| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-16 13:41:37 | 10/05/2022 |
| | 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL AND |
| | TOTAL CANOPY MITIGATION DUE FOR ALL PROPOSED REMOVALS. |
| | TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED WITH A CANOPY DIAMETER OF |
| | 20 FEET OR MORE SHOULD HAVE THE MITIGATION SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ACTUAL DIAMETER. TREES |
| | LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY DIAMETER AND PALMS SHOULD SHOW |
| | THE CATEGORY MITIGATION DUE. MAKE THE FOLLOWING |
| | CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE DISPOSITION LIST SHEET L-: |
| | TREES #1, #4, AND #23 ARE 20 FEET OR ABOVE IN CANOPY |
| | DIAMETER, SO MUST HAVE THE ACTUAL CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | CALCULATED FOR MITIGATION DUE. TREE#4, 21, 22, 23, AND |
| | 24 ARE CATEGORY 2 (150 SQ FT EACH EXCEPT #23 AT 314SQ |
| | FT) TREE #9 IS CATEGORY 1 (300 SQ FT) ARECA PALMS DO |
| | NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION. (#5, 7, 12, AND 16 NO |
| | MITIGATION DUE) #24 DISPOSITION CORRECT TO REMOVE WITH |
| | ADJUSTMENTS, TOTAL MITIGATION WAS 7587 SQ FT. ADJUST |
| | LIST OF PROVIDED MITIGATION FROM THE PLANT LIST TO |
| | IDENTIFY EACH SPECIES AND THE CANOPY CREDIT ASSIGNED TO |
| | IT. PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR NOTE #4 REGARDING |
| | OFFSITE TREES IN PROXIMITY TO NORTH PROPERTY LINE, AS |
| | THERE ARE NO TREES IN THIS AREA. |
| | RESPONSE: REVISIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO ADDRESS THIS |
| | COMMENT. REFER TO SHEET L-100. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 2. SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-113 D. ALL STREETSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION, |
| | RENOVATION OR ADDITION WITH A CONSTRUCTION COST EQUAL |
| | OR ABOVE 50% OF THE PROPERTY'S IMPROVEMENT VALUE AS |
| | INDICATED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S |
| | OFFICE. EXISTING STREET TREES AND SIDEWALK FOR THIS |
| | PROJECT ARE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE |
| | REQUIRED NEW STREET TREES, SIDEWALK, PLANTING BEDS AND |
| | STRUCTURAL SOIL. |
| | RESPONSE: EXISTING TREES AND SIDEWALK ALONG S DIXIE HWY |
| | HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH NEW LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE. |
| | REFER TO SHEET L-200 AND L-300. LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL |
| | SOIL OUTLINE HAS BEEN ADDED TO SHEET L-300 AND NOTES ON |
| | SHEET L-252 |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SOIL |
| | REQUIRED ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE, SPECIFICALLY UNDERNEATH |
| | THE SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE ON STREET PARKING SHOWN ON |
| | S DIXIE ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT IS NOT POSSIBLE WITHIN |
| | THE EXISTING SETBACK FROM THE CURB. STREETSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET WITHIN THIS AREA. IF THERE IS |
| | NOT SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO PROVIDE THE PLANTING BED, TREE |
| | GRATES MAY BE USED IF REQUIRED FOR SIDEWALK TRAVEL |
| | WIDTH. |
| | THE REQUIRED PLANTING BED WIDTH OF 4 FEET CANNOT BE |
| | ACHIEVED ALONG S DIXIE, SO PARTIAL TREE GRATES MAY BE |
| | USED TO PROVIDE SPACE FOR THE TREE TO BE PLACED |
| | ADEQUATELY AWAY FROM THE CURB. |
| | RESPONSE: ON STREET PARKING HAS BEEN REMOVED AND TREE |
| | GRATES HAVE BEEN ADDED REFER TO SHEET L-300. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR |
| | REQUIRED STREET TREES AT MAXIMUM SPACING EVERY 30 FEET |
| | OR PORTION THEREOF FOR EACH STREETSCAPE LENGTH, AND |
| | SHOW THE NUMBER PROVIDED PER SECTION 94- 113D.2. CODE |
| | SECTION REFERENCE HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED. SOUTH |
| | PROPERTY LINE MEASUREMENT OF 245 FEET LENGTH REQUIRES 9 |
| | STREET TREES. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-200 AND L-201 FOR THE STREET |
| | TREE REVISION. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] TREE SPACING ALONG DATURA STREET |
| | NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED, TREES ON EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY |
| | ARE SPACED FURTHER THAN 30 FT. PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | |
| | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM OF THE |
| | REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE |
| | AREAS FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT IN THE SITE AND |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF OPEN SPACE |
| | AS ALLOWED BY TABLE IV-7 AND DEFINITIONS IN SECTION |
| | 94-109. SHOW HOW THE STANDARDS FOR THE TYPES OF OPEN |
| | SPACE ARE MET FOR VEGETATED AREAS AND TREE CANOPY |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE BASED ON TABLE IV-8 ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN. LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | PLANS AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE OPEN SPACE TYPE THEN |
| | DEMONSTRATE HOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THAT TYPE ARE MET. |
| | PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART |
| | ON SHEET L-201. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS SHEET |
| | A0.03: SHEET A0.03 MUST SHOW HOW THE REQUIRED PRIVATE |
| | OPEN SPACE OF 9,810 SQ FT IS PROVIDED BY SHOWING THE |
| | PERIMETER OF EACH AREA AND THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF |
| | EACH SPACE. ROOFTOP GARDEN IS IDENTIFIED, SO AREA |
| | PROVIDED MUST BE SHOWN IN, 30% VEGETATED AREA SHOWN, |
| | AND 20% TREE CANOPY SHOWN. PASEO-PASSAGE IS NOT AN OPEN |
| | SPACE TYPE. SHOW THE AREA AND ASSIGN AN ALLOWED OPEN |
| | SPACE TYPE AND SHOW THE REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED AREA |
| | AND TREE CANOPY ARE MET. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-203. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 6. NOT SATISFIED. REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO SECTION |
| | 94-443(D) FROM THE CODE REQUIREMENT CHART AS THIS IS |
| | NOT APPLICABLE IN THE DMP. REMOVE |
| | THE SECTION FROM THE CHART ON SHEET L-201 AND REPLACE |
| | WITH REQUIREMENTS FROM SECTION 94-113 FOR THE |
| | STREETSCAPE AND SECTION 94-109 FOR THE OPEN SPACE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO UPDATED CHART ON SHEET L-201. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] WHAT IS THE REFERENCE TO NATURAL GRASS |
| | AREAS? WHERE IS THIS REQUIREMENT FROM? TABLE STATES |
| | REQUIREMENT IS 1,515 AND NONE IS PROVIDED? PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY THIS REQUIREMENT. LIKELY NOT A DMP REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE |
| | OPEN SPACE TYPES REQUIRING TREE CANOPY MUST SHOW THE |
| | TREE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREE TYPES BASED ON |
| | TABLE IV-8 AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL. TOTALS FOR TREE |
| | CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE ARE SHOWN ON SHEET A0.03, BUT THE |
| | BREAKDOWN OF HOW THAT IS ACHIEVED IS NOT INCLUDED. THIS |
| | NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SHEET L-210 |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-100 FOR TOTAL CANOPY CREDIT |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF AREAS PROPOSED MUST MEET |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-451, INCLUDING ALL AREAS |
| | THAT ARE ALLOWED BY CODE MUST NOT BE VISIBLE FROM A |
| | ROAD OR STREET. |
| | RESPONSE: NOTED. THERE IS NO ARTIFICIAL TURF IN THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 9. ONGOING. EXPLAIN IF THE EXISTING FPL TRANSMISSION |
| | LINES WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY IN PLACE OR BE |
| | RELOCATED. |
| | RESPONSE: TRANSMISSION LINES WITHIN THE ALLEY WILL STAY |
| | IN PLACE. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 10. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | WATER AND SEWER AND DRAINAGE LINES ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN. SHOW LOCATIONS OF BACKFLOWS AND ADJUST LOCATIONS |
| | OF UTILITY LINES TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED TREES AND LANDSCAPING. FIRELINE FROM DATURA ST |
| | APPEARS TO BE IN CONFLICT WITH STREET TREE. ADJUST TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICT. WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ARE NOT SHOWN |
| | ON LANDSCAPE PLANS AS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: LANDSCAPE PLANS HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED TO AVOID |
| | UTILITY LINES. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] APPEARS THAT STREET LIGHTS CONFLICT |
| | WITH TREES AND THEIR CANOPIES ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE. |
| | PLEASE ADJUST. APPEARS THAT SOME WATER MAINS INTERSECT |
| | WITH STREET TREE LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 11. SATISFIED. PLANT LIST NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO |
| | INCLUDE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT, AND |
| | SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AREA PROVIDED |
| | FOR REFERENCE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN SPACE |
| | TYPE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR EACH OPEN SPACE |
| | AREA HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON SHEET L-201. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 12. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 94-445 L. PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF |
| | PLANT MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT |
| | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE |
| | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH |
| | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH |
| | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF |
| | NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTS ADDED BASED ON THE |
| | PLANT LIST. PROVIDE THE TOTAL PLANT MATERIAL ADDED |
| | COUNT AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTS THAT ARE DROUGHT |
| | TOLERANT OR NATIVE THEN SHOW ONE PERCENTAGE. |
| | RESPONSE: PLANTING DESIGN HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO MEET THE |
| | NATIVE AND DROUGHT TOLERANT REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SHEET |
| | L-201. |
| | |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR |
| | ALL GROUND MOUNTED VALVES AND EQUIPMENT AND ADD A NOTE |
| | THAT ALL EQUIPMENT |
| | WILL BE SCREENED. WATER METER AND BACKFLOW ARE NOT |
| | SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLANS AS SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO GENERAL NOTE #6 ON SHEET L-200. IN |
| | ADDITION, SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS HAVE BEEN ADDED |
| | AROUND THE ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES TO PROVIDE A SCREEN. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] FDC VALVE ON DATURA FRONTAGE/WALL |
| | OF LIVE/WORK UNIT IS EXPOSED ON SOUTHERN SIDE, PLEASE |
| | INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL HEDGE OR LANDSCAPING TO SCREEN |
| | VALVES FROM RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/4/23: |
| | 14. PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS AND DETAIL FOR THE STRUCTURAL |
| | SOIL UNDER HARDSCAPE ADJACENT TO THE STREET TREES AS |
| | REQUIRED IN 94-113(2). STAFF CAN PROVIDE THE TYPICAL |
| | INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS ON REQUEST. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-252 AND L-300. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SOIL REQUIRED |
| | ALONG DATURA FRONTAGE, SPECIFICALLY UNDERNEATH THE |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 15. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE DESIGN |
| | OPTIONS CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) AND PROVIDE THE |
| | REQUIRED 50 POINTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-202. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 16. PLANT SCHEDULE ON SHEET L-200 DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | PLANT LIST SHOWN ON SHEET L-201. CRAPE MYRTLE AND |
| | BRIDAL VEIL TREES ARE NOT CONSISTENT. |
| | RESPONSE: PLANT SCHEDULES HAVE BEEN MATCHED. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 17. REMOVE EXISTING TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN FROM THE |
| | PLANT LIST ON SHEET L-201, AS NO TREES OR PALMS ARE TO |
| | REMAIN. |
| | RESPONSE: ALL TREES ARE REPRESENTED AS ???TO BE |
| | REMOVED??? ON SHEET L-100. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 18. THE SIGHT TRIANGLE SHOWN ON SHEET L-200 IS NOT |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE DOWNTOWN REQUIREMENT MEASURED FROM |
| | THE BACK OF CURB PER SECTION 94-113 (C). REVISE TO MEET |
| | REQUIREMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE STREET TREES CAN BE |
| | PLANTED WITHIN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE, AS THERE WILL BE NO |
| | CANOPY LOWER THAN 8 FEET, SO TREES NEED TO BE ADJUSTED |
| | TO THE 30 FOOT MAXIMUM SPACING ALONG DATURA ST. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO SHEET L-200 AND L-300 FOR UPDATED |
| | SIGHT TRIANGLES. |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] TRIANGLES SHOULD BE STARTING FROM BACK |
| | OF CURB, PLANS SHOW TRIANGLE STARTING FROM INTERIOR TO |
| | THE SITE. PLEASE ADJUST. |
| | |
| | 19. RENDERINGS MUST BE CORRECTED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT |
| | THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING. |
| | RESPONSE: REFER TO REVISED RENDERINGS ON SHEETS A600, |
| | A601, A602, A603, A604. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOTED |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [CONDITIONED] |
| | |
| | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND |
| | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOTED |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [CONDITIONED] |
| | |
| | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREET TREES AND |
| | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE |
| | THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | RESPONSE: NOTED |
| | 6.2.23 - ZONING REVIEW ON BEHALF OF LANDSCAPE PLANNER: |
| | [CONDITIONED] |
| | |
| |
Print |