| Date |
Text |
| 2023-05-15 10:13:23 | FROM:SMITH AMISIAL =LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1562 |
| | PROJECT: 4801 S DIXIE Z22100019 |
| | MAY 15,2023 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED. THE VALUE OF THE BUILDING IS $127,532.00 |
| | PER THE PBC PROPERTY APPRAISER. THE PROJECTED COST OF |
| | THE CHANGES FOR THE BUILDING ARE EXPECTED TO EXCEED |
| | $64,000.00, EXCEEDING 50% OF THE VALUE. PER SECTION |
| | 94-441(C)(2), THIS REQUIRES THE ENTIRE SITE BE BROUGHT |
| | INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | REVISE PLANS TO SHOW LANDSCAPING MEETING THE CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW FOR CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TREE INVENTORY AND DISPOSITION |
| | PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS AND IDENTIFYING THE EXISTING |
| | TREES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. |
| | |
| | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE TWO FICUS TREES NEED TO BE |
| | EVALUATED FOR HEALTH AND STRUCTURE. CONSTRUCTION IN |
| | CLOSE PROXIMITY MAY NEGATIVELY AFFECT THEM AND THE |
| | EXISTING AND POTENTIAL RISK SHOULD BE ASSESSED. |
| | FICUS TREE #2 (REFERRED IN ARBORIST REPORT AS #466) IS |
| | NOT IN GOOD CONDITION PER THE ARBORISTS REPORT AND |
| | CONSTRUCTION AROUND THE ROOT SYSTEM COULD SIGNIFICANTLY |
| | INCREASE RISK OF FAILURE. FICUS TREE #1 (REFERRED IN |
| | ARBORIST REPORT AS #465) IS IN REASONABLY HEALTHY AND |
| | BALANCED CONDITION, BUT THE LOCATION OF THE PAVED AREA |
| | PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WILL REMOVE A SIGNIFICANT |
| | PORTION OF THE EXISTING ROOT SYSTEM AND MAY INCREASE |
| | THE RISK OF FAILURE. |
| | |
| | NEW FEED BACK REGARDING ITEM 3 |
| | THE ARBORIST REPORT PROVIDED ONLY PROVIDES THE CURRENT |
| | HEALTH AND STRUCTURE REPORT OF THE TWO FICUS TREES 466 |
| | AND 465. TREE 466???S CONDITION IS QUESTIONABLE TO |
| | PRESERVE AS IS PER THE ARBORIST REPORT. LANDSCAPE PLANS |
| | PROVIDED PROPOSE CUTTING THE ROOTS BACK AND INSTALLING |
| | A ROOT BARRIER WITHIN THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE TWO |
| | FICUS TREES. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT THAT |
| | SHOWS HOW MUCH OF THE ROOT STRUCTURE WILL BE CUT BACK |
| | AND THE SURVIVABILITY AND VIABILITY OF THE TWO TREES TO |
| | REMAIN IN THEIR LOCATION AFTER THE ROOT CUTBACK AND |
| | ROOT BARRIERS ARE IN PLACE AND THE PLAN OF ACTION FOR |
| | SUCH. THE ARBORIST REPORT MUCH ADDRESS THE RISK OF |
| | FAILURE, IF ANY, AND MITIGATION PROCEDURES/PLANS FOR |
| | THE REMOVAL OF PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING ROOT SYSTEM. A |
| | LETTER STATING THE OWNERS CONSENT TO REPLACE THE TREES |
| | IF THEY FAIL WILL NOT SUFFICE TO KEEP THE TREES IN THE |
| | LOCATIONS AS PROPOSED IN LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS FOR |
| | THE SITE BASED ON 40% OPEN SPACE PER SECTION |
| | 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE OPEN |
| | SPACE BASED ON THE SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | |
| | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2) LABEL |
| | THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG EACH |
| | PROPERTY LINE AND CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF TREES |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR EACH BUFFER SEGMENT. THE |
| | TOTAL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY LINE PER THE SURVEY MUST |
| | BE USED. |
| | EAST AND WEST BUFFER CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS MUST |
| | BE INCLUDED. |
| | |
| | NEW FEED BACK REGARDING ITEM 5 |
| | THE EAST BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AND CALCULATIONS CAN BE |
| | PROVIDED WITH THE SIDEWALK THERE. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 6. NO LONGER ACCRUBLE THE SPLIT ZONING FOR THE SITE |
| | CREATES CONFLICTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER |
| | REQUIREMENTS BEING DIFFERENT FOR EACH ZONING CATEGORY. |
| | NON RESIDENTIAL ZONING ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING |
| | REQUIRES A WALL PER SECTION 94-443(A). THIS COULD BE |
| | RESOLVED BY REZONING. |
| | WEST BUFFER CALCULATIONS MUST BE SHOWN AND BUFFER |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443 (E)2., PROVIDE THE 30% |
| | FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATION REQUIRED AND PROVIDED |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING AND THE SECOND BUILDING. THE |
| | PLAN MUST SHOW THE LINEAR FOOTAGE OF EACH BUILDING |
| | PERIMETER, REQUIRED LINEAR FOOTAGE AND PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A. AND B., |
| | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND INTERIOR ISLANDS MUST |
| | HAVE AT LEAST 8 FEET WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA AND RUN THE |
| | FULL LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACE. EACH AREA |
| | SHALL HAVE AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE PER ROW |
| | OF PARKING. |
| | THE PARKING IS BEING RECONFIGURED FROM THE EXISTING SO |
| | TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS MUST BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED. A MINIMUM OF 75% OF ALL TREES REQUIRED TO |
| | BE PLANTED WITHIN THE PARKING AREA MUST BE CATEGORY 1 |
| | SHADE TREES. SHOW THE NUMBER REQUIRED AND THE |
| | PERCENTAGE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED UTILITY LINES |
| | INCLUDING WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE MUST BE SHOWN ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH REQUIRED |
| | LANDSCAPING. CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN, SITE PLAN AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE CONSISTENT. |
| | THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE LINE WITH ROOT BARRIER WILL |
| | REMOVE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF THE |
| | TWO EXISTING FICUS TREES, WOULD BE BETTER IF LOCATED |
| | AWAY FROM THE TREES. |
| | |
| | 11. SATISFIED. SHOW AND LABEL ALL OVERHEAD POWER LINES |
| | THAT WILL LIMIT THE TREE SPECIES TO RIGHT TREE RIGHT |
| | PLACE GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 12. PER SECTION 94-443 (A)(1) A PROTECTIVE SCREEN WALL |
| | IS REQUIRED ALONG ANY ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY |
| | LINES. THE SPLIT ZONING CAUSES A CONFLICT IF ANY OF THE |
| | PROPOSED COMMERCIAL USE IS NOT BUFFERED FROM THE |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTY. THE PARKING AREA ENCROACHES INTO THE |
| | SF 14 ZONING. |
| | |
| | 13. NOT SATISFIED. ADONIDIA PALMS MUST BE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 8 FEET CT. |
| | THE REPLY IN COMMENTS IS INCORRECTLY REFERRING TO |
| | SPACING. |
| | |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| |
Print |
