| Date |
Text |
| 2022-10-13 04:15:47 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING |
| | 2) CORRECT THE EXEMPTION REFERENCE AS IT IS TRAFFIC |
| | CONCURRENCY EXCEPTION AREA (TCEA), NOT CRA. |
| | 3) SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING. A FULL TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | IS NEEDED; EXEMPTION FROM COUNTY CONCURRENCY DOES NOT |
| | PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST MORE IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS, |
| | GIVEN THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN LAND USE AND TRIP |
| | GENERATION TOGETHER WITH IMPACT TO THE SURROUNDING |
| | ROADWAY NETWORK |
| | 4) ALL CONCERNS AND COMMENTS PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY IN |
| | THE TPS LETTER SHALL BE ADDRESSED |
| | 5) MORE DETAILED TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) |
| | MEASURES SHALL BE DISCUSSED AND AGREED WITH CITY |
| | PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS |
| | 6) TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSES SHALL BE CONDUCTED |
| | AT EACH IMPACTED UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ALONG PALM |
| | BEACH LAKES BLVD AND DIXIE HIGHWAY |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 7) PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING TRANSPORTATION RELATED |
| | FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, DRIVING AISLES, PARKING |
| | STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, DRIVEWAY, GATES, |
| | CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, CORNER & DRIVEWAY |
| | SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) PROPERLY LABELED |
| | AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD BE NAMED T-1.0 |
| | 8) IN THE T-1.0 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC CURB |
| | DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, |
| | PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS |
| | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 9) PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN. |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE SITE. SUCH |
| | PLAN IS PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW AND SHOULD BE |
| | NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T-1.1 OR T-2.0) |
| | 10) PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE TRUCK AND/OR |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND WHEEL |
| | PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT COLORS. |
| | PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS IN A SEPARATE SHEET. SUCH PLAN(S) |
| | CONTAINING THE ANALYSIS ARE PART OF THE TRANSPORTATION |
| | REVIEW AND SHOULD BE NAMED ACCORDINGLY (E.G. T1.2, |
| | T-3.0) |
| | 11) PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS SHEETS FOR |
| | EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (E.G. |
| | CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAL, |
| | ETC.) |
| | 12) PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE NUMBER OF |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA |
| | AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 13) IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, PROVIDE AN |
| | OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE ANALYSIS SHOULD BE |
| | DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY MEETING |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
