| Date |
Text |
| 2022-11-13 09:25:57 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL |
| | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION |
| | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE |
| | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION PROCESSES. |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE |
| | PLAN APPROVAL: |
| | |
| | 1. LABEL EXISTING UTILITIES (SIZE AND MATERIAL). |
| | |
| | 2. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT MEET CITY CODE. |
| | |
| | 3. SHOW COMPLETE REMOVAL OF STORM PIPE BETWEEN STORM |
| | MH#2 AND STORM MH #4. |
| | |
| | 4. REMOVE STORM MH #3 AND THE PIPE BETWEEN STORM MH #3 |
| | AND CURB INLET #4. |
| | |
| | 5. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE STORM PIPE BETWEEN CURB |
| | INLET #2 AND STORM MH #1 - TO BE REMOVED OR TO REMAIN? |
| | |
| | 6. JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED STORM PIPE SIZES THAT WILL BE |
| | CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 7. EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE CHECKED TO SEE IF |
| | THEY ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPE |
| | CONNECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 8. WHERE WILL PROPOSED STORM MH #5 DRAIN TO? EXISTING |
| | STORM PIPE TO THE SOUTH IS SHOWN TO BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 9. FDOT SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED ALONG S. OLIVE AVE. |
| | |
| | 10. PROVIDE PROPOSED FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | 11. REVIEW INVERTS OF SEWER AND STORM PIPES. THERE |
| | APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT EAST OF PROPOSED CATCH BASIN |
| | #11. |
| | |
| | 12. AVOID RUNNING THE STORM PIPE UNDER THE CIRCULAR |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA SOUTH OF THE BUILDING, |
| | |
| | 13. SECTION C-C: |
| | A. LABEL S. OLIVE R/W |
| | B. LABEL THE SPECIAL TYPE "F" CURB AND GUTTER |
| | C. LABEL THE HEADER CURB(?) ALONG THE EDGE OF THE |
| | PAVER SIDEWALK. NOTE THE HEADER CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON |
| | THE PGD PLAN. |
| | |
| | 14. SECTION D-D: |
| | A. INDICATE SUPERPAVE ASPHALT WITHIN THE R/W. |
| | B. LABEL THE R/W (WALLINGFORD PLACE). |
| | C. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR THE PAVER |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO |
| | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING |
| | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 1. DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP |
| | CRITERIA. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED WITH |
| | THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. CONSIDER LOW IMPACT |
| | DEVELOPMENT IN THE DESIGN OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT BEFORE START OF |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 3. PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
