| Date |
Text |
| 2023-04-24 17:04:08 | CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL: |
| | 1. PDG AND UTILITY PLANS SUBMITTED FOR ENGINEERRING |
| | PERMIT SHALL HAVE ALL UTILITY PIPES WITHIN THE R/W |
| | LABELED WITH SIZE AND MATERIAL. EXISTING PIPE INVERTS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED AT DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER |
| | STRUCTURES. |
| | |
| | 2. THE EOR WILL NEED TO JUSTIFY THE PIPE SIZE FOR ALL |
| | STORM PIPES LARGER THAN 15" AND CONNECTING TO THE |
| | CITY'S MS4. BASED ON THE CURRENT DESIGN, THIS WOULD |
| | APPLY TO THE PROPOSED 30" DIAMETER RCP PIPE BETWEEN |
| | CB-1 AND EX. STORM MH #8. |
| | |
| | 3. PBAU WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DRAIANGE |
| | SYSTEM PIPES AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PUBLIC R/W |
| | UPSTREAM OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURE CB-1. A MAINTENANCE |
| | AGREEMENT MAY NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY. |
| | |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 3/24/2023 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS WERE |
| | REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 1. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE |
| | AND MATERIAL). ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - SEE CONDITIONAL |
| | APPROVAL NOTE #1 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PARKING STRIPING DETAIL (ON |
| | SHEET C3.1) DOES NOT MEET CITY CODE (SECTION 94-485). |
| | ADD'L COMMENT - DETAIL IS MISSING THE 4" X 12" |
| | CONNECTOR STRIPE AT THE ENDS OF THE PARALLEL STRIPES. |
| | SHOW CORRECT PARKING LOT STRIPING ON THE ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 3. [SATISFIED] SHOW COMPLETE REMOVAL OF STORM PIPE |
| | BETWEEN STORM MH#2 AND STORM MH #4. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: |
| | MEET WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES DURING AFTER SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL TO DETERMINE THE LIMITS OF THE STORM PIPE |
| | REMOVAL/ABANDONMENT DUE TO THE SANITARY SEWER CROSSING. |
| | |
| | 4. [SATISFIED] REMOVE STORM MH #3 AND THE PIPE BETWEEN |
| | STORM MH #3 AND CURB INLET #4. |
| | |
| | 6. [NOT SATISFIED] JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE |
| | SIZES THAT WILL BE CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S STORM |
| | DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. SEE |
| | CONDITIONAL APPROVAL #2 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES |
| | TO BE CHECKED TO SEE IF THEY ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR |
| | PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE CONNECTIONS. ADD'L COMMENT - EX. |
| | MH #8 SHOWS WEST PPE CHANGING FROM 10" TO 30". THE 30" |
| | PIPE TO BE VALIDATED PER COMMENT #6. |
| | |
| | 9. [SATISFIED] FDOT SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER |
| | SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG S. OLIVE AVE. |
| | |
| | 13. [SATISFIED] SECTION C-C: |
| | A. LABEL S. OLIVE R/W |
| | B. LABEL THE SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER |
| | C. LABEL THE HEADER CURB(?) ALONG THE EDGE OF THE |
| | PAVER SIDEWALK. NOTE THE HEADER CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON |
| | THE PGD PLAN. |
| | |
| | 14. [SATISFIED] SECTION D-D: |
| | A. INDICATE SUPERPAVE ASPHALT WITHIN THE R/W. |
| | B. LABEL THE R/W (WALLINGFORD PLACE). |
| | C. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR THE PAVER |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (2/24/2023 SUBMITTAL) |
| | 15. [SATISFIED] LIST VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND |
| | CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON EVERY SHEET WITH |
| | ELEVATION INFORMATION. INFORMATION IS MISSING ON SHEETS |
| | C4.2 |
| | |
| | 16. [SATISFIED] LABEL THE CONTROL STRUCTURE ON THE PGD |
| | PLAN. PROVIDE A DETAIL WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF |
| | BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. ADD'L COMMENT: ADD |
| | THE WEIR ELEVATION TO THE PDG PLAN. PRB WILL BE NEEDED |
| | OVER THE WEST PIPE. |
| | |
| | 17. [SATISFIED] INDICATE ON THE DEMOLITION PLAN IF THE |
| | STORM PIPE SOUTH OF CURB INLET #1 IS TO REMAIN OR BE |
| | REMOVED. PGD PLAN CALLS OUT 46 LF OF 24-INCH RCP. |
| | |
| | 18. [SATISFIED] CURB RAMPS ARE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO |
| | CURRENT ADA STANDARDS IF THE ASPHALT ADJACENT TO THE |
| | CURB RAMP IS MODIFIED (INCLUDING MILLING AND |
| | RESURFACING). REVIEW THE CURB RAMPS ON OPPOSITE SIDES |
| | OF THE STREETS TO DETERMINE IF THE RAMPS CURRENTLY MEET |
| | ADA REQUIREMENTS. INDICATE ON SHEET C3.0, SITE |
| | GEOMETRY, MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 19. [SATISFIED] SFWMD REQUIRES LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE |
| | CONTRACT BE IN PLACE FOR PERVIOUS PAVERS TO BE |
| | CONSIDERED PERVIOUS SURFACES IN THE STORMWATER |
| | MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS. ADD'L COMMENT - PERVIOUS PAVERS NO |
| | LONGER PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 20 [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] APPLICANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE |
| | FOR MAINTAINING DRAINAGE SYSTEM FROM PROPOSED CB #11 TO |
| | THE CONNECTION TO EXISTING MH #8, INCLUDING THE STORM |
| | PIPES BETWEEN PROPOSED CURB INLET #9 AND PROPOSED CURB |
| | INLET #7. ADD'L COMMENT - REMOVE "PRIVATE" FROM THE |
| | STORM PIPE LABELS FOR DRAINAGE PIPES WITHIN THE RIGHT |
| | OF WAY. PBAU WIL NEED TO ENTER INTO A MAINTENANCE |
| | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR PBAU TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO |
| | MAINTAIN THE STORM PIPE AND STRUCTURES WITHIN THE R/W. |
| | LIMITS OF MAINTENANCE TO BE INDICATED IN THE AGREEMENT. |
| | SEE SITE PLAN CONNDTION #3 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 21. [SATISFIED] THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A DROP OFF AREA |
| | SOUTH OF THE BUILDING IN THE CIRCLE DRIVE PULL UP. |
| | ADVISE IF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE DROP OFF AREA IS |
| | TO BE FLUSH WITH THE PAVEMENT FOR ADA ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | REVISE SECTION B-B ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (3/4/2023 SUBMITAL) |
| | 22. S. DIXIE HWY IS MAINTAINED BY FDOT. ANY |
| | IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE R/W WILL NEED A PERMIT FROM |
| | FDOT. |
| | |
| | 23. PROP. MH-3 IS MIISING THE INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE |
| | EXISTING WEST PIPE. SHOW ON THE ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMTITAL. |
| | |
| | 24. INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE SPECIAL FDOT TYPE F CURB |
| | AND GUTTER ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTAL. CONTACT |
| | REVIEWER FOR INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |