| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-30 17:28:39 | FAILED |
| | 3/30/2023 |
| | |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED |
| | STAFF WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY THIS IS NOT BEING REZONED |
| | AS THE SITE DESIGN SEEMS TO BE LIMITED DUE TO THE |
| | SINGLE FAMILY ZONING LOCATED ON THE REAR OF THE |
| | PROPERTY. NOTE THAT TO THE SF14 ZONING DESIGNATION TO |
| | THE REAR. NOTE THAT TH FLU. FOR THIS SITE IS COMMERICAL |
| | /COMMERCIAL EAST. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED |
| | (PLANS WERE REVISED COMMENT NO LONGER APPLIES) |
| | THE WIDTH OF THE EXPANSION ON THE FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT |
| | MATCH WHAT IS ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3. NOT SATISFIED |
| | THERE IS NO LOADING SPACE DESIGNATED ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | ADDITION COMMENT REGARDING THE LOADING SPACE |
| | THE LOADING SPACE WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE LOCATED IN |
| | THE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED |
| | WHAT IS THE LINE EXTENDING FROM BUILDING B? |
| | |
| | 5. NOT SATISFIED |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE THE MONUMENT SIGN DIMENTIONS. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED |
| | SINCE YOU ARE ALTERING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING |
| | AREA, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE ALL THE DIMENTIONS |
| | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY CODE. |
| | |
| | 6A. SATISFIED |
| | (PLANS WERE REVISED COMMENT NO LONGER APPLIES) |
| | PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE 3 PARKING SPACES WEST OF |
| | THE ADA SPACES, AS THEY APPEAR LONGER THAN THE 4 TO THE |
| | EAST OF THEM. |
| | |
| | 6B. NOT SATISFIED |
| | PROVIDE ALL THE PARKING DIMENSION FOR THE PARKING |
| | SPACES OCCUPYING BY THE CAR LIFT. |
| | |
| | 6C SATISFIED |
| | NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THEDRIVE AISLE AS |
| | TWO- WAY DIRECTION MOVEMENT REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 24 |
| | FEET WIDE DRIVE AISLE. |
| | |
| | 7. NOT SATISFIED |
| | STAFF NEED A GREATER IN DEPTH EXPLANATION HOW THE CAR |
| | LIFTS WORK AND HOW THEY WILL OPERATE. WITH THE TWO |
| | LIFTS BEING LOCATED BACK TO BACK FROM ONE ANOTHER AND |
| | THE FDOT LETTER STATING "VALET OPERATION NOT PROPOSED" |
| | |
| | 7A NEW COMMENT |
| | THE CAR LIFT IS REQUIRED TO BE PROPERLY SCREENED PLEASE |
| | SHOW HOW YOU ARE PLANNING ON SCREENING THE LIFT. |
| | |
| | 8. NOT SATISFIED |
| | PROVIDE THE DIMENTIONS FOR THE CAR LIFT |
| | |
| | 8A NOT SATISFIED |
| | WILL THIS INTERFERE WITH ANY WHEEL STOPS ON THE PARKING |
| | BELOW? |
| | |
| | 8B. NOT SATISFIED |
| | IS THE 5FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SUFFICENT TO ENCURE THE |
| | RAISED CARS ARE LOCATED A SAFE DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE |
| | ADJACENT BUILDING? PLEASE PROVIDE A RANGE OF HOW FAR |
| | THE CARS WILL ENROACH INTO THIS SETBACKS/LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIELD |
| | (PLANS NO LONGER SHOW LIFT LOCATED IN THE SINGLE FAMILY |
| | ZONING DISTRICT) |
| | THE PROPOSED PARKING LIFTS EXTEND INTO THE SF14 PORTION |
| | OF THIS PROPERTY, WHICH IS CONSIDERED TO BE OFF SITE |
| | PARKING. IT WAS STAFFS UNDERSTANDING THAT ALL NEW |
| | PARKING FACILTIES WOULD BE CONTAINED WITHIN THW NC |
| | PROTION OF THIS PROPERTY. NOTE THAT PLACING NEW OFF |
| | SITE PARKING FACILITES WOULD REQUIRED A CLASS B SPECIAL |
| | USE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIELD |
| | THERE IS A PORTION OF CONCRETE BETWEEN THE TWO ADA |
| | SPACES THAT WOULD NOT ALLOW THE SPACES TO BE STRIPED AS |
| | REQUIRED BY CODE. PLEASE SHOW THAT THESE PARKING SPACES |
| | ARE STRIPED APPROPRIATELY. |
| | |
| | 11.NOT STATIFED |
| | ARE YOU PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE ON STREET PARKING |
| | AREAS? STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE EXISTING ON STREET |
| | PARKING DOES NOT MEET CODE PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | DIMENSIONS OF WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ALONG DIXIE HWY. |
| | |
| | 11A. STATIFIED |
| | (NO ALTERNATIONS ARE GOING TO BE MADE AT THIS TIME |
| | REGARDING THE ON STREET PARKING.) |
| | IF PROPOSING AN ALTERATION OF THE ON STREET PARKING |
| | AREA, PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT |
| | CERTIFYING THE ON-STREET PARKING. |
| | |
| | 12. STATIFIED |
| | PROVIDE AN ACCESS DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT |
| | CERTIFING THE CHANGES YOU ARE MAKING TO THE ACCESS |
| | POINT ALONG DIXIE HWY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ALEXIS SANGELEER |
| | PLANNER |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE PROVIDE A MINMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF |
| | FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUMBITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/ |
| | PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONA; |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE ITF THE PLANNING DIVSION HAS NOT RECEIVED |
| | A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS/REVIEW COMMENTS WITHIN |
| | 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING/COMMENTS |
| | ISSUANCE BY (MAY 30,2023 ) THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY |
| | NOTIFY THE APPLICATNTHAT THE CASE IS CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRED A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOSLYISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSES, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($1000). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
