| Date |
Text |
| 2023-02-28 19:55:59 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC |
| | STUDY. NOTE: THE STUDY MUST BE PRESENTED IN A SEPARATE |
| | DOCUMENT THAN THE INSIGNIFICANT TIS. PLEASE COMPLETE |
| | THE STUDY, INCLUSIVE OF TEST 2, AND PROVIDE SUMMARY |
| | TABLES HIGHLIGHTING DEFICIENCIES AND/OR LEVEL OF |
| | SERVICE DEGRADATION, IF ANY; A SITE PLAN SHOULD BE |
| | PROVIDED. HCM ANALYSIS FOR THE EVERNIA DRIVEWAY SHOULD |
| | BE PROVIDED TO PROVE THAT A LEFT-TURN LANE WOULD NOT BE |
| | NECESSARY. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT COUNTY CONCURRENCY |
| | DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY CITY CONCURRENCY, AND THE |
| | FACT THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS WITHIN A TCEA |
| | DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUEST FURTHER ANALYSIS |
| | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED |
| | 3) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND |
| | MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES. NONE WERE PROPOSED IN THE |
| | LATEST RESUBMISSION, EVEN THOUGH A SECTION IN THE |
| | TRAFFIC STATEMENT WAS TITLED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 4) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION |
| | SPECIFIC SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, |
| | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD |
| | BE NAMED T1. SEVERAL TRANSPORTATION ITEMS AND |
| | CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING, PLEASE REVISE. |
| | 5) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE T1 SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE |
| | BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF |
| | THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 6) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING PLAN, WHICH COULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT OR |
| | INCLUDED IN THE T1 SITE PLAN. SEVERAL SIGNAGE AND |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS, ESPECIALLY RELATED TO THE ALLEY ARE |
| | MISSING |
| | 7) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES AND |
| | WHEEL PATHS CLEARLY DISTINCT AND DEFINED IN DIFFERENT |
| | COLORS. PLEASE PROVIDE A HIGHER RESOLUTION BACKGROUND |
| | IMAGE, INSERT EXACT MEASUREMENTS OF ALLEY WIDTH, AS THE |
| | ACTUAL DRIVABLE SURFACE IS MUCH LESS THAN 11-FEET. ANY |
| | OBSTRUCTION, SUCH AS LIGHT POLES AND TREES MUST BE |
| | IDENTIFIED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT. THERE ARE MAJOR |
| | ENCROACHMENTS SHOWN AT THE MOMENT. |
| | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 9) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY GATES PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | CLEARLY SHOWCASE THE REQUIRED 20 FEET SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK OR EDGE OF TRAVEL LANES |
| | 10) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS |
| | 11) NOT SATISFIED. ALLEY SHOULD BE DESIGNATED ONE-WAY, |
| | INSTALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS PERTAINING |
| | PREFERRED DIRECTIONALITY. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS |
| | GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS THAT WILL |
| | TRAVERSE THE ALLEY; THUS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SAFE AND |
| | OPTIMAL VEHICULAR OPERATIONS, PROPER MITIGATION |
| | MEASURES, SUCH AS RE-PAVEMENT WITH AT LEAST |
| | ONE-AND-ONE-HALF-INCH ASPHALT THICKNESS, EXTENSIVE |
| | SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND REMOVAL OF OBSTACLES |
| | AND OBSTRUCTIONS ARE WARRANTED. PLEASE DO SHOW THE |
| | EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT WIDTH, BASED ON ACTUAL & CURRENT |
| | FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS. |
| | 12) NOT SATISFIED. SHOWCASE THE ALLEYWAY AND ALL |
| | RELATED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES THROUGHOUT ITS ENTIRE |
| | LENGTH FROM SAPODILLA TO ROSEMARY. LATEST |
| | TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN IS EXTREMELY DEFICIENT IN |
| | ADDRESSING THIS COMMENT. |
| | 13) THE PROPOSED LOADING ZONE DOES NOT SEEM PROPERLY |
| | LOCATED FOR SAFE AND ATTAINABLE VEHICULAR OPERATIONS |
| | AND MANEUVERINGS. A DEDICATED AND MORE DETAILED (E.G. |
| | SHOWCASE EXACT ROAD CONFIGURATION, HIGHLIGHT ANY |
| | OBSTRUCTIONS/OBSTACLES, ETC.) AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOULD |
| | BE PERFORMED TO PROVE ITS FEASIBILITY |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
