| Date |
Text |
| 2022-10-11 11:18:47 | CASE NO. Z22090021 |
| | CASE NAME GRAMERCY PARK |
| | ADDRESS 5615 PARKE AVENUE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ALEXANDER FOWLKES @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | 1. IT SEEMS THAT YOU HAVE ANALYZED THE ENTIRE SUBJECT |
| | AREA AS ONE PARCEL WITH AN ROS ZONING, WHEN IN FACT |
| | THIS IS 2 SEPARATE PARCELS. THE SOUTHERNMOST PARCEL IS |
| | ZONED ROS, HOWEVER THE NORTHERNMOST PARCEL IS ZONED |
| | CON. THESE ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS HAVE DIFFERENT |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND MUST BE ANALYZED AS SUCH. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE SEPARATE SITE CALCULATION TABLES TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-204 FOR THE ROS PARCEL AND SEC. |
| | 94-205 FOR THE CON PARCEL. |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE FUTURE PLANS |
| | FOR THIS PARK. PRIOR TO YOUR SUBMITTAL, IT WAS |
| | STAFF???S UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU WERE COMING IN ONLY TO |
| | SEEK APPROVAL FOR A MULCH PATH GOING INTO THE CON |
| | PARCEL AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER AND ACCOMPANYING SITE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ROS PARCEL. YET WE ARE SEEING SOME |
| | LARGE RETENTION PONDS GOING INTO THE CON PARCEL, |
| | RESULTING IN THE DISPOSITION OF A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF |
| | TREES. IS THIS PART OF A LATER PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT OR |
| | ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL FOR THESE AS A PART OF THIS |
| | APPLICATION? |
| | 2A. PLEASE NOTE THAT ONLY PASSIVE USES ARE PERMITTED |
| | WITHIN PARKS IN CON ZONING DESIGNATIONS. |
| | 2B. PLEASE NOTE THAT REMOVING SUCH A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER |
| | OF TREES FOR WATER RETENTION PONDS IN A CON ZONED |
| | PARCEL WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED. YOU WILL NEED TO GO |
| | THROUGH A REZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT TO |
| | PERMIT SUCH DEVELOPMENT. SO, IF THIS IS PART OF A |
| | FUTURE PHASE PLEASE DENOTE IT AS SUCH SO WE CAN MOVE |
| | FORWARD WITH THIS APPLICATION. |
| | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE BACKGROUND OF |
| | THE CON PARCEL. STAFF IS UNSURE WHY THIS PARCEL IS |
| | ZONED FOR CONSERVATION AND WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION |
| | REGARDING WHAT IS BEING PRESERVED OR PROTECTED HERE. |
| | 3A. IF YOU ARE PROPOSING DEVELOPMENT THAT WOULD GO |
| | BEYOND PASSIVE USES WITHIN THE CON PARCEL, AN |
| | ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WILL BE REQUIRED SHOWING THERE |
| | ARE NO THREATENED, ENDANGERED, OR RARE SPECIES. |
| | 4. YOU HAVE PROPOSED 4 PARKING SPACES IN THE CON |
| | PARCEL. ALTHOUGH CON ZONED AREAS ALLOW FOR IMPERVIOUS |
| | AREA, PUTTING PARKING IN THE PARCEL WOULD REQUIRE A |
| | WAIVER FROM THE ADDITIONAL USE STANDARDS, SEE SEC. |
| | 94-273 (D)(54.1)(B) WHICH STATES THAT NO PARKING SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED. |
| | A. THIS STANDARD IS WAIVABLE BY THE ZONING BOARD OF |
| | APPEALS, BUT SEEING AS YOU HAVE EXCEEDED YOUR REQUIRED |
| | PARKING STAFF WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO KEEP THIS AREA AS |
| | JUST AN ACCESS POINT AND NOT ALLOW FOR ANY PARKING. |
| | 5. PORTIONS OF THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED |
| | COMMUNITY CENTER GO UP TO HE MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK, |
| | THEREFORE YOU WILL NEED TO CONFIRM THE ROOF OVERHANG |
| | ENCROACHES NO MORE THAN 3 FT INTO THE SIDE SETBACK. |
| | 6. CONFIRM THAT THE OUTDOOR STAIRCASES ARE NOT TALLER |
| | THAN 3 FT. IF THEY ARE, THEY WILL NEED TO MEET PRIMARY |
| | STRUCTURE SETBACKS. |
| | 7. IS THE DUMPSTER ON THE SITE PLAN EXISTING OR |
| | PROPOSED? IF NOT EXISTING, PROVIDE DETAILS SHWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH LATEST REVISION OF CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH GENERAL CONSTRUCTION-GARBAGE ENCLOSURE STANDARD, |
| | GC-7. |
| | 8. PROVIDE THE SCREENING DETAILS OF THE WALL |
| | SURROUNDING THE HILLER SO STAFF CAN CONFIRM IT IS |
| | PROPERLY SCREENED. |
| | |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF |
| | FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS/REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC |
| | MEETING/COMMENT ISSUANCE (BY 12/13), THE PLANNING |
| | DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE CASE IS |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE |
| | A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | |
| |
Print |
