| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-14 16:57:13 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 03.14.2023 |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED - AN APPROVED TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARDS LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT - TRAFFIC DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITY |
| | LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED. A LETTER FROM FPU IS STILL |
| | MISSING. THIS CAN BE CONDITIONED PRIOR TO CITY |
| | COMMISSION; HOWEVER, THE LETTER MUST BE PROVIDED AS |
| | SOON AS POSSIBLE |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED (THIS REVIEW/DISCUSSION WILL CONTINUE AS |
| | THE PROJECT MOVES INTO PERMITTING) - SIGNIFICANT |
| | DISCUSSIONS WILL NEED TO CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE SITE |
| | PLAN REVIEW/PERMITTING PROCESS REGARDING THE PHASING. |
| | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS AND DATA TABLES WILL LIKELY NEED TO |
| | BE PROVIDED. WILL NEED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT SUFFICIENT |
| | PARKING, ACCESS, ETC. WILL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES |
| | THAT THERE ARE 76 SPACES PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA, AND ARE A PART OF THE WAIVER |
| | REQUEST; THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 78 SPACES. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED (BEING ADDRESSED AS PART OF LEASE |
| | PROVISIONS) - DISCUSSIONS WILL NEED TO CONTINUE |
| | REGARDING THE LIMITS OF THE MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS. |
| | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO MAINTENACE OF NORTH PARKING BY |
| | THE SCIENCE CENTER) - IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE THE LEASE |
| | LINE SUCH THAT IT DOES NOT SPLIT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING |
| | SPACE? IF THE PARKING OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA WILL BE |
| | THE MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION OF THE SCIENCE CENTER, |
| | IT???S NOT SO MUCH OF AN ISSUE. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE PARKING WAIVER ??? |
| | THERE IS NO REQUEST TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED |
| | SPACES, BUT SIMPLY TO ALLOW THE SPACES TO BE LOCATED |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA. |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED - THERE ARE MULTIPLE LOCATIONS WHERE |
| | TREES, GATES, ETC. ARE PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AN |
| | EASEMENT. EITHER THE TREES SHALL BE RELOCATED TO POINTS |
| | OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM |
| | THE EASEMENT HOLDER. |
| | |
| | 8.1. SATISFIED - THERE ARE STILL LOCATIONS WHERE TREES |
| | ARE BEING SHOWN IN AN EASEMENT. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED - ON THE SITE PLAN THERE IS A SYMBOL OF W2 |
| | ALONG THE EAST LEASE LINE ??? I BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE |
| | W3 TO CORRESPOND WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WAIVER. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED - ON THE SITE PLAN THERE IS A SYMBOL OF |
| | W3 ALONG THE WEST LEASE LINE ??? NO WAIVER IS BEING |
| | REQUESTED ALONG THIS PROPERTY LINE, CORRECT? THIS SEEMS |
| | CONFUSING. THE SYMBOLS FOR THE WAIVERS SHOULD BE |
| | LOCATED IN THE AREAS IN WHICH THE WAIVER IS PROPOSED TO |
| | OCCUR (IF SPECIFIC TO A LOCATION). |
| | |
| | 10.1. SATISFIED - THERE IS A SYMBOL OF W4 ALONG THE |
| | WEST PROPERTY LINE. IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT THIS |
| | INDICATES A WAIVER FROM FENCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, BUT |
| | THIS IS NOT CONTAINED IN THE WAIVER TABLE ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 11. SATISFIED - IS THE DIESEL TANK PROPOSED TO BE ABOVE |
| | OR BELOW GROUND? IF ABOVE GROUND, AN OPAQUE ENCLOSURE |
| | AND HEDGING SHALL BE PROVIDED ??? PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 11.1. SATISFIED - THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE DIESEL TANK |
| | AND BRANCH PICK-UP AREA ENCROACHES INTO AN EASEMENT. |
| | EASEMENT CONSENT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE EASEMENT |
| | HOLDER. ADDITIONALLY, THE WALL IS WITHIN THE "FRONT" |
| | SETBACK AND WOULD NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE WAIVER |
| | REQUEST AS IT IS MORE THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 11.2. SATISFIED- THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE DIESEL TANK |
| | AND BRANCH PICK-UP AREA DOES NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED |
| | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SURROUNDING IT. |
| | |
| | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR |
| | THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, AS WELL AS ENCLOSURE OF THE |
| | AQUARIUM EQUIPMENT, ETC. ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION MAY NEED |
| | TO OCCUR ON THE HOW EQUIPMENT/SERVICE AREAS ARE BEING |
| | SCREENED AND WHAT DETAILS NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 12.1. SATISFIED - THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE GENERATORS |
| | DOES NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL |
| | SURROUNDING IT. |
| | |
| | 12.2. SATISFIED - THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE GENERATORS |
| | SHALL BE OPAQUE AND THE GENERATOR SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE. |
| | |
| | 12.3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - HOW IS THE AQUARIUM |
| | EQUIPMENT YARD PROPOSED TO BE SCREENED/LANDSCAPED? THE |
| | CHAINLINK FENCE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH AN OPAQUE FENCE |
| | AND LANDSCAPING. |
| | |
| | 12.4. SATISFIED - DETAIL #5 ON SHEET AS-203 IS LABELED |
| | AS THE ELEVATION FOR THE DIESEL TANK STORAGE, HOWEVER |
| | THIS APPEARS TO BE FOR THE LOADING/SERVICE AREA. |
| | |
| | 12.5. SATISFIED - IN THE SERVICE AREA SURROUNDING |
| | BUILDING 2A, THERE APPEARS TO BE REMNANTS OF FENCING |
| | STILL BEING SHOWN, IN ADDITION TO THE PROPOSED WALL. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 13. SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN |
| | BUILDING 1 AND BUILDING 2? IS THIS A PART OF THE WAIVER |
| | REQUEST? |
| | |
| | 14. SATISFIED - WOULD IT BE PREFERRED TO REMOVE FROM |
| | THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS ANY EASEMENTS THAT HAVE |
| | ALREADY BEEN ABANDONED? |
| | |
| | 14.1. SATISFIED - THERE APPEAR TO BE LABELS FOR |
| | ABANDONED EASEMENTS THAT STILL EXIST ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 15. SATISFIED - THERE IS DETAIL LACKING ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN, SPECIFICALLY REGARDING THOSE AREAS IN FRONT OF |
| | THE PROPOSED EXPANSION. GATES ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE IS |
| | NOT INFORMATION AS TO WHETHER THESE GATES TIE INTO |
| | PROPOSED FENCING OR WALLS, WHAT THE FENCING/WALLS (IF |
| | APPLICABLE) ARE PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF, ETC. |
| | |
| | 15.1. SATISFIED - THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN INDICATES |
| | A SECURITY GATE, FENCING, ETC. ALONG THE SOUTH LEASE |
| | BOUNDARY; THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND WOULD |
| | NEED TO BE A PART OF THE WAIVER #4 REQUEST AS A PORTION |
| | OF IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE "FRONT" SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 16. SATISFIED ??? SHOULDN???T BUILDING 4 BE SHADED AS A |
| | ???PROPOSED BUILDING???? IS THIS BUILDING ACCOUNTED FOR |
| | IN SQUARE FOOTAGES, ETC.? |
| | |
| | 17. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS BEING IDENTIFIED |
| | AS THE FRONT, SIDE, REAR, ETC. AS THE PROPOSED SETBACKS |
| | INDICATED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE DO NOT SEEM TO |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - FENCES, GATES, ETC. LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK ARE NOT TO EXCEED FOUR (4) |
| | FEET IN HEIGHT. A WAIVER IS REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | 18.1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS #11.1. AND |
| | #15.1. REGARDING ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS THAT NEED TO BE |
| | IDENTIFIED FOR THE WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 19. SATISFIED - THE BIKE RACK AT BUILDING 5 IS ORIENTED |
| | IN SUCH A WAY THAT BOTH SPACES CANNOT BE ACCESSED. |
| | |
| | 20. SATISFIED - IN ADDITION TO THE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | BUILDING AT THE ROOF DECK, PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF |
| | THE BUILDING AS MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET. |
| | |
| | 20.1. SATISFIED - THE HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET |
| | WAS PROVIDED IN THE "RESPONSE TO COMMENTS" BUT DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 21. SATISFIED - THE LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED, PLUS THE |
| | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA PROPOSED, SHOULD ADD UP TO |
| | 100%. ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT |
| | REQUIREMENTS TABLE, THE TOTAL IS ONLY 93%. |
| | |
| | 22. SATISFIED - EXPLANATION IS NEEDED REGARDING THE |
| | SECURITY GATE AT THE NORTH END OF THE FPL SUBSTATION. |
| | HOW WILL FPL MAINTAIN ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES? |
| | WHEN IS THE GATE OPEN/CLOSED? WILL PATRONS OF THE |
| | SCIENCE CENTER BE PRESENT WHEN THIS GATE IS CLOSED AND |
| | IF SO, WILL A TURNAROUND NEED TO BE PROVIDED? |
| | |
| | 23. SATISFIED - THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN REFERENCES |
| | A COVERED WALKWAY BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS. THIS IS NOT |
| | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND THERE IS NOT ENOUGH |
| | INFORMATION/DETAIL TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS PROPOSED. WHAT |
| | IS THIS COVERING TO CONSIST OF? WHAT ARE THE LIMITS OF |
| | THE COVERING? IS THE COVERING CONNECTED TO EACH OF THE |
| | BUILDINGS? IF SO, THEN ALL OF THE CONNECTED BUILDINGS |
| | COULD POTENTIALLY BE CLASSIFIED AS ONE BUILDING (FROM A |
| | ZONING PERSPECTIVE). MORE INFORMATION IS NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 26. SATISFIED - THE GRAPHIC SCALE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | SITE PLAN IS INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 27. SATISFIED - THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE SITE PLAN. SPECIFIC AREAS INCLUDE: |
| | - CHILLER ENCLOSURE IS STILL LABELED AS BUILDING #4 |
| | - BUILDING #4 ON THE SITE PLAN IS LABELED AS BUILDING |
| | #5 ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. |
| | - THE BIKE RACK SOUTH OF BUILDING #4 (AS LABELED ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN) IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. |
| | - THE SIDEWALK NEAR THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SOUTH OF |
| | BUILDING #4 (AS LABELED ON THE SITE PLAN) IS DIFFERENT. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, |
| | 2022. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023, PLANNING |
| | BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO |
| | LATER THAN FEBRUARY 7, 2023. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND |
| | BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | LINDA LOUIE, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ??? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1458 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
