| Date |
Text |
| 2023-03-15 10:40:32 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. SETUP A METHODOLOGY MEETING |
| | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL DETAILED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. |
| | NOTE: THIS SHOULD BE A SEPARATE DOCUMENT FROM THE |
| | TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE LATEST SITE PLAN IN THE ANALYSIS |
| | 4) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER, ONCE RECEIVED |
| | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE VALID TRANSPORTATION DEMAND |
| | MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 6) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC |
| | SITE PLAN FOR THE GROUND FLOOR. SHOWCASING |
| | TRANSPORTATION RELATED FEATURES (E.G. ROADWAY WIDTHS, |
| | DRIVING AISLES, PARKING STALLS, SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | DRIVEWAY, GATES, CROSSWALKS, VISIBILITY TRIANGLE, |
| | CORNER & DRIVEWAY SEPARATION DISTANCES, SLOPES, ETC.) |
| | PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. SEVERAL DIMENSIONS |
| | MISSING IN LATEST RESUBMISSION, PLEASE REMOVE TREE |
| | CANOPY GRAPHICS |
| | 7) SATISFIED. IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN, PLEASE |
| | SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (E.G. DRIVEWAY, CURB CUTS, |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS, PARKING STALLS, ETC.) ON THE |
| | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT |
| | 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKING PLAN. INCLUSIVE OF ALL FEATURES WITHIN THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALONG ALL ROADS FRONTING THE |
| | SITE. THIS CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE |
| | PLAN |
| | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK VEHICLES |
| | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING REFERENCE AND SPECS |
| | SHEETS FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION FEATURES |
| | (E.G. CURB, RAMP, GATE, SIGNAGE, PAVEMENT MARKING, |
| | SIGNAL, ETC.) |
| | 11) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS WITH |
| | THE FOLLOWING SPECS: A CONDUIT (2-INCH SCHEDULE 40 PVC) |
| | TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL PULL BOX (240V / |
| | 10,000W CIRCUIT) |
| | 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 13) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY VEHICULAR GATES PROPOSED |
| | WITHIN 20-FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK? |
| | 14) SATISFIED. IS VALET SERVICE PROPOSED? IF SO, |
| | PROVIDE AN OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS. DETAILS OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED DURING THE METHODOLOGY |
| | MEETING |
| | 15) SATISFIED. EXISTING SIDEWALK ON DATURA IS 10-FEET |
| | WIDE, THAT MEASUREMENT SHOULD BE PRESERVED IF NOT |
| | EXCEEDED |
| | 16) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(Q)(2): |
| | NON-PARKING RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 PERCENT. IF THE |
| | RAMP IS GREATER THAN 14 PERCENT, A BREAK-OVER |
| | TRANSITION SHALL BE REQUIRED. THE PREFERRED STANDARD IS |
| | TEN PERCENT FOR NON-PARKING RAMP SLOPES. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | SLOPE PERCENTAGES FOR EACH RAMP AND CONFORM TO CODE |
| | PERTAINING THE BREAK-OVER TRANSITION |
| | 17) SATISFIED. PER CITY CODE SEC 94-111(C)(1): IN THOSE |
| | CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A |
| | WALL, FENCE, BUILDING, OR OTHER PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION, |
| | THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A MINIMUM OF ONE |
| | FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON BOTH SIDES OF |
| | THE STALL, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR EACH |
| | PARKING STALL ADJACENT TO A WALL OR OBSTRUCTIONS |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
