| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-13 16:30:43 | 1/13/23 ??? FAILED |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING PROCESS COMMENTS WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING: |
| | A. WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | B. PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS AND 2 SETS OF FOLDED PHYSICAL PLANS, ALONG |
| | WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 IN X 17 IN). |
| | C. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | D. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | E. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF |
| | 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | AFTER THE FIRST RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | REQUIRED MATERIALS MUST BE PROVIDED: |
| | F. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM THE CITY |
| | OF WEST PALM BEACH ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS |
| | REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, |
| | STORM DRAINAGE, AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | G. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY/PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARD REVIEW (TPS) LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. [NOT |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | H. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE WARRANTY |
| | DEED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. [SATISFIED] |
| | I. PLEASE PROVIDE A PHYSICAL HARDCOPY OF THE ADDRESS |
| | REQUEST FORM. [SATISFIED] |
| | J. PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED PLANS ADDRESSING THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS BELOW. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | K. PLEASE PROVIDE/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION ON ALL THE DIFFERENT PLANS AND REQUIRED |
| | MATERIALS WITHIN THE APPLICATION PACKET RESUBMITTAL. |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | L. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED SIGN POSTING AFFIDAVITS |
| | WHEN SIGNS HAVE BEEN PUT UP/POSTED. [SATISFIED SUBJECT |
| | TO THESE BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE DEADLINES FOR THE |
| | PLANNING BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS] |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: |
| | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND |
| | REVISED PLANS REFERENCING THE CURRENT PROPERTY |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CENTREPARK COMMERCIAL |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND |
| | REVISED PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING |
| | CONSISTENT INFORMATION REGARDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | THE EXISTING LOT AREA, PROPOSED USES(S), AND PROPOSED |
| | MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | 3. PLEASE EITHER SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE |
| | PLANS (OVERALL SITE PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE |
| | PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 & 2 PLAN SHEETS) TO MATCH THE |
| | PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) OR REMOVE/DO |
| | NOT PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE |
| | PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS, SITE PLAN, AND LEVEL 1 & |
| | 2 PLAN SHEETS) IN YOUR RESUBMITTAL PACKET. [PARTIALLY |
| | SATISFIED] |
| | 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED |
| | EASEMENTS ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING SETBACK DIMENSION FROM THE NORTH (SIDE) |
| | PROPERTY LINE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 |
| | OF 1). [SATISFIED] |
| | 6. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE WIDTH |
| | DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ON THE PRELIMINARY |
| | SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). [SATISFIED] |
| | 7. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO |
| | AUSTRALIAN AVENUE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH REQUIREMENT PER RESOLUTION NO. |
| | 16-21. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 8. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE CORRECT INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USE PER SECTION 94-486 |
| | OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS |
| | (ZLDR). THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | 9. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROPOSAL IS NOT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-486 OF THE ZLDR FOR THE |
| | MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | MEDICAL OFFICE USE. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISE THE PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [WITHDRAWN] |
| | 10. BASED ON REVIEW COMMENTS NUMBER 9 AND 10 ABOVE AND |
| | PER SUBSECTIONS 94-485(O) AND (Q) OF THE ZLDR, PLEASE |
| | REVISE THE PLANS, ACCORDINGLY, FOR THE REQUIRED AND |
| | PROPOSED NUMBER OF HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES AND |
| | BICYCLE PARKING. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF ALL PROPOSED HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACES ON THE |
| | DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) HANDICAP/ADA PARKING SPACE ON |
| | LEVEL 1. [SATISFIED] |
| | 13. PER SUBSECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDR PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE |
| | PROPOSED LOADING SPACES ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION, |
| | HEIGHT, AND INTENSITY OF ALL OUTDOOR ILLUMINATION ON |
| | THE DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 15. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE HEIGHT AND |
| | SIZE OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIZE ON THE DIFFERENT |
| | PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 16. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE |
| | REQUIREMENT PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(2)(E)(2) OF THE |
| | ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 17. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF ALL PUBLIC ART PROPOSED ON THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [RESPONSE PROVIDED] |
| | 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS (OR OPERATIONAL EQUIVALENTS) |
| | WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE(S) ON THE |
| | DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 19. PLEASE IDENTIFY/INDICATE/DEMONSTRATE THE LOCATION |
| | OF ANY SPECIAL UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS VALVES, |
| | METERS, BACKFLOW CONNECTIONS, PUMP STATIONS, |
| | TRANSFORMERS, AND ALL ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ON THE |
| | DIFFERENT PLANS, ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR |
| | DUMPSTERS AND SIGNS. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | 21. IT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT THERE IS AN |
| | INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE AND |
| | PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS TABLE ON THE |
| | PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1), THEREFORE, |
| | PLEASE CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. [SATISFIED] |
| | 22. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED |
| | TO 20% IN THE SITE TABULAR DATA TABLE ON THE |
| | PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) ACCORDING TO |
| | SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 23. PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM REQUIRED REAR SETBACK TO |
| | FIVE (5) FEET IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS |
| | TABLE ON THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1) |
| | ACCORDING TO SECTION 94-243 OF THE ZLDR. [SATISFIED] |
| | 24. PLEASE REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | 25. PER RESOLUTION NO. 16-21, PLEASE SUBMIT/PROVIDE |
| | SIGNED LETTERS FROM THE CENTREPARK PROPERTY OWNER???S |
| | ASSOCIATION AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY |
| | STATING THAT THEY REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL REVIEW COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED: |
| | M. PLEASE PROVIDE THE STANDARD OF COMPLIANCE RESPONSES |
| | TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY???S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) SECTION 94-207. |
| | 26. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 2., PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT A REVISED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND REVISED |
| | PLANS IDENTIFYING/INDICATING/DEMONSTRATING CONSISTENT |
| | INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING |
| | HEIGHT. |
| | 27. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 3., PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT REVISED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANS (OVERALL SITE |
| | PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT PARAMETERS SHEETS) TO MATCH THE |
| | PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1 OF 1). |
| | 28. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 10., PLEASE |
| | CORRECT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING |
| | INDICATED ON THE SITE TABULAR DATA. |
| | 29. THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SUM |
| | TOTAL AREA ALLOWANCE PER SUBSECTION 94-408(D)(3)(B) OF |
| | THE ZLDR. THEREFORE, PLEASE REVISE THE DIFFERENT PLANS, |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 30. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 20., PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE THE STANDARD CITY DETAILS FOR DUMPSTERS. |
| | 31. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 24., PLEASE |
| | REVISE THE WAIVERS BEING REQUESTED ACCORDING TO THE |
| | PROPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT. |
| | 32. IN REFERENCE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT 25., PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT/PROVIDE THE SIGNED LETTER FROM THE CENTREPARK |
| | ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD EXPLICITLY STATING THAT THEY |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED PROJECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | KEVIE DEFRANC |
| | SENIOR PLANNER - PLANNING DIVISION |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1449 |
| | |
| |
Print |
