| Date |
Text |
| 2023-05-08 10:37:36 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 4/17/2023 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE |
| | DELETED. |
| | |
| | 6. [SATISFIED] IF DUMPSTER DRIVEWAY CAN REMAIN, REPLACE |
| | TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER WITH DROP CURB ACROSS THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: SHOW THE PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENTS/CHANGES WITHIN THE PARK PARCEL TO |
| | ACCOMMODATE THIS PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 7. [SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL UTILITIES (SIZE, |
| | MATERIAL) ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. SHOW ON THE GRADING |
| | AND DRAINAGE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 8. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE TREES AND THE EXISTING CATCH |
| | BASIN BETWEEN THE PARK'S DRIVEWAY AND THE NORTH |
| | PROPERTY LINE OF THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 9. [SATISFIED] THERE APPEAR TO BE A UTILITY GATE VALVE |
| | BOX AND A LIGHT POLE IN THE SIDEWALK THAT ARE NOT SHOWN |
| | ON THE SURVEY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: VALVE IS NOT SHOWN. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (2/3/2023 SUBMITTAL) |
| | |
| | 12. [NOT SATISFIED] REVIEW THE PLACEMENT OF THE TRENCH |
| | DRAIN ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY AT THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. IT |
| | IS SHOWN AT A HIGH POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENT: THE FLOODING WILL NOT GET HIGHER |
| | THAN ELEVATION 15.0 FT NAVD BEFORE OVERFLOWING TO |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTIES. IF WATER IS FLOWING OUT OF THE |
| | TRENCH DRAIN, THEN THE BUILDING WILL LIKELY BE FLOODED |
| | BECAUSE THE FFE IS LOWER THAN THE ELEVATION OF THE |
| | TRENCH DRAIN. |
| | |
| | 13. [SATISFIED] DRIVEWAY APRON TO BE CONCRETE WITHIN |
| | THE S. DIXIE RIGHT OF WAY UNLESS FDOT APPROVES ASPHALT. |
| | |
| | 14. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING |
| | DRIVEWAYS AND DROP CURB WITH TYPE F CURB AND GUTTER AND |
| | CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT MAX. 2% CROSS SLOPE. |
| | |
| | 15. [SATISFIED ??? EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE LIGHT |
| | POLE UNLESS THE POLE AND HAND HOLES CAN BE LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE 10-FT EASEMENT.] SHOW WHERE THE LIGHT POLE |
| | NORTH OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY (AND WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DRIVEWAY) WILL BE LOCATED. TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE |
| | TREE CANOPY. |
| | |
| | 16. [SATISFIED] CONSTRUCTING THE DRIVEWAY AND TRENCHING |
| | THE WATER SERVICE LINE SO CLOSE TO THE EXISTING TREES |
| | MAY LEAVE THE TREES UNSTABLE AFTER THE ROOTS ARE |
| | PRUNED.. |
| | |
| | 17. [SATISFIED] REVIEW STRIPING CALLOUTS IN THE PARKING |
| | LOT, IN PARTICULAR THE STOP BAR AND DOUBLE YELLOW |
| | STRIPING. |
| | |
| | 18. [SATISFIED ??? EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE |
| | PORTION OF SIDEWALK OUTSIDE OF THE 10-FT UTILITY |
| | EASEMENT.] SECTION A - SHOW THE PROPOSED BACK OF WALK |
| | AT THE EXISTING GRADE AND CREATE A DRIVEWAY TRANSITION |
| | BETWEEN THE FRONT OF SIDEWALK AND THE BACK OF VALLEY |
| | GUTTER. SEE FDOT STANDARD PLAN #522-003. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
