| Date |
Text |
| 2022-11-14 09:06:28 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: PBAU Z22100017 |
| | NOVEMBER 8, 2022 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION LIST: |
| | ??? PROVIDE THE TREE DISPOSITION INVENTORY MAP AS AN |
| | OVERLAY TO THE EXISTING SITE CONFIGURATION AS SHOWN ON |
| | THE SURVEY, NOT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN SO THAT THE |
| | LOCATIONS MATCH THE TREE SURVEY. |
| | ??? MOVE ALL MITIGATION INFORMATION TO THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION SHEETS, SHOULD NOT BE ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | SHEETS. |
| | ??? CORRECT BOTANICAL NAME FOR MAHOGANY IN THE ARBORIST |
| | REPORT. |
| | ??? TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER |
| | OF 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES |
| | LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW |
| | THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE AS SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | ??? PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE |
| | INCLUDING THE PALM MITIGATION. |
| | ??? PROVIDE THE MITIGATION CREDITS BASED ON THE PLANT |
| | LIST BY TREE CATEGORY AND PROVIDE A TOTAL SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE. |
| | ??? CORRECT NOTE ON L1.2 ALL CANOPY MITIGATION MUST BE |
| | PROVIDED ON SITE OR PAYMENT IN LIEU PAYMENT MADE TO THE |
| | CANOPY MITIGATION FUND. |
| | |
| | 2. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE TREES AND |
| | PALMS IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR |
| | RELOCATED. PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE CONDITION FOR |
| | EACH NATIVE TREE OR PALM PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED IN THE |
| | ARBORISTS REPORT AND EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR REMOVAL PER |
| | SECTION 94-448. |
| | |
| | 3. PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT HAPPENED TO THE KAPOK |
| | TREE THAT WAS LOCATED ON THIS SITE. |
| | |
| | 4. THE LACK OF TREE CANOPY AND THE EXTENSIVE PAVED |
| | AREAS IN THE DESIGN AROUND THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS |
| | NOTED, THE HEAT ISLAND CREATED WILL NOT BE PEDESTRIAN |
| | FRIENDLY. THERE IS A DEFICIT OF TREE CANOPY REPLACEMENT |
| | |
| | 5. THE BUFFER ALONG OLIVE NEEDS TO CONSIST OF TREES |
| | APPROPRIATE UNDER THE POWER LINES TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR |
| | THE SIDEWALK INSTEAD OF PALMS. |
| | |
| | 6. CORRECT THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN |
| | OPTIONS CHART TO ELIMINATE TAKING 51% IN TWICE IN THE |
| | SAME OPTION. SEE (3)GROUNDCOVER, (4) SHRUBS, AND (5) |
| | TREES. |
| | |
| | 7. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS OF |
| | UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING, AS THERE ARE MULTIPLE |
| | CONFLICTS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 8. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. PLANT |
| | SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT MATERIAL |
| | ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT TOLERANT |
| | SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE LIST OF |
| | SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH FLORIDA |
| | WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH FLORIDA |
| | LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE ONE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE BASED ON THE |
| | PLANT LIST. |
| | |
| | 9. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED |
| | VALVES AND EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
