| Date |
Text |
| 2022-12-13 08:22:13 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 12.08.2009 |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. AN APPROVED TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LETTER |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ??? TRAFFIC DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2. OUTSTANDING PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 3. SIGNIFICANT DISCUSSIONS WILL NEED TO CONTINUE |
| | THROUGHOUT THE SITE PLAN REVIEW/PERMITTING PROCESS |
| | REGARDING THE PHASING. ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS AND DATA |
| | TABLES WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE PROVIDED. WILL NEED TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE THAT SUFFICIENT PARKING, ACCESS, ETC. WILL |
| | BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 4. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THERE ARE |
| | 76 SPACES PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED OUTSIDE OF THE |
| | LEASE AREA, AND ARE A PART OF THE WAIVER REQUEST; THE |
| | SITE PLAN SHOWS 78 SPACES. |
| | |
| | 5. DISCUSSIONS WILL NEED TO CONTINUE REGARDING THE |
| | LIMITS OF THE MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS. ADDITIONAL |
| | EXHIBITS WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 6. IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE THE LEASE LINE SUCH THAT IT |
| | DOES NOT SPLIT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE? IF THE |
| | PARKING OUTSIDE OF THE LEASE AREA WILL BE THE |
| | MAINTENANCE OBLIGATION OF THE SCIENCE CENTER, IT???S |
| | NOT SO MUCH OF AN ISSUE. |
| | |
| | 7. PLEASE CLARIFY THE PARKING WAIVER ??? THERE IS NO |
| | REQUEST TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SPACES, BUT |
| | SIMPLY TO ALLOW THE SPACES TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE |
| | LEASE AREA. |
| | |
| | 8. THERE ARE MULTIPLE LOCATIONS WHERE TREES, GATES, |
| | ETC. ARE PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AN EASEMENT. |
| | EITHER THE TREES SHALL BE RELOCATED TO POINTS OUTSIDE |
| | THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE |
| | EASEMENT HOLDER. |
| | |
| | 9. ON THE SITE PLAN THERE IS A SYMBOL OF W2 ALONG THE |
| | EAST LEASE LINE ??? I BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE W3 TO |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WAIVER. |
| | |
| | 10. ON THE SITE PLAN THERE IS A SYMBOL OF W3 ALONG THE |
| | WEST LEASE LINE ??? NO WAIVER IS BEING REQUESTED ALONG |
| | THIS PROPERTY LINE, CORRECT? THIS SEEMS CONFUSING. THE |
| | SYMBOLS FOR THE WAIVERS SHOULD BE LOCATED IN THE AREAS |
| | IN WHICH THE WAIVER IS PROPOSED TO OCCUR (IF SPECIFIC |
| | TO A LOCATION). |
| | |
| | 11. IS THE DIESEL TANK PROPOSED TO BE ABOVE OR BELOW |
| | GROUND? IF ABOVE GROUND, AN OPAQUE ENCLOSURE AND |
| | HEDGING SHALL BE PROVIDED ??? PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 12. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE GENERATOR |
| | ENCLOSURE, AS WELL AS ENCLOSURE OF THE AQUARIUM |
| | EQUIPMENT, ETC. ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION MAY NEED TO OCCUR |
| | ON THE HOW EQUIPMENT/SERVICE AREAS ARE BEING SCREENED |
| | AND WHAT DETAILS NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 13. WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDING 1 |
| | AND BUILDING 2? IS THIS A PART OF THE WAIVER REQUEST? |
| | |
| | 14. WOULD IT BE PREFERRED TO REMOVE FROM THE |
| | SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS ANY EASEMENTS THAT HAVE ALREADY |
| | BEEN ABANDONED? |
| | |
| | 15. THERE IS DETAIL LACKING ON THE SITE PLAN, |
| | SPECIFICALLY REGARDING THOSE AREAS IN FRONT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED EXPANSION. GATES ARE SHOWN, BUT THERE IS NOT |
| | INFORMATION AS TO WHETHER THESE GATES TIE INTO PROPOSED |
| | FENCING OR WALLS, WHAT THE FENCING/WALLS (IF |
| | APPLICABLE) ARE PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF, ETC. |
| | |
| | 16. SHOULDN???T BUILDING 4 BE SHADED AS A ???PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING???? IS THIS BUILDING ACCOUNTED FOR IN SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGES, ETC.? |
| | |
| | 17. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS BEING IDENTIFIED AS THE |
| | FRONT, SIDE, REAR, ETC. AS THE PROPOSED SETBACKS |
| | INDICATED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE DO NOT SEEM TO |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE SETBACKS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 18. FENCES, GATES, ETC. LOCATED WITHIN THE FRONT |
| | SETBACK ARE NOT TO EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 19. THE BIKE RACK AT BUILDING 5 IS ORIENTED IN SUCH A |
| | WAY THAT BOTH SPACES CANNOT BE ACCESSED. |
| | |
| | 20. IN ADDITION TO THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING AT THE |
| | ROOF DECK, PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING AS |
| | MEASURED TO THE TOP OF THE PARAPET. |
| | |
| | 21. THE LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED, PLUS THE IMPERVIOUS |
| | SURFACE AREA PROPOSED, SHOULD ADD UP TO 100%. ACCORDING |
| | TO THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE, THE |
| | TOTAL IS ONLY 93%. |
| | |
| | 22. EXPLANATION IS NEEDED REGARDING THE SECURITY GATE |
| | AT THE NORTH END OF THE FPL SUBSTATION. HOW WILL FPL |
| | MAINTAIN ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES? WHEN IS THE |
| | GATE OPEN/CLOSED? WILL PATRONS OF THE SCIENCE CENTER BE |
| | PRESENT WHEN THIS GATE IS CLOSED AND IF SO, WILL A |
| | TURNAROUND NEED TO BE PROVIDED? |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 23, |
| | 2022. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 22, 2023, PLANNING |
| | BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO |
| | LATER THAN FEBRUARY 7, 2023. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND |
| | BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ??? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
