| Date |
Text |
| 2022-12-04 10:02:41 | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING: |
| | -PLANS SHOW BUILDING OF STRUCTURES IN FPL EASEMENT IN |
| | THE SOUTHWEST AREA OF PROJECT. IS THAT ALRIGHT WITH |
| | FPL? |
| | -THERE IS A STOP SIGN TOO CLOSE TO PROPOSED WATER |
| | SERVICE ON CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE INCREASE THE HORIZONTAL |
| | CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN THEM. |
| | -CALLOUT SIZE OF PROPOSED WATER METER AND PROPOSED |
| | FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. |
| | -CIVIL PLANS SHOW PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND |
| | STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION IN WESTERN FPL EASEMENT AS WELL |
| | AS PARKING SPOTS. IS THAT ALRIGHT WITH FPL? |
| | -EXISTING BE AND IRR SHOWING RUNNING UNDERNEATH |
| | PROPOSED CHILLER ENCLOSURE. |
| | -CIVIL PLANS SHOW EXISTING WATER METER AT FAR NORTH |
| | SIDE. SHOW THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINE FOR IT. |
| | -MASTER SITE PLAN SHOWS A GATE NEAR THE NORTHWEST SIDE |
| | OF FPL FACILITY. THIS WAS ALSO MENTIONED IN |
| | JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT. PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW |
| | PROPERTY LINES THERE AND PROPERTY APPRAISER SEEMS TO |
| | SHOW IT EITHER IN STATE RIGHT OF WAY OR FPL PROPERTY. |
| | -IS THERE A CURRENT ACCESS AGREEMENT OR EASEMENT ACROSS |
| | THE FPL STATION PROPERTY FOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC? |
| | -SURVEY SHOWS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND SOLAR AREA WHERE |
| | LAKE EXPANSION IS PROPOSED. WOULD THE RESTRICTIVE |
| | COVENANT AND SOLAR AREA PREVENT THAT CONSTRUCTION? |
| | -SURVEY SHOWS NEGATIVE PLEDGE AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE |
| | COVENANT. WOULD THAT PREVENT ANY OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | BLDG. 3 OR 1? |
| | -THE LABELING OF THE FPL EASEMENTS ON THE SURVEY AND |
| | CIVIL PLANS AT THE SOUTHWEST AREA OF THE PROPERTY DO |
| | NOT MATCH. PLEASE VERIFY POSITIONING AND UPDATE PLANS. |
| | -LABEL THE NEW GENERATOR ENCLOSURE ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | -WHERE WILL THE WASTEWATER FROM THE PROPOSED CITY OF |
| | WPB RESTROOM GO? |
| | -WHY IS THERE A PROPOSED SAND/OIL SEPARATOR NEAR NORTH |
| | SIDE OF PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM? |
| | -WHERE DOES THE WASTEWATER FROM THE PROPOSED PRIVATE |
| | LIFT STATION GO? SHOW AND LABEL FORCE MAIN. |
| | -DOES THE CHILLER ENCLOSURE NEED A SEPARATE METERED |
| | WATER SERVICE? |
| | -SIDEWALK LOCATION AT EASTERN SIDE DOES NOT MATCH |
| | BETWEEN CIVIL PLAN AND MASTER SITE PLAN. IN PARTICULAR, |
| | THE AREA NEAR WHERE POLE IS PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED ON |
| | MSP. PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS MATCH THE |
| | GENERAL LAYOUT. |
| | -RELOCATED WATER SERVICE FOR BUILDING 5 MUST HAVE AN RP |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. PLEASE SHOW THAT SYMBOL ON CIVIL |
| | PLAN. |
| | -NO NEW VALVES ARE SHOWN ON PROPOSED WATER MAIN. ADD |
| | GATE VALVES. |
| | -DOES THE PRIVATE LIFT STATION NEED A METERED WATER |
| | SERVICE? |
| | -ADD WATER AND SEWER DEMAND CALCULATIONS TO CIVIL |
| | PLANS. |
| | -WPB GIS IS SHOWING 6 INCH WATER MAIN PIPE SECTION NEAR |
| | EAST SIDE OF LEASE AREA. PLEASE VERIFY SIZING AND SHOW |
| | ON PLANS. MAY NEED TO INCREASE PIPE SIZE IF PROPOSED |
| | WATER SERVICES ARE LARGE DIAMETER. |
| | -ON SHEET LP10, SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES |
| | NEAR THE EAST SIDE. MISSING AT LEAST THE EXISTING WATER |
| | MAIN, SANITARY SEWER PIPE, AND PROPOSED RELOCATED |
| | METERED WATER SERVICE FOR BLDG. 5. |
| | -ON SHEET LP11, SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES. |
| | AT LEAST THE WATER MAIN IS MISSING. |
| | -UPDATE LANDSCAPING PLANS WITH THE MOST RECENT REVISION |
| | OF UTILITIES FROM CIVIL PLANS. |
| | -JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONED CHILLER ENCLOSURE |
| | WILL HOUSE A FIRE PUMP AND TANK. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION ON THE TANK, AND VERIFY IF ANY OF THE |
| | PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEMS WILL HAVE AUXILIARY WATER SYSTEM |
| | OR TANKS CONNECTED TO THEM. |
| | -CIVIL PLANS SAID THERE IS A WELL PUMP. IS THAT WHERE |
| | IRRIGATION WATER WILL COME FROM? |
| | RESPECTFULLY, |
| | MARK HURLEY [email protected] |
| |
Print |
