| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-13 17:07:05 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: PBAU Z22100018 |
| | MARCH 13, 2023 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION LIST: |
| | ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TREE DISPOSITION INVENTORY |
| | MAP AS AN OVERLAY TO THE EXISTING SITE CONFIGURATION AS |
| | SHOWN ON THE SURVEY, NOT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SO THAT |
| | THE LOCATIONS MATCH THE TREE SURVEY. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. MOVE ALL MITIGATION INFORMATION TO THE |
| | TREE DISPOSITION SHEETS, SHOULD NOT BE ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | SHEETS. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT BOTANICAL NAME FOR MAHOGANY IN |
| | THE ARBORIST REPORT. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A |
| | CANOPY DIAMETER OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE |
| | MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE |
| | ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY |
| | DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW THE CATEGORY MITIGATION |
| | DUE AS SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE DUE INCLUDING THE PALM MITIGATION. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON |
| | THE PLANT LIST BY TREE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE A TOTAL |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | ??? SATISFIED. CORRECT NOTE ON L1.2 ALL CANOPY |
| | MITIGATION MUST BE PROVIDED ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU |
| | PAYMENT MADE TO THE CANOPY MITIGATION FUND. |
| | 1/26/23 BONDING IS NOT AN OPTION BY CODE PER THE |
| | PLANNING AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR. |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE |
| | TREES AND PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON |
| | SITE OR RELOCATED. PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE CONDITION |
| | FOR EACH NATIVE TREE OR PALM PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED IN |
| | THE ARBORISTS REPORT AND EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL |
| | PER SECTION 94-448. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT HAPPENED TO |
| | THE KAPOK TREE THAT WAS LOCATED ON THIS SITE. |
| | VERY SAD THAT THIS TREE WAS LOST. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED. THE LACK OF TREE CANOPY AND THE EXTENSIVE |
| | PAVED AREAS IN THE DESIGN AROUND THE PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | IS NOTED, THE HEAT ISLAND CREATED WILL NOT BE |
| | PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY. THERE IS A DEFICIT OF TREE CANOPY |
| | REPLACEMENT. |
| | 1/26/23 THE TREE CANOPY MITIGATION CAN BE ADDED |
| | ANYWHERE WITHIN THE CSPD BOUNDARY. THE ADDED TREES |
| | CANNOT BE REPLACEMENTS FOR TREES THAT ARE MISSING AND |
| | SHOULD BE REPLACED AS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON APPROVED |
| | PLANS OR ARE OBVIOUS REQUIRED TREES SUCH AS IN PARKING |
| | AREAS. A MASTER PLAN MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH TREE |
| | LOCATIONS, SPECIES AND SIZES INDICATED THAT WOULD BE |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION, AND THE PLAN |
| | THEN SUBMITTED WITH THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR THE |
| | BUSINESS SCHOOL PROJECT. THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE TREES |
| | TO BE PLANTED AND THE LANDSCAPE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE |
| | CO FOR THE NEW BUILDING. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER ALONG OLIVE NEEDS TO CONSIST |
| | OF TREES APPROPRIATE UNDER THE POWER LINES TO PROVIDE |
| | SHADE FOR THE SIDEWALK INSTEAD OF PALMS. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE |
| | DESIGN OPTIONS CHART TO ELIMINATE TAKING 51% IN TWICE |
| | IN THE SAME OPTION. SEE (3)GROUNDCOVER, (4) SHRUBS, AND |
| | (5) TREES. |
| | SOD AREA FOR OPTION #7 IS DIFFICULT TO VERIFY, SUGGEST |
| | DROP FROM LIST. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST |
| | LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH |
| | EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING, AS THERE |
| | ARE MULTIPLE CONFLICTS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. |
| | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT |
| | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT |
| | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE |
| | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH |
| | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH |
| | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE ONE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED |
| | ON THE PLANT LIST. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND |
| | MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR |
| | THE BUILDING, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A REVISED |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHOWING |
| | THE LOCATIONS AND SPECIES OF THE TREES TO MEET THE TREE |
| | MITIGATION REQUIRED ON SITE FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| |
Print |
