| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-14 10:52:12 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY, AS IT |
| | IS BASED ON OLD TRAFFIC COUNTS, ASSUMPTIONS AND |
| | METHODOLOGIES. PLEASE PERFORM A NEW SET OF TRAFFIC |
| | COUNTS, AND PROVIDE A DETAILED ELABORATION ON THE TRIP |
| | GENERATION CALCULATION |
| | 2) SATISFIED. INCLUDE THE INTERSECTIONS OF DREHER TRAIL |
| | N WITH SUMMIT AND SOUTHERN BLVD IN THE ANALYSIS |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN UPDATED PARKING STUDY. ACTUAL |
| | DATA SHOULD BE COLLECTED IN ORDER TO CORROBORATE THE |
| | THEORETICAL FORMULAS. TYPICAL DAILY/WEEKEND USAGE AND |
| | AT LEAST ONE SPECIAL EVENT SHOULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR |
| | 4) SATISFIED. BOTH THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT AND |
| | PARKING DEMAND STUDY NEED TO CONSIDER THE MULTI-PHASE |
| | APPROACH OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDE |
| | NARRATIVE EXPLAINING AND ILLUSTRATING TRAFFIC IMPACTS, |
| | CIRCULATION, PARKING AND MITIGATION MEASUREMENTS FOR |
| | EACH PHASE |
| | 5) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CRASH ANALYSIS ALONG |
| | THE MAIN ACCESS DRIVEWAYS AND IDENTIFY MITIGATION |
| | MEASUREMENTS. THE S4 DATABASE SHOWED 4 INCIDENTS IN THE |
| | PAST 2 YEARS. CITY WAS ALSO CONTACTED IN 2020 |
| | PERTAINING IMPROVEMENTS BY THE SHARP TURN ALONG N |
| | DREHER TRAIL JUST WEST OF THE SCIENCE CENTER. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE AN ELABORATION PARAGRAPH PERTAINING THE |
| | RESULTS, AND RECOMMEND MITIGATION MEASURES, IF NEEDED |
| | OR IDENTIFIED |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | 7) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE |
| | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT |
| | (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE ENCOURAGED. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS |
| | NOT A SUFFICIENT ANSWER. |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 8) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION |
| | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, |
| | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD |
| | BE NAMED T-1.0. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING IN THE |
| | LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REVISE AND VERIFY THAT |
| | DRIVE AISLES AND PARKING STALLS ARE COMPLIANT WITH CITY |
| | CODE MINIMUM WIDTH/LENGTH REQUIREMENTS |
| | 9) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF |
| | THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING |
| | PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH |
| | PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE |
| | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) |
| | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT |
| | COLORS. PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH |
| | PLAN(S) CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY |
| | (E.G. T1.2, T-3.0) |
| | 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 13) SATISFIED. IN THE PAVEMENT, MARKING & SIGN PLAN, |
| | PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE THE NUMBER |
| | OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR RELOCATED, |
| | IF ANY |
| | 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? |
| | IF SO, CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK |
| | DISTANCE FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK. IN CASE A |
| | SIDEWALK IS MISSING, PLEASE SHOWCASE THE SETBACK |
| | DISTANCE FROM THE EDGE OF THE TRAVEL LANE. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE SHEET/DOCUMENT NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH ITEM |
| | 15) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE A THOROUGH OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY |
| | MEETING |
| | 16) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY BUS STOPS BEING IMPACTED? |
| | 17) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN |
| | EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY? |
| | 18) TO BE SATISFIED AT BUILDING PERMIT. PROVIDE A |
| | CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO CITY CODE |
| | 86-246 FOR DETAILS. |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
