| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-15 10:16:49 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY |
| | MEETING |
| | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC STUDY. |
| | PER OTHER COMMENTS, THE ANALYSIS MAY NEED REVISION OR |
| | INCLUSION OF FURTHER ITEMS |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING MANAGEMENT |
| | PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION PERTAINING THE |
| | AGREEMENTS FOR THE CROSS-PARKING FACILITIES NOT OWNED |
| | BY PBAU AND OUTSIDE OF THE CSPD; SPECIFICALLY, A |
| | STATEMENT OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY EACH FACILITY OWNER(S) |
| | THAT CONFIRMS AVAILABILITY OF EXTRA PARKING CAPACITY AT |
| | THEIR FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE PBAU DEMAND |
| | 5) TO BE SATISFIED BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | PROVIDE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN. PLEASE REFER TO |
| | CITY CODE 86-246 FOR DETAILS. THIS ITEM WILL BE |
| | INCLUDED IN THE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL |
| | 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THE |
| | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT |
| | (TDM) MEASURES MAY BE ENCOURAGED. TO BE FURTHER |
| | DISCUSSED AND/OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED, AND INCLUDED |
| | IN THE ANALYSIS |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE |
| | PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION |
| | RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, |
| | PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, |
| | GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & |
| | DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY |
| | LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED |
| | T-1.0. LATEST SUBMISSION PROVIDES VERY FEW OF THE |
| | REQUESTED ITEMS IN THIS COMMENT, ALL DIMENSIONS AND |
| | PROPOSED SITE FEATURES ARE MISSING |
| | 8) SATISFIED. THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN SHOULD |
| | INCLUDE DIXIE HIGHWAY AND ACACIA RD AS THE WESTERN AND |
| | SOUTHERN BOUNDARIES, RESPECTIVELY |
| | 9) SATISFIED. IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF |
| | THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. DETAILS |
| | MUST BE DRAWN, PLEASE COMPLETE THE T-1 SHEET |
| | ACCORDINGLY |
| | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING |
| | PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH |
| | PLAN COULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE |
| | ONE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC CIVIL SHEET |
| | NAME/NUMBER OR INCLUDE IN THE T-1.0 PLAN. |
| | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT |
| | COLORS |
| | 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS |
| | SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES |
| | (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, |
| | SIGNAL, ETC.) |
| | 13) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH |
| | THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) |
| | TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V / |
| | 10,000W CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE A SET OF OPTIONAL |
| | LOCATIONS, THE FINAL SELECTION COULD THEN BE PERFORMED |
| | AT A LATER STAGE AS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL |
| | 14) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 15) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF |
| | EXISTING AND PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING STALLS. PROVIDE |
| | THE NUMBER OF METERED STALLS THAT ARE BEING REMOVED OR |
| | RELOCATED, IF ANY. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION |
| | SHOWCASING APPROVAL FROM PARKING DEPARTMENT FOR THE |
| | REMOVAL OF THE SEVEN (7) ON-STREET PARKING STALLS AND |
| | FEES PAID, IF ANY |
| | 16) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK |
| | 17) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE A THOROUGH VALET OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS |
| | OF THE ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE |
| | METHODOLOGY MEETING. PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER NARRATIVE, |
| | IDEALLY A PARAGRAPH WITHIN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, REGARDING |
| | HOW THE DROP-OFF AREA VEHICULAR OPERATIONS WILL BE |
| | REGULATED, OPERATED AND MONITORED. A VALET OPERATIONAL |
| | ANALYSIS MUST BE PROVIDED AT THIS STAGE, IF POTENTIALLY |
| | CONTEMPLATED IN THE FUTURE |
| | 18) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY TRANSIT STOPS BEING |
| | IMPACTED? |
| | 19) SATISFIED. IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING AN |
| | EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITY? |
| | 20) SATISFIED. IS A GARAGE BEING PROPOSED? |
| | 21) SATISFIED. HAS THE OWNER OF THE PARKING LOT EAST OF |
| | S OLIVE AGREED WITH THE CLOSURE OF THE EXISTING |
| | DRIVEWAY FRONTING GRUBER PL? |
| | 22) SATISFIED. HOW ARE EXISTING OPERATIONS ON KINGS CT |
| | BEING IMPACTED? IS ACCESS BEING PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY |
| | REMOVED? |
| | 23) SATISFIED. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES SHOULD BE AT THE |
| | MINIMUM 8-FEET WIDE THROUGHOUT THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. GIVEN THE HIGH PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC OF THE |
| | AREA, IT IS RECOMMENDED A MINIMUM OF 10-FEET |
| | UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH, ESPECIALLY ALONG S OLIVE AVE. |
| | PLEASE SHOWCASE ALL SIDEWALKS AND THEIR DIMENSIONS IN |
| | THE T1.0 PLAN OR PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER |
| | DEPICTING SUCH ITEMS |
| | 24) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED, THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN |
| | DRIVEWAY SHOULD BE ALIGNED WITH CHADBOURNE CT |
| | 25) SATISFIED. IF APPROVED, PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN |
| | CROSSWALKS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN |
| | DRIVEWAY |
| | 26) SATISFIED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS ON S OLIVE |
| | AVE AT THE ACACIA RD INTERSECTION. THIS REQUEST WOULD |
| | INCREASE STUDENT/PEDESTRIAN SAFETY NEARBY THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT; NONETHELESS, DUE TO PBAU REQUEST, IT WILL |
| | BE DELAYED TO FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA |
| | 27) SATISFIED. INSTALL A PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK EITHER |
| | NORTH OR SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED NORTHERN DRIVEWAY |
| | 28) SATISFIED. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS AND |
| | CORRESPONDING STOP-FOR-PEDESTRIAN SIGNAGE BY THE |
| | WALLINGFORD PLACE AND GRUBER PLACE STREET TRANSITION, |
| | JUST SOUTH AND WEST OF THE TURNING PORTION, |
| | RESPECTIVELY |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
