| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-31 10:07:46 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 01.31.2023 |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED - AN APPROVED TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARDS LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ??? TRAFFIC DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2. NOT SATISFIED - OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.1. NEW COMMENT - COMCAST AND FPL LETTERS STILL |
| | OUTSTANDING. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED (THIS REVIEW/DISCUSSION WILL CONTINUE AS |
| | THE PROJECT MOVES INTO PERMITTING) - SIGNIFICANT |
| | DISCUSSIONS WILL NEED TO CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE SITE |
| | PLAN REVIEW/PERMITTING PROCESS REGARDING THE PHASING. |
| | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS AND DATA TABLES WILL LIKELY NEED TO |
| | BE PROVIDED. WILL NEED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT SUFFICIENT |
| | PARKING, ACCESS, ETC. WILL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES |
| | THAT THERE ARE 76 SPACES PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA, AND ARE A PART OF THE WAIVER |
| | REQUEST; THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 78 SPACES. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED (BEING ADDRESSED AS PART OF LEASE |
| | PROVISIONS) - DISCUSSIONS WILL NEED TO CONTINUE |
| | REGARDING THE LIMITS OF THE MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS. |
| | ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED (SUBJECT TO MAINTENACE OF NORTH PARKING BY |
| | THE SCIENCE CENTER) - IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE THE LEASE |
| | LINE SUCH THAT IT DOES NOT SPLIT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING |
| | SPACE? IF THE PARKING OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA WILL BE |
| | THE MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION OF THE SCIENCE CENTER, |
| | IT???S NOT SO MUCH OF AN ISSUE. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY THE PARKING WAIVER ??? |
| | THERE IS NO REQUEST TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED |
| | SPACES, BUT SIMPLY TO ALLOW THE SPACES TO BE LOCATED |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA. |
| | |
| | 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THERE ARE MULTIPLE LOCATIONS |
| | WHERE TREES, GATES, ETC. ARE PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED |
| | WITHIN AN EASEMENT. EITHER THE TREES SHALL BE RELOCATED |
| | TO POINTS OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT SHALL BE |
| | OBTAINED FROM THE EASEMENT HOLDER. |
| | |
| | 8.1. NEW COMMENT - THERE ARE STILL LOCATIONS WHERE |
| | TREES ARE BEING SHOWN IN AN EASEMENT. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED - ON THE SITE PLAN THERE IS A SYMBOL OF W2 |
| | ALONG THE EAST LEASE LINE ??? I BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE |
| | W3 TO CORRESPOND WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WAIVER. |
| | |
| | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - ON THE SITE PLAN THERE IS A |
| | SYMBOL OF W3 ALONG THE WEST LEASE LINE ??? NO WAIVER IS |
| | BEING REQUESTED ALONG THIS PROPERTY LINE, CORRECT? THIS |
| | SEEMS CONFUSING. THE SYMBOLS FOR THE WAIVERS SHOULD BE |
| | LOCATED IN THE AREAS IN WHICH THE WAIVER IS PROPOSED TO |
| | OCCUR (IF SPECIFIC TO A LOCATION). |
| | |
| | 10.1. NEW COMMENT - THERE IS A SYMBOL OF W4 ALONG THE |
| | WEST PROPERTY LINE. IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT THIS |
| | INDICATES A WAIVER FROM FENCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, BUT |
| | THIS IS NOT CONTAINED IN THE WAIVER TABLE ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 11. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - IS THE DIESEL TANK PROPOSED |
| | TO BE ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND? IF ABOVE GROUND, AN OPAQUE |
| | ENCLOSURE AND HEDGING SHALL BE PROVIDED ??? PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 11.1. NEW COMMENT - THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE DIESEL |
| | TANK AND BRANCH PICK-UP AREA ENCROACHES INTO AN |
| | EASEMENT. EASEMENT CONSENT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE |
| | EASEMENT HOLDER. ADDITIONALLY, THE WALL IS WITHIN THE |
| | "FRONT" SETBACK AND WOULD NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | WAIVER REQUEST AS IT IS MORE THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN |
| | HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 11.2. NEW COMMENT - THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE DIESEL |
| | TANK AND BRANCH PICK-UP AREA DOES NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED |
| | LANDSCAPE MATERIAL SURROUNDING IT. |
| | |
| | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR |
| | THE GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, AS WELL AS ENCLOSURE OF THE |
| | AQUARIUM EQUIPMENT, ETC. ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION MAY NEED |
| | TO OCCUR ON THE HOW EQUIPMENT/SERVICE AREAS ARE BEING |
| | SCREENED AND WHAT DETAILS NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 12.1. NEW COMMENT - THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE GENERATORS |
| | DOES NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL |
| | SURROUNDING IT. |
| | |
| | 12.2. NEW COMMENT - THE ENCLOSURE AROUND THE GENERATORS |
| | SHALL BE OPAQUE AND THE GENERATOR SHALL NOT BE VISIBLE. |
| | |
| | 12.3. NEW COMMENT - HOW IS THE AQUARIUM EQUIPMENT YARD |
| | PROPOSED TO BE SCREENED/LANDSCAPED? |
| | |
| | 12.4. NEW COMMENT - DETAIL #5 ON SHEET AS-203 IS |
| | LABELED AS THE ELEVATION FOR THE DIESEL TANK STORAGE, |
| | HOWEVER THIS APPEARS TO BE FOR THE LOADING/SERVICE |
| | AREA. |
| | |
| | 12.5. NEW COMMENT - IN THE SERVICE AREA SURROUNDING |
| | BUILDING 2A, THERE APPEARS TO BE REMNANTS OF FENCING |
| | STILL BEING SHOWN, IN ADDITION TO THE PROPOSED WALL. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 13. SATISFIED - WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN |
| | BUILDING 1 AND BUILDING 2? IS THIS A PART OF THE WAIVER |
| | REQUEST? |
| | |
| | 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - WOULD IT BE PREFERRED TO |
| | REMOVE FROM THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS ANY EASEMENTS THAT |
| | HAVE ALREADY BEEN ABANDONED? |
| | |
| | 14.1. NEW COMMENT - THERE APPEAR TO BE LABELS FOR |
| | ABANDONED EASEMENTS THAT STILL EXIST ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 15. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - THERE IS DETAIL LACKING ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN, SPECIFICALLY REGARDING THOSE AREAS IN |
| | FRONT OF THE PROPOSED EXPANSION. GATES ARE SHOWN, BUT |
| | THERE IS NOT INFORMATION AS TO WHETHER THESE GATES TIE |
| | INTO PROPOSED FENCING OR WALLS, WHAT THE FENCING/WALLS |
| | (IF APPLICABLE) ARE PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF, ETC. |
| | |
| | 15.1. NEW COMMENT - THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN |
| | INDICATES A SECURITY GATE, FENCING, ETC. ALONG THE |
| | SOUTH LEASE BOUNDARY; THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN AND WOULD NEED TO BE A PART OF THE WAIVER #4 |
| | REQUEST AS A PORTION OF IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE |
| | "FRONT" SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 16. SATISFIED - SHOULDN???T BUILDING 4 BE SHADED AS A |
| | ???PROPOSED BUILDING???? IS THIS BUILDING ACCOUNTED FOR |
| | IN SQUARE FOOTAGES, ETC.? |
| | |
| | 17. SATISFIED - PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS BEING IDENTIFIED |
| | AS THE FRONT, SIDE, REAR, ETC. AS THE PROPOSED SETBACKS |
| | INDICATED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE DO NOT SEEM TO |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 18. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - FENCES, GATES, ETC. LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK ARE NOT TO EXCEED FOUR (4) |
| | FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 18.1. NEW COMMENT - SEE COMMENTS #11.1. AND #15.1. |
| | REGARDING ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS THAT NEED TO BE |
| | IDENTIFIED FOR THE WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 19. SATISFIED - THE BIKE RACK AT BUILDING 5 IS ORIENTED |
| | IN SUCH A WAY THAT BOTH SPACES CANNOT BE ACCESSED. |
| | |
| | 20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED - IN ADDITION TO THE HEIGHT OF |
| | THE BUILDING AT THE ROOF DECK, PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING AS MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE |
| | PARAPET. |
| | |
| | 20.1. NEW COMMENT - THE HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF THE |
| | PARAPET WAS PROVIDED IN THE "RESPONSE TO COMMENTS" BUT |
| | DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 21. SATISFIED - THE LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED, PLUS THE |
| | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA PROPOSED, SHOULD ADD UP TO |
| | 100%. ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT |
| | REQUIREMENTS TABLE, THE TOTAL IS ONLY 93%. |
| | |
| | 22. SATISFIED - EXPLANATION IS NEEDED REGARDING THE |
| | SECURITY GATE AT THE NORTH END OF THE FPL SUBSTATION. |
| | HOW WILL FPL MAINTAIN ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES? |
| | WHEN IS THE GATE OPEN/CLOSED? WILL PATRONS OF THE |
| | SCIENCE CENTER BE PRESENT WHEN THIS GATE IS CLOSED AND |
| | IF SO, WILL A TURNAROUND NEED TO BE PROVIDED? |
| | |
| | 23. NEW COMMENT - THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN |
| | REFERENCES A COVERED WALKWAY BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS. |
| | THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND THERE IS NOT |
| | ENOUGH INFORMATION/DETAIL TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS |
| | PROPOSED. WHAT IS THIS COVERING TO CONSIST OF? WHAT ARE |
| | THE LIMITS OF THE COVERING? IS THE COVERING CONNECTED |
| | TO EACH OF THE BUILDINGS? IF SO, THEN ALL OF THE |
| | CONNECTED BUILDINGS COULD POTENTIALLY BE CLASSIFIED AS |
| | ONE BUILDING (FROM A ZONING PERSPECTIVE). MORE |
| | INFORMATION IS NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 26. NEW COMMENT - THE GRAPHIC SCALE ON THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN IS INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 27. NEW COMMENT ??? THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DOES |
| | NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. SPECIFIC AREAS INCLUDE: |
| | - CHILLER ENCLOSURE IS STILL LABELED AS BUILDING #4 |
| | - BUILDING #4 ON THE SITE PLAN IS LABELED AS BUILDING |
| | #5 ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. |
| | - THE BIKE RACK SOUTH OF BUILDING #4 (AS LABELED ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN) IS IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION. |
| | - THE SIDEWALK NEAR THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SOUTH OF |
| | BUILDING #4 (AS LABELED ON THE SITE PLAN) IS DIFFERENT. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, |
| | 2022. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023, PLANNING |
| | BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO |
| | LATER THAN FEBRUARY 7, 2023. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND |
| | BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ??? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| |
Print |
