJECT: ROXY'S RENOVATION AND EXPANSION Z22120027 |
| | CONTACT CLAUDIA IBAVEN, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, AT |
| | 561-822-1402 OR VIA [email protected]. |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC LETTER BY THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION 561-684-4030. |
| | - ON PROJECT FAST SHEET, REVISE THE TABLE ZONING AND |
| | FUTURE LAND USE AND EXISTING USES, FROM CURRENT ZONING, |
| | SUBJECT AREA NORTH 'CWD-CD' TO THE CORRECT 'CWD-10'. |
| | - PROVIDE ENGINEERING PLANS/DOCUMENTS. |
| | - PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR ANY AERIAL EASEMENTS FOR 309 |
| | CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY AND IF A NEW AERIAL EASEMENT IS |
| | NEEDED FOR 313 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | - PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE |
| | TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE COLLECTION |
| | SERVICES. |
| | - PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR |
| | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF |
| | THEIR SERVICES. |
| | - PLEASE SHARE ANY PUBLIC OUTREACH THAT HAS BEEN DONE |
| | FOR THE PROJECT. |
| | - PER SEC. 94-39 (J)(4) AND SEC. 94-54 (B)(3), THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO MEET PROCEDURES OF |
| | NOTICES OF PUBLIC MEETINGS. AS DIRECTED BY THE PLANNING |
| | DIRECTOR, THE NOTICE WILL NEED TO INCLUDE THE EXPECTED |
| | 60-DAY CLOSURE OF CLEMATIS STREET BETWEEN SOUTH OLIVE |
| | AVE AND S DIXIE HWY WHILE THE PROJECT IS IN |
| | CONSTRUCTION TO INFORM NEIGHBORS. |
| | - THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE CITY OF WPB'S ART LIFE |
| | ASSESSMENT. PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN |
| | PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR AT 561-822-1521 OR VIA EMAIL |
| | AT [email protected]. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1.- JUSTIFICATION LETTER: |
| | |
| | - AS DESCRIBED ON THE LETTER "PROPERTIES ARE DESIGNED |
| | TO FUNCTION AS ONE COHESIVE PROPERTY", PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | IF BOTH PROPERTIES ARE ONLY CONNECTED VIA THE ROOFTOP |
| | AND NOT ON THE GROUND FLOOR OR 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL USE |
| | OF THE 313 CLEMATIS ST. PROPERTY. IF THE INTENTION IS |
| | TO ACTIVATE THE VACANT BUILDING, PLEASE EXPLAIN FURTHER |
| | WHAT TYPE OF USE THE GROUND FLOOR, SECOND FLOOR, AND |
| | THIRD FLOOR WILL HAVE. IS THE GROUND FLOOR A NEW |
| | RESTAURANT OR A BAR? ARE 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR OFFICES? |
| | WILL THE ROOFTOP BE PART OF THE EXISTING BAR/PUB? WILL |
| | BOTH PROPERTIES FUNCTION AS ONE BUSINESS OR SEPARATE |
| | BUSINESSES? |
| | |
| | NOTE, IF NEW SPACES WILL BE 'ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE |
| | ESTABLISHMENTS', PLEASE REVIEW WPB CODE OF ORDINANCES, |
| | CHAPTER 6- ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND ADDRESS HOW THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET THE CITY CODE. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE REVISE SECTION 'REQUEST 1: SITE PLAN REVIEW', |
| | THERE ARE SOME RESPONSES THAT ARE DESCRIBING A |
| | DIFFERENT PROJECT AND SOME SENTENCES ARE INCOMPLETE. |
| | PER SEC. 94-54 (B), THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO |
| | SPECIAL REVIEW BY DAC AS IT IS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF |
| | THE CLEMATIS WATERFRONT CONSERVATION DISTRICT (CWD-CD). |
| | PLEASE RESPONSE ON THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER HOW THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL |
| | REVIEW. FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE STANDARDS PLEASE |
| | CHECK SEC. 94-54 (B)(2). |
| | |
| | - ON RESPONSE E), VARIANCE STANDARDS, PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | WHAT ARE "VERTICAL PROJECTIONS", IS THERE A PORTION OF |
| | THE BUILDING/FACADE WALL ON THE 3RD FLOOR OF 313 |
| | CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY MEETING THE SETBACK? AND EXPLAIN |
| | FURTHER WHY THE ADDITION OF THE ONE FLOOR IS THE |
| | "MINIMUM AMOUNT NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT". |
| | |
| | - ON RESPONSE J), VARIANCE STANDARDS, PLEASE EXPLAIN |
| | FURTHER THE MEANING OF 'DIMENSIONAL CHALLENGE'. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2.- ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RENDERINGS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE INCLUDE BOTH PROPERTIES FLOOR PLANS (GROUND |
| | FLOOR AND SECOND FLOOR) INTO ONE DRAWING TO ILLUSTRATE |
| | THE PROJECT AS A WHOLE AND HOW THEY PHYSICALLY CONNECT |
| | OR NOT AS YOU DO A-102. FOR EXAMPLE, COMBINING A-201 |
| | WITH A-301 TO SHOW GROUND FLOORS OF BOTH PROPERTIES, |
| | AND THEIR RELATION TO THE SURROUNDING AREAS SUCH AS |
| | SIDEWALK, ADJACENT BUILDINGS, PROPERTY LINE, ALLEY, |
| | ETC. THIS WILL ALSO HELP ILLUSTRATE CLEARLY PEDESTRIAN |
| | CIRCULATION AND EGRESS/INGRESS ON BOTH PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | - AS THIS IS A RENOVATION, PLEASE CLEARLY DIFFERENTIATE |
| | WHAT IS EXISTING AND WHAT IS NEW OR CHANGING IN EVERY |
| | FLOOR PLAN. FOR EXAMPLE, A-101 TABLE SHOWS THAT ON THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR THERE WILL BE 85 SQ.FT. ADDED BUT THERE IS |
| | NO SHEET OR DIAGRAM THAT ILLUSTRATES THE AREA THAT IS |
| | ADDED. |
| | |
| | - SEPARATE DIAGRAM SHEETS ARE REQUIRED TO CLEARLY |
| | ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN |
| | REGULATIONS. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE DATA TABLE FOR |
| | SOME REGULATIONS THAT THE PROJECT NEEDS TO MEET, BUT |
| | DIAGRAMS ARE NEEDED TO ILLUSTRATE WHAT IS BEING |
| | INCLUDED/EXCLUDED FROM CALCULATIONS. FOR EXAMPLE: |
| | |
| | O A-101 SHOWS TABLE WITH AREA CALCULATIONS BUT ONLY |
| | SHOWS THE 313 CLEMATIS ST PROPERTY FLOOR PLAN, AND IT |
| | DOES NOT HIGHLIGHT THE AREA ON THE FLOOR PLAN THAT IS |
| | INCLUDED FOR FAR AND GBA CALCULATIONS. |
| | O ON DIAGRAMS AND DRAWINGS PLEASE ADD APPROPRIATE |
| | DRAWING ELEMENTS SUCH AS PROPERTY LINES, SETBACK LINES, |
| | AND DIMENSIONS TO SEE HOW EACH THE PROJECT IS MEETING |
| | (OR NOT) THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. NOTE, THE SETBACK |
| | DISTANCE IS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB AND THE |
| | NEAREST BUILDING SURFACE. PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109, |
| | 'SETBACK' DEFINITION FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| | O INCLUDE ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS, VERTICAL DIMENSIONS TO |
| | CLEARLY SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PLEASE REVIEW SEC. 94-109, 'HEIGHT' DEFINITION AND |
| | FIGURE IV-13 FOR MORE INFORMATION ON HOW IS MEASURED. |
| | ON ELEVATIONS, ALSO ADD SETBACK LINES (FRONT, SIDE, AND |
| | REAR SETBACKS) TO SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | O AS PER SEC. 94-122, TABLE IV-26, THERE IS A REQUIRED |
| | MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, MINIMUM ACTIVE USE, MINIMUM |
| | TRANSPARENCY, MINIMUM LINER DEPTH, PLEASE SHOW ON |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS, TABLE CALCULATIONS, AND |
| | DIAGRAMS SHEETS HOW THE PROJECT MEETS REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS AND SHOW |
| | WITH CALCULATIONS TABLES AND DIAGRAMS HOW YOU ARE |
| | MEETING THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | O SEC. 94-105 & SEC. 94-106, USE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR |
| | GENERAL USES WITH SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS. |
| | O THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CHANGING THE FACADE OF |
| | 313 CLEMATIS ST, PLEASE SHOW HOW IT MEETS THE SEC. |
| | 94-109, TABLE IV-4.- FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | O FOR NEW BUILDING ELEMENTS THAT ENCROACH OVER THE ROW, |
| | PLEASE SHOW HOW THE PROJECT MEETS SEC. 94-109, TABLE |
| | IV-5.- PROJECTION STANDARDS. FEEL FREE TO USE SECTIONS |
| | THAT CAN CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE WITH DIMENSIONS HOW |
| | PROJECTIONS STANDARDS ARE MET. |
| | O AS MENTIONED BEFORE, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED, |
| | ON LANDSCAPE PLANS, 'OPEN SPACE' NEEDS TO BE DEFINED AS |
| | THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE FOR THE PROPERTY. PLEASE REVIEW |
| | SEC. 94-109, TABLE IV-7 OPEN SPACE STANDARDS AND REVISE |
| | PLANS, TABLE CALCULATIONS, AND CREATE DIAGRAMS TO SHOW |
| | HOW IT MEETS THE STANDARDS. MORE COMMENTS ON 4. |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS COMMENTS. |
| | O AS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS IN THE CLEMATIS |
| | WATERFRONT DISTRICT, CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ON AN |
| | ELEVATION DRAWING EXPLAIN FURTHER OR SHOW WITH PHOTOS |
| | OR DIAGRAMS HOW THE PROJECT'S SCALE AND CHARACTER ARE |
| | IN LINE WITH OTHER PROPERTIES ON THE BLOCK OR IN FRONT |
| | OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3.- SITE PLANS: |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE, THE DATA TABLE CAN BE ITS OWN SHEET. IN |
| | ADDITION, THE TABLE NEEDS TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED |
| | SECTIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY (SOME |
| | SECTIONS ARE MENTIONED ABOVE IN THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | DRAWING COMMENTS). THE TABLE ALSO NEEDS TO CLEARLY SHOW |
| | REQUIREMENTS PER CODE AND WHAT IS PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | - SITE PLANS SHOULD INCLUDE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE AND ADJACENT AREAS THAT WILL |
| | BE DIRECTLY IMPACTED OR CONNECTED BY AND TO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST IN |
| | THE DMP APPLICATION AND ADD MISSING ITEMS, SUCH AS: |
| | O VICINITY MAP SHOWING THE PROPERTY IN RELATION WITH |
| | THE SURROUNDING AREA. |
| | O LOCATION OF PROPERTY LINE, ROW, ALLEY, SIDEWALKS, |
| | PROPOSED/EXISTING EASEMENTS, ETC. |
| | O LOCATION, HEIGHT AND SIZE OF SIGNS, LIGHT FIXTURES, |
| | BIKE RACKS, FIRE HYDRANTS, TREES, LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND |
| | OTHER STRUCTURES EXISTING OR PROPOSED. |
| | O MEANS OF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO AND FROM THE SITE. |
| | O LOCATION AND SCREENING OF ALL GARBAGE RECEPTACLES AND |
| | GARBAGE COMPACTORS ON THE ALLEY THAT SERVE THE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | O THE DELINEATION OF EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES |
| | IN FRONT OR ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY. |
| | O LANDSCAPED AREAS EXISTING OR PROPOSED |
| | |
| | |
| | 4.- LANDSCAPE PLANS: |
| | |
| | - AS PER SEC. 94-122, TABLE IV-26, THERE IS A REQUIRED |
| | MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE OF "20% TERRACE WITHIN |
| | SETBACK ATOP 2ND STORY (32')". PROVIDE A DIAGRAM TO |
| | SHOW THE AREA YOU ARE CONSIDERING AS THE REQUIRED 20% |
| | TERRACE. REVIEW SEC. 94-109 'TERRACE' DEFINITION AND |
| | TABLE IV-6 IF YOU NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION. IN |
| | ADDITION, REVISE TABLE CALCULATIONS AND CREATE DIAGRAMS |
| | TO SHOW HOW REQUIREMENTS IN TABLE IV-7 ARE MET FOR |
| | 'VEGETATED' AREA AND 'OVERHEAD COVER' AREA. |
| | |
| | - LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND |
| | CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRIVATE |
| | OPEN SPACE ARE MET. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKLIST IN THE DMP |
| | APPLICATION TO MAKE SURE ALL ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN |
| | PLANS, SUCH AS: |
| | O LOCATIONS OF ROW, PROPERTY LINES, ADJACENT STREETS, |
| | ALLEY AND ACCESS WAYS, EXISTING AND PROPOSED SETBACKS |
| | IN ALL SIDES OF THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. |
| | O LOCATION OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED TREES, SHRUBS, |
| | GROUND COVERS, ETC. AND IDENTIFY WITH LABELS TREES ON |
| | SIDEWALKS. |
| | O LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, AND SCREENING OF ALL GARBAGE |
| | RECEPTACLES, OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS, AND GARBAGE |
| | COMPACTOR OR OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN SITE OR |
| | ADJACENT TO THE SITE. PLEASE SHOW HOW GARBAGE WILL BE |
| | MANAGED INSIDE THE PROPERTY. |
| | O THE DELINEATION OF EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES |
| | IN FRONT OR ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY |
| | |
| | |
| | 5.- SURVEY PLANS: |
| | AN UPDATED SURVEY WOULD NEED TO BE SUBMITTED IF THE |
| | SURVEY SUBMITTED ON 12.13.2022 DOES NOT REFLECT THE |
| | EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR BOTH PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | |
| | 6.- OTHER COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE, AS PER SEC. 94-54 (A)(1), THE APPLICANT |
| | SHALL ADDRESS ANY COMMENTS OF THE PPRC AND SUBMIT A |
| | REVISED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE MEETING |
| | SCHEDULED ON 1/12/2023. FAILURE TO MAKE THE REQUIRED |
| | SUBMITTALS WITHIN THE 60-DAY DEADLINE WILL DEEM THE |
| | APPLICATION AS WITHDRAWN. AT LEAST 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE |
| | EXPIRATION OF THE 60-DAY REVISION PERIOD, THE APPLICANT |
| | MAY REQUEST A 30-DAY EXTENSION. NO FURTHER EXTENSION |
| | REQUEST IS PERMITTED. COMMENTS RELATING TO REVISED |
| | APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE |
| | DATE OF SUCH COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS NEED |
| | TO BE PROVIDED AS WELL AS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) PAPER |
| | COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF |
| | ALL PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED IN THE |
| | APPLICATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | --END OF COMMENTS--- |
| | |
| |
Print |